Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
2011:77:1;23-27
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.74969
PMID: 21220875

Non-typical morphology and localization in Turkish atopic dermatitis patients with onset before the age of 18 years

Kurtulus D Yazganoglu, Esen Ozkaya
 Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Kurtulus D Yazganoglu
Istanbul University Istanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, 34093 Çapa-Istanbul
Turkey
How to cite this article:
Yazganoglu KD, Ozkaya E. Non-typical morphology and localization in Turkish atopic dermatitis patients with onset before the age of 18 years. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011;77:23-27
Copyright: (C)2011 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Background: Hanifin and Rajka's criteria (HRC) are the gold standard for the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD). Apart from the age-related distribution and typical morphology of the lesions as defined in one of the major criteria of HRC, patients may also show nontypical morphology and localization. Aim: The aim of this study was to find the frequency of nontypical morphology and localization in Turkish AD patients with onset before the age of 18 years, who were diagnosed according to HRC. Methods: This was a methodological study based on the analysis of patients' data derived from the checklists of HRC and precise clinical documentation of each patient. A total of 321 Turkish patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2004 with the onset of AD before the age of 18 years were allocated to the study group. Results: 49.5% of patients had nontypical localization of AD, the majority being infants or children who had flexural involvement rather than the typical cheek or extremity lesions. Lichenified/exudative eczematous pattern was the most frequent morphologic type (45.5%); however, 54.5% of the patients showed combined or isolated variants, e.g. nummular and seborrheic patterns, in particular. Conclusions: A considerable amount of Turkish patients with AD before the age of 18 years presented with nontypical morphology and/or localization according to their age group. The confirmation of our findings in a multicentric prospective study would further allow a completion and correction of the diagnostic criteria of AD for age groups.
Keywords: Age groups, atopic dermatitis, diagnostic criteria

Introduction

Hanifin and Rajka′s criteria [1] (HRC) are widely used for the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD). Apart from the age-related distribution (infancy-related cheek involvement/childhood-related extremity involvement/adolescence- or adult-related flexural involvement) and the typical lichenified/exudative eczematous morphologic pattern as defined in one of the major criteria of HRC, patients may also have nontypical morphology and localization. [2] So far, there are no large reports on the clinical presentation of AD on Turkish patients in the literature. The aim of this methodological study was to find the frequency of nontypical morphology and localization in Turkish AD patients with onset before the age of 18 years, who were diagnosed according to HRC.

Methods

This methodological study was based on the analysis of patients′ data by assessing the checklists of HRC and precise clinical documentation of each patient in our outpatient clinic for AD. A total of 399 Turkish AD patients were consecutively diagnosed according to HRC between June 1996 and January 2004. Among them, 321 (80.5%) with onset of AD before the age of 18 years were allocated to the study group. Patients were analyzed in three subgroups according to the onset at infancy (1 month-2 years), at childhood (2-10 years), and at adolescence (10-18 years).

The severity of AD was assessed according to the Langeland score. [3]

Patients with or without typical morphology and distribution were noted. Morphology of dermatitis was evaluated as follows: typical lichenified/exudative eczematous pattern or other variants such as nummular, papular, prurigo-like, follicular, seborrheic dermatitis-like, mixed patterns, and erythroderma.

Localization of dermatitis was evaluated as follows: Face/symmetrical cheek involvement, flexural sites (antecubital/popliteal/neck/wrist/ankle) with or without involvement of other parts of the body, nonflexural involvement of the extremities, seborrheic areas (scalp and retroauricular region), anogenital/diaper area, and generalized involvement. Site of onset was also recorded.

Concomitant mucosal atopic disease (allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma bronchiale) was determined according to personal history, skin prick testing (Hal-Brial, Haarlem, Holland) and/or specific IgE levels using UniCAP/Pharmacia CAP System allergens (Pharmacia and Upjohn Diagnostics , Uppsala, Sweden) against a selection of nine aeroallergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium herbarum, Artemisia vulgaris, Secale cereale, grass mix, tree mix, and cat hair). Family histories of AD and/or mucosal atopy in first-degree relatives were recorded.

Serum total IgE levels were determined using UniCAP/Pharmacia CAP System (Pharmacia and Upjohn Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden). Levels more than 150 IU/ml were regarded as high.

Data were stored and assessed using SPSS for Windows Release 11.0 version. The Chi-square was used for the comparisons. A two-tailed p0 value less than 0.05 was taken to indicate a statistically significant association. The study was assessed and approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Results

The age range of 321 patients (175 females, 146 males; female/male = 1.2) was 6 months-61 years (median: 7; interquartile range: 12) with an age of onset range of 1 months-18 years (median: 1.5; interquartile range: 5.8). AD started at infancy (1 month-2 years) in 55.2%, at childhood (2-10 years) in 30.5%, and at adolescence (10-18 years) in 14.3% of patients. In 72.9% of the patients, AD started under the age of 5 years. The duration of the disease ranged from 6 months to 48 years (median: 35.3, interquartile range: 72).

AD was mild in 51.7% of patients, moderate in 39.6% and severe in 8.7%. There was no significant statistical difference regarding AD′s severity between patients with onset of AD before and after the age of 2 years. Besides, no correlation was found between AD′s severity and gender of patients.

Localization

Body-site distribution of AD is shown in [Table - 1]. The main involved sites were flexures in 239 patients (74.5%), being most frequently antecubital/popliteal flexural areas in 217 patients (67.6%).

Table 1 :Localization of atopic dermatitis in patients with onset before 18 years of age

Additionally, 52.7% of the patients with flexural eczema were infant or childhood cases. A total of 159 patients (49.5%) had nontypical localization of AD according to their age group, 93.1% of them being infants or children who had flexural involvement rather than the typical cheek or extremity lesions.

On the other hand, typical symmetrical cheek involvement was observed in 108 cases, 90.7% of them being infants, 7.4% children, 1.9% adolescents.

Regarding site of onset, flexural (mainly antecubital/popliteal) onset of AD was seen in the majority of cases (n = 130, 40.5%), followed by face (symmetrical cheek involvement) (n = 95, 29.6%), and extremity extensors (n = 33, 10.3%). The most frequent initial localization was the flexural areas in those with onset of AD at childhood and at adolescence (62.3 and 58.7%, respectively). As a striking finding, the second most frequent initial localization was flexural involvement (23.7%), following the typical symmetrical cheek involvement (49.7%) in those with onset of AD at infancy. A total of 103 patients (79.2%) with flexural eczema as the initial AD lesion were those with onset of AD at infancy or childhood. Patients showing typical cheek involvement as the initial lesion of AD were almost exclusively those with onset of AD at infancy (93.6%). Only 6.4% of patients with typical cheek involvement were those with onset of AD at childhood.

Hand lesions were reported in a total of 97 cases (30.2%). It was seen in 26.5% of infant, 31.6% of childhood and 41.3% of adolescent patients.

Anogenital lesions were seen in 14 (4.4%) of our cases, with the majority being infants (64%).

Morphology

A typical lichenified/exudative pattern was the most frequent morphologic type of dermatitis (45.5%), followed by a mixed type (44.9%) comprising combinations of mainly lichenified/eczematous pattern with other patterns of dermatitis, mainly nummular pattern.

A total of 175 patients (54.5%) had the nontypical morphologic variants such as nummular (21.2%), seborrheic dermatitis-like (21.2%), papular (18.7%), follicular (8.7%), and prurigo-like (4.6%) patterns mainly in combination with the lichenified/exudative pattern. Among them, 31 patients (9.6%) had the following isolated morphologic variants: 17 patients (5.3%) had nummular pattern alone, whereas 7 patients (2.2%) had papular, 4 patients (1.2%) prurigo-like, and 3 patients (0.9%) follicular pattern alone.

Personal/familial atopy

A personal history of mucosal atopy was present in 142 patients (44.2%). Mucosal allergic disease was detected in 63 (44.4%) comprising allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in 43 patients, allergic asthma bronchiale in 4 patients, and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis plus allergic asthma bronchiale in 16 patients. House dust mite antigens were the most relevant allergens (88.9%). AD preceded mucosal atopy or started synchronously with mucosal atopy in a majority of cases (40.1 and 41.5%, respectively).

A family history of atopy was present in 78 patients (24.3%); 38 suffered from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis alone, 20 from asthma bronchiale alone, 8 from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis plus asthma bronchiale, 6 from AD alone and 6 from AD plus mucosal atopic disease.

A total of 165 patients (51.4%) had neither personal nor family history of atopy.

Laboratory

Serum total IgE level was high in 57.5% of patients with a range from 155 to 21,000 IU/ml (median: 200, interquartile range: 638.8). Serum total IgE was significantly higher in patients with mucosal atopy than in those without mucosal atopy ( P < 0.05; Chi-square = 6.1; OR = 1.9; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-3.4).

Frequency of Hanifin and Rajka′s criteria

Frequencies of the HRC are listed in [Table - 2]. It can be seen that 166 patients (51.7%) had three major criteria, whereas 155 patients (48.3%) had four major criteria. The number of positive minor features ranged from 3 to 17 in the whole group (mean = 7.5). Patients with less than seven minor criteria had significantly a milder disease ( P < 0.001, Chi-square = 17.8, OR = 2.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.7-4.6). The most frequent minor criterion was xerosis (86%), followed by early onset of age (72.9%), and itch when sweating (69.5%). The number of minor features was significantly higher in patients with xerosis than in those without xerosis ( P < 0.001; Chi-square = 16.0; OR = 3.9; 95% confidence interval = 1.9-7.9).

Table 2 :Frequencies (%) of the Hanifin and Rajka's criteria[1] in atopic dermatitis patients with onset before the age of 18 years

The frequency of the minor criteria was significantly lower in those who were younger than 2 years (mean: 5.6) compared with those who were older than 2 years at the time of diagnosis ( P < 0.001, Chi-square = 37.3, OR = 6.2, 95% confidence interval = 3.2-12.1).

Discussion

AD is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a varied range of presentations and lack of a proper definition. The diagnosis depends on clinical features as there are no definitive diagnostic tests. The HRC have been considered as a gold standard for the diagnosis of AD since their introduction in 1980. [1] Apart from HRC, there are more sets of criteria for AD such as the UK Working Party′s criteria, [4] Millennium criteria [5] or those developed for specific ethnical patient population, e.g. Japanese dermatological association criteria [6] and Kang and Tian′s criteria. [7] However, different from these criteria the HRC have been found to be useful particularly in hospital-based studies due to high sensitivity. [8],[9] The major drawback of the HRC is the low specificity. [9] Inclusion of atopy (especially family history) as a major criterion [9] and lack of diagnostic significance of many of the minor criteria that were also found in control groups were regarded as the main reasons for loss of specificity of the HRC. [4],[10],[11],[12]

Interestingly, nearly half of the patients had different localization of dermatitis than would be expected according to their age group in this study. These were almost exclusively infants or children with flexural lesions rather than the expected face or extremity lesions as indicated in the HRC. [1] Furthermore, flexural areas were a frequent initial localization even in those with onset of AD at infancy. For this reason, the recently modified HRC [13] would be more suitable for the diagnosis of AD, indicating that flexural involvement could be seen at any age, rather than only in adolescents or adults. On the contrary, typical cheek involvement as an initial localization of AD was seen almost exclusively in infancy.

Hand lesions that are frequently seen in adult AD patients [2] were observed in nearly one-third of the infant or childhood cases in this study. A recent report indicated that hands were frequently involved in childhood AD. [14]

Another striking finding was related with the morphology of AD. A typical lichenified/exudative pattern was most frequently seen. However, nearly 60% of the patients had the nontypical morphologic variants such as seborrheic-dermatitis like, nummular, papular, follicular, and prurigo-like, mainly in combination with the lichenified/exudative pattern. These morphologic variants are well described in the literature, with nummular pattern being the most commonly reported type in children and adults. [15],[16] Orange and de Waard-van der Spek suggested adding nummular pattern to the clinical signs in young children. [15] Papular, follicular, seborrheic dermatitis-like patterns are other well-described forms of AD, especially in children, [15],[16],[17],[18] whereas prurigo-like lesions are more frequently reported in adults. [17],[18] In the present series, seborrheic dermatitis-like pattern on scalp and retroauricular area, and nummular pattern were the most frequently observed nontypical morphologic variants.

It might be difficult to differentiate the AD of seborrheic areas (scalp/retroauricular region) from infantile seborrheic dermatitis (ISD) that might even precede or be superimposed on AD. [19] Early onset since the first months of life, greasy crusts, and absence of pruritus are the characteristic features of ISD. [19] In contrast, scalp lesions in AD are characteristically very pruritic. In case of additional flexural involvement, the most useful distinguishing feature was the increased incidence of lesions in the axillae and in the napkin area in ISD, whereas the absence of axillary involvement was suggested to be characteristic for AD. [9],[20] Although usually spared in infants due to humidity under the diaper, [15] the napkin area can also be involved in AD as the skin of these patients is more susceptible to irritants like the ones in urine and feces. [21] Anogenital lesions were seen in 4.4% of our cases, with the majority being infants.

It must be stated that our results have been achieved on the basis of a specific ethnic patient population. The genetic background of Turkish patients might have led to a different clinical phenotype, i.e. large number of nontypical presentation of AD such as more flexural lesions than expected.

In the present study, patients with onset of AD before the age of 18 years had a mean number of seven minor criteria according to HRC. [1] Patients under the age of 2 years had significantly less minor criteria in this study, suggesting a time-related increase in the number of minor criteria with increasing age. At that point, a risk of underdiagnosis of AD among infants with less than three minor criteria would arise if they would be evaluated strictly according to HRC.

In conclusion, this study on Turkish AD patients with onset before the age of 18 years has shown that a considerable number of patients could have a different morphology (i.e. seborrheic dermatitis-like, nummular, papular, follicular, or prurigo-like) and/or different distribution of AD. Flexural areas were an important site of involvement in any age group. Even at infancy, AD might begin with flexural lesions in nearly one-fourth of the cases. Besides, there was a time-related increase in the number of positive minor criteria. We believe that the confirmation of our findings in a multicentric prospective study would further allow that the diagnostic criteria of AD could be completed and corrected for age groups.

References
1.
Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1980;92:44-7.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Ozkaya E. Adult-onset atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;52:579-82.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Rajka G, Langeland T. Grading of the severity of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1989;144:13-4.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Williams HC, Burney PG, Hay RJ, Archer CB, Shipley MJ, Hunter JJ, et al. The U.K. Working Party's diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis. I. Derivation of a minimum set of discriminators for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1994;131:383-96.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Bos JD, Van Leent EJ, Sillevis Smitt JH. The millennium criteria for the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis. Exp Dermatol 1998;7:132-8.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Krafchik RB, Halbert A, Yamamato K, Sasaki R. Eczematous Dermatitis. In: Schachner LA, Hansen RC, editors. Pediatric Dermatology. 3 rd ed. Spain: Elsevier Limited; 2003. p. 609-30.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Kang KF, Tian RM. Criteria for atopic dermatitis in a Chinese population. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1989;144:26-7.
[Google Scholar]
8.
De D, Kanwar AJ, Handa S. Comparative efficacy of Hanifin and Rajka's criteria and the UK working party's diagnostic criteria in diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in a hospital setting in North India. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:853-9.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Williams HC, Burney PG, Pembroke AC, Hay RJ. The U.K. Working Party's diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis. III. Independent hospital validation. Br J Dermatol 1994;131:406-16.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Mevorah B, Marazzi A, Frenk E. The prevalence of accentuated palmoplantar markings and keratosis pilaris in atopic dermatitis, autosomal dominant ichthyosis and control dermatological patients. Br J Dermatol 1985;112:679-85.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Kang KF, Tian RM. Atopic dermatitis. An evaluation of clinical and laboratory findings. Int J Dermatol 1987;26:27-32.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Nagaraja, Kanwar AJ, Dhar S, Singh S. Frequency and significance of minor clinical features in various age-related subgroup of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatr Dermatol 1996;13:10-3.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Eichenfield LF, Hanifin JM, Luger TA, Stevens SR, Pride HB. Consensus conference on pediatric atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:1088-95.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Bφhme M, Svensson A, Kull I, Nordvall SL, Wahlgren CF. Clinical features of atopic dermatitis at two years of age: A prospective, population-based case-control study. Acta Derm Venereol 2001;81:193-7.
[Google Scholar]
15.
Oranje AP, Waard-van der Spek FB. Atopic dermatitis: Review 2000 to January 2001. Curr Opin Pediatr 2002;14:410-3.
[Google Scholar]
16.
Thestrup-Pedersen K. Clinical aspects of atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2000;25:535-43.
[Google Scholar]
17.
Horαkovα E, Wozniak KD. Analysis of the occurrence of morphologic changes in atopic dermatitis in childhood. Z Hautkr 1993;68:155-8.
[Google Scholar]
18.
Herzberg J. Little known forms of neurodermitis. Hautarzt 1973;24:47-51.
[Google Scholar]
19.
Moises-Alfaro CB, Caceres-Rios HW, Rueda M, Velazquez-Acosta A, Ruiz-Maldonado R. Are infantile seborrheic and atopic dermatitis clinical variants of the same disease? Int J Dermatol 2002;41:349-51.
[Google Scholar]
20.
Yates VM, Kerr RE, MacKie RM. Early diagnosis of infantile seborrhoeic dermatitis and atopic dermatitis-clinical features. Br J Dermatol 1983;108:633-8.
[Google Scholar]
21.
Seymour JL, Keswick BH, Hanifin JM, Jordan WP, Milligan MC. Clinical effects of diaper types on the skin of normal infants and infants with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;17:988-97.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
2,990

PDF downloads
2,885
Show Sections