Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology - Comparative study of trichloroacetic acid versus glycolic acid chemical peels in the treatment of melasma
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Net Study
2010:76:4;447-447
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.66602
PMID: 20657143

Comparative study of trichloroacetic acid versus glycolic acid chemical peels in the treatment of melasma

Rashmi Kumari, Devinder Mohan Thappa
 Department of Dermatology and STD, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India

Correspondence Address:
Devinder Mohan Thappa
Professor and Head, Department of Dermatology and STD, JIPMER, Pondicherry-605 006
India
How to cite this article:
Kumari R, Thappa DM. Comparative study of trichloroacetic acid versus glycolic acid chemical peels in the treatment of melasma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2010;76:447
Copyright: (C)2010 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Background: Melasma is a common cause of facial hyperpigmentation with significant cosmetic deformity. Many modalities of treatment are available, but none is satisfactory. Aim: This study was designed to compare the therapeutic response of melasma in Indian women to glycolic acid (GA 20-35%) versus trichloroacetic acid (TCA 10-20%) for chemical peeling. Methods: Forty nonpregnant female patients with a minimum melasma area and severity index (MASI) of 10 were recruited in the study. After a detailed history and clinical examination under natural light, MASI was calculated and color photographs were taken of all the patients. The patients were advised to carry out a prepeel program of daily application of 12% GA cream or 0.1% tretinoin at night for 2 weeks. They were then treated with graded concentrations of 20-35% GA facial peel every 15 days in GA group and 10-20% TCA in the second group. Results: Objective response to treatment evaluated by reduction in MASI scoring after 12 weeks was by 79% reduction (from 26.6 to 5.6) in GA group and by 73% reduction in TCA group (from 29.1 to 8.2) but this difference was not significant. Patients with epidermal-type melasma showed a better response to treatment than those with mixed-type melasma (P < 0.05). Subjective response, as graded by the patient, showed good or very good response in 75% in GA group and 65% in TCA group. No relation of treatment response to age and duration of melasma could be established in this study. Conclusions: A prepeel program of daily application of 12% GA cream at night for 2 weeks, followed by graded increase in GA and TCA concentrations proved to be an equally effective treatment modality for epidermal and mixed melasma. There are hardly any major side effects, and regular use of sunscreens prevents chances of postpeel hyperpigmentation. GA peel is associated with fewer side effects than TCA and has the added advantage of facial rejuvenation.
Keywords: Melasma, chemical peels, glycolic acid, trichloroacetic acid

Introduction

Melasma is a common, acquired, symmetric hypermelanosis, characterized by irregular light to dark brown macules and patches commonly involving the cheeks, forehead, upper lip, nose, and chin. [1] Chemical peeling is an increasingly popular method for treating a myriad of benign skin disorders including melasma. Various combination of topical medications like hydroquinone, tretinoin, topical steroids are also used for melasma but chemical peeling provides more rapid response to topical therapy. [2] Today, a plethora of peeling agents are available. Those most commonly used include phenol, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), alpha hydroxyacids (AHAs), and beta hydroxyacids.

Although both TCA and GA are being used in various centers in India, there have been very few studies comparing these two agents in pigmented patients (Fitzpatrick skin type IV to V) with melasma, using both subjective and objective methods of evaluation (MASI). This prompted us to compare these two easily available agents, TCA and GA. Both are superficial to medium depth peels and are not effective for dermal melasma. Hence, cases of dermal melasma were not included in this study. We undertook this study to compare the therapeutic response of melasma in Indian women to graded concentrations of glycolic acid (GA 20-35%) versus trichloroacetic acid (TCA 10-20%) for chemical peeling.

Methods

This study was carried out on 40 nonpregnant women with epidermal and mixed melasma, with a minimum melasma area and severity index (MASI) 7 of 10, visiting the outpatient department of our hospital over 1 year duration from March 2005 to March 2006, after getting due ethical clearance from our institute ethics committee. Patients with a history of herpes, taking oral contraceptive pills, isotretinoin, pregnancy, lactation, history of keloids or hypertrophic scars, concomitant systemic or skin disease and those with unrealistic expectations were excluded from the study. These 40 women were randomized into two groups of 20 patients in each, by computerized generated numbers [Table - 1].

To calculate MASI, the face was divided into four regions [forehead (F) 30%; right malar (MR) 30%; left malar (ML) 30%, chin (C) 10%] and each area was given a numerical value (A, 0-6). The sum of severity for darkness (D, 0-4) and homogeneity (H, 0-4) of melasma was multiplied by the numerical value and percentage of each area. These values were then added to obtain MASI by a single-blinded trained dermatologist.

MASI = 0.3(DF + HF )AF + 0.3(DMR + HMR )AMR + 0.3(DML + HML )AML + 0.1(DC + HC )AC.

A detailed history was taken and clinical examination was performed under natural light by a team of dermatologists to select cases of epidermal and mixed melasma. In case of any doubt in diagnosis, histopathologic confirmation was done before including the case in this study. The MASI score was calculated and color photographs were taken of all patients under standard conditions in natural light. In a prepeel program, patients were advised to apply topical sunscreen daily [sun protection factor-15 (SPF-15)] and 12% GA cream (in GA group) or 0.1% tretinoin (in TCA group) at night for 2 weeks.

The first group was treated with graded concentrations of GA (20-35%) and second group with TCA (10-20%). For the purpose of peeling, the face was divided into anatomic units - right forehead, left forehead, left cheek, right cheek, nose and glabella, and perioral area. After degreasing, treatment with GA/TCA peel was carried out in the respective group for a period of 20-30 seconds and was left for a definite period of time (first peel: 20% GA/10% TCA for 2 minutes; second peel: 20% GA/10%TCA for 4 minutes; third peel: 35% GA/20% TCA for 2 minutes; fourth peel: 35% GA/20% TCA for 4 minutes, separated by 2-week intervals) on the individual anatomic units, separately and in a preset sequence. The peel was terminated by the dilutional effect of washing with neutralizer sodium bicarbonate in the same sequence as the application in GA group and cold saline/ice in TCA group. At regular intervals, the degree of tolerability to the facial peel and the side effects were recorded before proceeding to the higher concentration. In cases where there was a slow or inadequate response, further treatment with peels was carried out at 2-week intervals.

The primary objective of this study was to assess the degree of improvement in pigmentation objectively using MASI at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Color photographs were taken of all patients at baseline and 30 days after the last peel. The patients were advised to apply 2% hydroquinone at night and to continue with topical sunscreen (SPF-15) to maintain the results achieved after the fourth peel.

Subjective improvement before and at the completion of the study, the response in each patient was graded as: no response if there was no change in MASI score at the end of three peels; mild response if there was less than 25% change; moderate response with 25 to <50% decrease in MASI; good response if there was 50 to <75% fall in MASI score; very good response with more than 75% fall in MASI score. Secondary outcome measures such as the side effects, if any, and cost of the therapy were recorded. A minimum of 6 months of follow up in each case was done to look for relapse, if any. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using SPSS software. Student′s paired t-test and EPIINFO software were used to calculate significant differences between the parameters.

Results

There were 40 patients included in the study with 38 females and only 2 males, of age between 18 and 53 years with a mean of 32 ± 6.9 years. Duration of melasma ranged between 1 and 10 years with a mean 4.3 ± 2.5 years. There was no significant precipitating factor observed in relation to occurrence of melasma like relation to pregnancy, history of drugs/oral contraceptive pills, sunlight exposure, etc.

Most cases were of epidermal type (78%) and one-fourth of the cases were of mixed type of melasma (22%). The most common pattern was malar (60%) followed by centrofacial pattern (40%). Total number of peels required in both the groups is as shown in [Table - 2]. Mean of peels required in both groups was 7.13 approximately and was not different in the two groups, GA group (mean 7.0 peels) and TCA (7.3 peels).

Objective response to treatment as studied by fall in MASI scoring after 12 weeks was 79% reduction (from 26.6 to 5.6) in GA group and 73% reduction (from 29.1 to 8.2) in TCA group. The MASI scores at baseline 4, 8, 12 weeks were as shown in [Figure - 1]. There was no significant difference in reduction of MASI scores at the end of six peels after 12 weeks between both the groups (P > 0.05). However, TCA peel [Figure - 2] showed an initial rapid response compared to GA [Figure - 3]. In the TCA group, the patients reported a quicker improvement after two peels but the response was comparable in the two groups at the end of peeling sessions, with both the groups showing equally efficacious response. Of the 20 cases of melasma which were treated with GA, there was 79% reduction in epidermal melasma (from mean MASI of 25.5 to 5.6) and 48% reduction in mixed melasma cases (from mean MASI 30.2 to 21.8). Also, this difference in response with respect to type of melasma was significant (P < 0.05). Comparison of the duration of melasma with the response to treatment gave no significant difference.

Subjective response, as graded by the patient, showed good or very good response in 75% in GA group and 65% in TCA group (statistically insignificant). No relation of treatment response to age or duration of melasma could be established in this study [Table - 3].

During the study, the frequency of serious side effects was very low [Table - 4]. There was mild burning sensation in 95% of patients in GA group to moderate to severe burning in 75% of patients in the TCA group. Postpeel crackening was reported in 35% of cases in TCA group but in none of the patients in the GA group. Persistent erythema was seen only in one case and peeling was deferred due to side effects on five occasions and done 1 week later till the erythema subsided. There were no side effects of hyperpigmentation in spite of the fact that most patients were of Fitzpatrick skin type IV-VI. There was significant improvement in the texture and glow of skin appreciated by 75% of the patients in GA group, which was not appreciated in TCA group.

Relapse was seen in only two cases after a follow up of 6 months in GA group at the same site. Other patients maintained the results achieved with the regular use of sunscreens after a follow up for more than a year.

Discussion

Melasma is more common in women of child-bearing age, [3] although men also suffer from the condition and account for 10% of the cases. [4] Melasma affects all races, but is observed more frequently among individuals with skin type IV-VI, especially in women of Hispanic, Caribbean, and Asian origin, who live in areas of intense ultraviolet radiation. [5] There are three clinical patterns - centrofacial, malar, and mandibular - depending upon the area of localization. [1] Histologically, melasma is divided into three types: epidermal, dermal, and mixed. [6] Wood′s light causes intensification of pigmentation in epidermal-type melasma, but does not enhance the pigmentation in the dermal type. But this distinction may not be useful in pigmented races. A combination of epidermal and dermal macules is recognized as the mixed type. [7]

Chemical peeling aims at production of controlled chemical burns of epidermis and/or dermis, resulting in exhalation and subsequent resurfacing of the epidermis and remodeling of collagen and elastic fibers with deposition of glycosaminoglycans in dermis. Both the agents used in this study, TCA 10-20% and GA 20-35%, are superficial peels. [8] Superficial peels are defined as those causing injury to the dermis and dermoepidermal interface. Medium depth peels are those that penetrate to the papillary or reticular dermis (35-50% TCA). Deep peels are those that cause destruction into the reticular dermis but have longer healing time and more serious complications. Application of TCA to the skin causes precipitation of proteins and coagulative necrosis of cells in epidermis. In higher concentration, it causes necrosis of collagen in the papillary to upper reticular dermis. Over several days, the necrotic layers sloughs and the skin re-epithelizes from the germinative segments of hair follicles. [8]

The benefits of AHAs have long been recognized. [9] Cleopatra, for example, applied sour milk (contains lactic acid) to her face, while Polynesian women found sugarcane juice (contains GA) to provide them with similar benefits. AHAs decrease corneocyte cohesion leading to sloughing of dead cells and stimulation of new cell growth in the basal cell layer. In higher concentrations, they cause epidermolysis. Products with a small molecular size per volume are more active and penetrate the skin more deeply. GA has the smallest molecular structure, followed by lactic, pyruvic, malic, tartaric, and citric acids. The bioavailability of AHAs increases as the pH decreases (desirable pH 2.8-4.8), and they are the only peels that are time dependent and can be neutralized easily. [10]

In our study, the average age of patients at the onset of melasma was middle age as reported in other studies from India, but Kimbrough-Green et al.[11] reported a much higher age of onset (44 years) in their study of Black patients, whereas in another study in Caucasian patients the age group was comparable with mean of 30 years. The types of melasma in our patients also differed from those studied by Kimbrough-Green et al.[11] in Black women and Griffiths et al.[12] in Caucasian women. They observed epidermal-type melasma in 43 and 94% of patients, respectively, compared to our figure of 66%. Sanchez et al.[6] found centrofacial pattern to be the most common, but in our study and most other studies [13],[14] the commonest pattern was malar followed by centrofacial.

In another Indian study carried out by Kalla et al.,[15] GA and TCA showed comparable results on subjective scores given by patients [Table - 5]. They had not used any scientific scoring system like MASI for comparison. On comparing the results of TCA peels in our study with that done by Kalla et al.[15] on 32 patients, there was no significant difference in response to TCA peels [Figure - 4], but Kalla et al. had used on average only 4.1 peels whereas we used on an average 7.3 peels to achieve the desired results. They found 54% cases having more than 50% response to peeling by both agents as compared to 70% cases in our study. In their study GA (55-70%) had required more number of peels than TCA (10-15%), whereas in our study the response to GA was initially slower but equal number of peels were required in both the groups. Kalla et al.[15] observed a more rapid response to TCA than GA in their study. They had found that duration of disease was inversely proportional to response to peeling but our study refutes this fact with similar response to longstanding cases. As with our study the local irritant effects and postpeel crackening were more with TCA than with GA. Relapse and hyperpigmentation were much less in our study. The rate of hyperpigmentation and relapse was higher in the TCA group (25%) than GA group but this was not so in our study where both the groups had minimal postinflammatory pigmentation.

Many other studies [6],[9] that have used GA in various concentrations in similar skin type patients have shown variable results as shown in [Table - 6]. But there have been very few studies focusing on the efficacy of these two commonly available agents in a scientific manner in South Indian patients who are mostly dark skinned and hence comparison is difficult. Previous studies have shown significant clinical improvement of melasma pigmentation following 70 or 50% GA facial peel after two consecutive peels 1 month apart. [13],[14] Grover and Reddu [16] had in their experience with GA (10-30%) in various cases received a similar response, that is, above 60% in more than 90% of cases. Sarkar et al.[2] had compared the efficacy of 20% GA with Kligman′s formula in 20 cases of epidermal melasma and had seen a significant reduction (>80%) in MASI scores with GA when compared to plain Kligman′s regime. The response is not as high in our study as that of Javaheri et al., [9] while comparing the MASI scores of GA group but subjective response was comparable. We compared the MASI scores in the GA group with respect to type of melasma (epidermal versus mixed) with that of the GA peeling scores obtained in the study of Javaheri et al. [Table - 7]. It showed significant differences in response to epidermal melasma [Figure - 5] with a better response, but in mixed melasma cases both the studies had a similar response to GA. In a recent study [17] from Pakistan, chemical peeling was done in group A (GA 50%) and group B (TCA 20%) with 25 patients in each group. The mean score of response calculated for both the groups revealed better overall clinical response in TCA group than in GA group but this difference was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05). In another study, 1% tretinoin peel versus 70% GA at weekly intervals was carried out in 10 patients in a split-face trial. A significant decrease in the modified MASI from baseline to 12 weeks was observed on both facial sides (P < 0.001). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference between the right and left sides. The study concluded that serial 1% tretinoin peel is as effective a therapy for melasma as chemical peeling with 70% GA. [18]

Limitation of our study included the observer bias in the subjective scoring. To eliminate this, MASI scoring was done by a single-blinded independent person but split-face analysis was not attempted by us. This is a small series of patients treated with chemical peeling at our center to see the response to chemical peeling to both TCA and GA.

Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation has been reported to be the most common side effect with GA facial peels [14] but in our study the frequency of all side effects was much lower as compared to that of other studies. [2] This may have been due to the graded concentration method of acids use and strict adherence to photoprotection. The fewer side effects that occurred like mild erythema and burning sensation were mostly well tolerable. No patient developed herpes, vesiculation or keloids post peels as was reported in other studies. Regular use of sunscreens helped in maintaining the result of the peels on follow up. Postpeel crackening effect that occurred only with TCA and not with GA makes it beneficial for patients to continue outdoor activities and office work in GA group. [19] In TCA group, many patients took leave from there work to avoid facing their colleagues but in GA group patients were not embarrassed in any way and the glow due to facial rejuvenation made them look appreciably younger. Hence, the higher cost of GA compensates by the less number of leaves patient may henceforth require during the procedure.

Conclusions

A prepeel program of daily application of 12% GA cream at night for 2 weeks, followed by graded increase in GA and TCA concentrations of facial peel for a duration of 2-4 minutes once every 2 weeks for three consecutive months proved to be an equally effective treatment modality without any major side effects. The beneficial results achieved can be maintained with topical application of sunscreen SPF-15 and 2% hydroquinone. Regular use of sunscreens prevents the chances of postpeel hyperpigmentation. GA peel is associated with fewer side effects than TCA and has the added advantage of facial rejuvenation and patients can continue to go for work.

References
1.
Lapeere H, Borne B, Schepper S, Verhaeghe E, Ongenae K, Geel NV. Hypomelanosis and hypermelanosis. In: Wolff K, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Gilchrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, editors. Dermatology in General Medicine, 7 th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. P. 622-40.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Sarkar R, Kaur C, Bhalla M, Kanwar AJ. The combination of glycolic acid peels with a topical regimen in the treatment of melasma in Dark-skinned patients: a comparative study. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:828-32.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Karen JK, Pomeranz MK. Skin changes and diseases in pregnancy. In: Wolff K, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Gilchrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, editors. Dermatology in General Medicine, 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. P. 955-62.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Vazquez M, Maldonado H, Benaman C, Sanchez JL. Melasma in men: A clinical and histologic study. Int J Dermatol 1988;27:25-7.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Grimes PE. Melasma: etiologic and therapeutic consideration. Arch Dermatol 1995;131:1453-7.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Sanchez NP, Pathak MA, Sato S, Fitzpatrick TB, Sanchez JL, Mihm MC Jr. A clinical light microscopic, ultrastructural and immunofluorescence study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981;4:698-710.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Gilchrest BA, Fitzpatrick TB, Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Localization of melanin pigmentation in the skin with Wood's lamp. Br J Dermatol 1977;96:245-8.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Nguyen TH, Rooney JA. Trichloroacetic acid peels. Dermatol Ther 2000;13:173-82.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Javaheri SM, Handa S, Kaur I, Kumar B. Safety and efficacy of glycolic acid facial peel in Indian women with melasma. Int J Dermatol 2001;40:354-7.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Salvin JW. Considerations in alpha hydroxyacid peels. Clin Plast Surg 1998;25:45-52.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Kimbrough-Green CK, Griffiths CE, Finkel LJ, Hamilton TA, Bulengo-Ransby SM, Ellis CN, et al. Topical retinoic acid (tretinoin) for melasma in black patients. Arch Dermatol 1994;130:727-33.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Griffiths CE, Finkel LJ, Ditre CM, Hamilton TA, Ellis CN, Voorhees JJ. Topical tretinoin (retinoic acid) improves melasma. A vehicle- controlled, clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 1993;129:415-21.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Moy LS, Mene R. Glycolic acid chemical peel. In: Roenigk R, Roenigk, editors. Roenigk and Roenigk's Dermatologic Surgery: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996. P. 1103-63.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Moy LS. Superficial chemical peels with alpha-hydroxy acid. In: Robinson JK, Andt KA, Wintroub BU, editors. Atlas of Cutaneous Surgery, 1 st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995. P. 345-51.
[Google Scholar]
15.
Kalla G, Garg A, Kachhawa D. Chemical peeling-glycolic acid versus trichloroacetic acid in melasma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2001;67:82-4.
[Google Scholar]
16.
Grover C, Reddu BS. The therapeutic value of glycolic acid peels in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:148-50.
[Google Scholar]
17.
Dogra A, Gupta S, Gupta S. Comparative efficacy of 20% trichloroacetic acid and 50% glycolic acid peels in treatment of recalcitrant melasma. J Pak Assoc Derma 2006;16:79-85.
[Google Scholar]
18.
Khunger N, Sarkar R, Jain RK. Tretinoin peels versus glycolic acid peels in the treatment of Melasma in dark-skinned patients. Dermatol Surg 2004;30:1609.
[Google Scholar]
19.
Ditre CM. Glycolic acid peels. Dermatol Ther 2000;13:165-72.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
411

PDF downloads
136
Show Sections