Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obervation Letter
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Original Article
2018:84:2;153-156
doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_45_17
PMID: 29393081

Kumkum-induced allergic contact dermatitis: Are we missing the actual culprit?

Ashwini Annabathula, S Priya, CR Srinivas
 Department of Dermatology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Ashwini Annabathula
Department of Dermatology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore - 641 004, Tamil Nadu
India
Published: 02-Feb-2018
How to cite this article:
Annabathula A, Priya S, Srinivas C R. Kumkum-induced allergic contact dermatitis: Are we missing the actual culprit?. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2018;84:153-156
Copyright: (C)2018 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Background: Kumkum, made with turmeric and slaked lime along with colour enhancing dyes is known to cause allergic contact dermatitis. The possible contact allergens in kumkum include turmeric, Sudan-1, 4-aminoazobenzene, brilliant lake red R and cananga oil. We report patch test results among patients with suspected contact hypersensitivity to kumkum.
Objective: To identify the allergen causing kumkum induced allergic contact dermatitis by patch testing and to advise patients about organic kumkum which doesnot contain colour enhancing dyes.
Methods: Eighteen patients with suspected contact hypersensitivity to kumkum were patch tested with undiluted kumkum, undiluted turmeric, Sudan-1 (95%), 4-aminoazobenzene and allergens of the Indian Standard Series.
Results: Of the 18 patients, 14 patients had patch test positivity to kumkum and 4 had a negative reaction to kumkum. Patch test with other suspected contact allergens showed positive reaction to turmeric in 4 patients, Sudan-1 in 3 patients and 4-aminoazobenzene in 2 patients. Among the allergens of the Indian Standard Series, positivity to nickel and fragrance mix was seen in 5 and 2 patients respectively. Positive reaction to PPD, chlorocresol and parthenium was seen in 1 patient each.
Limitation: Small sample size.
Conclusion: Allergic contact dermatitis to kumkum occurs both due to the dyes (added for enhancing the colour) and turmeric. All patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis should be patch tested with kumkum, turmeric and dyes, based on which alternative non-allergic material could be advised. Kumkum dermatitis can also occur due to various other allergens, for which too patch testing should be done.
Keywords: 4-Aminoazobenzene, kumkum, Sudan-1, turmeric

Introduction

Kumkum is commonly used for social and religious reasons in India and is available as a powder or liquid.[1] It is applied over the forehead by both men and women.[2],[3] However, women use it more frequently; in addition to the forehead, it is applied over the parting area of hair (vermillion) by married women as a sign of their marital status. It also comes in contact with the intermammary area following its application over the “mangalsutra.” It is a scarlet red mixture of dried turmeric and slaked lime along with color-enhancing dyes.[4]

Allergic contact dermatitis is common in people using kumkum and may manifest as erythema, papular, and vesicular lesions.[1] The possible contact allergens in kumkum include turmeric, Sudan-1, 4-aminoazobenzene, brilliant lake red R and cananga oil.[1]

The purpose of this study is to identify the possible allergen(s) causing allergic contact dermatitis to kumkum and to advise patients about organic kumkum.

Methods

Eighteen patients with pruritus, erythema, papules, vesicles, pigmentation, or scaling over and around the site of kumkum application were studied in the Department of Dermatology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Detailed history regarding the duration of symptoms, involvement of various sites, and other medical history was recorded. Patients on systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressives, pregnant, and lactating females were excluded from the study.

Patch testing with the standard technique using Finn chambers was done on the back of all the 18 patients with kumkum (undiluted), turmeric (undiluted), Sudan-1 (95%), 4-aminoazobenzene and allergens of the Indian Standard Series. The Indian Standard Series was obtained from Chemotechnique Diagnostics, AB Sweden. Reactions were interpreted as recommended by International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG). Grades of 1+ or more were considered as positive reactions. Patients who had positive reaction on day 2 and day 3, as well as those with a negative reaction on day 2 but positive reaction day 3, were considered as positive. Patients who had a negative reaction on day 3 were considered to be negative. Also, the positive reactions were due to true positivity and not due to excited skin syndrome where multiple positivity may be caused due to nonspecific hyper-reactivity of the skin.

Results

Of the 18 patients patch tested [Table - 1], 13 (72.2%) were females and 5 (27.8%) were males, the mean age of whom was 50.6 years (ranging from 21 to 76 years), and the mean duration of symptoms was 12.9 months (ranging from 2 to 36 months).

Table 1: Patch test results of 18 patients

The most common site of involvement was forehead, which was observed in 10 (55.6%) patients [Figure - 1], followed by glabella in 7 (38.9%) patients and entire face in 6 (33.3%) patients [Figure - 2].

Figure 1: Lichenoid lesion over the forehead (most common site)
Figure 2: Hyperpigmented scaly lesions over the entire face

Fourteen (77.8%) patients showed patch test positivity to undiluted kumkum [Figure - 3], out of whom 3 patients had 3+ reaction, 6 patients had 2+ reaction, and 5 had 1+ reaction. Four (22.2%) patients did not show positivity to kumkum.

Figure 3: Patch test – Positive reaction to kumkum

Patch test with suspected contact allergens in kumkum revealed positive reaction to turmeric in 4 patients, Sudan-1 in 3 patients, and 4-aminoazobenzene in 2 patients.

Among the allergens of the Indian Standard Series, positivity to nickel and fragrance mix was seen in 5 and 2 patients, respectively. Positivity to paraphenylenediamine (PPD) and chlorocresol was seen in 1 patient each. Three patients showed positive reaction to multiple allergens (>2), including kumkum itself [Figure - 4]. Patch test did not show positive reaction to allergens of Indian Standard Series and kumkum (and its components) in 3 (16.7%) patients.

Figure 4: Patch test – Positive reaction to multiple antigens

Discussion

Kumkum-induced allergic contact dermatitis was seen in 14 patients involving both the sexes, with a female preponderance. Males, to an extent, can refrain from using kumkum but it is difficult for females to discontinue the use of kumkum due to social and religious obligations. The dermatitis is unlikely to subside unless the exposure to allergen is completely discontinued.

Turmeric (curcumin) showed positive reaction in 4 patients. It is applied over the entire face and limbs by many people, as it is believed to have anti-acne properties and to reduce the growth of hair.[5],[6] Kumkum positivity in some patients could be a result of reactivity to turmeric, as it is the major ingredient of kumkum. Sudan-1 and 4-aminoazobenzene, which are the color enhancing dyes used in kumkum, showed positive patch test reactions in 3 and 2 patients, respectively.

Kumkum-induced dermatitis can be either due to turmeric or the dyes used to enhance the color of kumkum. Patients who are allergic to the dyes can make kumkum at home by mixing turmeric with slaked lime and corn flour and those who are allergic to turmeric can use non-allergenic stickers, red lipsticks/lip liners after patch testing.

Among the allergens of the Indian Standard Series, nickel positivity was seen in 5 patients. Dermatitis in these patients could have been either due to direct contamination or as a contaminant from the metal tins used to store kumkum or from ear rings.[7],[8] However, none of them had history of ear-ring dermatitis. Dermatitis in 2 patients who were positive to fragrance mix could have been due to the addition of fragrance to kumkum since fragrances are added to many cosmetics [9] and reaction in patients positive to chlorocresol could have been due to the use of topicals containing the preservative.[10] Identifying allergens in the patients who showed positivity to kumkum alone is also of utmost importance.

We plan to conduct further studies where we intend to observe the patch test sites for the development of pigmentation and perform photo patch testing on as many components of kumkum as are known to cause photo allergic reactions.[11]

The only limitation of this study was its small sample size.

Conclusion

The authors would like to highlight the fact that the diagnosis of kumkum dermatitis is the starting of the quest to find the actual culprit causing dermatitis. It is of utmost necessity that the patients are precisely diagnosed and provided with other nonallergenic or organic kumkum after patch testing.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained allappropriate patient consent forms. In the form, thepatientshave given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References
1.
Kumar JV, Moideen R, Murugesh SB. Contactants in 'Kum-Kum' dermatitis. Indian J DermatolVenereolLeprol 1996;62:220-1.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Nath AK, Thappa DM. Kumkum-induced dermatitis: An analysis of 46 cases. ClinExpDermatol 2007;32:385-7.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Goh CL, Kozuka T. Pigmented contact dermatitis from 'kumkum'. ClinExpDermatol 1986;11:603-6.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Lal MS, Srinivas CR. Allergic contact dermatitis to turmeric in kumkum. Indian J Dermatol 2006;51:200.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Hata M, Sasaki E, Ota M, Fujimoto K, Yajima J, Shichida T, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from curcumin (turmeric). Contact Dermatitis 1997;36:107-8.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Goh CL, Ng SK. Allergic contact dermatitis to Curcuma longa (turmeric). Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:186.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Pourjafar H, Ghasemnejad R, Noori N. Heavy metals content of canned tuna fish marketed in Tabriz, Iran. Iran J Vet Med 2014;8:9-14.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Katz SA, Samitz MH. Leaching of nickel from stainless steel consumer commodities. ActaDermVenereol 1975;55:113-5.
[Google Scholar]
9.
de Groot AC, Bruynzeel DP, Bos JD, van der Meeren HL, van Joost T, Jagtman BA, et al. The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 1988;124:1525-9.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Narendra G, Srinivas CR. Patch testing with Indian standard series. Indian J DermatolVenereolLeprol 2002;68:281-2.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Tewary M, Ahmed I. Bindi dermatitis to 'chandan'bindi. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:372-4.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
508

PDF downloads
158
Show Sections