Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Original Article
2009:75:5;463-468
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.55388
PMID: 19736424

Modeling signaling pathways leading to wrinkle formation: Identification of the skin aging target

Pallavi Chauhan, Madhvi Shakya
 Department of Bioinformatics, MANIT, Bhopal - 462 051, India

Correspondence Address:
Pallavi Chauhan
Department of Bioinformatics, MANIT, Bhopal - 462 051
India
How to cite this article:
Chauhan P, Shakya M. Modeling signaling pathways leading to wrinkle formation: Identification of the skin aging target. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:463-468
Copyright: (C)2009 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Background: In the present scenario, wrinkle formation, prominent sign of skin ageing, is one of the most demanding areas of research. This burgeoning research demand to reduce, delay and restore the effects of skin ageing has led to the study of various signaling pathways leading to wrinkle formation. Wrinkles appear on skin due to influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on mitogenic reactions and signal transduction pathways. Aim: The aim of the present study is to analyze each protein involved in the signaling pathway leading to dilapidation of collagen and an attempt has been made to compare different signal transduction pathways to identify a common target for skin ageing. Methods: In the present work, bioinformatics tools have been used to extract information from already existing experimental data. The statistical techniques are used for further analysis and make useful predictions for skin ageing. Results: Stressors like UV irradiation, osmotic stress and heat shock have been reported to activate epidermal growth factor receptor, interleukin 1 receptor, tumor necrosis factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor and platelet activation factor receptor signaling pathways, which lead to the production of matrix metalloproteinases, collagen degradation and, consequently, wrinkle formation. When all the five signaling pathways were modeled, the c-jun part of the AP-1 transcription factor was found to be a common intermediate protein involved in all the signaling cascades. Moreover, it shows differential expression in the skin on response to stressors. Conclusion: We proposed c-jun to be the most potent target for drug designing against wrinkle formation.
Keywords: Ageing target, Distance matrix, Signaling pathways, Skin ageing, Stressors

Introduction

Skin ageing is one of the most demanding areas of research, as now-a-days it is more significant to prolong health expectancy, allowing people to look younger and live healthy lives rather than to prolong life expectancy. Skin ageing is characterized by signs like discoloration, wrinkles and texture loss. The two major types of skin ageing are intrinsic ageing and extrinsic ageing. Intrinsic ageing is genetically programmed ageing, also called chronological ageing, whereas extrinsic ageing is due to environmental factors like sunlight, mainly UV rays (commonly known as photoageing), stress and pollution. [1],[2] These factors activate the receptors of signal transduction pathways through a ligand-independent mechanism.[3] Chronological ageing and photoageing have different signs and they differ also in the electron microscopic appearance but no longer considered separate entities as they share some important molecular features.[4],[5] Consequently, it can be concluded that extrinsic ageing is superimposition on intrinsic ageing and is thus called premature ageing.

One of the most prominent signs of skin ageing is wrinkle formation. Wrinkles appear on the skin due to loss of elasticity caused by rapid degradation of collagen. This deficiency is contributed by the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on mitogenic response and signal transduction pathways. Receptors like epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1r), tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFr), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFr) and platelet-activating factor receptor (PAF-r) on activation stimulate tyrosine kinase and the associated adapter proteins, which transfer the signal to the transcription factor activation protein 1 (AP-1) and initiate the production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs).[6] This disturbs the natural balance between MMPs and mmp inhibitors, resulting in loss of collagen in the skin. [7] AP-1 transcription factor is composed of two subunits: c-fos and c-jun. In human skin, AP-1 activity is limited by c-jun expression because c-fos is continuously expressed. Interestingly, while c-fos expression in young (18-28 years old) and aged (80 years old) skin does not differ, c-jun expression is elevated in aged compared with young skin. [8]

In order to reduce, delay and restore the effects of skin ageing, it is highly important to completely understand its biological process. The present study is proposed to analyze each protein involved in the pathway leading to dilapidation of collagen and an attempt has been made to compare different signal transduction pathways to identify a common target for both types of ageing so that when targeted through drug design, the intensity of collagen degradation will decline. In the present work, bioinformatics tools have been used to extract information for already existing experimental data. The statistical techniques are used for further analysis and make useful predictions for skin ageing.

Methods

On the way to unearth the proposed findings, the literature was thoroughly studied to identify the proteins involved in the signal transduction pathway leading to wrinkle formation. Further, protein-protein interaction between these identified proteins was derived using String.

String (http://string.embl.de) is a database of interacting proteins and a tool for protein networking. String provided search of the protein interactant and gave a diagrammatic representation of these interactants in the form of a protein network. It is a rich database of interacting proteins collected from experiments, text mining, databases, coexpression, cooccurrence, gene fusion, neighbor proteins and homology proteins. However, for the present work, only experimentally validated protein interactants (joined together by violet lines) were considered to construct the signal transduction pathway.

Sometimes, a single protein has more than one interactant in the same pathway, which may create a problem in finding the accurate signaling pathway. To solve the problem of finding the exact flow of signals between various interactants in a signal transduction pathway, Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was calculated. More the value of the Pearson correlation coefficient, more closely the proteins are evolutionarily related to each other. In this method, coevolutionary information of the interacting partners was gathered and correlation was applied between the distance matrices, where each matrix stores the pairwise distances between a protein and its orthologues from a group of reference genomes. [9] To calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient, orthologues of each interacting protein were collected from the Kegg/Ko database. Then, a distance matrix was generated from the protein and its orthologous sequences by the ClustalW software. ClustalW software is used for multiple sequence alignment. Once a distance matrix is obtained, it is converted to a phylogenetic vector by taking the lower half of the elements of the distance matrix. Then, normalization of the phylogenetic vector is carried out by the following formula:

As discussed above, normalized vectors were constructed for all the interacting proteins. From these normalized vectors, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the desired proteins.

The method discussed above for calculation of the Pearson correlation coefficient is illustrated by taking an example of the EGFr protein sequence (of homosapiens). [10] We have collected orthologues of EGFr from 10 different eukaryotes (like rat, dog, pig, cow, opossum, chicken, zebrafish, chimpanzee, mouse and monkey). Then, all these 11 sequences were subjected to ClustalW to obtain a distance matrix, as shown in [Figure - 1]. [Figure - 1] shows a symmetric matrix. The lower half of the matrix was used to generate the phylogenetic vector. With 11 protein sequences, 55 elements were generated in each phylogenetic vector according to the formula {(n 2 -n)/2}. Now, the phylogenetic vector obtained was normalized by the above formula and the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between EGFr and other protein interactants.

Results

Altogether, there were 30 proteins studied from the literature that were found to be involved in collagen degradation. After deriving the protein interaction between the identified proteins and calculation of the Pearson correlation coefficient between the proteins that have more than one interactant, signaling pathway leading to wrinkle formation was modeled.

EGFr and associated proteins involved in the signaling pathway

According to the literature, UV-activated EGFr is at least partly responsible for the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (Erk1/2) directly, which then activates c-jun. [11],[12]

String determined growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2), Ras GTPase-activating protein 1 (Rasa1), mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (Mapk1/Erk2) and mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (Mapk3/Erk1) to be the interactants of EGFr. To determine the strength of the interaction of these proteins with EGFr, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated [Table - 1]A. Because EGFr-Mapk1 showed the maximum strength of interaction, it can be concluded that EGFr directly activates Mapk1, i.e. Erk2 rather than Erk1, which further transfers the signal to c-jun [Figure - 2]A. Moreover, EGFr-Mapk3 is not an experimentally proved interaction.

PDGFr and associated proteins involved in the signaling pathway

PDGFr also leads to the production of MMPs via activation of Erk 1/2 and c-jun on stress. In vascular smooth muscles cells, factors ranging from physical exertion to psychological stress activate intracellular signaling and stimulate the synthesis of alfa platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFrA) and transcription factor c-fos/c-jun. [13] In fibroblast cells, beta platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFrB) activates c-jun via the Erk1/2 pathway. [14] These are ligand-dependant activation of receptors. However, UV rays activate the PDGFrB pathways, leading to MMPs production, which is ligand-independent activation.

String confirmed that PDGFrB and PDGFrA interact with Grb2 experimentally. Grb2 further interacts with Mapk1 and Mapk3 and transfers the signal to c-jun. In order to determine the most potent interactant among them, the r-value was calculated [Table - 1]B. Grb2-Mapk1 showed the maximum r-value and therefore it was considered as an intermediate protein involved in the pathway. Moreover, Grb2-Mapk9 interaction was not experimentally proved. The concluded signaling pathway of PDGFr is shown in [Figure - 2]E.

PAF-r and associated proteins involved in the signaling pathway

According to the literature, UV light irradiation and acute thermal damage activates PAF-r-mediated activation of Erk1/2. PAF-r, not directly but indirectly, brings about activation of Erk1/2. The transactivation of EGFr by PAF-r involves a matrix metalloproteinase-dependent cleavage and secretion of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (Hb-Egf) that activates the EGFr and subsequently phosphorylates Erk. [15]

String fully supports the literature and showed an interaction between Hb-Egf and EGFr and then EGFr interacting with Mapk1 (potent interactant than Mapk3), carrying the signal to c-jun [Figure - 2]B.

TNFr and associated proteins involved in the signaling pathway

TNFr also participates in the production of MMPs when activated by environmental stress, such as UV rays. Experiments have proved that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (Traf2/Trap3) bifurcates the TNF-mediated NF-kB and c-jun pathways. Traf2 is an adaptor protein of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B (TNFr2) but not the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A (TNFr1). Therefore, it can be concluded that the signaling transduction pathway starts on activation of TNFr2, which further activates Traf2 and, sequentially, stress-activated protein kinase 2 (Jnk2/Mapk9) and c-jun, which leads to the production of MMPs. [16]

String, as such, generated results that have been given in the literature, i.e. TNFrsf1B combined with Trap3, which further combined with Mapk9. TNFrsf1B- Trap3, Trap3- Mapk9 and Mapk9-c-jun are experimentally proved interactants. Because Trap3 does not interact with Mapk8 experimentally, therefore, Mapk9 was considered to be involved in the signaling pathway. The concluded pathway is given in [Figure - 2]D.

IL-1r and associated proteins involved in the signaling pathway

According to research papers, the IL-1r-mediated signaling pathway is activated by environmental stress. On activation, it activates the toll-like receptor protein interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-2 (Irak2), which further activates the TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (Traf6). Traf6 is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor family of proteins. It does not interact with Tnf. Instead, it is associated with IL-1 via Irak. After Traf6 activation, mitogen-activated protein kinase is activated, which further activates c-jun and ultimately activates MMPs, which leads to collagen degradation. [17] Iraf bifurcates the IL-1-induced NF-kB and Jnk pathways.

The String database was used for finding protein interactants involved in the signaling pathway. A list of the interactants involved in the pathway is given in [Table - 2].

Experimentally, IL-1r1 was found to interact with both Irak2 and Traf6. Now, according to the literature, Traf6 further carries the signal to a protein kinase, which was found to be mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 14 or NF-kappa beta-inducing kinase (Map3k14). But Map3k14 is not an interactant of c-jun. However, it activates Nf-kb2 and participates in inflammation. Moreover, Irak2 does not interact with Jnk1/2 experimentally. But, when studies with Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (Irak1) were performed, it was found to be an interactant of IL-1r1, Traf6 and stress-activated protein kinase 1 (Jnk1/Mapk8). Mapk8 further activates c-jun, which leads to MMPs activation. Therefore, it is proposed that Irak1 and not Irak2 bifurcates the IL-1-induced Nf-kb and Jnk pathways.

It was found that Jnk1/2 interacts with Irak1 for transferring the signal to c-jun. The Pearson correlation coefficient calculated for these proteins is given in [Table - 1]C. Because the strength of the interaction is more for Irak1-Mapk8, it is likely to transfer the signal to c-jun. Moreover, Irak1-Mapk9 is not an experimental interactant. The concluded pathway is shown in [Figure - 2]C.

Discussion

EGFr, PDGFr, PAF-r, TNFr and IL-1r1, activated by stressors like heat, osmotic stress and UV-rays, superimpose the chronological ageing and intensify the degradation of collagen and, consequently, lead to wrinkle formation. In the EGFr signaling pathway, EGFR carries signal directly to Mapk1 and activates c-jun for the production of MMPs. In the PDGFr pathway, PDGFra and PDGFrb activate Grb2, Mapk1 and c-jun for MMPs production. In the PAF-r pathway, PAF-r transactivates EGFr via Hb-Egf, which activates Mapk1 and c-jun. In the TNFr-mediated signaling pathway, TNFrsf1B carries the signal to Trap3, which further activates c-jun via Mapk9. IL-1r1 activates c-jun via Irak1. The diagrammatic representation of all these signaling pathways is shown in [Figure - 3].

When all the pathways were studied for a common target, c-jun was the only protein involved in all the pathways. Therefore, it is proposed to be the most potent target for drug design. Targeting this protein will decrease the degradation of collagen in the skin by blocking all these five pathways. Moreover, its expression increases in photoaged and old skin, proving its involvement in collagen degradation and wrinkle formation. Whereas expression of c-fos remains unaffected and studies indicate that c-fos-regulated genes exert a protective function, its deficiency makes the cells hypersensitive to a broad spectrum of DNA-damaging agents. [18] Therefore, it would be more effective to target c-jun instead of targeting the whole AP-1 protein (c-fos + c-jun).

At present, there is no drug for c-jun. Because we have identified the target, our next step is toward the in silico designing of ligands for c-jun, which, after wet lab experimentation, can be a potent drug.

References
1.
Trautinger F. Mechanism to photo damage of the skin and its functional consequences for skin ageing. Clin Exp Dermatol 2002;26:573-7.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Lahmann C, Bergemann J, Harrison G, Young AR. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 and skin ageing in smokers. Lancet 2001;357:935-6.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Rosette C, Karin M. Ultraviolet light and osmotic stress: Activation of the JNK cascade through multiple growth factor and cytokine receptors. Science 1996;274:1194-7.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Bouissou H, Pieraggi MT, Julian M, Savit T. The elastic tissue of the skin. A comparison of spontaneous and actinic (solar) aging. Int J Dermatol 1988;27:327-35.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Fisher GJ, Talwar HS, Lin J, Lin P, McPhillips F, Wang Z, et al . Retinoic acid inhibits induction of c-Jun protein by ultraviolet radiation that occurs subsequent to activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in human skin in vivo. J Clin Invest 1998;101:1432-40.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Rittie L, Fisher GJ. UV-light -induced signal cascades and skin aging. Ageing Res Rev 2002;1:705-20.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Rocquet C, Bonté F. Molecular aspects of skin ageing - recent data. Acta Derm Venereol 2002;3:71-94.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Fisher GJ, Kang S, Varani J, Bata-Csorgo Z, Wan Y, Datta S, et al . Mechanism of photoageing and chronological skin ageing. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1462-70.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Craig RA, Liao L. Phylogenetic tree information aids supervised learning for predicting protein-protein interaction based on distance matrices. BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8:6.8
[Google Scholar]
10.
Sato T, Yamanishi Y, Kanehisa M, Toh H. The inference of protein-protein interactions by co-evolutionary analysis is improved by excluding the information about the phylogenetic relationships. Bioinformatics 2005;21:3482-9.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Wan YS, Wang ZQ, Voorhees J, Fisher G. EGF receptor crosstalks with cytokine receptors leading to the activation of c-Jun kinase in response to UV irradiation in human keratinocytes. Cell Signal 2001;13:139-44.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Di Girolamo N, Coroneo M, Wakefield D. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Is Partially Responsible for the Increased Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Expression in Ocular Epithelial Cells after UVB Radiation. Am J Pathol 2005;167:489-503.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Hu Y, Bock G, Wick G, Xu Q. Activation of PDGF receptor in a vascular smooth muscle cells by mechanical stress. FASEB J 1998;12:1135-42.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Nielsen MB, Christensen ST, Hoffmann EK. Effects of osmotic stress on the activity of MAPKs and PDGFr-b-mediated signal transduction in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008;294:1046-55.
[Google Scholar]
15.
Marques SA, Dy LC, Southall MD, Yi Q, Smietana E, Kapur R, et al . The Platelet-Activating Factor Receptor Activates the Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Induces Proliferation of Epidermal Cells through an Epidermal Growth Factor-Receptor-Dependent Pathway. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002;300:1026-35.
[Google Scholar]
16.
MacEwan DJ. TNF ligands and receptors-a matter of life and death. Br J Pharmacol 2002;135:855-75.
[Google Scholar]
17.
Wang X, Bi Z, Chu W, Wan Y. IL-1 receptor antagonist attenuates MAP kinase/AP-1 activation and MMP1 expression in UVA-irradiated human fibroblasts induced by culture medium from UVB-irradiated human skin keratinocytes. Int J Mol Med 2005;16:1117-24.
[Google Scholar]
18.
Fritz G, Kaina B. Activation of c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase 1 by UV Irradiation Is Inhibited by Wortmannin without Affecting c-jun Expression. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:1768-74.88.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
286

PDF downloads
229
Show Sections