Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology

Translate this page into:
[gtranslate]

Original Article
2003:69:4;284-286
PMID: 17642913

Clinico-mycological evaluation of onychomycosis at Bangalore and Jorhat

S Grover
 Department of Dermatology, Air Force Hospital, Agram PO, Bangalore - 560007, India

Correspondence Address:
S Grover
Department of Dermatology, Command Hospital (Air Force), Agram PO, Bangalore - 560007
India
How to cite this article:
Grover S. Clinico-mycological evaluation of onychomycosis at Bangalore and Jorhat . Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:284-286
Copyright: (C)2003 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical and mycological features of onychomycosis show variation with time and place. Material and Methods: A study to analyze the morphological variants and mycological isolates of onychomycosis was carried out in 50 patients attending the dermatology out-patient departments at the Air Force Hospitals at Bangalore and at Jorhat. Nail clippings were subjected to direct microscopy and cultured on Sabourauds Dextrose Agar. Results: The commonest age group affected (56%) was the 20-40 year age group. The fingernails alone were involved in 24 (48%) patients, the toenails alone in 15 (30%) patients, and both in 11 (22%) patients. Distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis was encountered in 41 (82%) patients, proximal superficial onychomycosis and total dystrophic onychomycosis in 3 each (6%), paronychia in 2 (4%) and superficial white onychomycosis in 1. Of the 59 samples cultured, dermatophytes were grown in 14 (23.7%), non-dermatophyte moulds (NDM) in 13 (22.0%), candida in 10 (16.8%) and no growth in 22 (37.2%) samples. Conclusion: Among the dermatophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, and among the NDM, Aspergillus spp., were the commonest isolates.
Keywords: Onychomycosis, Mycology, Dermatophytes, Non-dermatophyte moulds
INTRODUCTION

Onychomycosis refers to fungal infection of the nail with various etiological agents, viz. dermatophytes, yeasts and non-dermatophyte moulds (NDM). Dermatophytes, especially Trichophyton rubrum, are most frequently implicated as its causative agents, but yeasts and NDM are increasingly recognized as etiological agents in causing primary invasion of the nail. [1],[2],[3] We undertook this study to identify the clinical pattern of this disease in our centers, isolate the most common fungal pathogens responsible and assess the role of yeast and NDM in causing onychomycosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Successive out-patients diagnosed clinically as having onychomycosis were included in the study conducted at the Air Force Hospitals at Bangalore and at Jorhat. A detailed history, including that of trauma, infections, occupation and personal habits, was taken. Patients with any significant medical history were excluded from the study. Nail clippings from the infected nails were collected in small black paper envelopes for easy visualization of specimens. A portion was immersed in 10% KOH overnight and examined the next morning by light microscopy. The rest was preserved in the same envelopes in order to absorb moisture and reduce or eliminate bacterial contamination. One week later, after the specimens were adequately dried of the moisture in the envelopes, they were inoculated in pairs in plain Sabouraud′s Dextrose Agar (SDA) and SDA with chloramphenicol and incubated at room temperature. All cultures were examined bi-weekly for growth and incubated for four weeks before declaring them negative. Germ tube tests were performed on all growths identified as yeasts. The growths were noted for colony characteristics in the form of texture, surface color, color on the reverse, and diffusible pigment. Tease mounts, cellophane tape mounts and slide cultures were undertaken for microscopic morphology. The cultures were reported on the basis of the macroscopic and microscopic examination and germ tube tests.[4],[5]

RESULTS

There were a total of 50 cases consisting of 31 males and 19 females (male to female ratio = 1.63:1). The commonest age group was the 20-40 year age group, followed by the 51-60 year age group and both 41-50 and 61-70 year age groups [Table - 1]. The fingernails alone were most frequently involved (48%), followed by the toenails alone (30%) and both (22%) [Table - 2]. Distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis (DLSO) was the commonest clinical pattern (82%), followed by proximal superficial onychomycosis (PSO) and total dystrophic onychomycosis (TDO) (6% each), paronychia (4%) and superficial white onychomycosis (SWO) (2%) [Table - 3].

As some of the cases had involvement of multiple sites, 59 samples were collected and cultured. Of these, dermatophytes were grown in 14 (23.7%), non-dermatophyte moulds (NDM) in 13 (22.1%), candida in 10 (16.9%) and no growth was observed in 22 (37.3%) samples. Among dermatophytes, Trichophyton rubrum was the commonest isolate (42.9%), followed by Epidermophyton floccosum (35.7%), Trichophyton tonsurans (14.3%) and Trichophyton schoenleinii (7.1%). Among the NDM, Aspergillus niger was the commonest isolate (84.6%), followed by Penicillium and Cladosporium (7.7% each). Of the 59 samples cultured, 55.9% were KOH-positive and 62.7% were culture-positive [Table - 3].

DISCUSSION

All the men in our study were soldiers. We found a high incidence of onychomycosis in a younger age group which could be the result of occupation related subclinical trauma or perhaps because younger people are cosmetically more conscious than older ones. The male predominance in our study may be due to predisposing factors like occupation related subclinical trauma and use of occlusive footwear.

We found dermatophytes, especially Trichophyton rubrum, to be the most frequent etiological agents in onychomycosis, and DLSO to be the commonest morphological pattern, which has been reported earlier.[3] Though NDM are often considered as contaminants, they have been reported to colonize damaged tissues and cause secondary tissue destruction. Their role in causing cutaneous infections is not proven and a primary pathogenic role of NDM is controversial. NDM have been isolated in 2%-22% cases and yeasts in 17%-66% cases of onychomycosis in some studies.[1],[2] Our high rate (22.1%) of isolation of NDM can be explained by our climate, since a higher prevalence of NDM in onychomycosis is reported in hot and humid tropical and sub-tropical climates.[1] Some stringent criteria have been described to define NDM as a primary pathogen: (a) isolation of NDM in pure culture, (b) absence of dermatophytes, and (c) demonstration of KOH-positive filaments.[6] Using these criteria, 8 of the 13 NDM in our study (all of which are Aspergillus niger) would qualify as primary pathogens.

The KOH positivity rate varied from 35.6%-88.6% in various studies and the culture positivity rate from 36%- 53.6%.[7] Our KOH positivity rate (55.9%) fell within the reported range, but we had a comparatively high culture positivity rate (62.7%). This can be attributed to the ′drying procedure′ of Milne that we followed, which reduces the rate of contamination and produces pure cultures in the isolates.[4]

To conclude, our study revealed a male preponderance, DLSO as the commonest morphological pattern, and dermatophytes as the commonest mycological isolate. It also stresses the increasing role of NDM in causing onychomycosis in recent times.

References
1.
Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Lorenzi S. Onychomycosis caused by non-dermatophyte moulds: Clinical features and response to treatment of 59 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:217-24.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Greer DL. Evolving role of non dermatophytes in onychomycosis. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:52-9.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Ramani R, Srinivas CR, Ramani A, et al. Molds in onychomycosis. Int J Dermatol 1993;32:877-8.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Milne LJR. Fungi. In: Collee JC, Duguid JP, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, editors. Practical medical microbiology. 13th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1989. p. 676-7.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckberger PC, Winn WC. Color atlas and textbook of microbiology (Mycology). 5th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1997. p. 983-1053.
[Google Scholar]
6.
English MP. Nails and fungi. Br J Dermatol 1976;94:697-701.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Mohanty JC, Mohanty SK, Sahoo RC, et al. Diagnosis of superficial mycoses by direct microscopy- a statistical evaluation. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1999;65:72-4.
[Google Scholar]
Show Sections