Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Studies
1997:63:1;20-21
PMID: 20944251

IgG subclasses in pemphigus vulgaris

Amrinder J Kanwar, Gurvinder P Thami, Gursharan K Bedi
 Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Chandigarh-160047, India

Correspondence Address:
Amrinder J Kanwar
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Chandigarh-160047
India
How to cite this article:
Kanwar AJ, Thami GP, Bedi GK. IgG subclasses in pemphigus vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1997;63:20-21
Copyright: (C)1997 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Direct immunofluorescence in perilesional skin of 13 pemphigus patients is studied for IgG subclasses. IgG1 and lgG4 were predominant subclasses deposited. No correlation of subclasses of IgG with clinical parameters were found.
Keywords: Pemphigus, IgG1, lgG4, Immunofluorescence

Introduction

In pemphigus autoantibodies directed against the cell surface of keratinocytes can be demonstrated in serum by indirect immunofluorescence and in epithelium by direct immunofluorescence (DIF).[1][2] DIF is most reliable diagnostic test in pemphigus and remains positive for many years after clinical remission.[3] The circulating antibodies, are always of IgG type, however in bound antibodies, IgG is almost invariably present and in about half of the patients there are deposits also of IgA, IgM or C3.[4] Further analysis of IgG subclasses responsible for pathogenesis of pemphigus have shown IgG1 and IgG4 as predominant subclasses deposited in intercellular spaces.[5][6][7] The aim of the present study was to characterize IgG subclasses in DIF in Indian patients of pemphigus vulgaris and their correlation, if any, to the activity or severity of the disease.

Materials and Methods

Irrespective of age, sex, extent and duration of disease, 13 Indian patients of pemphigus vulgaris diagnosed clinically and histopathologically were taken for study of IgG subclasses.

The disease was active in all patients and they were at variable stage of therapy with dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse. DIF was positive and showed deposition of IgG in intercellular spaces. IgG subclasses were looked for in immunofluorescence specimens using standard immunofluorescence techniques.

Results

In all there were 10 males and 3 females with age range of 12-56 years. Prescence of IgG subclasses was graded as absent(-), weakly positive(+/-), positive(+), strongly positive(++), very strongly positive(+++). Details are shown in [Table - 1].

IgG1 and IgG4 were the most frequently deposited subgroups with very strongly positive reaction seen only with IgG4 deposition. Eleven patients (84.6%) had both IgG1 and IgG4 deposits. One patient each was negative for IgG1 and IgG4. IgG2 was detected in 6 patients (46.1%) and IgG3 was found in 2 patients (15.3%) only. No correlation between age, sex, severity or extent and activity of the disease with type of IgG subclasses was found.

Discussion

Pemphigus in Indians is peculiar in that onset of the disease occurs at a younger age and pemphigus vulgaris is the most common variant while pemphigus foliacious is uncommon.[7] Despite these clinical differences, it is immunopathologically same as in other countries. Wilson et al (1992) have confirmed these findings while comparing immunofluorescence studies of Indian and UK population.[7] Previous studies have demonstrated that it is IgG1 and IgG4 fractions which are predominantly deposited in DIF of pemphigus.[5-7] These studies have failed to find a correlation with clinical parameters like type, severity or activety of the disease as in the present study. Subclasses IgG3 and IgG2 has not so far been found to the extent as in the present study. Wilson et al reported IgG2 in (11.1%) and IgG3 in none of the 19 Indian patients studied.[7] The present study emphasises the previous findings that IgG subclasses are not related to type, extent or severity disease in pemphigus vulgaris and that pemphigus vulgaris in Indians is at least not different immunologically.

Acknowledgement

We are thankful to Dr Vijay Kumar of School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York for help in carrying out immunofluorescence studies.

References
1.
Beutner EH, Chorzelski TP, Jablonska S. Immunofluorescence tests. Clinical significance of sera and skin in bullous diseases. Int J Dermatol 1985;24:405-21.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Sethi JK, Kanwar AJ, Kaur S, Sehgal S. Direct immunofluores,cence as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in pemphigus. Ind J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1992;58:379-83.
[Google Scholar]
3.
David M, Weismann-Katzenelson V, Hazaz B, et al. The usefulness of immunofluorescence tests in pemphigus patients in clinical remission. Br J Dermatol 1989;120:391-5.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Sam WH, Sehur PH. Studies of antibodies in pemphigoid and pemphigus. J Lab Clin Med 1973;82:249-54.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Jones C C, Hamilton RG, Jordan RE. Subclass distribution of human IgG autoantibodies in pemphigus. J Clin Immunol 1988;8:43-9.
[Google Scholar]
6.
David M, Katzenelson V, Hazaz B, et al, Determination of IgG subclasses in patients with pemphigus with active disease and in remission. Arch Dermatol 1989;125:787-90.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Wilson CL, Wojnarowska F, Dean D, Pasricha JS. IgG subclasses in pemphigus in Indian and UK populations. Clin Exp Dermatol 1993;18:226-30.
[Google Scholar]
Show Sections