Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Net Letter
2015:81:6;655-655
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.168352
PMID: 26515867

Benign penile melanosis: A linear variant

Vijayeeta Jairath1 , Nidhi Jindal1 , Manu Sehrawat1 , VK Jain1 , Sarabjit Kaur1 , MM Priyadarshini2
1 Department of Dermatology Venereology Leprosy, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
2 Department of Pathology, Kannur Medical College, Kerala, India

Correspondence Address:
Vijayeeta Jairath
11-J/2 UH Medical Enclaves, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak - 124 001, Haryana
India
How to cite this article:
Jairath V, Jindal N, Sehrawat M, Jain V K, Kaur S, Priyadarshini M M. Benign penile melanosis: A linear variant. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2015;81:655
Copyright: (C)2015 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Sir,

Penile melanosis is a rare benign hyperpigmentation of the glans and shaft of the penis usually affecting men of age between 15–72 years. Apart from melanin, other pigmentary deposits such as hemosiderin, lipofuscin, lipofuscin-like pigment and ferrous sulfate also contribute to the discoloration in penile melanosis.[1] Besides genetic and racial factors playing an important role in its pathogenesis, studies have reported it to be associated with previous injury, treatment with anthralin or psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) therapy.[2]

Penile melanotic macules are a matter of concern to both the treating physician as well as the patient. Presence of large or enlarging macules with irregular edges and multifocal or variegated pigmentary patterns may arouse concern about atypical melanocytic proliferation and acral lentiginous melanoma.[3] It can be of cosmetic concern and embarrassment to the patient due to its unsightly appearance. Though a number of reports about penile melanosis are available,[2],[3] a linear variant of penile melanotic macule appears to be uncommon.

A 21-year-old man presented to the outpatient department of our hospital with complaints of an asymptomatic, grayish-black discoloration of glans penis since childhood. There was no history of genital infection, trauma or any previous treatments including PUVA therapy. No family or personal history of systemic disorder associated with hyperpigmentation was present. The reason for his visit to our department was his rejection from admission to the naval services due to this hyperpigmentation. The patient gave no history of increase in size or change in the colour of lesion. He was otherwise healthy and had no history of a previous skin problem. Examination revealed a line of uniform hyperpigmentation on the glans measuring about 1 × 0.2 cms with no surrounding inflammation or erythema [Figure - 1]. The rest of the physical and systemic examination was normal with no other abnormal pigmentation on his skin, mucosa or nails. Histologic examination of a 2.5-mm punch biopsy specimen revealed mild acanthosis, hyperpigmentation of basal keratinocytes and pigmentary incontinence with scattered melanophages in the dermis [Figure - 2].

Figure 1: Linear uniform hyperpigmentation on the glans measuring about 3 × 0.2 cm with no surrounding inflammation or erythema
Figure 2: Mild acanthosis, hyperpigmentation of basal keratinocytes, and pigmentary incontinence with scattered melanophages in the dermis (H and E, ×40)

Absence of contiguous melanocytic proliferation and significant atypia differentiated it from melanoma. Furthermore, the immunohistochemical staining with human melanoma black 45 (HMB45) antibody was negative. The patient was assured about the benign nature of the lesion and was advised to report back in case of any significant change. The patient is on follow up for 2 years with no change in morphology of the existing lesion.

Genital melanotic macules are not uncommon. Most lesions go unnoticed by the patients due to the asymptomatic nature and its site. In a study of 10 000 men by Barnhill et al., the prevalence was reported to be 14.2%. This benign disorder has been labelled differently by various authors. Lenane et al., coined the term genital melanotic macule for penile melanosis. In 1982, Kopf and Bart described variegated macular hyperpigmentation on the glans and penile shaft in a 37-year-old white male as “penile lentigo”.[4] They emerge either as isolated lesions or as an important element of a syndrome with multisystem anomalies.[5] Because there was no history of any drug intake or any other systemic manifestations, disorders such as Peutz–Jegher syndrome, LAMB syndrome, LEOPARD syndrome, Ruvalcaba–Myhre syndrome, and Laugier–Hunziker syndrome were ruled out. An array of benign conditions must be considered in the differential diagnosis of these hyperpigmented genital lesions. The key features that discriminated our case from lichen planus were the absence of papular eruptions prior to onset of the hyperpigmentation along with a non-supportive histopathology.

Morphologically they vary from diffuse to irregular well-demarcated macules. The unique feature in our case was the linear presentation resembling a “sketch mark”; we were unable to find any previous reports of a similar presentation.

References
1.
Rosai J. Rosai and ackerman's surgical pathology. 9th ed. New York: Mosby; 2004.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Barnhill RL, Rabinovitz H. Benign Melanocytic Neoplasms. Dermatology In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, editors. 2nd ed. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. 2008. p. 1717-20.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Newton Bishop JA. Lentigos, Melanocytic Naevi and Melanoma. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C, editors. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology. 8th ed. Vol. 54. A John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Publication; 2010. p. 54-6.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Recuz J, Clerici T. Penile melanosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;20:567-70.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Lenane P, Keane CO, Connell BO, Loughlin SO, Powell FC. Genital melanotic macules: Clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:640-4.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
58

PDF downloads
12
Show Sections