Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
2016:82:6;695-697
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.188653
PMID: 27549868

Aplasia cutis congenita, group 5 without fetus papyraceus in two newborns

Sarabjit Kaur, Ankita Sangwan, Surabhi Dayal, Ishita Dua, Vijay Kumar Jain
 Department of Dermatology and Venereology and Leprology, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Correspondence Address:
Sarabjit Kaur
House No. 401, Sector 14, Rohtak - 124 001, Haryana
India
How to cite this article:
Kaur S, Sangwan A, Dayal S, Dua I, Jain VK. Aplasia cutis congenita, group 5 without fetus papyraceus in two newborns. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2016;82:695-697
Copyright: (C)2016 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Sir,

Aplasia cutis congenita is an uncommon disorder characterized by the congenital absence of a portion of the skin, the most common presentation being a solitary lesion on the vertex of the scalp, just lateral to the midline (70%). Lesions are usually non-inflammatory, well-demarcated and have a variable appearance depending on the size (0.5–10 cm), extent, depth and degree of healing and scarring.[1],[2]

The various causative pathophysiological mechanisms include genetic factors, intrauterine trauma, fetus papyraceus, intrauterine infections by varicella or herpes viruses, drugs including methimazole, carbimazole and misoprostol, feto-fetal transfusion, early rupture of amniotic membrane forming amniotic bands and abnormal elastic fiber biomechanical forces.[1],[2] Truncal aplasia cutis congenita is usually associated with fetus papyraceus, classified as group 5. We report a rare presentation of aplasia cutis congenita, group 5 in two newborns without any history of twin gestation/fetus papyraceus.

Case 1

A 2-day-old healthy male child with a birth weight of 2.9 kg, delivered by full-term normal vaginal delivery to a multigravida mother, presented with congenital absence of skin on bilateral flanks. Ultrasonography done at 18 and 32 weeks antenatally had revealed a single live fetus with normal parameters and with no obvious congenital malformations. On examination, the lesions had a gelatinous appearance with a glistening red base and visible capillaries covered with a thin transparent membrane. They were 6.3 cm × 4.2 cm, well-defined and symmetrical, present on bilateral flanks joined with a linear streak [Figure - 1]a.

Figure 1a: Absent portion of the skin on the abdomen in a 2-day old male child

Case 2

A newborn healthy male child, weighing 2.8 kg. delivered by full-term normal vaginal delivery, presented with absence of the skin on the trunk, arms and legs. His mother had a history of typhoid fever at 6 weeks of gestation which was managed conservatively; the antenatal period was otherwise uneventful. Ultrasonography at 18 and 28 weeks antenatally revealed a single live fetus with healthy parameters and no twin gestation was noted. On examination, the lesions were well-demarcated, symmetrical, linear/elliptical and stellate. They were covered with a thin, gelatinous, shiny membrane and were present on both flanks, upper arms and thighs, distributed in a H-shaped pattern measuring 7.1 cm × 4.4 cm [Figure - 2]a.

Figure 2a: Typical H-shaped distribution of aplasia cutis congenita in a newborn

There was no history of any intrauterine infection/trauma or exposure to any teratogenic drug in both cases. Scalp and nail examination, radiological examination and ultrasonography revealed no abnormalities in both children. Lesions healed within 2.5 months and 1 month of conservative treatment with topical mupirocin twice daily in case 1 [Figure - 1]b and 2 [Figure - 2]b, respectively.

Figure 1b: Complete resolution of lesions after 2.5 months leaving behind a smooth, hypo- to hyperpigmented, hairless, papery scar
Figure 2b: Complete resolution of lesions after 1 month

A diagnosis of aplasia cutis congenita, group 5 without fetus papyraceus was made in both cases.

Frieden classified aplasia cutis congenita into nine groups in 1986.[3]

  • Group 1: Aplasia cutis congenita of scalp without multiple anomalies
  • Group 2: Aplasia cutis congenita of scalp with limb anomalies
  • Group 3: Aplasia cutis congenita of scalp with epidermal and sebaceous nevi
  • Group 4: Aplasia cutis congenita with a hair collar overlying deeper embryonic malformations such as meningomyelocele, porencephaly and others
  • Group 5: Aplasia cutis congenita associated with fetus papyraceus/placental infarcts
  • Group 6: Aplasia cutis congenita associated with epidermolysis bullosa
  • Group 7: Aplasia cutis congenita of the extremities without epidermolysis bullosa
  • Group 8: Aplasia cutis congenita associated with teratogen exposure, intrauterine infections or drugs
  • Group 9: Aplasia cutis congenita associated with malformation syndromes such as Patau syndrome, Goltz syndrome and others.

During a twin pregnancy, the intrauterine death of one fetus occurring at the 12–14th week of gestation may result in the persistence of a dead fetus (fetus papyraceus) in association with a live and viable twin. Fetus papyraceus causes the release of thrombogenic substances that can cause placental infarction, disseminated intravascular coagulation and cutaneous lesions.[4] In singletons with no history of fetus papyraceus, as seen in our cases, such lesions reflect either in utero death of an unrecognized twin/triplet or placental infarction.[2] Typhoid in the mother in the second case might be the cause of truncal aplasia cutis congenita. Although intrauterine typhoid infection has not been implicated in the causation, it has a great impact in causing intrauterine death. Salmonella typhimurium proliferates in the infected placenta and causes placental necrosis thus leading to fetal death.[5]

Most lesions heal spontaneously from the margins, leaving behind a smooth, yellowish, hairless, papery scar. Small residual lesions can be treated by excision of the abnormal skin margins followed by primary closure. Composite skin grafts have been used successfully, using allogenic keratinocytes or autologous fibroblasts followed by keratinocytes a week later.[2]

We were unable to find similar previous reports. Truncal aplasia cutis congenita is itself a rare presentation, more so in the absence of history of twin pregnancy/papyraceus fetuses. These cases also draw attention to the possibility of in utero death of an unrecognized twin/triplet. Further, the role of other hidden factors or the possibility of intrauterine infection such as typhoid needs to be studied in the causation of truncal aplasia cutis congenita. More evidence is needed to confirm the entity of aplasia cutis congenita, group 5 without fetus papyraceus.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References
1.
Crowe MA. Aplasia Cutis Congenita, Medscape. Available from: http://www.emedicine.medscape.com/article/1110134-overview. [Last accessed on 2016 Mar 06].
[Google Scholar]
2.
Moss C, Shahidulla H. Naevi and other developmental defects. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C, editors. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology. 8th ed. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell Publication; 2010. p. 18.98-106.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Frieden IJ. Aplasia cutis congenita: A clinical review and proposal for classification. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986;14:646-60.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Shirvany TE, Zahedpasha Y, Lookzadeh M. Aplasia cutis congenita: A case report. Iran J Pediatr 2009;19:185-8.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Vigliani MB, Bakardjiev AI. First trimester typhoid fever with vertical transmission of Salmonella typhi, an intracellular organism. Case Rep Med 2013;2013:973297.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
484

PDF downloads
283
Show Sections