Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
2016:82:2;184-186
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.165538
PMID: 26374658

Contact sensitivity to topical corticosteroids in India

Umesh Sahu, Sanjeev Handa, Dipankar De
 Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Sanjeev Handa
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
India
How to cite this article:
Sahu U, Handa S, De D. Contact sensitivity to topical corticosteroids in India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2016;82:184-186
Copyright: (C)2016 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Sir,

The first report of allergic contact dermatitis from topically applied hydrocortisone appeared in the late 1950s. [1] The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis to topical corticosteroids varies from region to region and appears to be associated with the regional availability of corticosteroids and prescribing practices. Prevalence rates up to 5% have been reported. [2] The most common form is delayed-type hypersensitivity, but type 1 allergy has also been observed. [3]

The allergen in most corticosteroids is thought to be steroid glyoxal, a degradation product, which interacts with arginine. High arginine-binding corticosteroids, including non-fluorinated steroids such as hydrocortisone are more likely to cause sensitization. Some groups of patients are considered to be at increased risk of corticosteroid sensitivity. These are patients using multiple steroid-based preparations for long periods for the treatment of eczema, leg ulcers, stasis dermatitis, perianal dermatitis, hand and foot eczema, chronic actinic dermatitis and facial dermatitis. Patients with corticosteroid sensitivity can present with varied manifestations such as chronic eczema, local urticarial rash and poor response to treatment or worsening of disease following application of topical steroids.

In India, over the counter availability of corticosteroids and patients indulging in self-medication puts individuals at a higher risk of corticosteroid sensitivity. Subramanian et al. reported delayed sensitivity (on day 10) to clobetasol-17-propionate and betamethasone 17-valerate in a 64-year-old male upon testing with the Indian Standard Series (ISS) and medicament series. [4] We were unable to find any previous reports of a formal study to assess the prevalence of corticosteroid sensitivity in Indian patients.

One hundred subjects were recruited from the contact dermatitis clinic of the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. We included patients with leg ulcers, stasis dermatitis, perianal dermatitis, hand and foot eczema, chronic actinic dermatitis and facial dermatitis who had disease for more than 3 months and who were, or had been using topical preparations. Detailed examination of the patient was done with respect to sites involved and morphology of lesions.

Patch testing was performed with the corticosteroid series (Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Sweden, [Table - 1]) using aluminum chambers pre-mounted on hypoallergenic Scanpor tape and the results were recorded at 48, 96, and 168 h. according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria. Patients on oral steroid doses equivalent to or more than 15 mg of prednisolone or other immunosuppressive medications were not included. No other patch test series was tested.

Table 1: Constituents of corticosteroid series used

Of 100 study subjects, 71 (71%) were males and 29 (29%) were females. Overall mean age of the study population was 47.4 years (range, 19-72 years).

The studied population included 27 (27%) office workers, 25 (25%) farmers, 18 (18%), housewives, 16 (16%) retired government servants, 10 (10%) shopkeepers, and 4 (4%) students. Thirty-six (36%) individuals suffered from occupational dermatitis, 18 (18%) farmers had air-borne contact dermatitis to parthenium, 12 (12%) had hand eczema aggravated by household work, and stasis dermatitis was observed in 6 (6%) patients who were shopkeepers requiring prolonged hours of standing.

Of 100 patients included, 44 had facial dermatitis, 33 had involvement of the hands, and 23 had leg eczema. The mean total duration of illness was 5.8 years (range, 0.5-20 years; median, 5 years; SD, 4.4 years). Air-borne contact dermatitis was the most common cause of facial dermatitis, followed by chronic actinic dermatitis. In the facial dermatitis group, the average duration of illness was 6.3 years (range, 5-20 years; SD, 9.7 years).

Thirty-three patients (24 males and 9 females) had hand eczema with the average duration of illness being 4.6 years (range, 0.5-15 years; SD, 14.3 years). Twenty-three patients (15 males and 8 females) had leg eczema and all patients had stasis dermatitis. The average duration of illness was 6.8 years (range, 1-20 years; SD, 13 years).

The most commonly used corticosteroid group was group D1, followed in decreasing order of frequency by group A and group B (Coopman′s classification). The most commonly used steroids, such as clobetasol propionate, clobetasone butyrate, mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, belong to group D1. Four patients gave history of using hydrocortisone (Group A). Three (3%) of our patients reported intermittent use of budesonide (Group B) in the inhalant form [Figure - 1].

Figure 1: Pattern and indications of corticosteroids use by the patients. (Totals may be more than the number of patients in each group as some patients had applied more than one type of corticosteroid)

In two patients, tixocortol-21-pivalate was positive at all three readings done at 48, 96, and 168 h. However, none of these pateints reported aggravation of their symptoms with topical corticosteroid use.

Previous studies from Europe have reported a prevalence of 0.2% in Barcelona, [5] 1.6% in Belgium, [6] and 4.8% in a series from United Kingdom. [7] Tixocortol-21-pivalate allergy is a marker of group-A corticosteroid allergy. In India, group-A corticosteroids are available in steroid-only topical formulations as hydrocortisone acetate or butyrate, in combination with hydroquinone and tretinoin for patients with melasma, and in combination with topical antibiotics or antifungals. Considering the ease of availability of these medications and the tendency for self-medication the likelihood of these patients having used a topical corticosteroid preparation is high.

Tixocortol pivalate [8],[9] and budesonide [10] have been reported as the most common sensitizers across studies. Molecules belonging to groups A, B, and D2 (the labile esters) are more likely to induce sensitization than the D1 group steroids, despite being among the most frequently prescribed preparations.

Our study had a small sample size of 100 patients. Complete and reliable history regarding the nature of exposure to topical corticosteroids, drug compound, formulation, and use of over the counter topical corticosteroids could not be elicited in a few of our patients. as they were not formally educated and unable to provide the information sought.

The overall prevalence of 2% positive patch test reactivity observed in our study is within the reported range. Our study population had no previous exposure to tixocortol pivalate because it is not commercially available in India. The availability of hydrocortisone acetate in various topical medications could be the possible reason for positive reactions to tixocortol observed by us (cross-reactivity). Currently the Indian Standard Series recommended for patch testing by Contact and Occupational Dermatoses Forum of India does not include any topical corticosteroid. Our data suggests that tixocortol pivalate should be included in the Indian Standard Series.

References
1.
Burckhardt W. Contact eczema caused by hydrocortisone. Hautarzt 1959;10:42-3.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Alani MD, Alani SD. Allergic contact dermatitis to corticosteroids. Ann Allergy 1972;30:181-5.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Baeck M, Marot L, Nicolas JF, Pilette C, Tennstedt D, Goossens A. Allergic hypersensitivity to topical and systemic corticosteroids: A review. Allergy 2009;64:978-94.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Subramanyan S, Jerajani HR, Chowkekar S, Karkhanis S. Delayed patch test positivity to corticosteroids in chronic eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2006;54:227-8.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Dooms-Goossens A, Andersen KE, Burrows D, Camarasa JG, Ducombs G, Frosch PJ, et al. A survey of the results of patch tests with tixocortol pivalate. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20:158.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Dooms-Goossens AE, Degreef HJ, Marien KJ, Coopman SA. Contact allergy to corticosteroids: A frequently missed diagnosis? J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21:538-43.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Wilkinson SM, Cartwright PH, English JS. Hydrocortisone: An important cutaneous allergen. Lancet 1991;337:761-2.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Keegel T, Saunders H, Milne R, Sajjachareonpong P, Fletcher A, Nixon R. Topical corticosteroid allergy in an urban Australian centre. Contact Dermatitis 2004;50:6-14.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Lutz ME, el-Azhary RA, Gibson LE, Fransway AF. Contact hypersensitivity to tixocortol pivalate. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:691-5.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Baeck M, Chemelle JA, Terreux R, Drieghe J, Goossens A. Delayed hypersensitivity to corticosteroids in a series of 315 patients: Clinical data and patch test results. Contact Dermatitis 2009;61:163-75.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
63

PDF downloads
27
Show Sections