Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Author’s Reply
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Reviewers 2024
Reviewers 2025
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Author’s Reply
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Reviewers 2024
Reviewers 2025
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Observation Letter
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJDVL_1218_2024

Long-term efficacy and safety of JAKi in refractory livedoid vasculopathy

Department of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Department of Outpatient, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Corresponding author: Dr. Wei Li, Department of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. liweihx_hxyy@scu.edu.cn

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Xiao Y, Wang Y, Tan P, Wen D, Zhao S, Li W. Long-term efficacy and safety of JAKi in refractory livedoid vasculopathy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_1218_2024

Dear Editor,

Livedoid vasculopathy (LV) is a rare, chronic ulcerative disorder primarily affecting females. Numerous treatment modalities have been tried with varying efficacy for LV, include anticoagulants and glucocorticoids.1,2 Recent case reports and series have suggested the potential of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), particularly baricitinib, in managing LV.3-5 However, the long-term efficacy and safety profile of JAKi remain unclear and require further investigation. This is especially true considering the thrombotic risks associated with JAKi highlighted by FDA warnings. We report long-term follow-up of two cases of LV treated with JAKi.

Two female patients aged 16 and 26 years presented with painful erythematous and irregular necrotic ulcerated lesions present on the ankles, dorsa of both feet, calves and thigh for the duration of 3 and 2 years respectively [Figure 1], suggestive of Livedoid vasculopathy (LV). The clinical diagnosis of LV was confirmed on histology [Figure 2], arteriovenous ultrasounds, and coagulation parameters. Both patients did not respond to the conventional treatments, including steroids and anticoagulants. Treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and regular monitoring of haematologic profiles, coagulation parameters, and hepatic and renal functions were initiated with informed consent. Clinical details, including site, previous treatments, and laboratory results, have been summarised in Table 1.

Patient 2. Lesion at baseline showing erythema and ulcers covered with crusts.
Figure 1:
Patient 2. Lesion at baseline showing erythema and ulcers covered with crusts.
Patient 2: Thrombo-occlusive changes in dermal vessels with perivascular lymphocytes. (Haematoxylin & eosin, 100x).
Figure 2:
Patient 2: Thrombo-occlusive changes in dermal vessels with perivascular lymphocytes. (Haematoxylin & eosin, 100x).
Table 1: The demographic and clinical information of two patients
No. Sex/age (yrs) Disease duration (yrs) Lesions localisation Livedo reticularis Summer exacerbation Previous treatment Laboratory findings
1 F/16 3 Bilateral thighs, calves, ankles, and dorsal of feet Yes Yes Steroid (dosage not available); thalid-omide; dipyr-idamole

D-dimer: 1.59 mg/L FEU; hCRP: 3.97 mg/L (normal range: <3.5 mg/L);

ANA (-); APLA (-); ENA (-); ANCA (-); Other coagulation indices (-)

2 F/26 2 Bilateral an-kles and dor-sum of feet No Yes Steroid (cumula-tive dosage: 7700 mg, maximum dosage: 60 mg once daily); thalidomide; dipyr-idamole; diosmin; aspirin

Plasma fasting glucose: 7.39 mmol/L (normal range: 3.9-5.9 mmol/L); IgG 16.3 g/L (normal range: 8-15.5 g/L); hCRP 4.58 mg/L (normal range: <3.5 mg/L);

ANA (-); APLA (-); ENA (-); ANCA (-); Coagulation indexes (-)

FEU: Fibrinogen equivalent unit, ANA: Antinuclear antibody, APLA: Antiphospholipid antibody, ENA: Extractable nuclear antigens, ANCA: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, hCRP: hypersensitive C-reactive protein

Patient 1 was started on 2 mg of baricitinib daily, leading to significant improvement by the 8th week. The clinical assessment score dropped from 9 (erythema 3/ulceration 3/pain 3) to 3 (erythema 0/ulceration 2/pain 1). Follow-up was disrupted after week 10 due to COVID-19, leading to a 12-week pause in treatment and the recurrence of painful lesions on the dorsa of both feet. She was then started on rivaroxaban which had to be discontinued due to severe bone pains. Subsequently, she was initiated on tofacitinib (5mg twice daily) for 33 weeks, stabilising her condition with mild adverse effects of nausea and dizziness. Later, she was re-administered baricitinib 2 mg daily and maintained a response for over 32 weeks with no significant side effects [Figure 3].

At week 42, post treatment complete resolution of the lesions.
Figure 3:
At week 42, post treatment complete resolution of the lesions.

Patient 2 also experienced rapid relief on baricitinib (4 mg daily) for 12 weeks and her clinical assessment score reduced from 8 (erythema 2, ulceration 2, pain 3) to 1 (erythema 0, ulceration 0, pain 1). She was maintained in remission even after reducing the dose to 2 mg daily and later every alternate day over 42 weeks. In December 2022, she experienced a flare-up post-COVID-19 infection. The severe recurrence was managed by increasing the baricitinib dosage back to 2 mg daily.

LV is categorised as an obstructive vasculopathy with ischaemic-thrombotic alteration as its primary pathogenesis. This understanding supports the effectiveness of anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban.1,2 There is however, also a role of inflammation in the pathogenetic pathways for LV which supports the rationale of using JAK inhibitors in LV. In 2020, Jia and colleagues reported rapid symptomatic relief in LV with tofacitinib.3 Similar outcomes were observed with baricitinib, with a mean remission time of 7.75 ± 3.45 weeks among eight patients.4 Our findings are consistent with these reports, showing remission in two patients within 8 and 12 weeks. Additionally, the selective JAK1 inhibitor, abrocitinib demonstrated significant improvements in another isolated case.5

Managing this chronic disease raises concerns about the long-term efficacy, as previous cases had a relatively short follow-up period ranging from 10 to 28 weeks.4,5 Both patients received JAKi with a cumulative duration of over 62 and 75 weeks. Regarding the recurrences, in a previous case report on tofacitinib, no flare-ups of pain or ulcers were noted within a 52-week follow-up.3 However, in our study, both patients reported recurrences; first after discontinuing baricitinib but responded well to subsequent treatment with tofacitinib and baricitinib, maintaining remission thereafter. In the second patient, exacerbation could be attributed to COVID-19 infection, a scenario which has been reported previously.6,7

For safety concerns, off-label use of JAKi in LV warrants caution due to associated thrombotic risks, as highlighted by FDA warnings. Previously, no side effects were reported among LV patients treated with JAKi.3,5 In our cases, mild nausea and dizziness were reported with tofacitinib, with no adverse events noted during extended treatment with baricitinib.

In summary, our cases demonstrate that both tofacitinib and baricitinib could be relatively safe and effective options for treating and maintaining remission in LV. However, more cases with long-term follow-ups are necessary in the future to fully elucidate the efficacy and safety profiles of JAKi.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , . Treatment for livedoid vasculopathy: A systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154:193-202.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . A comprehensive review on pathogenesis, associations, clinical findings, and treatment of livedoid vasculopathy. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:993515.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Refractory ulcerations associated with livedoid vasculopathy successfully treated with tofacitinib. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e14470.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Baricitinib is potentially effective in the treatment of refractory livedoid vasculopathy. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1008392.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Abrocitinib as a novel treatment for multiple skin disorders: 3 case reports and a scoping review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024;17:35-40.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Recrudescence of livedoid vasculopathy induced by COVID-19. Int J Dermatol. 2021;60:e185-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Secondary livedoid vasculopathy following SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024;38:e368-70.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
4,350

PDF downloads
2,264
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections