Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology

Translate this page into:
[gtranslate]

Original Article
2002:68:6;330-333
PMID: 17656991

Evaluation of salt split technique of immunofluorescence in bullous pemphigoid

Seema Satyapal, Sangeeta Amladi, HR Jerajani
 Department of Dermatology, L. T. M. Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400022, India

Correspondence Address:
Sangeeta Amladi
Department of Dermatology, L. T. M. Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400022
India
How to cite this article:
Satyapal S, Amladi S, Jerajani H R. Evaluation of salt split technique of immunofluorescence in bullous pemphigoid. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2002;68:330-333
Copyright: (C)2002 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that salt split skin is a more sensitive substrate than intact skin for immunofluorescence diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid. We undertook this study to define the role of salt split technique of immunofluorescence findings in 32 clinical and histopothology confirmed cases of bullous pemphigoid. Both direct and indirect immunofluorescences were performed using normal and split skin. Direct immunofluorescence positivity of 100% was noted with both routine and salt split method. Additional immunoreadont deposition was noted with direct method on split skin in 5 cases. Patterns of fluorescence in the latter were roof (40.60%), floor (9.4%) and combined roof and floor (50%). On indirect immunofluorescence, positivity was almost doubled with salt split technique ( 68%) as compared to routine method (36%). Thus, salt split technique was equivalent to routine on direct method in positivity with additional immunoreactant deposits noted in some and had double the sensitivity of the indirect method in detecting immunofluorescence in bullous pemphigoid.
Keywords: Bullous pemphigoid, Salt split immunofluorescence

Introduction

Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disorder characterized by outoantibodies to the basement membrane zone (BMZ). These are detected as a linear band of fluorescence, along the basement membrane zone, of C3 in 100%, IgG in 90-95% and less commonly IgM, IgA on direct immunofluorescence (DIF). [1] Circulating autoantibodies are detected in around 60-80% of cases on indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). [1] Recent studies suggest that skin which has been split through the BMZ using 1 mol/L sodium chloride to create an artificial blister is a more sensitive substrate than intact skin for this purpose. [2],[3] The present study was undertaken with the aim of evaluating this recently introduced modification and comparing it with the routine method of immunofluorescence in bullous pemphigoid.

Materials and Methods

Thirty - two cases which were clinically and histologically bullous pemphigoid were included in the study. Serum samples were available in 25 cases. The samples for both routine and salt split method were collected and processed in the following manner: [Figure - 1]

Direct immunofluorescence

A perilesional skin biopsy with 5mm punch was collected in Michel medium (transport medium) and stored at room temperature. Biopsy specimens were rinsed in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) at pH 7.2 for 30 minutes. Snap freezing with embedding medium (Jung tissue freezing medium, Leica Instruments, Germany) was carried out in the cryostat at-20° C and 3-4 micron section obtained. A minimum of 3 sections were washed with PBS for 10 minutes thrice and air dried. A drop of specific regent-Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labeled antihuman IgG, IgM, IgA, complement C3 and fibrin were used. These slides were then incubated at 37°. C for 30 minutes in a moist chamber and then again rinsed with PBS (3 washing of 10 minutes each) to remove the conjugate. The slides were air dried and mounted with buffered glycerol (pH 8). Reading was done under the fluorescence microscope (Nikon model HB 1010 AF).

Indirect immunofluorescence:

Serum samples were available in 25 cases. These were stored at 4° C prior to testing. Substrate used was normal human skin tissue, obtained from the plastic surgery department. The skin was transported in saline, rinsed briefly in PBS. [Figure - 2]

For routine method the tissue was directly mounted in embedding medium, snap frozen and 4 micron sections taken. Initial screening dilutions of sera in titres of 1:10 and 1:100 were made with PBS. Few drops of the dilutions of sera were poured on labeled slides and incubated at 37° C for 30 minutes in a moist chamber. Second incubation of the slides with FITC tagged anti human IgG was done for 30 minutes. The slides were washed, air dried and mounted with buffered glycerol and results read under the fluorescence microscope. Higher dilution was tested if sera was positive on 1 : 100. The fluorescence titre was determined as the highest dilution of serum giving visible fluorescence under the microscope. [Figure - 3]

Skin separation method

For salt split, the method of obtaining tissue samples, transportation and processing remains the same for both DIF and IIF Tissue samples, if stored in Michel medium, were rinsed well with PBS for 30 minutes. Incubation in 10-15ml1 mol/ L sodium chloride at 40 C for 72 hours was done. The epidermis was then separated from the dermis with use of fine forceps to tease it gently. The specimens were processed in the same manner as described above to obtain 4 micron sections. DIF and IIF staining was carried out as above. The fluorescence was graded as follows:

1+

When seen only in high power (40 X)

2+

When seen with low and high power (20X & 40X)

3+

When seen even on scan-ner view (1 OX) [Figure - 4]

Results

Direct immunof-luorescence showed 100% positivity with both methods. C3 alone or in combination was found in 90. 60% cases on routine method. IgG deposits alone were seen in 2 cases. With salt the most common pat-tern was combined roof and floor in 50% cases. Roof alone was noted in 40. 6% and floor in 9. 4%. With salt split method an increase in the intensity of fluorescence was noted [Table - 1]. On routine method it was additionally noted with IgG in 7 cases. With salt split DIF, the strength of fluores-cence increased or remained the same but never decreased. Additional immunoreactant deposits were seen in 5 cases using split technique (15. 6%). They were IgG in 3, IgM in 2 and IgA in a single case [Table - 2].

On IIF by routine method positivity was 36%. This positivity was increased to 68% by salt split technique (p< 0. 05, chi squre test). There was increase in the titres in 2 cases from 1:80 to 1:100 and 1:20 to 1:40. The pattern of fluorescence on DIF and IIF with salt split method remained consistent.

Discussion

Salt split technique of immunofluores-cence has recently been described in evaluation of subepidermal blistering disorders. [2],[1] We under-took this study to evaluate this technique in our set up for bullous pemphigoid. Routine DIF positivity of 100% persisted with salt split method. This fig-ure is similar to that reported by Beutner et al. [1] On routine DIF, intensity of fluorescence increased but never decreased. Maximum intensity was ad-ditionally noted with IgG on split tissue testing. Enhanced intensity of fluorescence as observed has been shown in [Table - 1]. This shows that incu-bation of tissue in salt solution does not result in reduction of fluorescence in terms of both positiv-ity and intensity. With salt split method the pattern of linear roof and floor fluorescence was noted in maximum cases. Floor pattern was noted in 3 cases. Studies have shown that roof, roof and floor occur in bullous pemphigoid frequently. [3],[4] Floor pattern has rarely been reported.[4],[5],[6] This could be explained by heterogeneity of bullous pemphig-oid antigen and steric modification of the antigen due to such treatment, resulting in floor pattern. [7] This makes differentiation of bullous pemphigoid from epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) diffi-cult. However these can be differentiated by elec-tron microscopy, immunoelectron microscopy or response to therapy. [7] One study carried out re-cently has described the use of toad skin to differ-entiate between bullous pemphigoid and EBA when floor pattern is present. [7] In our study all 3 patients with dermal pattern of fluorescence were females with mild, moderate and severe disease respec-tively. No specific correlation, clinical and histo-pathological could be found. Additional immun-oreactant deposition was found in a total of 5 cases comprising IgG, IgM, IgA. No references regard-ing such a finding could be found. We think that this could be due to splitting resulting in exposing or making the BMS deposits more available for detection thereby increasing the sensitivity of the test.

On IIF with salt spilt the positivity increased to 68% from 36% from on routine method. Various studies have shown increased sensitivity of salt split skin as a substrate for IIF[8],[9] In addition, 2 cases showed increase in the titre of circulating autoantibodies when using split skin as substrate have been reported. [8] It has been hypothesised that sodium chloride therapy of substrate exposes or chemically modifies the BMZ antigens so that they react avidly with autoantibodies in the patients′ sera. [8] Pattern on salt split IIF was consistent with that noted on salt split DIF. In cases of mixed pattern, fluorescence was more intense or equal in intensity to dermal fluorescence but never less.

Salt split technique in immunofluo-rescence is an additional tool to study and further elucidate immunopathology of bullous pemphigoid. Salt split skin as a substrate for IIF shows higher sensitivity in detecting circulating antibodies. The procedure is cheap, easy to carry out and does not create any extra burden on the immunofluorescence lab and should be employed as a routine in immunofluorescence study of patients with bullous pemphigoid.

References
1.
Beutner EH, Chorzelski TP, Kumar V. Immunopathology of the Skin, 3rd edition, Wiley, New York 1987.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Gammon WR, Briggaman RA, Inman AO, et al. Differentiating anti lamina lucida and anti sublamina densa anti basement membrane zone antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence on 1. 0 Mol Sodium chloride separated skin. J Invest Dermatol 1984;82:139-144.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Gammon WR, Kowaleski C, Chorzelski TP, et al. Direct immunofluorescence studies of sodium chloride separated skin in differential diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 22: 664 - 670.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Domloge HN, Bisalbutra P, Gammon WR et al. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy of 1 mol/L Nacl treated patient skin. JAM Acad Dermatal 1991; 24: 946 - 951.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Logan RA, Bhogal B, Das AK, et al. Localisation of bul lous pemphigoid antibody on indirect immunofluorescence study of 228 cases using salt split technique. Br J Dermatol 1987;117:471-8.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Nimi Y, Zhu XJ, Bystryn JC. Identification of cicatricial pemphigoid antigen. Arch Dermatol 1992;128: 55 - 57.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Resmussen HR, Brandrup BF. Use of Nacl. separated human skin in detection of circulating anti basement zone antibodies. Acta Dermatol Venereal 1989;69:515 - 519.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Mochado P, Micholaki, Roche P, et al. Serological diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid. Comparison of the sensitivity of immunofluorescence on salt split skin to immunoblotting. Br J Dermatol 1992; 126: 236-241.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Pang RK, lee YS, Ratnam KV. Floor pattern in salt split cannot distinguish bullous pemphigoid from epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Use of toad skin. Arch Dermatol 1993; 129:744-746.
[Google Scholar]
Show Sections