Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
CROSSMARK LOGO Buy Reprints
PDF

Translate this page into:

Observation Letter
87 (
2
); 263-265
doi:
10.25259/IJDVL_941_19

An unusual case of recurrent chemotherapy recall phenomenon

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Corresponding author: Dr. Vishal Gupta, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029, India. doctor.vishalgupta@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Taneja N, Agarwal S, Gupta V. An unusual case of recurrent chemotherapy recall phenomenon. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021;87:263-5.

Sir,

Mucocutaneous adverse effects of chemotherapy are largely well-recognized; however, chemotherapy recall has been rarely reported in literature.

A 55-year-old man with a medical history of relapsed colonic adenocarcinoma was being treated with 2-weekly cycles of irinotecan (300 mg on day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (680 mg bolus on day 1, followed by 400 mg infusion over 2 days). He presented to us with a 5-day history of pain and blisters over the left forearm in a linear pattern following the third chemotherapy cycle. This chemotherapy cycle had been administered through a superficial vein on the contralateral antecubital fossa. However, the lesions had developed over his left forearm, through which he had received the previous chemotherapy cycle 2 weeks ago. There was no prior history suggestive of a drug extravasation reaction at this site. On examination, there was a thin hypopigmented supravenous linear plaque with superficial ulceration over the left forearm and hyperpigmentation over the right cubital fossa [Figure 1]. The lesions resolved with a topical corticosteroid–antibiotic combination in a few days. The patient consulted us again after the fifth chemotherapy cycle, for burning pain and dusky erythema over the dorsa of both hands along the veins used for the previous (fourth) chemotherapy administration [Figure 2]. The fifth chemotherapy cycle was given through a vein on dorsum of the right hand, but distant from the site of current symptoms. At this time, a skin biopsy from erythema on the dorsum of the left hand was performed, which showed focal parakeratosis with neutrophils in the stratum corneum, spongiosis, a few necrotic keratinocytes and focal basal epidermal vacuolar damage. There was a mild interstitial infiltrate of lymphocytes and histiocytes in the superficial dermis [Figure 3]. The skin lesions subsided within 3 to 4 days with a potent topical corticosteroid. The patient developed similar symptoms after the sixth cycle as well, at the site through which he received his fifth chemotherapy administration, which resolved with topical corticosteroids in a few days. The chronological sequence of the patient’s symptoms and chemotherapy cycles is summarized in Table 1.

Figure 1:: Linear hypopigmented plaque with superficial ulcers along the course of vein on left forearm (chemotherapy administered through a vein on contralateral right cubital fossa). Note the supraventine hyperpigmentation on the right cubital fossa, probably representing postinflammatory sequelae of an earlier chemotherapy recall reaction
Figure 2:: Bilateral dorsa of the hands showing dusky erythema and scaling over the veins through which the patient received his previous chemotherapy cycle. Note the previous recall reaction on the left forearm has subsided with hyperpigmentation
Table 1:: Chronology of chemotherapy recall events as reported by the patient
Chemotherapy session Veins used for chemotherapy administration Sites developing recall reaction
Second Vein of the left forearm Cannot recall the exact events
Third* Right antecubital fossa Along the vein on the left forearm
Fourth Dorsum of bilateral hands Along the vein right antecubital fossa
Fifth* Dorsum of the right hand Along the veins on the dorsum of both hands
Sixth* Vein on the right forearm Along the vein on the dorsum of the right hand
Patient consulted us after these chemotherapy sessions
Figure 3a:: Skin biopsy showed focal parakeratosis, mild spongiosis and a few necrotic keratinocytes in the epidermis (H and E, ×100)
Figure 3b:: Higher magnification showing mild spongiosis, necrotic keratinocytes and focal vacuolar basal keratinocyte damage (H and E, ×400)

The recall phenomenon is best known with radiation therapy, manifesting as “recall” of dermatitis by the skin in a previously irradiated field. It presents as an acute inflammatory reaction, similar to a ‘sunburn,’ confined to the site of prior irradiation, which is triggered by certain anticancer medications and antibiotics.1 Rarely, such a recall phenomenon may also occur at sites of previous intravenous chemotherapy administration.2,3

Our patient developed inflammatory reactions after each chemotherapy cycle, along the course of the superficial vein used for the antecedent chemotherapy administration. Interestingly, the “recall” happened only along the veins used for the last cycle, while the other former sites of chemotherapy administration remained quiescent. While 5-fluorouracil has been previously reported to cause chemotherapy recall reactions, we could not find any similar reports with irinotecan.2 Apart from 5-fluorouracil, chemotherapy recall reactions have also been reported with mitomycin C, paclitaxel, doxorubicin and epirubicin.3 A history of drug extravasation reaction was usually present in these cases before the recall phenomenon, and the recall reaction occurred only at the site of extravasation reaction.2,4,5 However, our patient denied history suggestive of any prior drug extravasation reaction. Recall reaction without a preceding history of drug extravasation has also been reported previously with 5-fluorouracil administration.3 Unlike our case, the recall manifested as tender nodules and only at the sites of intravenous access for previous chemotherapy cycles. The authors did not mention if the recall was confined to sites of only the immediately preceding chemotherapy infusions or all previous sites of chemotherapy administration.3 The exact pathogenesis of this phenomenon is not known. It has been postulated that the relatively high local concentrations of the chemotherapeutic drug during the initial infusions may cause subclinical tissue damage, which becomes more severe and manifests clinically when re-exposed to the drug via systemic circulation.3 To conclude, we report an unusual case of recurrent chemotherapy recall reactions. Topical corticosteroids improved the recall reactions and chemotherapy could be continued without any interruption or dose reduction.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , . Letter: Adriamycin activating a recall phenomenon after radiation therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1974;81:407-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Recall of cutaneous toxicity from fluorouracil. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:644-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Chemotherapy recall reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:797.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Recall phenomenon following epirubicin. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999;11:424-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Paclitaxel-induced “recall” soft tissue injury occurring at the site of previous extravasation with subsequent intravenous treatment in a different limb. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:2237-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
736

PDF downloads
381
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections