Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letter to the Editor
2012:78:2;187-189
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.93639
PMID: 22421653

Are Q-switched lasers for Nevus of Ota really effective in pigmented skin?

Kabir Sardana, Shikha Chugh, Vijay Garg
 Department of Dermatology, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Kabir Sardana
466, Sector 28, UP - 201 303, Noida
India
How to cite this article:
Sardana K, Chugh S, Garg V. Are Q-switched lasers for Nevus of Ota really effective in pigmented skin?. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2012;78:187-189
Copyright: (C)2012 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Sir,

We read with interest the study of Kar et al.,[1] but we would like to put in to perspective the optimistic outcome reported in view of the published data [2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] [Table - 1], [Figure - 1] and our findings [Figure - 2]. Our results with Q-switched Nd:YAG are not as heartening, as the majority of the patients have <25% response [Figure - 2]. There are three issues that need to be addressed in relation to the role of pigment-specific lasers in Nevus of Ota. First is the method of assessment, which should ideally be objective [2],[5],[7] in nature [Table - 1]. The quartile scoring is highly subjective in nature, and the results can vary depending on the observer. [1],[4] The statistical analysis in [Table - 1] of the study, [1] where a marked difference has been noted, should have probably used the Pearsons coefficient of correlation. The basic premise was an attempt to correlate the difference in the improvement versus the number of sittings, which is a basic percept for the tests of correlation. It would have been better if the cases of bilateral nevus were excluded from the analysis, as they have a universally poor result. [2],[3],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] Moreover, in the methods, the goal was to continue sittings till complete improvement or 15 sittings, but 36 out of 50 patients did not achieve this goal. If we accept the conclusion that >10 sittings are better and also that no added benefit was achieved beyond 12 sittings, it is difficult to comprehend that a marked difference in response was seen within two sittings (12 versus 10). The second issue is in relation to the predictors of response, which, apart from the number of sittings, should have included the site, depth and color of the lesion. [9] The most practical seems to be the color, and Ueda et al., [9] found that brown-violet/violet-blue lesions are more responsive than blue-green lesions, which has not been highlighted by the authors. [1] Probably the most important parameter is the onset of improvement, which has been shown to start much earlier (three to four sittings) [10] in type1/2 skin, and this crucial fact has not been mentioned in the present study. [1] As all the lasers studied [Table - 1], [Figure - 1] are certified (US FDA, CE and/or ISO), the parameters and output are not markedly different. Thus, it is unlikely that the difference is because of the laser used rather than the skin color studied.

Figure 1: An overview of the spectrum of laser modalities for Nevus of Ota
Figure 2: (a, b): Pre- and post-Qsw Nd:YAG laser sitting with <25% improvement after 10 sittings
Table 1: A chronological analysis of salient studies/data of lasers in Nevus of Ota

The results in pigmented skin are not as good as in the western skin, in terms of number of sittings and percentage of improvement [Table - 1], [Figure - 1], as the inherent pigmentation in the epidermis interferes with the laser beam before it targets the nevus cells. The statement that "the results in Type 4-5 skin are better than type 1-3 skin" [1] is not borne in respect to the published evidence. [2],[3],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] Paradoxically, Kar et al., [1] further state in the conclusion that the results are not good in the Indian skin type and then reiterate that it is an effective modality. Kar et al., showed that four out of 50 cases showed >75% improvement after 10 sittings, and our abysmal results (25% response, 10 sittings; [Figure - 2]) contrasts with studies where excellent response is seen in the majority of the patients in just two to five sittings. [3],[6],[9],[10] This can be explained by the lack of competing pigment in other skin types. [3],[6],[9],[10] Although comparative data [Figure - 1] between the different Q-switched lasers have variable results, one notable fact that emerges is an attempt [2],[5],[6],[7],[8],[10],[11] to remove the epidermal pigment with combination modalities. The notable examples include the combination of QS 532-nm Nd:YAG laser with QS 1,064-nm Nd:YAG laser [5] and the use of an ablative laser followed by the QS ruby laser. We tried both these combinations [Table - 1] without satisfactory results. The enlisted combination studies [2],[5],[6],[7],[8],[10],[11] that are primarily in skin types 1, 2 and 3 are a pointer to the tacit acceptance that QS Nd:YAG is by itself not a highly effective modality for dermal melanocytosis. In fact, the use of fractional lasers is yet another addition in the therapy, [11] with the fractional Q-switched ruby laser being the latest technology with a potential use in pigmented lesions [12] [Figure - 1], [Table - 1]. The litany of studies and the use of combination lasers, [5],[6],[7],[8],[11] even in type 1/2 skin, who have a better response than our skin types, points to the lack of an effective tool for amelioration of dermal melanocytosis. We should also remember that subjective quartile scoring is not the crucible by which patients judge the results especially when they have to pay for the modality. We can offer at best a modality that is probably safe and can provide reasonable improvement in our skin type. When this is at a no-cost, as it is in ours and probably the authors institution, it may not be an issue, but when monetary considerations are at play, it might not be preferred by the patient. The issue of recurrence notwithstanding (0.9-5% at 3-4 years), probably the best available laser is QS ruby laser [2] [Figure - 1]. The recent use of fractional ruby laser (Ascepelion, Germany), is a tacit admission that we are yet to discover an "effective laser" intervention with "objective" improvement for Nevus of Ota in Indian skin. The patient, especially in pigmented skin, should be given a realistic end point to avoid disappointment with the present Q switched lasers technology. Also, an objective parameter of assessment of response will go a long way in evidence-based analysis of data than the subjective "quartile" system of improvement.

References
1.
Kar HK, Gupta L. 1064 nm Q switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of nevus of Ota: An Indian open label prospective study of 50 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011;77:565-70.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Chang CJ, Kou CS. Comparing the effectiveness of Q-switched Ruby laser treatment with that of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser for oculodermal melanosis (Nevus of Ota). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:339-45.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Liu J, Ma YP, Ma XG, Chen JZ, Sun Y, Xu HH, et al. A retrospective study of Q-switched alexandrite laser in treating nevus of ota. Dermatol Surg 2011 in press.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Aurangabadkar S. QYAG5 Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of nevus of ota: An Indian study of 50 patients. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2008;1:80-4.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Ee HL, Goh CL, Khoo LS, Chan ES, Ang P. Treatment of acquired bilateral nevus of ota-like macules (Hori's nevus) with a combination of the 532 nm Q-Switched Nd:YAG laser followed by the 1,064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG is more effective: Prospective study. Dermatol Surg 2006;32:34-40.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Momosawa A, Yoshimura K, Uchida G, Sato K, Aiba E, Matsumoto D, et al. Combined therapy using Q-switched ruby laser and bleaching treatment with tretinoin and hydroquinone for acquired dermal melanocytosis. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:1001-7.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Manuskiatti W, Sivayathorn A, Leelaudomlipi P, Fitzpatrick RE. Treatment of acquired bilateral nevus of Ota-like macules (Hori's nevus) using a combination of scanned carbon dioxide laser followed by Q-switched ruby laser. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:584-91.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Chan HH, Ying SY, Ho WS, Kono T, King WW. An in vivo trial comparing the clinical efficacy and complications of Q-switched 755 nm alexandrite and Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers in the treatment of nevus of Ota. Dermatol Surg 2000;26:919-22.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Ueda S, Isoda M, Imayama S. Response of naevus of Ota to Q-switched ruby laser treatment according to lesion colour. Br J Dermatol 2000;142:77-83.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Kunachak S, Leelaudomlipi P. Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment for acquired bilateral nevus of Ota-like maculae: A long-term follow-up. Lasers Surg Med 2000;26:476-9.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Moody MN, Landau JM, Vergilis-Kalner IJ, Goldberg LH, Marquez D, Friedman PM. 1,064-nm Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser and 1,550-nm fractionated erbium-doped fiber laser for the treatment of nevus of ota in fitzpatrick skin type IV. Dermatol Surg 2011;37:1163-7.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Jang WS, Lee CK, Kim BJ, Kim MN. Efficacy of 694-nm Q-switched ruby fractional laser treatment of melasma in female Korean patients. Dermatol Surg 2011;37:1133-40.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
343

PDF downloads
87
Show Sections