Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
2006:72:5;346-349
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.27749
PMID: 17050927

Efficacy of 3% diclofenac gel for the treatment of actinic keratoses: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study

Iraji Fariba1 , Asilian Ali2 , Siadat Amir Hossein3 , Safavai Atefeh1 , Seyed Afshin Atarzadeh Behbahan1
1 Department of Dermatology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Pharmacology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Skin diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Iraji Fariba
Department of Dermatology, Al-zahra Hospital, P.O. Box: 892, Isfahan
Iran
How to cite this article:
Fariba I, Ali A, Hossein SA, Atefeh S, Atarzadeh Behbahan SA. Efficacy of 3% diclofenac gel for the treatment of actinic keratoses: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006;72:346-349
Copyright: (C)2006 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Background: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are premalignant skin lesions caused by excessive sun exposure. Aims: To explore the therapeutic efficacy of 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel in the topical treatment of AK. Methods: Sixty-four lesions in 20 patients were evaluated. They were randomized to receive either the active treatment, 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel or placebo, which consisted of the inactive gel vehicle, hyaluronan for a period of three months. The collected data were analyzed by using Student t- tests. Results: There was a reduction in the lesion size in 64.7% of diclofenac-treated lesions and 34.3% of control lesions during the three-month course of treatment. Only 9.3% of the lesions in the diclofenac group were completely cleared during three months of treatment. During the treatment, no significant side-effect was observed in both groups. Conclusion: Considering the malignant potential of actinic keratoses and the importance of clearing them to prevent their transformation to squamous cell carcinoma, the efficacy of diclofenac gel seen in our study seems to be low. This treatment may be useful for patients who do not tolerate other, more effective kinds of treatment for actinic keratoses.
Keywords: Actinic keratosis, Diclofenac gel, Treatment
Effect of 2·5% hyaluronan gel alone and 3% diclofenac in 2·5% hyaluronan gel on the mean size of actinic keratosis lesions
Effect of 2·5% hyaluronan gel alone and 3% diclofenac in 2·5% hyaluronan gel on the mean size of actinic keratosis lesions

Introduction

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are premalignant skin lesions caused by excessive sun exposure. Although confined to the epidermis, they have the potential to progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)[1] at an estimated rate of 0.25 to 15% per year.[2],[3] Spontaneous regression in those who reduce their exposure to sunlight or use sunscreens has been reported.[4] The standard treatment methods for AKs are ablative options, including cryosurgery (the most common method),[5] surgical excision/curettage and electrodesiccation and dermabrasion. However, a noninvasive approach is preferable to ablative therapies since topical therapies can reduce the risk of pain, infection and scarring and can treat lesions in cosmetically sensitive or difficult-to-treat locations. These include 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), diclofenac sodium gel 3%, photodynamic therapy (PDT) and imiquimod 5% cream.[5]

Though Revers et al[6] observed no efficacy with topical diclofenac gel after 30 days, many open-label studies have demonstrated that 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel is effective in the treatment of AK.[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] The current study was performed to explore further the therapeutic efficacy of 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel in the topical treatment of AK.

Methods

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted between the years 2003 and 2004 in the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Clinics and Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center (SDLRC). The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel in comparison with placebo (vehicle gel only) for the treatment of patients with AKs. The drug and placebo were provided by Isfahan Pharmacy School.

Individuals aged 30 years or older, in general good health, with a clinical diagnosis of AKs in at least one of the selected major body areas (forehead, central face, scalp, dorsa of hands) were eligible for inclusion in the study. Informed consent was taken from them. Patients with lesions on the lips were excluded because these lesions had a high risk of transformation to invasive SCC. Women were included only if they were postmenopausal or were using contraception. Patients were excluded if they had a history or were suspected, of hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients of the active or vehicle medication or a history of allergy to aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Other exclusion criteria were current treatment with a disallowed medication (e.g., 5-FU, etretinate, cyclosporine, retinoids, topical steroids or recent trichloroacetic acid or glycolic acid peels), unwillingness to discontinue the use of cosmetics or sunscreen on the designated site, treatment with any other investigational drug or participation in another study within the previous 60 days and refusal to undergo a washout period before entry into the study.

Sixty-four lesions of actinic keratosis in 20 patients were evaluated, 32 for active treatment and another 32 lesions with relatively similar characteristics but on the opposite side, as controls. Lesions were randomized to receive either 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel or placebo (the inactive gel vehicle, hyaluronan only) 0.5 g b.i.d. in each 5 cm 2sub treatment area for 90 days. All patients were also advised to use a sunscreen and to avoid excessive exposure to the sun. Adverse events were reviewed at each visit from the start of treatment.

The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated using lesion size and the patient′s response. Any reduction in the lesion size was considered as a partial response, while complete disappearance of the lesion was considered as complete response. The collected data were analyzed by using Student t- tests and Chi square test with the SPSS program (release 10).

Results

Demographic profile Sixty-four lesions were evaluated in 20 patients including 27.7% female and 72.3% male patients. Their mean age was 55.1 years old (range, 30-75 years). Lesions were located on the scalp (13%) or on the face (87%).

Efficacy regarding lesion size In the control group, the mean lesion size was significantly reduced ( p =0.044) by 8.47% from 0.59 ± 0.56 cm 2sub before treatment to 0.54 ± 0.69 cm 2sub after treatment with hyaluronan gel alone. In the treated group, the mean lesion size was 0.66 ± 0.54 cm 2sub and 0.39 ± 0.44 cm 2sub before and after treatment respectively (40.90% reduction in the mean lesion size), a significant difference ( p < 0.0005) [Table - 1]. The difference between reduction in the mean lesion size was significant between these two groups ( p < 0.0005).

Efficacy regarding patient′s response In the side treated with hyaluronan gel alone, 34.3% of patients had reduction in their skin lesions, 59.5% had no change, 3.1% (one patient) had worsening and 3.1% (one patient) had complete resolution. In the side treated with diclofenac gel, 64.7% of patients had reduction in their skin lesions, 9.3% had complete clearing, 3.1% (one patient) had worsening, while 22.9% had no change.

The Chi square test for patient′s response to treatment was significant ( p =0.001).

Side-effects Side-effects were limited to negligible. Irritation was seen in eight patients who were treated with diclofenac gel. None of the patients stopped treatment due to side-effects.

Discussion

Our study shows that 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel provides a somewhat effective but well tolerated treatment for AK. There was a reduction in the lesion size in 64.7% of diclofenac-treated lesions and 34.3% of control-treated lesions during the three months of treatment. However, only 9.3% of diclofenac-treated lesions were completely cured. Our study was the first one that evaluated treated and control lesions in the same patient.

There are a few studies on the efficacy of diclofenac gel in the treatment of actinic keratoses.

In an open-label study that was conducted in 1997 to evaluate the efficacy of topical 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid for treatment of AKs,[12] 29 adults were treated for periods ranging from 33 to 176 days (median, 62 days). Of the 29 subjects, 27 were reevaluated 30 days after drug therapy discontinuation. Of the 27 patients, 22 (81%) had a complete response and another 4 (15%) showed marked clinical improvement. The authors concluded that topical 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel might be a clinically useful topical agent for the treatment of actinic keratoses.[12] In another study, the investigators achieved no significant differences in AK clearance when patients were treated with 3% diclofenac gel for 30 days versus vehicle.[6]

In another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving outpatients with a diagnosis of five or more AK lesions contained in one to three 5 cm blocks,[11] patients received either active treatment (3% diclofenac gel in 2.5% hyaluronan gel) or inactive gel vehicle (hyaluronan) as placebo (0.5 g b.i.d. in each 5 cm treatment area for 90 days). Results obtained from 96 patients at follow-up (30 days after end of treatment) indicated that a significantly higher proportion of patients who received active treatment cleared as compared to the placebo group.[11]

In another study, the efficacy and tolerability of twice daily diclofenac sodium gel (3.0%) in the treatment of AK for a treatment period of 90 days and a 30-day follow-up period, was evaluated.[7] At Day 90 of treatment, 78% of patients had > or = 75% AK lesion clearance based on the target lesion number score (TLNS). Improvement was further observed in 85% patients who demonstrated more than or equal to 75% AK lesion clearance at Day 120 (follow-up). Dry skin and rash at the application site were the most commonly reported adverse events and most of these adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.[7]

The efficacy of diclofenac gel in AK seems to be low in our study. We suggest randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy of diclofenac gel with that of 5-flurouracil to determine whether the use of diclofenac gel as a first-line treatment for AK is logical.

We conclude that 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel is safe, but only somewhat effective for the treatment of actinic keratosis. It may be useful for patients who do not tolerate other, more effective kinds of treatment for actinic keratosis.

References
1.
Schwartz RA. The actinic keratosis. A perspective and update. Dermatol Surg 1997;11:1009-19.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Marks R, Rennie G, Selwood TS. Malignant transformation of solar keratoses to squamous cell carcinoma. Lancet 1988;1: 795-7.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Dodson JM, DeSpain J, Hewett JE, Clark DP. Malignant potential of actinic keratoses and the controversy over treatment: A patient-oriented perspective. Arch Dermatol 1991;127: 1029-31.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Marks R, Foley P, Goodman G, Hage BH, Selwood TS. Spontaneous remission of solar keratoses: The case for conservative management. Br J Dermatol 1986;115:649-55.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Jorizzo JL. Current and novel treatment options for actinic keratosis. J Cutan Med Surg 2004;8:13-21.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Rivers JK, Arlette J, Shear N, Guenther L, Carey W, Poulin, Y. Topical treatment of actinic keratoses with 3·0% diclofenac in 2·5% hyaluronan gel. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:94-100.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Nelson C, Rigel D, Smith S, Swanson N, Wolf J. Phase IV, open-label assessment of the treatment of actinic keratosis with 3.0% diclofenac sodium topical gel (Solaraze). J Drugs Dermatol 2004;3:401-7.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Rivers JK. Topical 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel for the treatment of actinic keratoses. Skin Therapy Lett 2004;9:1-3.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Tutrone WD, Saini R, Caglar S, Weinberg JM, Crespo J. Topical therapy for actinic keratoses II: Diclofenac, colchicine and retinoids. Cutis 2003;71:373-9.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Jarvis B, Figgitt DP. Topical 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel: A review of its use in patients with actinic keratoses. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4:203-13.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Wolf JE Jr, Taylor JR, Tschen E, Kang S. Topical 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel in the treatment of actinic keratoses. Int J Dermatol 2001;40:709-13.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Rivers JK, McLean DI. An open study to assess the efficacy and safety of topical 3% diclofenac in a 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel for the treatment of actinic keratoses. Arch Dermatol 1997;133:1239-42.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
2,641

PDF downloads
725
Show Sections