Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
2019:85:5;546-548
doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_776_18
PMID: 31368451

Diagnostic role of dermatoscopy in porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus

Nilendu Sarma1 , Sayantani Chakraborty2
1 Department of Dermatology, Dr. B C Roy Post Graduate Institute of Pediatric Science, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Dermatology, R. G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Correspondence Address:
Nilendu Sarma
P N Colony, Sapuipara, Bally, Howrah, West Bengal
India
How to cite this article:
Sarma N, Chakraborty S. Diagnostic role of dermatoscopy in porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2019;85:546-548
Copyright: (C)2019 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Sir,

Porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus is a rare, relatively newly described variant of porokeratotic eccrine hamartoma. It was first reported in 1979 by Marsden et al.,[1] although the terminology was subsequently coined by Abell and Read.[2]

Cases where invaginated cornoid lamella involves dilated eccrine duct are termed as porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus. When such lamella involves hair follicle, it is known as porokeratotic eccrine and hair follicle nevus. It has been proposed that most cases involve both follicle and eccrine ducts and true distinction between these entities does not exist. Thus, porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus is considered a more unifying term for these conditions.[3]

A 23-year-old woman presented with multiple dark, asymptomatic, firm linear eruptions on her right leg since early childhood. After initial progression, it became stable. No other members of the family had a similar condition.

The eruptions were found to be firm, dark papular eruptions, distributed along Blaschko's lines on the right lower limb. These involved dorsum of right foot, anterior leg and extended up to upper thigh.

Papules were discrete on the foot, but on the leg and thigh multiple papules grouped to form larger well-defined plaques. Individual papules could not be dislodged with a firm sliding force. Marginal crater with invagination was noticed in some lesions [Figure - 1].

Figure 1: Grouped dark papules of porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus distributed along Blaschko's line on right leg in a young lady. Inset: close-up view showing grouped papules forming plaque, and some papules having the invagination at the margin (arrow)

Dermatoscopic examination was done with DermLite 4. A typical hyperkeratotic circinate margin that outlined the porokeratosis appeared as well-defined dark-colored rim under dermatoscopy. Prominent whitish areas were detected to surround the rim and possibly indicated the aberrant keratinization. Keratin plugs that appeared as white milia-like structures were detected.

This bluish gray background color extended much beyond the rim. Although this was visible clinically with naked eyes, it was appreciated much clearly under dermatoscope. It possibly indicated dermal melanophages that were confirmed histologically. This clearly indicated the actual extent of the lesion and there were numerous, homogenously distributed tiny white dots, most possibly representing the opening of the eccrine ducts. Such accentuated white dots were not found in the surrounding normal areas. Widened follicular openings were also found [Figure - 2].

Figure 2: Dermoscopy (DermLite 4, ×10, polarized mode) shows well-defined irregular dark-colored rim encircling the main lesion. A prominent whitish band (solid red arrow) surrounds the darker rim. Within the encircled area, there are many prominent milia-like white structures (within a diamond) that possibly represent follicular plugs. Numerous homogenously distributed white tiny dots (circle) represent eccrine ducts. Eccrine ducts spared follicular openings that appeared large and wide (arrow without fill). The lesional margin is formed by a dark bluish gray veil (solid yellow arrow)

Histopathological examination revealed hyperkeratosis and acanthosis. There was a prominent invaginated thick keratin plug with cornoid lamella (parakeratotic column) with underlying multiple dermal eccrine ducts. One hair follicle was also noted below the cornoid lamella [Figure - 3]. The area just beneath the cornoid lamella showed the absent granular layer. Dyskeratotic cells were also detected [Figure - 4]. There were prominent dermal melanophages and a perivascular and periappendageal inflammatory infiltration.

Figure 3: Focal hyperkeratosis, acanthosis and keratin plug invaginating within dermis closely associated with numerous, multiple eccrine ducts in close association with coronoid lamella, and hypogranulosis. A hair follicle lies deep into the dermis in the same vertical plane. Mild mixed inflammatory cells were also found. Dermal melanophages and inflammatory infiltrate were also noted (hematoxylin and eosin, ×100)
Figure 4: Higher magnification shows a prominent parakeratotic column, absent granular layer and dyskeratotic cells (hematoxylin and eosin, ×400

Histopathological findings confirmed the diagnosis of porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus or porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus. The patient was treated with topical keratolytic such as salicylic acid 6% ointment, 10% urea and topical tazarotene gel (0.1%) without any benefit.

Porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus is generally present at birth. This is characterized by the presence of asymptomatic areas of plugged pits, spiny keratotic filiform papules which may also enlarge to papules, nodules and plaque. This may be localized, generalized showing a segmental or Blaschkoid linear distribution.

It has been proposed that single GJB2 somatic mutation could cause porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus.[4] KID syndrome could be a more generalized form of porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus. Both these conditions share many similarities in histopathology and molecular and genetic peculiarity.[5]

Cornoid lamella is considered to represent the abnormal clone of cells that may actually originate in the eccrine ducts or that may result from focal abnormal keratinization of the epidermis due to mosaicism.

Porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus needs to be differentiated from linear porokeratosis, focal dermal hypoplasia, inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevus, linear psoriasis, linear Darier's disease, linear hypertrophic lichen planus and curvilinear ichthyosis in Conradi- Hünermann syndrome, CHILD syndrome (Congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform erythroderma and limb defects) and nevus comedonicus.

Linear porokeratosis is unassociated with dilated and hyperplastic eccrine ostia and/or hair follicles. It also lacks hypogranulosis.

Dilated and hypertrophic eccrine ducts and follicles are considered key alterations in porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus.[5] The finding of a keratin plug containing the parakeratotic cornoid lamella overlying the dilated acrosyringeal duct or hair follicle is the most confirmatory diagnostic finding. However, identifying the spatial relationship between a bigger keratin plug within the tiny superficial portion of the eccrine duct is considered a very challenging task. Many sections, in different directions, may be required to identify this. Dilatation or hyperplasia of acrosyringial ducts or presence of a follicle just underlying the cornoid lamella is important clues to the diagnosis. Absence (or hypoplasia) of granular cell layer at the bottom of the plug, and dyskeratotic keratinocytes in the epidermis are also considered helpful features that may assist in the diagnosis.

Role of dermatoscopy was found to be very crucial and reflected its more frequent use as a diagnostic tool. It helped us to assess the actual extent of the lesion beyond the invagination. Numerous densely packed distinct white dots that most possibly represented dilated and hypertrophic appendageal ducts are major histological finding in porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus that is detected under the dermatoscope. Thus, dermatoscopy can be an important noninvasive alternate tool to elicit these abnormalities in porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References
1.
Marsden RA, Fleming K, Dawber RP. Comedo naevus of the palm – a sweat duct naevus? Br J Dermatol 1979;101:717-22.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Abell E, Read SI. Porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct naevus. Br J Dermatol 1980;103:435-41.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Goddard DS, Rogers M, Frieden IJ, Krol AL, White CR Jr., Jayaraman AG, et al. Widespread porokeratotic adnexal ostial nevus: clinical features and proposal of a new name unifying porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus and porokeratotic eccrine and hair follicle nevus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:1060.e1-4.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Levinsohn JL, McNiff JM, Antaya RJ, Choate KA. A somatic p.G45E GJB2 mutation causing porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus. JAMA Dermatol 2015;151:638-41.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Titeux M, Mendonça V, Décha A, Moreira E, Magina S, Maia A, et al. Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome caused by GJB2 maternal mosaicism. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:776-9.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
659

PDF downloads
149
Show Sections