Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Study Letter
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJDVL_880_2024

Prevalence of polysensitivity in allergic contact dermatitis: A five-year retrospective study

Department of Dermatology, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Bathinda, Punjab, India
Department of Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy, JSS Medical College and Hospital, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Corresponding author: Dr. Garehatty Rudrappa Kanthraj, Department of Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy, JSS Medical College and Hospital, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. kanthacad@yahoo.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Aradita C, Sahana S, Ranugha P.S.S, Kanthraj GR. Prevalence of polysensitivity in allergic contact dermatitis: A five-year retrospective study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_880_2024

Dear Editor,

Contact allergy is an exaggerated reaction of the individual’s immune system following exposure to low molecular weight chemicals triggering cell-mediated immunity.1

The term polysensitisation(syn.: polyvalent sensitisation, multiple contact allergies) describes sensitisation to more than one allergen verified by appropriate tests (e.g. skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E [IgE] assays and epicutaneous patch testing).1

In India, there is a paucity of studies focused on polysensitivity. The main purpose of this study was to identify the common allergens involved, observe the patterns of monosensitisation and polysensitisation in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) cases using the Indian standard series (ISS) and provide a review on polysensitivity.

A retrospective analytical study was done from 2015 to 2020 in the department of dermatology, JSS medical college, JSSAHER, Mysore. Clinically suspicious cases of ACD at any site irrespective of age and sex were subjected to patch testing using Indian Standard Series (ISS) with 20 allergens approved by Contact and Occupational Dermatitis Forum of India (CODFI). We used International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) criteria to identify the positive allergens in our study: 1+ erythema, infiltration and papules; 2+ vesicles; and 3+ vesicles coalescing to form bullae. Readings were taken on days two, four and seven. The comparison was done based on age, sex, site of eczema and allergens involved in monosensitivity and polysensitivity.

History, clinical presentation and outcome of patch test results and type of allergen were considered for relevancy. Among 182 patients, patch tests of 164 (89.61%) patients were relevant.

A total of 348 cases of ACD were included. Patch testing was positive in 182 patients (52.6%), single positivity in 114 (62.6%) and polysensitivity in 68 patients (37.1%). Positivity was seen more commonly in adults (19-64 years) [n=163 (89.6%)], followed by geriatric (>65 years) patients [n=11 (6%)] and adolescents (10-18 years) [n=8 (4.4%)]. Positivity to patch tests were slightly more in females [n=92 (50.5%)] compared to males [n=90 (49.5%)]. The most common sites involved in polysensitivity were both hands and feet [n=72 (39.6%)], followed by exclusive foot involvement [n=45(24.7%)] and generalised eczema [n=30 (16.5%)] [Table 1]. Polysensitivity to two, three and four allergens were seen in 45 (66.1%), 17 (25%) and 4 (5.8%) patients, respectively. There was one (1.5%) patient who had polysensitivity to five allergens and one (1.5%) to seven allergens [Figure 1].

Table 1: Frequency of monosensitivity and polysensitivity among the different sites involved in eczema
Site of eczema Monosensitivity Polysensitivity
Hand-feet eczema 39(54.2%) 33(45.8%)
Hand eczema 15(68.2%) 7(31.8%)
Feet eczema 29(64.4%) 16(35.6%)
Leg eczema 1 (100%) 0
Generalised eczema 30(71.4%) 12(28.6%)
Polysensitivity in patch test readings to three, four and five allergens. (Black arrow- positive patch test).
Figure 1:
Polysensitivity in patch test readings to three, four and five allergens. (Black arrow- positive patch test).

We noted that polysensitivity was commonly seen with potassium dichromate and cobalt chloride among nine patients in hand-feet eczema; potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride and nickel sulphate among two patients in hand eczema; mercapto mix and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) in five patients with feet eczema. We did not find polysensitivity among leg eczema cases and no allergens showed any common trend in generalised eczema.

There is ambiguity in the definition of polysensitisation. Few authors consider it to be a positive reaction to two or more allergens and few consider three or more allergens.1 Positive patch test results to two or more allergens were considered as polysensitivity in this study. Monosensitivity was seen more commonly with females [n=65 (70.7%)], whereas polysensitivity was seen more in males [n=41 (45.6%)]. Among different occupations, farmers [n=28(63.6%)] showed the most polysensitivity and housewives [n=35 (79.5%)] showed the highest rates of monosenstivity. There was no statistically significant difference with regard to age, duration of eczema and site of eczema among patients with monosensitivity and polysensitivity. The three prinicipal allergens in monosensitivity are nickel sulphate, potassium dichromate and paraphenyldiamine. Potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride; potassium dichromate, nickel sulphate; potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride, nickel sulphate; mercapto mix, 2-mercaptobenzothiozole are the three common allergen combinations involved in polysensitivity [Table 2]. Among the sites involved, patch tests in hand-feet eczema 35(48.6%) showed maximum polysensitivity.

Table 2: Summary of frequency of the most common allergens involved in monosensitivity and polysensitivity
Allergens Polysensitivity Monosensitivity
Potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride 10 (14.7%)
Potassium dichromate, nickel sulphate 10 (14.7%)
Potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride, nickel sulphate 5 (7.4%)
Mercapto mix, 2-mercaptobenzothiozole 5 (7.4%)
Nickel sulphate 42 (36.8%)
Potassium dichromate 32 (28.1%)
Paraphenylidinediamine 22 (19.3%)
Others 38 18

Mahajan et al.2 observed that polysensitivity occurs due to concurrent exposure to allergens eliciting multiple positive patch test reactions from exposures to multiple allergens, non-specific hyper-reactivity or as cross- reactions between tested allergens. It is observed commonly for metals (nickel sulphate, cobalt chloride and potassium dichromate), rubber chemicals (mercapto mix, thiuram mix and monobenzothiazole (MBT), paraphenylenediamine (PPD) and parabens, compositae plants and some fragrances and Balsam of Peru. We observed a similar pattern.

Distinguishing between true polysensitivity or angry back3 or excited skin syndrome or false positive reaction is necessary. Repeat patch testing can be performed. The reactions decrease by 40–60% in polysensitivity and 80% in angry back syndrome.4 The predisposing factors5-6 and pathogenesis of multiple contact allergies are depicted in Figure 2.

Flow chart of pathogenesis of polysensitivity/multiple contact allergies/concomitant reactions. (FLG –filaggrin).
Figure 2:
Flow chart of pathogenesis of polysensitivity/multiple contact allergies/concomitant reactions. (FLG –filaggrin).

A detailed assessment and personalised approach is required to manage the individual’s allergic triggers, aiming to reduce exposure to these allergens in the future and avoid cross reactions.

To conclude, 90% of the patch tests were clinically relevant. Polysensitivity was seen mostly in men among farmers, whereas monosensitivity was seen in women among homemakers. Nickel sulphate and potassium dichromate were common denominators in both polysensitivity and monosensitivity. On the contrary, paraphenyldiamine was more frequently observed with monosensitivity and cobalt chloride with polysensitivity.

Acknowledgement

We are thankful to Dr. Lancy D’souza PhD, Professor in Psychology, Maharaja’s College, University of Mysore, Mysore, Karnataka, India for research consultancy and statistical analysis of the data.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approval was not sought due to retrospective analysis of the data.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , . Polysensitization and increased susceptibility in contact allergy: A review. Allergy. 2008;63:156-67.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Clinical, occupational and allergological profile of 455 patients with occupational contact dermatitis: A 5-year study from a tertiary care center of North India. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021;12:541-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Polyvalente Kontaktallergie versus “Angry-Back”: zur Problematik falsch-positiver Epikutantestreaktionen. Allergologie. 1982;5:262-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . The role of dendritic cells in cutaneous immunity. Arch Dermatol Res. 1996;288:109-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . The prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis in 2004. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51:219-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Characterization of the polysensitized patient: A matched case-control study. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:22-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
2,524

PDF downloads
63
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections