Translate this page into:
Assessment of CXCL10 and S100B serum levels in patients with vitiligo before and after narrow-band ultraviolet B therapy: A quasi-experimental study
Corresponding author: Dr. Radwa El-Sayed Marie, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. rivercruise84@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Marie RE, Sleem SAE, Habib FE, Kamel NM, Atwa MA. Assessment of CXCL10 and S100B serum levels in patients with vitiligo before and after narrow-band ultraviolet B therapy: A quasi-experimental study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_56_2025
Dear Editor,
Vitiligo is characterised by the elevated expression of melanocyte-specific cytotoxic T-cells, leading to melanocyte death. The CXC-chemokine Ligand 10 (CXCL10) enhances chemoattraction and epidermal localisation of cytotoxic T-cells.1 S100B is a calcium binding protein expressed in melanocytes and released extracellularly upon their death.2 UVB narrow-band therapy (NB-UVB) is an effective vitiligo treatment that inhibits cytotoxic T-cells and promotes melanocyte migration.3 The need for serological marker changes to identify the possibility of re-pigmentation during NB-UVB therapy is crucial. Moreover, targeting these molecules will be a significant advancement in vitiligo treatment. This study aimed to evaluate CXCL10 and S100B serum levels in vitiligo patients before and after NB-UVB therapy compared to controls.
This quasi-experimental study included 20 patients with non-segmental vitiligo. Patients with autoimmune disorders, infections, light sensitive disorders, malignancy, systemic vitiligo treatment within the last three months were excluded. Vitiligo severity was assessed using Vitiligo Extent Score (VES).S1 Vitiligo activity was assessed via Vitiligo Disease Activity (VIDA) scoreS2 and evaluating vitiligo activity signsS3 (ill-defined borders, leukotrichia, recent koebnerization, and confetti depigmentation). In addition, twenty controls without a history of vitiligo, autoimmune diseases or cancers were recruited.
The study was performed following the Helsinki Declaration principles and was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics committee. All participants signed a written informed consent form.
Phototherapy was administered for 24 sessions, three times a week on non-consecutive days, in a phototherapy unit equipped with 16 fluorescent tubes (peak emission wavelength 311-312 nm) (TL-100W/01, Philips & Eindhoven). Patients’ lesional skin was considered Fitzpatrick skin phototype I, with a minimal erythema dose (MED) of 400 mJ/cm2. The starting fluence was 70% of MED (280 mJ/cm2), with 15% increase in each session. If severe erythema, burning pain, or blistering occurred, sessions were stopped until erythema subsided to a pale pink, then resumed at the final tolerated dose. S4 Patients were examined every 2 weeks for re-pigmentation. Two weeks after the 24th session, VES and activity signs were reassessed.
A 5 mL venous blood sample was collected in plain test tubes from each participant, left at room temperature for 20 minutes, then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4000 rpm. The separated serum was kept at -20°C till needed. CXCL10 and S100B serum levels were measured pretreatment and two weeks after the 24th session using an enzyme linked immune-sorbent assay [Supplementary File 1] as recommended by the manufacturers.
Vitiligo patients were 15 (75%) females and 5 (25%) males, ranging in age from 18-59 years (mean 28.75±11.60 years). Healthy controls were 14 (70%) females and 6 (30%) males, ranging in age from 19-58 years (mean 31.60±11.71 years). There were no significant differences in age or sex between patients and controls. Table 1 summarises the patients’ clinical data.
No. | % | |
---|---|---|
Duration of disease (years) | ||
Min. – Max. | 1.0 – 15.0 | |
Mean ± SD. | 6.55 ± 4.12 | |
Median (IQR) | 5.0 (3.0 – 10.0) | |
Age of disease onset (years) | ||
Min. – Max. | 8.0 – 48.0 | |
Mean ± SD. | 22.85 ± 13.18 | |
Median (IQR) | 20.0 (18.0 – 42.0) | |
Type of vitiligo | ||
Generalised | 17 | 85.0 |
Acrofacial | 3 | 15.0 |
VES score (severity) | ||
Min. – Max. | 0.80 – 21.69 | |
Mean ± SD. | 3.76 ± 5.63 | |
Median (IQR) | 1.73 (1.0 – 3.25) | |
VIDA score (Activity) | ||
-1 | 0 | 0.0 |
0 | 5 | 25.0 |
+1 | 3 | 15.0 |
+2 | 3 | 15.0 |
+3 | 3 | 15.0 |
+4 | 6 | 30.0 |
Signs of activity | ||
No | 9 | 45.0 |
Yes | 11 | 55.0 |
Ill-defined border | 3 | 15.0 |
Leukotrichia | 6 | 30.0 |
Koebner phenomenon | 4 | 20.0 |
Confetti depigmentation | 2 | 10.0 |
Family history | ||
Negative | 16 | 80.0 |
Positive | 4 | 20.0 |
SD: Standard deviation, IQR: Interquartile range
Post-treatment, re-pigmentation was detected in 17 (85%) patients [Figure 1a and b], VES was significantly reduced (p=0.028), as were the clinical activity signs (p=0.016). None of the patients showed new lesions of koebnerization, or ill- defined borders and half of patients with leukotrichia didn’t show any new white hairs [Supplementary Table 1].

- A 22-year-old woman patient presented with vitiligo lesions in the back of neck, chest, and left leg (left side). Right panel showing marginal and follicular re-pigmentation after 24 sessions of NB-UVB therapy.

- A 24-year-old woman presented with generalized vitiligo (left panel). Right thigh and leg lesions showing marginal and follicular re-pigmentation after 24 sessions of NB-UVB therapy.
In vitiligo patients, the pretreatment levels of both CXCL10 (mean 11.40±5.89, median 9.05, range 3.90-22.10 pg/mL) and S100B (mean 40.91±12.76, median 38.38, range 31.30-93.30 pg/mL,) were significantly higher than the post-treatment levels (CXCL10 levels: mean 6.34±4.54, median 4.8, range 3.20-21.55 pg/mL; S100B levels: mean 37.92±11.67, median 34.98, range 29.50-83.60 pg/mL) (p=0.004, p=0.02). The baseline pre-treatment levels of CXCL10 and S100B in vitiligo patients were also significantly higher than their levels in healthy controls (CXCL10 levels: mean 7.62±5.18, median 6.9, range 1.10-19.74 pg/mL; S100B levels: mean 33.72±2.74, median 33.5, range 30.0-38.50 pg/mL) (p=0.021, p<0.001). There were no significant differences between post-treatment levels and healthy controls’ levels [Figure 2a and b]. Significant positive correlations were found between VIDA score and both CXCL10, and S100B pretreatment levels (p<0.001, p=0.02) [Supplementary Figure 1].

- Serum CXCL10 level in patients with vitiligo (n=20) before and after NB-UVB compared to healthy controls (n=20).

- Serum S100B level in patients with vitiligo (n=20) before and after NB-UVB compared to healthy control (n=20). SD: Standard deviation. Wilcoxon signed ranks test (p1) was used for comparing between serum levels of markers before and after NB-UVB therapy. Mann Whitney test was used for comparing between pretreatment levels and levels in healthy controls (p2), as well as post-treatment levels and levels in healthy control (p3). *: Statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Similar to these findings, several studies reported higher CXCL101,4 and S100B2, 5 levels in vitiligo patients compared to controls, with a significant correlation with disease activity. CXCL10, and S100B may thus be markers for vitiligo activity. Furthermore, prior studies detected significant reduction in CXCL10 expression in vitiligo patients after NB-UVB therapy.6, 7
There was no significant association between post-NB-UVB re-pigmentation and patients’ clinical data or pretreatment levels of both markers [Supplementary Tables 2 and 3], implying that baseline levels of these markers didn’t correlate with the possibility of re-pigmentation after NB-UVB therapy
Only patients with post-NB-UVB re-pigmentation had significantly lower post-treatment CXCL10 and S100B levels than at baseline (p=0.001, p=0.011) [Supplementary Table 2]. This significant reduction in CXCL10 and S100B levels during NB-UVB therapy may therefore be indicative of re-pigmentation. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the changes in S100B levels after NB-UVB therapy.
Ethical approval
The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, number 4364, dated 23/11/2020.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
References
- CXCL-10 and interleukin-6 are reliable serum markers for vitiligo activity: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res.. 2018;31:330-6.
- [Google Scholar]
- Serum level of S100B in vitiligo patients: Is it a marker of disease activity? Australas J Dermatol.. 2021;62:e67-72.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- An update and review of narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy for vitiligo. Dermatological Reviews. 2022;3:326-35.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Increased expression of CXCR3 and its ligands in patients with vitiligo and CXCL10 as a potential clinical marker for vitiligo. Br J Dermatol.. 2016;174:1318-26.
- [Google Scholar]
- S100B is a potential disease activity marker in nonsegmental vitiligo. J Invest Dermatol.. 2017;137:1445-53.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Systemic CXCL10 is a predictive biomarker of vitiligo lesional skin infiltration, PUVA, NB-UVB and corticosteroid treatment response and outcome. Arch Dermatol Res. 2022;314:275-84.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Assessment of CXCL10 before and after narrow band UVB phototherapy in non-segmental vitiligo patients. Indian J Dermatol.. 2022;67:319-23.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]