Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Brief Report
2007:73:4;247-249
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.33635
PMID: 17675733

Fine needle aspiration cytology in reactional and non-reactional leprosy

PK Nigam1 , Prashant Kumar2 , N Pathak3 , S Mittal4
1 Department of Dermatology, Pt. J.N.M. Medical College & Assoc. Dr. B.R.A.M. Hospital, Raipur, India
2 Department of Medicine, Pt. J.N.M. Medical College & Assoc. Dr. B.R.A.M. Hospital, Raipur, India
3 Sai Sahara Pathology Clinic, Raipur - 492001, India
4 Department of Pathology, Pt. J.N.M. Medical College & Assoc. Dr. B.R.A.M. Hospital, Raipur, India

Correspondence Address:
P K Nigam
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Pt. J. N. M. Medical College and Asso., Dr. B.R.A.M. Hospital, D-30-A, Nr. Old Water Tank, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur - 492 001
India
How to cite this article:
Nigam P K, Kumar P, Pathak N, Mittal S. Fine needle aspiration cytology in reactional and non-reactional leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007;73:247-249
Copyright: (C)2007 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Background: Histopathological evaluation of skin lesions is not feasible in many leprosy endemic areas. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a simpler tool compared to histopathology for the evaluation of the cytomorphology of skin lesions. Aims: To study the cytomorphology of leprosy lesions in fine needle aspirates and correlate it with the histopathology. Methods: Seventy leprosy patients diagnosed and classified according to Ridley Jopling scale were included. Fine needle aspirates were taken from the lesion followed by a skin biopsy from the same site for histopathological examination after H/E staining. Results: Borderline leprosy patients with Type I reaction showed significantly large numbers of giant cells, collagen and elastin in their smears as compared to those without reaction. The smears were more heavily cellular with fragmented collagen and elastin along with significant increase in neutrophils in patients with Type II reaction while foamy macrophages with fatty background were common in non-reactional lepromatous leprosy patients. A complete correlation between histopathological and cytomorphological findings was observed in 77.3% of cases. Conclusion: FNAC may be used as an alternative tool to assess leprosy lesions in areas where histopathological services are not readily available.
Keywords: Cytomorphology, Fine needle aspiration cytology, Leprosy, Reactions
Table 2: Cytomorphological features on skin aspirates of lepromatous leprosy patients with and without Type II reaction
Table 2: Cytomorphological features on skin aspirates of lepromatous leprosy patients with and without Type II reaction
Table 1: Cytomorphological features on skin aspirates of borderline leprosy patients with and without Type I reaction
Table 1: Cytomorphological features on skin aspirates of borderline leprosy patients with and without Type I reaction

Cytology is a widely accepted diagnostic procedure for a large variety of malignant and inflammatory lesions. Skin-slit smears stained for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) have been conventionally used for the assessment of leprosy lesions but their use has been restricted to the evaluation of the bacterial index and morphological index. Marian Ridley emphasized the interpretation of cellular exudate in conventionally stained Ziehl-Neelsen smears. [1] Singh et al [2] studied the cytomorphology of the cellular exudates in fine needle aspirates (FNA) of leprosy lesions and could sub-classify them on the same position on the Ridley Jopling (R-J) scale as seen in histology. It was also observed that FNA smears, in contrast to slit-skin smears, were free of confounding epidermal squamous cells and therefore better suited for evaluating cell morphology. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of FNA in reactional and non-reactional leprosy lesions.

Methods

Seventy patients attending the skin and leprosy clinic were studied. Their diagnosis and classification in the R-J scale [3] were based on the clinical examination using standard criteria. Fine needle aspirations were done on the representative lesions followed by a skin biopsy from the same site for histopathological examination. Biopsies were evaluated and classified according to the histological criteria established by Lucas and Ridley [4] and the World Health Organization. [5] Fine needle aspiration smears were specially evaluated for cellularity, morphological details of macrophages, accompanying inflammatory cells and bacterial index. All smears were air-dried and stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG) stain and modified Ziehl-Neelsen′s stain. [6] Skin tissue for histopathology was obtained in 53 patients and stained with H and E stain. Cytological criteria for sub-classification of leprosy were applied as defined by Singh et al. [2] These are as follows:

1. Tuberculoid leprosy (including TT and BT)

a. Cellular smears

b. Cohesive epithelioid cell granulomas

c. Numerous lymphocytes not infiltrating the granuloma

d. No stainable AFB (BI=0)

2. Mid-borderline leprosy (BB)

a. Fair cellular yield

b. Poorly cohesive granulomas composed of an admixture of epithelioid cells and macrophages

c. Few lymphocytes infiltrating the granulomas

d. BI = 1+ to 2+

3. Borderline lepromatous leprosy (BL)

a. Moderate cellularity

b. Singly dispersed macrophages with ′negative images′; no epithelioid cells

c. Numerous lymphocytes diffusely admixed with macrophages

d. BI = 3+ to 4+

4. Lepromatous leprosy (LL)

a. Heavy cellularity

b. Numerous foamy macrophages in a fatty background with intracellular and extracellular ′negative images′

c. Few lymphocytes

d. BI = 5+ to 6+ (globi)

5. Reaction

Numerous fragmented AFB (MI< 1) and neutrophils suggest a Type II reaction in LL (erythema nodosum leprosum).

Results

A total of 70 patients (46 males and 24 females) were studied. Their age ranged from nine years to 64 years (mean 34.5 ± 2.75 years). The duration of leprosy ranged from one month to three years (mean 1.9 ± 0.6 years). Five patients had indeterminate leprosy (I), 12 patients had tuberculoid leprosy (TT), 19 patients had borderline tuberculoid leprosy (BT), eight patients had mid-borderline leprosy (BB), 12 patients had borderline lepromatous leprosy (BL) and 14 patients had lepromatous leprosy (LL). Of these, 15 patients presented with a lepra reaction (nine with a Type 1 lepra reaction and six patients with a Type 2 lepra reaction). The histopathological study of the tissue confirmed the clinical diagnosis in all the 53 patients except in two patients in whom the histopathological picture was nonspecific.

Patients with tuberculoid leprosy showed moderate to heavily cellular smears, cohesive epithelioid cell granulomas, numerous lymphocytes not infiltrating the granulomas and no stainable AFB. Skin smears of mid-borderline leprosy patients showed fairly cellular smears, poorly cohesive epithelioid cell granulomas composed of an admixture of epithelioid cells and macrophages and a few lymphocytes infiltrating the granuloma. Borderline leprosy patients were characterized by moderately cellular smears, singly dispersed macrophages with ′negative′ images, no epithelioid cells and numerous lymphocytes diffusely admixed with macrophages. Lepromatous leprosy patients showed heavy cellularity, foamy macrophages, fatty background, neutrophils, lymphocytes, collagen and elastin and stainable AFB in all the smears.

The smears of patients with reactional leprosy were highly cellular with foamy macrophages and ′negative′ images, neutrophilic infiltrate, degenerating collagen and elastin, a few lymphocytes and a fatty background [Table - 1],[Table - 2]. Among nine patients with a Type 1 lepra reaction (BT, six; BB, two; and BL, one), neuritis was present in six; none of them had a nerve abscess. All the patients presented with exacerbation of erythema and inflammation over existing lesions and appearance of a few new lesions. The cytomorphological features in six of the nine clinically diagnosed patients were confirmed by FNAC of skin aspirates using the standard cytological criteria described by Ridley and Radia. [7] All the remaining three patients showed nonspecific cytological features. All the borderline group patients (BT, BB and BL) had heavily cellular smears, lymphocytes, neutrophils and edematous background. However, loose epithelioid cell granulomas and giant cells, collagen, elastin and proliferating fibroblasts were present in a significantly large number in smears of borderline leprosy patients with a Type 1 lepra reaction. The cytological features of Type 2 lepra reaction were present in five of the six patients with ENL. The histopathological examination of the skin biopsy showed evidence of ENL in all of them except one. The smears were more heavily cellular with fragmented collagen and elastin and a significant increase in neutrophils in patients with a Type 2 lepra reaction, while foamy macrophages with fatty background were relatively more commonly seen in non-reactional lepromatous leprosy patients.

Discussion

Ridley and Jopling [1] proposed a histological classification of leprosy reflecting the immunological spectrum of the disease. It divides leprosy into five clinically and histologically recognizable groups based on the distribution of epithelioid cells, Langhans giant cells, foam cells, globi, lymphocytes, plasma cells, fibroblasts, a clear sub-epidermal zone, cellular cuffing and infiltration of nerves. The histopathological criteria for sub-classification of leprosy as defined by Ridley and Jopling have been applied to cytological smears by Singh et al. [4] They could place most of their patients in the same group as on histopathology.

Out of the 53 patients of leprosy in whom histopathology was done, 41 (77.3%) showed correlation of cytomorphological features with clinico-pathological diagnosis. In the remaining 12 patients (22.1%) there was poor correlation, possibly because of incorrect site selection. Moreover, this number might have been less if aspirates had been taken from multiple sites, as was observed by Singh et al. [2],[8]

Hence, it may be concluded that there is a fairly good correlation between the clinical, histological and cytomorphological features of skin aspirates and that it is possible to classify leprosy along the R-J scale based on cytological smears. Thus, in endemic areas, especially where histopathological services are not available, cytomorphological assessment of leprosy lesions may be advocated as a simple tool for evaluation of the primary diagnosis and natural course of the disease.

References
1.
Ridley MJ. The cellular exudate - Mycobacterium leprae relationship and the critical reading of slit smears. Lepr Rev 1989;60:229-40.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Singh N, Bhatia A, Gupta K, Ramam M. Cytomorphology of Leprosy across the Ridley Jopling spectrum. Acta Cytol 1996;40:719-23.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Ridley DS, Jopling WH. Classification of Leprosy according to immunity - A Five Group System. Int J Leprosy 1966;34:255-73.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Lucas SB, Ridley DS. The use of histopathology in Leprosy diagnosis and research. Lepr Rev 1989;60:257-62.
[Google Scholar]
5.
World Health Organization. A guide to leprosy control, 2 nd ed. WHO: Geneva; 1988.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Bancroft JD, Cook HC. Manual of histological techniques and their diagnostic application. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 1994. p. 25-6, 244-6, 328.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Ridley DS, Radia KB. The histological course of reactions in borderline leprosy and their outcome. Int J Leprosy 1981;49:383-92.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Singh N, Bhatia A, Arora VK, Bhattacharya SN. Fine needle aspiration cytology of lepromatous leprosy. Lepr Rev 1998;69:145-50.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
123

PDF downloads
25
Show Sections