Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
2015:81:6;608-610
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.168343
PMID: 26515841

Dermoscopy of aggressive basal cell carcinomas

Mirjana Popadic
 Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Clinic of Dermatovenereology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Correspondence Address:
Mirjana Popadic
Dermatovenereologist, Pasterova 2, Belgrade
Serbia
How to cite this article:
Popadic M. Dermoscopy of aggressive basal cell carcinomas. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2015;81:608-610
Copyright: (C)2015 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Sir,

The histological subtype of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most important factor used to determine the best treatment modality. Although up to 26 histological subtypes of basal cell carcinoma have been identified, only three of these (nodular, superficial and aggressive) are relevant to determining the appropriate treatment choice.[1] Superficial and nodular basal cell carcinoma, both usually demonstrate an indolent growth pattern and have a low-risk for incomplete treatment and recurrence. The third, a high-risk subtype, includes all basal cell carcinomas that exhibit aggressive-growth such as infiltrative, morpheaform, micronodular and basal cell carcinoma with squamous differentiation.[2] The “aggressive-growth” subtypes are characterized by an infiltrative growth pattern that has poor circumscription and tendency for perineural and perivascular invasion leading to difficulty in surgical eradication and consequent high recurrence rates.[2]

Early diagnosis and accurate treatment are essential to reduce morbidity and prevent recurrence/metastasis. Dermoscopic examination, by providing additional morphological information, can aid the clinical diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. However, the significance of dermoscopy in determining the aggressiveness of basal cell carcinoma remains to be elucidated.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the dermoscopic patterns of aggressive basal cell carcinoma and to investigate the possible role of dermoscopy in identifying the aggressive nature of the tumor.

Seven histopathologically proven aggressive basal cell carcinomas (4 morpheaform and 3 infiltrative) were identified and closely analyzed, using DermLite FOTO Equipment at 10-fold magnification.[3] Each aggressive tumor was evaluated for the presence of various dermoscopic features relevant for the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. In mixed-type lesions, the superiority rule was applied according to the most unfavorable subtype: aggressive > nonaggressive. Almost all were primary tumors except one that was a recurrent basal cell carcinoma (infiltrative type).

Males were predominantly affected in both variants of aggressive tumors [Table - 1]. Patients with infiltrative basal cell carcinoma were older (mean age 72 years; range 65–76 years) than patients with morpheaform basal cell carcinoma (mean age 66.5 years; range 51–78 years).

Table 1: Demographic, clinical and dermoscopic characteristic of aggressive basal cell carcinomas

All tumors were located in the head/neck region. Morpheaform basal cell carcinomas were larger (mean diameter 4.07 cm; range, 1.8–7 cm) than infiltrative basal cell carcinoma (mean diameter 2.9 cm; range, 1.2–4.5 cm), with a longer history of duration (78 months, range = 36–120 months), compared to infiltrative basal cell carcinomas (8.7 months, range = 2–12 months) [Table - 1].

The most frequently detected features in morpheaform basal cell carcinoma were milky-red background and arborizing microvessels (4/4, 100%), followed by short fine telangiectasias (SFT), white areas and structureless hypopigmentation (3/4, 75%). Structureless hyperpigmentation, white lines and multiple erosions were rarer findings (2/4, 50%) [Figure - 1] and [Figure - 2].[3]

Figure 1: Morpheaform basal cell carcinoma. On dermoscopy, numerous arborizing telangiectatic vessels and areas of structureless hypo/hyperpigmentation are seen
Figure 2: Morpheaform basal cell carcinoma. On dermoscopy, a milky-red background, with arborizing telangiectatic vessels, short fine telangiectatic vessels, white lines, structureless hypopigmentation and multiple small erosions are seen

All three infiltrative basal cell carcinomas demonstrated multiple erosions and white areas (3/3, 100%). Arborizing vessels/microvessels, multiple blue-gray globules and structureless hyperpigmentation were found in 2 of 3 (66.7%) infiltrative basal cell carcinomas [Figure - 3]a and [Figure - 3]b.[3]

Figure 3: Infiltrative basal cell carcinomas. (a) Flat clinical presentation with typical dermoscopic features in thin tumors (milky-red background, short fine telangiectatic vessels) in combination with white structures. (b) Nodular clinical presentation: Numerous pigmented features with structureless hypo/hyperpigmentation are identified

Pyne et al., established that aggressive basal cell carcinoma tends to have no or less pink within the tumor area and absent or few vessels in the central tumor area compared to other subtypes.[4] A recent study that investigated correlation of dermoscopic findings with different histopathologic variants of basal cell carcinoma showed that dermoscopy had a low sensitivity to detect risk of recurrence.[5] Arborizing vessels was found to be the main dermoscopic finding in infiltrative basal cell carcinoma and truncated vessels and globules in micronodular basal cell carcinoma.[5]

This article confirms that dermoscopy is useful in the detection of basal cell carcinoma with limited impact in discriminating aggressive basal cell carcinomas from the non-aggressive ones. Detailed dermoscopic analysis did not reveal any distinct feature that would point to the aggressive nature of tumors. In the infiltrative basal cell carcinomas that were evaluated, the presence of dermoscopic features correlated with tumor thickness. In the clinically thicker parts of infiltrative basal cell carcinomas, multiple erosions and pigmented features were identified, whereas in the thin parts of tumors white areas were frequently found.

Similar dermoscopic features were also seen in morpheaform basal cell carcinomas with one important difference, the flat parts of tumors had well developed, branched arborizing vessels, in contrast to the domination of short fine telangiectasias in flat, superficial basal cell carcinoma. This could be explained by deeper infiltration of tumor cells and consequently increasing vascular needs of the tumor tissue. Furthermore, white areas/lines were a striking feature, also localized to the flat parts of lesions. This probably correlates with prominent collagen in the tumor stroma of morpheaform basal cell carcinoma.

In conclusion, dermoscopy appears to be of limited diagnostic value to determine the aggressive histological nature of basal cell carcinoma, though larger comparative studies are required to ascertain its value.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References
1.
Wade TR, Ackerman AB. The many faces of basal-cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1978;4:23-8.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Crowson AN. Basal cell carcinoma: Biology, morphology and clinical implications. Mod Pathol 2006;19 Suppl 2:S127-47.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Popadic M. Dermoscopic features in different morphologic types of basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 2014;40:725-32.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Pyne J, Sapkota D, Wong JC. Aggressive basal cell carcinoma: dermatoscopy vascular features as clues to the diagnosis. Dermatol Pract Concept 2012;2:203a02.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Verduzco-Martínez AP, Quiñones-Venegas R, Guevara-Gutiérrez E, Tlacuilo-Parra A. Correlation of dermoscopic findings with histopathologic variants of basal cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol 2013;52:718-21.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
84

PDF downloads
27
Show Sections