Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Original Article
2014:80:4;296-299
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.136831
PMID: 25035352

Factors affecting the duration of phase I of dexamethasone - cyclophosphamide pulse therapy

Chitra S Nayak, Somshukla Ray, Anil Thombre, Mahim Jain
 Department of Dermatology, Topiwala National Medical College and BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai Central, Mumbai, India

Correspondence Address:
Chitra S Nayak
Topiwala National Medical College and BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Dr. AL Nair Road, Mumbai Central, Mumbai - 400 008
India
How to cite this article:
Nayak CS, Ray S, Thombre A, Jain M. Factors affecting the duration of phase I of dexamethasone - cyclophosphamide pulse therapy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2014;80:296-299
Copyright: (C)2014 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Background: The introduction of dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse (DCP) therapy for the pemphigus group of disorders by Pasricha has revolutionized the therapy for pemphigus. There are very few studies regarding factors affecting duration of phase I of the DCP. Aims: Our purpose was to study the relationship between various factors and duration of the phase I. Methods: A retrospective study of 98 patients of pemphigus on Dexamethasone Pulse therapy was conducted. Patients were classified according to duration of Phase 1 as those with phase I less than 6 months and those more than 6 months and analyzed for variable factors affecting duration of phase I. Results: Disease severity in pemphigus significantly prolonged the duration of phase I of DCP. Longer duration was also observed in patients on concurrent oral steroid therapy (both statistically significant). Conclusion: The findings from our study help us to address patient expectations and apprehensions regarding duration of therapy. A detailed understanding of the various patient and disease related factors responsible for affecting Phase I duration will help in better management of the patient, and the disease.
Keywords: Dexamethasone cyclophosphamide pulse therapy, pemphigus, phase I, pulse therapy

INTRODUCTION

Pemphigus is the most common and severe autoimmune vesiculobullous disorder in India. Mortality which was high (75%) in absence of treatment, has reduced drastically to 25-45% following the introduction of corticosteroids. With the advent of "steroid-sparing" agents, the mortality further reduced to less than 10%. A number of different immunosuppressive agents have been tried so far including cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, chlorambucil, cyclosporine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil. However, none of them is uniformly effective and treatment needs to be tailored for each individual patient.

The introduction of dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse (DCP) therapy for pemphigus by Pasricha et al. in 1982 revolutionized the treatment of the disease. Each cycle of dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy consists of slow infusion of 100 mg dexamethasone in 500 ml of 5% glucose daily for three consecutive days, with 500mg cyclophosphamide infusion on the second day. This cycle is repeated every 28 days throughout phases I and II. Oral cyclophosphamide (50mg once daily) is continued between pulses. The DCP regimen is administered in four phases. [1] During phase I, the patient may continue to develop recurrences in between the pulse infusions and can then be given additional treatment, either daily oral corticosteroids or additional dexamethasone pulses every 2 weeks instead of every 4 weeks. After the skin and mucous membrane lesions have resolved completely and additional medications have been withdrawn, the patient is considered to have entered phase II. In phase II, the patient is administered 9 more DCPs at 28 days intervals along with 50 mg cyclophosphamide orally daily following which the DCPs are stopped and the patient receives only 50 mg cyclophosphamide orally per day for the next 9 months as a part of phase III. After this, the treatment for pemphigus is withdrawn completely and the patient is followed up life long to look for a relapse if any (phase IV). In case of development of any new lesion during phases II-IV, the patient should be restarted on phase I DCP.

Thus, it seems that phase I of DCP determines the total duration of treatment required in any individual patient. In our experience, the length of phase I was found to vary from as short as 2 months to as long as nearly four years. Hence, we undertook a study to identify the factors that influence the duration of phase I which seems to give an indication for the overall prognosis in an individual patient.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Dermatology of the T.N.M.C And BYLN charitable Hospital. We recruited 98 patients with a diagnosis of pemphigus between 1997 and 2012.

The study is based upon a retrospective analysis of clinical data collected over 15 years. Patient photographs were not used nor could any patient be identified from any of the data given in this article. Therefore, no ethical clearance was sought.

Data recorded for all patients included a detailed history (duration of disease, the type and distribution of lesions, associated symptoms and other diseases, course of illness and drug history) and a thorough clinical examination at first visit and on follow up. The diagnosis was made on clinical grounds and confirmed by positive Tzanck smear, histopathology and direct immunofluorescence in doubtful cases. Clinical severity was recorded for all patients based on the number of skin lesions and disease was classified as mild (<15 skin blisters or erosions), moderate (15 to 30 skin blisters or erosions) and severe (>30 skin blisters or erosions or extensive confluent areas of erosion). Results of routine investigations performed in all patients were recorded (including a complete haemogram, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fasting and post-prandial blood glucose levels, liver and renal function tests, urine and stool analysis especially for occult blood, baseline ECG, chest X-Ray and ophthalmological examination for cataract and glaucoma).

The DCP treatment regimen as devised by Pasricha et al. [1] was followed. However, azathioprine instead of cyclophosphamide was administered to six patients of child-bearing age considering the risk of gonadal suppression. Any concurrent illness/infections were treated appropriately without discontinuing the DCP therapy. The first 54 patients had received the original regimen as devised by Pasricha et al. with phase II lasting for 6 months and phase III for 12 months. Six of these 54 patients relapsed during phase IV of therapy. Since 2008 the modified DCP regimen [2] was followed where phase II was continued for 9 months and phase III for another 9 months. Data of those patients who completed phase I DCP successfully was statistically analyzed using Chi-square tests and ′P′ values were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of ninety eight patients (53 females and 45 males) were evaluated. These included 81 cases of pemphigus vulgaris, 15 cases of pemphigus foliaceus and 2 cases of pemphigus erythematosus. Most of them belonged to the age group of 41-50 years (26.5%) and 31-40 years (25.5%). Their age ranged between 11 to 78 years. Patients were subdivided into two groups, those aged 40 years or less (n = 44) and those above 40 years (n = 54). The mean duration of phase I was comparable between patients of both age groups being 8.05 months (2 to 52 months) in those ≤40 years and 7.18 months (2 to 26 months) in those >40 years of age (P = 0.715). Gender was not found to influence the duration of phase I. Disease severity was found to significantly influence the duration of phase I (P = 0.003). Fourteen of the 19 patients (74%) with mild disease completed phase I within 6 months whereas only 10 of the 34 (29%) patients with severe disease completed phase I within 6 months. This is also reflected by the Kaplan Meier survival analysis [Figure - 1].

Figure 1: Relation between severity and duration of phase I

Prior oral steroid therapy, i.e. a delay in onset of DCP therapy was not found to significantly alter the duration of phase I. Of the 51 patients with duration of phase I ≤6 months, 28 (55%) were on prior oral steroids whereas of the 47 patients with phase I duration >6 months, 33 (70.2%) were on prior steroids. Eleven of 19 patients with mild disease, 30 of 45 patients with moderate disease and 20 of 34 patients with severe disease were on prior oral steroids.

Forty-seven patients took longer than 6 months to complete phase I; twenty eight of them also required concurrent oral steroids and this relationship was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.027, [Figure - 2]). Upon analysis, it was found that out of 34 patients with severe pemphigus, 25 were on concurrent steroids of which 18 patients needed more than 6 months to complete phase I of pulse therapy. This was not statistically significant. No significant relation was found between the duration of phase I and presence of oral lesions [Figure - 3]. A longer pre-treatment duration of the disease is usually considered to be indicative of an advanced disease that is more difficult to treat. However, we did not find any significant prolongation of phase I due to long pre-pulse disease.

Figure 2: Relation between concurrent oral steroid therapy and duration of phase I
Figure 3: Relation between oral lesions and duration of phase I

Cox proportion hazard analysis showed that severity of pemphigus is the only factor affecting the duration of Phase I [Table - 1].

Table 1: Multivariate analysis using Cox proportion hazard analysis

A survival analysis of the Kaplan Meier was performed on the entire study population. [Figure - 4] shows that only 14 out of 98 patients required more than ten pulses in phase I. Thus, most of the patients were lesion free in less than 1 year. Only one patient was still getting new lesions after 30 DCP pulses.

Figure 4: Kaplan Meier graph of completion of Phase I of DCP (The patient who completed phase I in 2 months was not included among the 'Number at risk')

DISCUSSION

Although DCP is a widely used therapy in patients with pemphigus and other dermatological and rheumatological disorders, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies assessing factors affecting duration of phase I of the DCP. In this study, we found that the severity of pemphigus correlated with the duration of phase I. Longer duration was also observed in patients on concurrent oral steroid therapy. Many of the patients requiring concurrent daily steroids had severe disease and hence it is proposed that severity of disease was more likely to determine duration of phase I rather than concurrent oral steroids. However, Rao et al. [3] did not find the duration of phase I to be related to the severity, extent, duration or grading of pemphigus. In another study, concurrent steroid therapy along with antibiotics for secondary infection, if any, was found to be more effective in inducing remission earlier and shortening duration of phase I. [2] Kanwar et al. [4],[5] in their series reported that the response to pulse therapy was faster in the milder form of disease; the severe form of disease requiring more number of pulses as well as higher doses of intervening oral corticosteroids. These results are similar to those of our study.

Eighty four (85.7%) of the 98 patients completed phase I with 10 pulses or less. This is comparable to a study by Pasricha et al. [2] where 83.7% patients required up to nine pulses in phase I. Gender and pre-pulse disease duration were found to have no effect on duration of phase I. Oral lesions are known to be recalcitrant to treatment. However, in the present study no significant difference was found in the duration of phase I between patients with significant oral lesions and those without. This further highlights an induction of quick remission of lesions which is considered one of the the main advantages of DCP. We observed correction of weight gain, better control of diabetes and hypertension in some patients after shifting to DCP and stopping oral corticosteroids.

The female patient who continued to be in phase I for 4 years had recurrent infection in the pemphigus erosions that was treated with antibiotics without stopping DCP pulses. However, she was ultimately diagnosed with Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection after performing culture and sensitivity testing from her erosions and her lesions cleared with appropriate antibiotics. She had complete healing of lesions, stopped getting new lesions and was declared to have entered phase II after 4 years of treatment in phase I, which may have been avoided if the MRSA was found and treated earlier. Early cultures in non-healing lesions are therefore recommended.

The findings from our study help us to address patient′s expectations and apprehensions regarding duration of therapy. A detailed understanding of the various patient and disease related factors responsible for affecting phase I duration will help in a better management of the patient and the disease.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank Dr. Dnyaneshwar Gajbhare, Assist. Professor, Department of Community Medicine, T.N.M.C and BYLN Ch. Hospital for his help.

References
1.
Pasricha JS. AIIMS experience. In: Pasricha JS, editor. Pulse Therapy in Pemphigus and Other Diseases. New Delhi, 1998. 2 nd ed. New Delhi: Pulse Therapy and Pemphigus Foundation; 2000. p. 21-40.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Pasricha JS, Poonam. Current regimen of pulse therapy for pemphigus: Minor modifications, improved results. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 20087217-21.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Rao PN, Lakshmi TS. Pulse therapy and its modifications in pemphigus: A six year study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:329-33.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Kanwar AJ, Kaur S, Thami GP. Long-term efficacy of dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in pemphigus. Dermatology 2002;204:228-31.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Kanwar AJ, Ajith AC, Narang T. Pemphigus in North India. J Cutan Med Surg 2006;10:21-5.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
286

PDF downloads
191
Show Sections