Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Brief Report
88 (
3
); 360-366
doi:
10.25259/IJDVL_207_19
pmid:
35138063

Dermoscopic criteria of discoid lupus erythematosus: An observational cross-sectional study of 28 patients

Department of Dermatology, Andrology and STDs, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Corresponding author: Dr. Amany Awad, Department of Dermatology, Andrology and STDs, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. ama.awad2007@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Fathy H, Ghanim BM, Refat S, Awad A. Dermoscopic criteria of discoid lupus erythematosus: An observational crosssectional study of 28 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2022;88:360-6.

Abstract

Background:

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) affects mainly the head and neck and lesions heal with scaring. Early diagnosis of DLE is crucial; dermoscopy may enable early diagnosis and help to assess the prognosis of well-established lesions.

Aims:

To describe the dermoscopic features of DLE and to correlate them with the histological findings, site and duration of DLE.

Material and Method:

This study included 28 patients diagnosed as DLE based on clinical and histopathological examination. We examined the lesions clinically, dermoscopically and histopathologically. Evaluated dermoscopic variables were based on data in the available literature and on our observations.

Results:

Whitish scales (89.3%), arborizing blood vessels (85.7%), follicular plugging (82.1%), and pigmentation (82.1%) were the commonest dermoscopic findings. Radial arrangement of arborizing blood vessel in between a radially arranged perifollicular whitish halo (starburst pattern) (39.3%) was noticed for the first time in this study. Rosettes (57.1%) were also seen. There was significant agreement between many dermoscopic and pathological findings with high sensitivity and specificity of many dermoscopic variants in the diagnosis of DLE. Follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halo, starburst pattern, follicular red dots and rosettes were detected in early stages of the disease but structureless whitish areas and telangiectasia need more time to develop.

Limitations:

We examined our patients at the time of presentation only without prospective monitoring and we had a relatively small sample size.

Conclusion:

Dermoscopy helps in the diagnosis of DLE at different body sites.

Keywords

Dermoscopy
discoid lupus
histopathology of discoid lupus erythematosus
rosettes
starburst pattern

Introduction

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a subtype of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus affecting mainly the face and scalp in localized disease,1 but widespread involvement on the trunk and limbs may be seen.2 Dermoscopy is a non invasive, rapid and simple tool3 that helps in the early diagnosis of DLE resulting in better response to treatment and prevention of scarring.4

Material and Method

This was an observational cross-sectional study of 28 patients [Table 1], done between October 2015 and November 2016 at the dermatology outpatient clinic of Mansoura University, Egypt. All included patients were diagnosed as DLE based on clinical and histopathological examination. All studied patients had no clinical signs or symptoms suggestive of SLE, and were negative for antinuclear antibodies (ANA). All included patients had typical DLE lesions. Patients who had received topical therapy in the previous month or systemic therapy in the 6 months before recruitment were excluded. We also excluded lesions without a definite histopathological diagnosis of DLE. Consent was taken from all patients before inclusion in the study. This study was done with the approval of the Committee of Research and Ethics and the Scientific Committee.

Table 1:: Demographics and clinical data of the studied cases
Demographics and clinical data values
Duration of disease (years), median (minimum-maximum) 1.75 (0.08-21.0)
Age (years), mean±SD 39.74±8.79
Sex, n(%)
Female 20 (71.5)
Male 8 (28.5)
Site of lesion, n(%)
Nonscalp* 14 (50.0)
Scalp 14 (50.0)
Total, n(%) 28 (100.0)
12 face, 1 arm, 1 chest. SD: Standard deviation

All patients were subjected to detailed history taking, general examination and detailed dermatological examination. Dermoscopic examination using polarized light (30×) was done and then a skin biopsy of the same lesion was taken. All slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and were examined by the third author. Dermoscopic images were evaluated by the fourth author followed by the second author and finally by the first author in the case of disagreement. Dermoscopic variables used in the evaluation process were those reported previously with DLE lesions in addition to our preliminary observations as in Table 2 [Figure 1]5,6. The study adopted the terminology approved in the last International Dermoscopy Society consensus7. Variables included in our histopathological examination are shown in Table 3.

Table 2:: Dermoscopic features of the studied discoid lupus erythematosus lesions (n=28)
Dermoscopy* n(%)
White patchy scales 25 (89.3)
Linear blood vessels 24 (85.7)
Follicular plugging 23 (82.1)
Speckled pigmentation 23 (82.1)
Perifollicular whitish halo 19 (67.9)
Structureless whitish areas 19 (67.9)
Rosette 16 (57.1)
Starburst pattern 11 (39.3)
Follicular red dots 10 (35.7)
Categories are not mutually exclusive
Table 3:: Pathology results of studied discoid lupus erythematosus lesions
Pathology* n(%)
Vacuolar interface dermatitis 28 (100)
Periadenexal lymphoid infiltrate 28 (100)
Follicular hyperkeratosis 24 (85.7)
Telangiectasia 24 (85.7)
Dermal fibrosis 23 (82.1)
Pigmentary incontinence 22 (78.6)
Surface hyperkeratosis 21 (75)
Perifollicular fibrosis 21 (75)
Dermal mucin deposition 19 (67.9)
Atrophy 16 (57.1)
Spotty parakeratosis 13 (46.4)
Perifollicular red blood cells 10 (35.7)
Categories are not mutually exclusive
Figure 1:: Dermoscopic features of discoid lupus erythematosus. (1) follicular plugging, (2) follicular red dots, (3) perifollicular whitish halo, (4) linear blood vessels, (5) pigmentation, (6) rosettes, and (7) starburst pattern

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. Tests used were Mann–Whitney U test, validity indices like sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive rate, negative predictive rate and reliability. Kappa coefficient was used to describe the agreement between categorical variables.

Results

Of the 28 studied patients, 20 (71.4%) were females and 8 (28.5%) were males; mean age was 39.7 ± 8.8 years. Fourteen (50%) patients had scalp lesions, 12 (42.9%) patients had lesion on the face, one (3.6%) on the chest and one (3.6%) on the arm. The median duration of lesions was 1.8 years [Table 1]. On dermoscopy, whitish patchy scales (25 cases, 89.3%) were the commonest finding followed by linear blood vessels (24, 85.7%) then follicular plugging (23, 82.1%) and pigmentation (23, 82.1%). Perifollicular whitish halos were observed in 19 (67.9%), white structureless areas in 19 (67.9%), rosettes in 16 (57.1%), a starburst pattern in 11 (39.3%) and follicular red dots in 10 (35.7%) of the studied patients [Table 2] [Figure 1]. Histopathology showed vacuolar interface dermatitis and periadenexal and perifollicular lymphoid infiltrate in 28 (100%) patients, follicular hyperkeratosis in 24 (85.7%), telangiectasia in 24 (85.7%), dermal fibrosis in 23 (82.1%), pigmentary incontinence in 22 (78.6%), perifollicular fibrosis in 21 (75%), surface hyperkeratosis in 21 (75%), dermal mucin deposition in 19 (67.9%), atrophy in 16 (57.1%), spotty parakeratosis in 13 (46.4%) and perifollicular red blood cells in 10 (35.7%) patients [Table 3]. The results show significant agreement between many of the dermoscopic and pathological findings with high sensitivity especially for follicular plugging, linear blood vessels, scales, pigmentation and follicular red dots and high specificity for follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halo, follicular red dots and linear blood vessels in the diagnosis of DLE [Table 4]. The study shows that follicular plugging, follicular red dots and starburst pattern [Figures 2, 3] are abundant in lesions with short history in contrast to linear blood vessels and structureless whitish areas which are more in lesions with long history [Table 5], [Figures 4, 5, 6]. With respect to the site of the DLE lesions, follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halos and a starburst pattern showed highly significant correlations for lesions outside the scalp [Figures 2, 5] in contrast to structureless whitish areas which appeared more on scalp lesions [Table 6], [Figures 3, 4].

Figure 2a:: Recent-onset discoid lupus erythematosus lesion on the face
Figure 2b:: Follicular plugging (white arrow), follicular red dots which suggest perifollicular inflammation which in turn indicates active disease (black arrow), whitish patchy scales (red arrow), starburst pattern (yellow arrow) and rosettes (blue arrow) (polarised × 30)
Figure 2c:: Surface hyperkeratosis, follicular hyperkeratosis, vacuolar interface dermatitis, perifollicular lymphoid infiltrate, wide dermal blood vessels and dermal mucin deposition (H and E, ×100)
Figure 3a:: A recent onset discoid lupus erythematosus lesion on the scalp
Figure 3b:: Follicular plugging (blue arrow), follicular red dots (red arrow), rosettes (white arrow), whitish globules (yellow arrow), starburst pattern (green arrow) (polarised × 30)
Figure 3c:: Vacuolar interface dermatitis, dilated dermal blood vessel, dermal mucin deposition, extravasation of red blood cells (H and E,×100)
Figure 4a:: A long-standing discoid lupus erythematosus lesion on the scalp
Figure 4b:: Follicular plugging (blue arrow), telangiectasia (red arrow), whitish-pink background (white arrow) and whitish patchy scales (yellow arrow) (polarised × 30)
Figure 4c:: Surface hyperkeratosis, follicular hyperkeratosis, vacuolar interface dermatitis, dilated blood vessels, periadenexal lymphoid infiltrate, pigment incontinence and fibrosis (H and E,×100)
Figure 5a:: Long-standing discoid lupus erythematosus lesion of the arm
Figure 5b:: Whitish globules indicate empty follicles (white arrow), arborizing blood vessels (red arrow), speckled pigmentation (black arrow), whitish scales (green arrow) and follicular plugging (blue arrow) (polarised × 30)
Figure 5c:: Surface hyperkeratosis, spotty parakeratosis, follicular hyperkeratosis, periadenexal lymphocytic infiltrate, vacuolar interface dermatitis, dermal fibrosis, dilated dermal blood vessels and pigmentary incontinence (H and E, ×100)
Figure 6a:: Chronic discoid lupus erythematosus lesion on the face of 20 years duration
Figure 6b:: Low number of follicular plugs (blue arrow) and whitish globules (white arrow) (polarised × 30)
Figure 6c:: Extensive surface and follicular hyperkeratosis, periadenexal lymphoid infiltrate, vacuolar interface dermatitis, dermal fibrosis and dilated dermal blood vessels (H and E,×200)
Table 4:: Validity and agreement between dermoscopic and pathological findings
Dermoscopy Pathology Kappa coefficient Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Positive predictive value (%) Negative predictive value (%) Accuracy (%)
Follicular plugging (n=23) Follicular hyperkeratosis (n=24) 0.868* 95.8 100.0 100.0 80.0 96.4
Perifollicular whitish halo (n=19) Perifollicular fibrosis (n=21) 0.652 85.7 85.7 94.7 66.67 85.7
Linear blood vessels (n=24) Telangiectasia (n=24) 0.71* 95.8 75.0 95.8 75.0 92.8
Scales (n=25) Hyperkeratosis (n=21) 0.29 95.2 28.6 80.0 66.7 78.6
Pigmentation (n=23) Pigment incontinence (n=22) 0.66 95.5 66.7 91.3 80.0 89.3
Structureless whitish areas (n=19) Dermal fibrosis (n=23) 0.258 73.9 60.0 89.5 33.3 71.4
Follicular red dots (n=10) Perifollicular red blood cell extravasation (n=10) 0.844* 90.0 94.4 90.0 94.4 92.9
Rosettes (n=16) Spotty parakeratosis (n=13) 0.22 69.2 53.3 56.2 66.7 60.7
Dermoscopy Pathology 0.601 88.6 71.2 88.1 72.3 83.5
Kappa coefficient >0.7 (n) out of 28
Table 5:: Variation of duration of lesions according to dermoscopic findings
Dermoscopic characters Duration (years), median (minimum-maximum) Test of significance
Follicular plugging
Absent 12.0 (4.0-20.0) Z=2.7,
Present 1.0 (0.08-21.0) P=0.008*
Perifollicular whitish halo
Absent 3.0 (1.0-20.0) Z=1.6,
Present 1.0 (0.08-21.0) P=0.12
Linear blood vessels
Absent 0.34 (0.16-1.0) Z=2.1,
Present 2.5 (0.08-21.0) P=0.03*
Scales
Absent 4.0 (0.42-4.0) Z=0.22,
Present 1.5 (0.08-21.0) P=0.82
Pigmentation
Absent 4.0 (0.25-20.0) Z=0.33,
Present 1.5 (0.085-21.0) P=0.74
Structureless whitish areas
Absent 0.25 (0.08-3.0) Z=3.22,
Present 4.0 (0.42-21.0) P=0.001**
Follicular red dots
Absent 4.0 (0.08-21.0) Z=2.04,
Present 0.915 (0.16-3.0) P=0.04*
Rosette
Absent 4.0 (0.08-20.0) Z=1.6,
Present 1.0 (0.16-21.0) P=0.1
Starburst pattern
Absent 4.0 (0.08-21.0) Z=2.07,
Present 0.42 (0.16-10.0) P=0.03*
P-value significant <0.05. Z: Mann-Whitney U-test
Table 6:: Dermoscopic characters according to lesion site (n=14)
Dermoscopic characters Nonscalp, n(%) Scalp, n(%) Test of significance
Follicular plugging
Absent 0 (0.0) 5 (35.7) FET, P=0.04*
Present 14 (100.0) 9 (64.3)
Perifollicular whitish halo
Absent 2 (14.3) 7 (50.0) 4.09, P=0.043*
Present 12 (85.7) 7 (50.0)
Linear blood vessels
Absent 3 (21.4) 1 (7.1) FET, P=0.59
Present 11 (78.6) 13 (92.9)
Scales
Absent 1 (7.1) 2 (14.3) FET, P=1.0
Present 13 (92.9) 12 (85.7)
Pigmentation
Absent 2 (14.3) 3 (21.4) FET, P=1.0
Present 12 (85.7) 11 (78.6)
Structureless whitish areas
Absent 8 (57.1) 1 (7.1) χ2=8.02,
Present 6 (42.9) 13 (92.9) P=0.005**
Follicular red dots
Absent 7 (50.0) 11 (78.6) χ2=2.5, P=0.15
Present 7 (50.0) 3 (21.4)
Rosette
Absent 4 (28.6) 8 (57.1) χ2=2.3, P=0.13
Present 10 (71.4) 6 (42.9)
Starburst pattern
Absent 3 (21.4) 14 (100.0) FET, P<0.001**
Present 11 (78.6) 0 (0.0)
High statistically significant, *P value significant <0.05. FET: Fischer’s exact test, χ2: Chi-square test

Discussion

Dermoscopy of the studied DLE lesions showed that whitish patchy scales, linear blood vessels, follicular plugging and pigmentation were the most frequent findings [Figures 4, 5]. A previous study with a larger sample size and shorter duration than our study which included lesions outside the scalp reported that perifollicular whitish halos, follicular plugging and telangiectasia were the most frequent findings in DLE.5 Large yellow dots, thick arborizing vessels and scattered dark brown discolouration of the skin were reported to be the most characteristic features of scalp DLE.8 Perifollicular whitish halos, white structureless areas [Figure 6] and follicular red dots [Figures 2, 3] were found in this study, in agreement with previous studies.5,6

Rosettes [Figures 2, 3] were a dermoscopic finding in recent-onset DLE lesions in our study (16 patients, 57.1%). They were reported previously only in one patient in a previous report.6 Another study recently described rosettes in 3 cases of DLE.9 We tried to correlate rosettes on dermoscopy with spotty parakeratosis on histopathology which we thought might have caused the optical reaction with polarized light, but the results were insignificant. Follicular hyperkeratosis which occur at the middle of the hair follicle and the heavy infiltration around the sebaceous gland insertion have been suggested to be the source of the optical reaction but this was not based on statistical data.9 Rosettes were also suggested to result from the optical effect of crossed polarisation with the horny material in smaller rosettes but perifollicular fibrosis is responsible for the larger ones which can be noticed in many tumours and inflammatory skin lesions including DLE; therefore, rosettes are not lesion-specific.10

A starburst pattern was a new dermoscopic feature of DLE in this study [Figures 2, 3] (11 patients, 39.3%). We noticed that it was more frequent in recent-onset DLE lesions located outside scalp. This pattern may be related to the pathological changes due to inflammation (inflammatory infiltrate and dilated blood vessels) around hair follicles.

We found good correlation between many of our dermoscopic findings and their corresponding pathological findings. These findings are in agreement with a previous report.5The results of this study revealed high sensitivity of follicular plugging (95.8%) and linear blood vessels (95.8%) and high specificity of follicular plugging (100%) and follicular red dots (94.4%) to the diagnosis of DLE with overall 88.6% sensitivity, 71.2% specificity and 83.5% accuracy. These results are in agreement with a previous study regarding the sensitivity of the scalling and specificity of dermoscopy in detecting DLE with lower sensitivity of other findings such as follicular plugging, linear blood vessels, pigmentation and follicular red dots.11 However, they had a small sample size and included only DLE lesions located on the scalp.11

We found that dermoscopic findings of DLE differ according to disease duration. Follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halos, starburst pattern, follicular red dots and rosettes are detected in the early stages of the disease but structureless whitish areas and telangiectasia apparently develop over time. These findings are consistent with the previous report.5 Our study also showed that follicular plugging, perifollicular whitish halos, starburst pattern, follicular red dots and rosettes are more frequent in DLE lesions outside the scalp, in contrast to telangiectasia and white structureless areas which are more frequent in scalp lesions. This too is consistent with the previous report that included cases with DLE located only outside the scalp,5 which the authors compared with studies of scalp DLE. Our study included both scalp and non-scalp lesions. These findings may be due to early presentation of patients with DLE on the face due to easy visibility of lesions and cosmetic concerns.

This study records the starburst pattern as a new feature of DLE. This finding was seen in 39.3% of DLE patients, especially in recent-onset and facial lesions. We also frequently noted rosettes, a relatively new finding with only four previously reported cases in the literature.

DLE can be differentiated on dermoscopy from subacute cutaneous lupus which shows whitish scaling associated with mixed vascular pattern with the absence of pigmentation and follicular plugging.12 Other inflammatory and granulomatous diseases can also be differentiated: sarcoidosis shows diffuse or localized, structureless, orange areas and well-focused linear or branching vessels; granuloma annulare shows unfocused vessels on a pinkish-reddish background and focal or diffuse yellowish-orange and whitish areas; cutaneous leishmaniasis is characterized by polymorphic vascularization, erythema, whitish or yellowish follicular plugs with rounded, oval, or tear-drop shape, white starburst-like pattern, scales and crusts13 and lastly granuloma faciale shows prominent follicles, branching linear vessels and brown globules.14

Limitations

We examined our patients at the time of presentation only with out prospective or retrospective monitoring of the effect of duration of the disease on each lesion. Also we included a relatively small sample size. But the interesting point in our study is that it’s the first study to include scalp and non scalp DLE cases in contrast to previous reports that included either scalp or non scalp DLE lesions.

Conclusion

Our study helps early diagnosis of DLE at different sites of the body. Early diagnosis and treatment result in decreasing the rate of scarring.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. . Clinical and dermoscopic spectrum of discoid lupus erythematosus: Novel observations from lips and oral mucosa. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57:830-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . The skin in autoimmune diseases-Unmet needs. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15:948-54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Dermatoscopy for the rapid diagnosis of Talaromyces marneffei infection: A case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:707.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Discoid Lupus Erythematosus. In: InClinical Cases in Skin of Color. Cham: Springer; . p. 3-13.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Dermoscopy of discoid lupus erythematosus. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:284-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Dermoscopy of discoid lupus erythematosus. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016;7:458.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Standardization of dermoscopic terminology and basic dermoscopic parameters to evaluate in general dermatology (non-neoplastic dermatoses): An expert consensus on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. 2019. doi:10.1111/bjd.18125.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Blood vessels In: Atlas of Trichoscopy. London: Springer; .
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . White rosettes in discoid lupus erythematosus: A new dermoscopic observation. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2017;7:9-11.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Rosettes and other white shiny structures in polarized dermoscopy: Histological correlate and optical explanation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:311-3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Validity of trichoscopy in the diagnosis of primary cicatricial alopecias. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55:1106-14.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Dermoscopy of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55:e605-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Dermatoscopy of granulomatous disorders. Dermatol Clin. 2018;36:369-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Dermoscopy of granuloma faciale: A description of a new finding. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93:587-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections