Translate this page into:
Dermoscopic criteria of discoid lupus erythematosus: An observational cross-sectional study of 28 patients
Corresponding author: Dr. Amany Awad, Department of Dermatology, Andrology and STDs, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. ama.awad2007@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Fathy H, Ghanim BM, Refat S, Awad A. Dermoscopic criteria of discoid lupus erythematosus: An observational crosssectional study of 28 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2022;88:360-6.
Abstract
Background:
Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) affects mainly the head and neck and lesions heal with scaring. Early diagnosis of DLE is crucial; dermoscopy may enable early diagnosis and help to assess the prognosis of well-established lesions.
Aims:
To describe the dermoscopic features of DLE and to correlate them with the histological findings, site and duration of DLE.
Material and Method:
This study included 28 patients diagnosed as DLE based on clinical and histopathological examination. We examined the lesions clinically, dermoscopically and histopathologically. Evaluated dermoscopic variables were based on data in the available literature and on our observations.
Results:
Whitish scales (89.3%), arborizing blood vessels (85.7%), follicular plugging (82.1%), and pigmentation (82.1%) were the commonest dermoscopic findings. Radial arrangement of arborizing blood vessel in between a radially arranged perifollicular whitish halo (starburst pattern) (39.3%) was noticed for the first time in this study. Rosettes (57.1%) were also seen. There was significant agreement between many dermoscopic and pathological findings with high sensitivity and specificity of many dermoscopic variants in the diagnosis of DLE. Follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halo, starburst pattern, follicular red dots and rosettes were detected in early stages of the disease but structureless whitish areas and telangiectasia need more time to develop.
Limitations:
We examined our patients at the time of presentation only without prospective monitoring and we had a relatively small sample size.
Conclusion:
Dermoscopy helps in the diagnosis of DLE at different body sites.
Keywords
Dermoscopy
discoid lupus
histopathology of discoid lupus erythematosus
rosettes
starburst pattern
Introduction
Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a subtype of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus affecting mainly the face and scalp in localized disease,1 but widespread involvement on the trunk and limbs may be seen.2 Dermoscopy is a non invasive, rapid and simple tool3 that helps in the early diagnosis of DLE resulting in better response to treatment and prevention of scarring.4
Material and Method
This was an observational cross-sectional study of 28 patients [Table 1], done between October 2015 and November 2016 at the dermatology outpatient clinic of Mansoura University, Egypt. All included patients were diagnosed as DLE based on clinical and histopathological examination. All studied patients had no clinical signs or symptoms suggestive of SLE, and were negative for antinuclear antibodies (ANA). All included patients had typical DLE lesions. Patients who had received topical therapy in the previous month or systemic therapy in the 6 months before recruitment were excluded. We also excluded lesions without a definite histopathological diagnosis of DLE. Consent was taken from all patients before inclusion in the study. This study was done with the approval of the Committee of Research and Ethics and the Scientific Committee.
Demographics and clinical data | values |
---|---|
Duration of disease (years), median (minimum-maximum) | 1.75 (0.08-21.0) |
Age (years), mean±SD | 39.74±8.79 |
Sex, n(%) | |
Female | 20 (71.5) |
Male | 8 (28.5) |
Site of lesion, n(%) | |
Nonscalp* | 14 (50.0) |
Scalp | 14 (50.0) |
Total, n(%) | 28 (100.0) |
All patients were subjected to detailed history taking, general examination and detailed dermatological examination. Dermoscopic examination using polarized light (30×) was done and then a skin biopsy of the same lesion was taken. All slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and were examined by the third author. Dermoscopic images were evaluated by the fourth author followed by the second author and finally by the first author in the case of disagreement. Dermoscopic variables used in the evaluation process were those reported previously with DLE lesions in addition to our preliminary observations as in Table 2 [Figure 1]5,6. The study adopted the terminology approved in the last International Dermoscopy Society consensus7. Variables included in our histopathological examination are shown in Table 3.
Dermoscopy* | n(%) |
---|---|
White patchy scales | 25 (89.3) |
Linear blood vessels | 24 (85.7) |
Follicular plugging | 23 (82.1) |
Speckled pigmentation | 23 (82.1) |
Perifollicular whitish halo | 19 (67.9) |
Structureless whitish areas | 19 (67.9) |
Rosette | 16 (57.1) |
Starburst pattern | 11 (39.3) |
Follicular red dots | 10 (35.7) |
Pathology* | n(%) |
---|---|
Vacuolar interface dermatitis | 28 (100) |
Periadenexal lymphoid infiltrate | 28 (100) |
Follicular hyperkeratosis | 24 (85.7) |
Telangiectasia | 24 (85.7) |
Dermal fibrosis | 23 (82.1) |
Pigmentary incontinence | 22 (78.6) |
Surface hyperkeratosis | 21 (75) |
Perifollicular fibrosis | 21 (75) |
Dermal mucin deposition | 19 (67.9) |
Atrophy | 16 (57.1) |
Spotty parakeratosis | 13 (46.4) |
Perifollicular red blood cells | 10 (35.7) |
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. Tests used were Mann–Whitney U test, validity indices like sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive rate, negative predictive rate and reliability. Kappa coefficient was used to describe the agreement between categorical variables.
Results
Of the 28 studied patients, 20 (71.4%) were females and 8 (28.5%) were males; mean age was 39.7 ± 8.8 years. Fourteen (50%) patients had scalp lesions, 12 (42.9%) patients had lesion on the face, one (3.6%) on the chest and one (3.6%) on the arm. The median duration of lesions was 1.8 years [Table 1]. On dermoscopy, whitish patchy scales (25 cases, 89.3%) were the commonest finding followed by linear blood vessels (24, 85.7%) then follicular plugging (23, 82.1%) and pigmentation (23, 82.1%). Perifollicular whitish halos were observed in 19 (67.9%), white structureless areas in 19 (67.9%), rosettes in 16 (57.1%), a starburst pattern in 11 (39.3%) and follicular red dots in 10 (35.7%) of the studied patients [Table 2] [Figure 1]. Histopathology showed vacuolar interface dermatitis and periadenexal and perifollicular lymphoid infiltrate in 28 (100%) patients, follicular hyperkeratosis in 24 (85.7%), telangiectasia in 24 (85.7%), dermal fibrosis in 23 (82.1%), pigmentary incontinence in 22 (78.6%), perifollicular fibrosis in 21 (75%), surface hyperkeratosis in 21 (75%), dermal mucin deposition in 19 (67.9%), atrophy in 16 (57.1%), spotty parakeratosis in 13 (46.4%) and perifollicular red blood cells in 10 (35.7%) patients [Table 3]. The results show significant agreement between many of the dermoscopic and pathological findings with high sensitivity especially for follicular plugging, linear blood vessels, scales, pigmentation and follicular red dots and high specificity for follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halo, follicular red dots and linear blood vessels in the diagnosis of DLE [Table 4]. The study shows that follicular plugging, follicular red dots and starburst pattern [Figures 2, 3] are abundant in lesions with short history in contrast to linear blood vessels and structureless whitish areas which are more in lesions with long history [Table 5], [Figures 4, 5, 6]. With respect to the site of the DLE lesions, follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halos and a starburst pattern showed highly significant correlations for lesions outside the scalp [Figures 2, 5] in contrast to structureless whitish areas which appeared more on scalp lesions [Table 6], [Figures 3, 4].
Dermoscopy | Pathology | Kappa coefficient | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | Accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Follicular plugging (n=23) | Follicular hyperkeratosis (n=24) | 0.868* | 95.8 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 80.0 | 96.4 |
Perifollicular whitish halo (n=19) | Perifollicular fibrosis (n=21) | 0.652 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 94.7 | 66.67 | 85.7 |
Linear blood vessels (n=24) | Telangiectasia (n=24) | 0.71* | 95.8 | 75.0 | 95.8 | 75.0 | 92.8 |
Scales (n=25) | Hyperkeratosis (n=21) | 0.29 | 95.2 | 28.6 | 80.0 | 66.7 | 78.6 |
Pigmentation (n=23) | Pigment incontinence (n=22) | 0.66 | 95.5 | 66.7 | 91.3 | 80.0 | 89.3 |
Structureless whitish areas (n=19) | Dermal fibrosis (n=23) | 0.258 | 73.9 | 60.0 | 89.5 | 33.3 | 71.4 |
Follicular red dots (n=10) | Perifollicular red blood cell extravasation (n=10) | 0.844* | 90.0 | 94.4 | 90.0 | 94.4 | 92.9 |
Rosettes (n=16) | Spotty parakeratosis (n=13) | 0.22 | 69.2 | 53.3 | 56.2 | 66.7 | 60.7 |
Dermoscopy | Pathology | 0.601 | 88.6 | 71.2 | 88.1 | 72.3 | 83.5 |
Dermoscopic characters | Duration (years), median (minimum-maximum) | Test of significance |
---|---|---|
Follicular plugging | ||
Absent | 12.0 (4.0-20.0) | Z=2.7, |
Present | 1.0 (0.08-21.0) | P=0.008* |
Perifollicular whitish halo | ||
Absent | 3.0 (1.0-20.0) | Z=1.6, |
Present | 1.0 (0.08-21.0) | P=0.12 |
Linear blood vessels | ||
Absent | 0.34 (0.16-1.0) | Z=2.1, |
Present | 2.5 (0.08-21.0) | P=0.03* |
Scales | ||
Absent | 4.0 (0.42-4.0) | Z=0.22, |
Present | 1.5 (0.08-21.0) | P=0.82 |
Pigmentation | ||
Absent | 4.0 (0.25-20.0) | Z=0.33, |
Present | 1.5 (0.085-21.0) | P=0.74 |
Structureless whitish areas | ||
Absent | 0.25 (0.08-3.0) | Z=3.22, |
Present | 4.0 (0.42-21.0) | P=0.001** |
Follicular red dots | ||
Absent | 4.0 (0.08-21.0) | Z=2.04, |
Present | 0.915 (0.16-3.0) | P=0.04* |
Rosette | ||
Absent | 4.0 (0.08-20.0) | Z=1.6, |
Present | 1.0 (0.16-21.0) | P=0.1 |
Starburst pattern | ||
Absent | 4.0 (0.08-21.0) | Z=2.07, |
Present | 0.42 (0.16-10.0) | P=0.03* |
Dermoscopic characters | Nonscalp, n(%) | Scalp, n(%) | Test of significance |
---|---|---|---|
Follicular plugging | |||
Absent | 0 (0.0) | 5 (35.7) | FET, P=0.04* |
Present | 14 (100.0) | 9 (64.3) | |
Perifollicular whitish halo | |||
Absent | 2 (14.3) | 7 (50.0) | 4.09, P=0.043* |
Present | 12 (85.7) | 7 (50.0) | |
Linear blood vessels | |||
Absent | 3 (21.4) | 1 (7.1) | FET, P=0.59 |
Present | 11 (78.6) | 13 (92.9) | |
Scales | |||
Absent | 1 (7.1) | 2 (14.3) | FET, P=1.0 |
Present | 13 (92.9) | 12 (85.7) | |
Pigmentation | |||
Absent | 2 (14.3) | 3 (21.4) | FET, P=1.0 |
Present | 12 (85.7) | 11 (78.6) | |
Structureless whitish areas | |||
Absent | 8 (57.1) | 1 (7.1) | χ2=8.02, |
Present | 6 (42.9) | 13 (92.9) | P=0.005** |
Follicular red dots | |||
Absent | 7 (50.0) | 11 (78.6) | χ2=2.5, P=0.15 |
Present | 7 (50.0) | 3 (21.4) | |
Rosette | |||
Absent | 4 (28.6) | 8 (57.1) | χ2=2.3, P=0.13 |
Present | 10 (71.4) | 6 (42.9) | |
Starburst pattern | |||
Absent | 3 (21.4) | 14 (100.0) | FET, P<0.001** |
Present | 11 (78.6) | 0 (0.0) |
Discussion
Dermoscopy of the studied DLE lesions showed that whitish patchy scales, linear blood vessels, follicular plugging and pigmentation were the most frequent findings [Figures 4, 5]. A previous study with a larger sample size and shorter duration than our study which included lesions outside the scalp reported that perifollicular whitish halos, follicular plugging and telangiectasia were the most frequent findings in DLE.5 Large yellow dots, thick arborizing vessels and scattered dark brown discolouration of the skin were reported to be the most characteristic features of scalp DLE.8 Perifollicular whitish halos, white structureless areas [Figure 6] and follicular red dots [Figures 2, 3] were found in this study, in agreement with previous studies.5,6
Rosettes [Figures 2, 3] were a dermoscopic finding in recent-onset DLE lesions in our study (16 patients, 57.1%). They were reported previously only in one patient in a previous report.6 Another study recently described rosettes in 3 cases of DLE.9 We tried to correlate rosettes on dermoscopy with spotty parakeratosis on histopathology which we thought might have caused the optical reaction with polarized light, but the results were insignificant. Follicular hyperkeratosis which occur at the middle of the hair follicle and the heavy infiltration around the sebaceous gland insertion have been suggested to be the source of the optical reaction but this was not based on statistical data.9 Rosettes were also suggested to result from the optical effect of crossed polarisation with the horny material in smaller rosettes but perifollicular fibrosis is responsible for the larger ones which can be noticed in many tumours and inflammatory skin lesions including DLE; therefore, rosettes are not lesion-specific.10
A starburst pattern was a new dermoscopic feature of DLE in this study [Figures 2, 3] (11 patients, 39.3%). We noticed that it was more frequent in recent-onset DLE lesions located outside scalp. This pattern may be related to the pathological changes due to inflammation (inflammatory infiltrate and dilated blood vessels) around hair follicles.
We found good correlation between many of our dermoscopic findings and their corresponding pathological findings. These findings are in agreement with a previous report.5The results of this study revealed high sensitivity of follicular plugging (95.8%) and linear blood vessels (95.8%) and high specificity of follicular plugging (100%) and follicular red dots (94.4%) to the diagnosis of DLE with overall 88.6% sensitivity, 71.2% specificity and 83.5% accuracy. These results are in agreement with a previous study regarding the sensitivity of the scalling and specificity of dermoscopy in detecting DLE with lower sensitivity of other findings such as follicular plugging, linear blood vessels, pigmentation and follicular red dots.11 However, they had a small sample size and included only DLE lesions located on the scalp.11
We found that dermoscopic findings of DLE differ according to disease duration. Follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halos, starburst pattern, follicular red dots and rosettes are detected in the early stages of the disease but structureless whitish areas and telangiectasia apparently develop over time. These findings are consistent with the previous report.5 Our study also showed that follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halos, starburst pattern, follicular red dots and rosettes are more frequent in DLE lesions outside the scalp, in contrast to telangiectasia and white structureless areas which are more frequent in scalp lesions. This too is consistent with the previous report that included cases with DLE located only outside the scalp,5 which the authors compared with studies of scalp DLE. Our study included both scalp and non-scalp lesions. These findings may be due to early presentation of patients with DLE on the face due to easy visibility of lesions and cosmetic concerns.
This study records the starburst pattern as a new feature of DLE. This finding was seen in 39.3% of DLE patients, especially in recent-onset and facial lesions. We also frequently noted rosettes, a relatively new finding with only four previously reported cases in the literature.
DLE can be differentiated on dermoscopy from subacute cutaneous lupus which shows whitish scaling associated with mixed vascular pattern with the absence of pigmentation and follicular plugging.12 Other inflammatory and granulomatous diseases can also be differentiated: sarcoidosis shows diffuse or localized, structureless, orange areas and well-focused linear or branching vessels; granuloma annulare shows unfocused vessels on a pinkish-reddish background and focal or diffuse yellowish-orange and whitish areas; cutaneous leishmaniasis is characterized by polymorphic vascularization, erythema, whitish or yellowish follicular plugs with rounded, oval, or tear-drop shape, white starburst-like pattern, scales and crusts13 and lastly granuloma faciale shows prominent follicles, branching linear vessels and brown globules.14
Limitations
We examined our patients at the time of presentation only with out prospective or retrospective monitoring of the effect of duration of the disease on each lesion. Also we included a relatively small sample size. But the interesting point in our study is that it’s the first study to include scalp and non scalp DLE cases in contrast to previous reports that included either scalp or non scalp DLE lesions.
Conclusion
Our study helps early diagnosis of DLE at different sites of the body. Early diagnosis and treatment result in decreasing the rate of scarring.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- Clinical and dermoscopic spectrum of discoid lupus erythematosus: Novel observations from lips and oral mucosa. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57:830-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The skin in autoimmune diseases-Unmet needs. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15:948-54.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dermatoscopy for the rapid diagnosis of Talaromyces marneffei infection: A case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:707.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Discoid Lupus Erythematosus. In: InClinical Cases in Skin of Color. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. :3-13.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dermoscopy of discoid lupus erythematosus. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:284-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dermoscopy of discoid lupus erythematosus. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016;7:458.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Standardization of dermoscopic terminology and basic dermoscopic parameters to evaluate in general dermatology (non-neoplastic dermatoses): An expert consensus on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. Br J Dermatol 2019. doi:10.1111/bjd.18125.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White rosettes in discoid lupus erythematosus: A new dermoscopic observation. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2017;7:9-11.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosettes and other white shiny structures in polarized dermoscopy: Histological correlate and optical explanation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:311-3.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Validity of trichoscopy in the diagnosis of primary cicatricial alopecias. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55:1106-14.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dermoscopy of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55:e605-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dermatoscopy of granulomatous disorders. Dermatol Clin. 2018;36:369-75.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dermoscopy of granuloma faciale: A description of a new finding. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93:587-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]