Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
2001:67:6;305-308
PMID: 17664784

A study of psoralen photochemotherapy with topical tar in the management of psoriasis vulgaris

CV Rama Sastry, PK Kar
 Department of Dermatology, 16/, Military Hospital C/o 56 APO, India

Correspondence Address:
P K Kar
167 military Hospital, C/o 56 APO
India
How to cite this article:
Rama Sastry C V, Kar P K. A study of psoralen photochemotherapy with topical tar in the management of psoriasis vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2001;67:305-308
Copyright: (C)2001 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

In a random study of 150 patients with psoriasis vulgaris, oral psoralen photochemotherapy using natural sunlight (PUVASOL) used alone was compared to PUVASOL plus adjunctive topical therapy with tar.
The combined PUVASOL and topical therapy with tar in 75 patients (group-I) with 30 minutes sunlight exposure done in every alternate day showed complete clearing of lesions in 68 (90.6%) patients. The average rate of clearance of lesions started to appear 12-24 days with a mean of 18 days.
Group I patients who received topical therapy in conjunction with PUVASOL, their skin lesions cleared more quickly with fewer treatments at a lower final 15 PUVASOL doses as compared to 22 PUVASOL doses in the control patients. Ninety percent of 51 patients using topical therapy on their scalp cleared their psoriasis in this area by the time their body psoriasis had cleared. Only 2 of the 45 (4.4%) patients with scalp involvement cleared receiving PU VASOL alone. All 7 patients with psoriatic arthritis cleared their psoriasis, but none of them noted any symptomatic alteration in the severity of their arthritis during the course of treatment in both the groups.
Keywords: Psoriasis vulgaris, Tar, 8-methoxypsoralen, Photochemotherapy

Introduction

Photochemotherapy using oral 8-methoxypsoralen and subsequent exposure to long wave ultra- violet light radiation (PUVA) or sunlight exposure (PUVASOL) has been reported as a satisfactory treatment for psoriasis. PUVASOL can be combined with topical tar, dithranol or topical corticosteroids. The tar and PUVASOL combination has the advantage of saving the number of light exposures, reducing the treatment time and reducing the cumulative psoralen dose required for clearing of psoriatic lesions.[4] We present the study of combined use of PUVASOL and 10% liquor picis carbonis (coal tar solution) in ointment base in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. The present study had two objectives: Firstly, to determine whether there is any benefit or problem arising from combining conventional topical agent with PUVASOL. Secondly to assess whether addition of topical tar treatment to PUVASOL would reduce total cumulative psoralen dose.

Materials and Methods

Clinically diagnosed 310 cases of psoriasis vulgaris patients who had attended the skin centre at a service hospital between Jan 98 to Jun 99 were included in the study. The diagnosis of psoriasis was confirmed by histopathological examination. The patients having pustular, erythrodermic and flexural psoriasis and the lesions involving axillae, groins and genitals were excluded from study. The study was limited to patients with psoriasis vulgaris who were not being treated with systemic corticosteroids or cytotoxic agents. Pregnancy was additional contra-indication to treatment. The area of skin involved by the disease ranged from 10% to 90% with average involvement of 40% for the both groups (rule of 9 for large areas and palm equals 1% body surface area for small areas). At the time of evaluation 68% of the patients had psoriasis of the scalp. Patients whose disease state and motivation made them acceptable for this study were randomly allocated to one of the treatment groups.

Design of the study

One hundred and fifty patients who completed the study were divided into two groups. In group I, 75 patients received PUVASOL therapy. Liquor picis carbonis 10% and salicylic acid 2% in vaseline base were applied on the lesions over the skin and a cream base containing 10% liquor picis carbonis and salicylic acid 2% was applied to the scalp at night. All patients with scalp involvement used 3% cetavelon lotion as shampoo for cleaning the scalp. In group II as control 75 patients were treated with PUVASOL therapy alone. Except for the use of lubricants as required to relieve dryness of the skin lesions the patients of this group received no topical treatment.

PUVASOL Therapy

8-methoxypsoralen (0.6 mg/ kg body wt) was ingested by the patients in both groups 2h before sunlight exposure on alternate day. Patients were exposed to sunlight starting from 15 minutes daily in the first week and increasing by 5 minutes to gradually 30 minutes. Eyes were protected by dark sunglasses while exposure to sunlight and also advised to put it throughout day. The above regimen were continued for a period of 8 weeks in both groups.

Laboratory investigations

Before starting therapy, all patients had a complete blood count, LFT, SGOT, SGPT, alkaline phosphatase and routine urinalysis RE. In addition a pre-treatment ophthalmologic examination was performed, to be repeated at six months interval.

Evaluation

Each patient was evaluated at weekly intervals and assessment of progress of treatment was carried out in each patient. The degree of scaling, palpability and redness of the lesions were recorded [Table - 3]. Erythematous reactions and pigmentation of uninvolved skin were assessed according to 1 to 3 scale as slight (+), moderate (+ +) and marked (+ + +),

Follow up

Patients were followed up monthly for 6 months. Once the psoriasis had cleared maintenance treatments were commenced at the final clearance dose of PUVASOL on a schedule of 4 treatments at weekly intervals followed by 4 treatments at fortnightly intervals. A relapse of psoriasis was defined as psoriasis involving > 5% body surface during the maintenance period.

Results

There was no significant difference between any of the treatment group or the control group in terms of age, sex, skin type , extent of psoriasis , previous systemic cytotoxic therapy and previous

systemic cytotoxic therapy and previous hospitalisation. Out of 13200 patients attending skin OPD during the above period, a total number of 310 (2.3%) patients had psoriasis. In this study, 150 completed 8 weeks of therapy and follow up. Out of 150 cases 108 were males and 42 were females between 18 and 65 years of age [Table - 1]. Duration of disease varied from 2 months to 16 years [Table - 2].

PUVASOL therapy with or without topical agents, achieved clearance of psoriasis to less than 10% body involvement in 87.3% of the 150 patients. [Table - 4] outlines the results of the individual treatment groups. Group I patients who received topical therapy responded with fewer treatments at a lower final PUVASOL dose as compared to the control patients. This required a mean of 16 PUVASOL treatments over a period of 8 weeks. The control group receiving PUVASOL alone, their skin lesions cleared with 22 mean PUVASOL doses.

The response to the therapy of psoriatic involvement of the scalp and nails in patients who cleared to less than 1% body involvement was better in patients using topical therapy along with PUVASOL [Table - 4]. 90% of the 51 patients using topical therapy on their scalp cleared the psoriasis in this area by the time their body psoriasis had cleared. In the control group only 2 of the 45 (4.4%) patients with scalp involvement cleared. Those two patients had only minimal scalp involvement limited to the margins. When reviewed 6 months later, the psoriasis of their scalp had remained clear in 46% patients without any topical therapy. The remaining 54% continued to use topical therapy for the scalp. Nail disease poorly responded to treatment in both groups and was slower to respond than psoriasis of the skin.

Nail disease was classified according to the predominant type present in each patient (pitting, onycholysis, dystrophy) but no significant difference was seen with response rates of the different types. The response of the nail disease did not differ between the treatment groups. All 7 patients with psoriatic arthritis cleared psoriasis but none of them noted any symptomatic alteration with severity of their arthritis during the course of treatment in both groups. Nausea, erythema and pruritus [Table - 5] were seen in some patients receiving PUVASOL therapy. All the laboratory investigations were within normal limit in all patients.

Discussion

The combination of tar with UV light (Goeckerman regimen) has long been known to be helpful in psoriasis.[6] Laboratory studies have shown that tar plus UV light reduces epidermal DNA synthesis.[7] This may be related to the formation of cross links between opposite strands on the DNA double helix.[8] The effectiveness of oral 8-methoxypsoralen and UV radiation (UVA) in resolving plaque psoriasis led to coining of the terms photochemotherapy and PUVA.[1] PUVA and PUVASOL have now been established as an effective out patient therapy in the management of psoriasis.[3] Photochemotherapy of psoriasis is safe. Several large,long-term follow up studies have shown, no increased incidence of skin tumours.[9] No cataract unequivocally attributable to PUVA has been reported in humans.[10]

The present study was designed to explore the interaction between PUVASOL therapy and existing topical treatments for psoriasis in terms of the benefits and the problems that may result from such combination therapy.

PUVASOL therapy has not been found to be useful in the treatment of scalp psoriasis because hairs scatter and absorb most of the incident UV-A. This study clearly shows that adjunctive topical tar with PUVASOL is better than PUVASOL therapy alone for the treatment of the scalp psoriasis. Furthermore at the 6 months follow up, 46% of the patients who had cleared their psoriasis on the scalp were still clear without any further topical therapy. It is possible that the small amount of radiation penetrating the hair, while being insufficient to clear the disease, may be adequate for maintenance of a clear state on the scalp.

Psoriatic nail disease cleared in 36% of the affected patients by the time of the 6 months post clearance follow up. Disease at that site takes longer to clear than psoriasis elsewhere and possibly more patients would have cleared with a longer follow up. Psoriatic arthritis did not alter during therapy but this is not surprising as little UV-A would be expected to reach the synovium of most joints.

Nausea affected about 13.3% of the patients receiving psoralen, and pruritus about 20% cases. Pigmentation was the commonest (29.3%) of cutaneous changes observed in our study which was diffuse type. Similar side effects have been observed by various workers.[2] Topical tar therapy in psoriasis is safe.[11],[12] No increase in malignancy of skin, bladder or any other organ was found in psoriasis patients using intermittent topical tar therapy over that of general population.[13]

This study has indicated that adjunctive topical tar therapy has a place in combination with PUVASOL in the treatment of scalp psoriasis. In addition it may have a place in the treatment of resistant localised plaques.

References
1.
Parrish JA, Fitzpatrik TB, Tanenbaum Let al. Photochemotherapy of psoriasis with oral methoxsalen and longwave ultraviolet light. N Engl J Med 1974; 291:1207-1211.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Buckley DA, Healy E, Rogers S. A comparison of twice weekly MPD-PUVA and three times weekly skin typing-PUVA regimens for the treatment of psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 1995; 133 : 417-422.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Camp RDR. Psoriasis. Textbook of Dermatology, Rook A, Sixth edition 1998, Blackwell Science Ltd, London, PP 1609-621.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Morison WL, Parrish JA, Fitzpatrick TB. Controlled study of PUVA and adjunctive topical therapy in the management of psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 1978; 98:125-132.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Finlay AY, Young DW. Short contact crude coal tar therapy for psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol 1985; 10: 371-374.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Goeckerman WH. Treatment of psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Syphilol 1931; 24 : 446-450.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Pathak MA, Biswas RK. Skin photosensitization and DNA cross linking ability of photochemotherapeutic agents. J Invest Dermatol 1977; 68: 236-240.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Stoughton RB, Dequoy P, Walters IF. Crude coal tar plus mean ultraviolet light suppresses DNA synthesis in epidermis. Arch Dermatol 1978;114: 43-45.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Farbee EM, Abel EA, Cox Al. Long term risks of psoralen and UVA therapy for psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 1983;119 : 46-51.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Back O, Hollstrom E, Liden S, et al. Absence of cataract ten years after treatment with 8- methoxypsoralen. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980;60 : 79-80.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Schmid MH, Korting HC. Coal tar, pine tar, sulphonated and shale oil preparations : comparative activity, efficacy and safety. Dermatology 1996;193:1-5.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Comaish JS. Tar and related compounds in the therapy of psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol 1981;6 : 639-645.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Jones SK, Mackie RM, Holt DJ, et al. Further evidence of the safety of tar in the management of psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 1985;113: 97-101.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
1,932

PDF downloads
935
Show Sections