Paradoxical psoriasis induced by IL-17 antagonists

Introduction

The three approved IL-17 inhibitors consist of IL-17A inhibitors (secukinumab and ixekizumab) and an IL-17 receptor (IL-17R) inhibitor (brodalumab). They exhibit satisfactory therapeutic outcomes and acceptable safety profiles in treating psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, occasional reports highlight less common side effects during anti-IL-17 treatment, such as paradoxical reactions. These reactions are notable for their unmistakable symptoms and the subsequent therapeutic challenge in follow-up care. Paradoxical reactions are generally defined as developing or worsening a preexisting immune-mediated disorder that would typically respond to the same therapeutic agent causing it.¹ In this context, we present a case series of patients who developed paradoxical psoriasis during anti-IL-17 treatment at our institution. We also review relevant articles, aiming to propose the most likely mechanisms of action and a relatively optimised therapeutic approach for physicians to consider as a reference.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a literature review using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases (updated through January 1, 2023). The search employed index terms like “anti-interleukin 17,” “ixekizumab,” “secukinumab,” and “brodalumab,” combined,” coupled with terms such as “paradoxical,” “psoriasis,” “arthritis,” “skin,” and “eruption.” Additionally, we reviewed citations within the articles to ensure comprehensive coverage. Patients with other established trigger factors were excluded from this review. Moreover, we present a case series of patients with preexisting psoriasis who developed paradoxical psoriasis eruptions during anti-IL-17 treatment in our institution from June 2020 to August 2022. All patients provided written informed consent, and the ethics committee approved the study.

Case Series

Case 1: A 59-year-old man had plaque psoriasis for over 30 years, along with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease for 10 years. And he was referred to our clinic, due to a sudden bout of erythroderma (Body surface area, BSA = 92%; Psoriasis area severity index, PASI = 65) [Figure 1a]. His medical history revealed regular use of Chinese herbal medicines for psoriasis, and he had been on hypoglycemic drugs and antihypertensives for a long time to manage his other health issues. Consequently, ixekizumab treatment was initiated at the prescribed dosages. Ten days later, PASI decreased to 29.2 [Figure 1b]. Unfortunately, the positive response halted in the 3^rd week, and erythroderma returned in the first month of ixekizumab treatment (PASI = 64.8) [Figure 1c]. No specific factors were identified as the cause for this deterioration. Due to the worsening of the disease, ixekizumab was stopped, and acitretin combined with cyclosporine was started to improve the condition. After 6 days of this treatment, erythema and edema showed significant improvement, and simultaneously, PASI decreased to 45 [Figure 1d].

Close

Figure 1a:

Erythrodermic psoriasis was diagonsed at the initial visit in case 1.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 1b:

After 10 days of treatment with ixekizumab in case 1.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 1c:

Paradoxical psoriasis was diagnosed after 1 month of treatment with ixekizumab in case 1

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 1d:

After discontinuation of ixekizumab and treatment with acitretin and cyclosporine for 6 days in case 1.

Export to PPT

Case 2: An 18-year-old woman, having psoriasis vulgaris for 8 years, was referred to our clinic due to erythroderma and psoriatic arthritis [Figure 2a]. A physical examination showed widespread redness and rough scaly plaques covering nearly all skin (BSA = 98%; PASI = 56.4). After a thorough assessment, ixekizumab was initiated. PASI decreased to 25.6 entirely following the second dose, and troublesome joint symptoms significantly improved [Figure 2b]. However, this positive response lasted for only one more week. During the 6-week follow-up, erythroderma reappeared without apparent cause (PASI = 62.4) [Figure 2c]. Consequently, ixekizumab was discontinued, and adalimumab was started. In another 3-month follow-up, the rash was nearly cleared (PASI = 2) [Figure 2d].

Close

Figure 2a:

Erythrodermic psoriasis was diagnosed at the initial visit in case 2.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 2b:

After 14 days of treatment with ixekizumab in case 2.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 2c:

Paradoxical psoriasis was diagnosed after six weeks of treatment with ixekizumab in case 2.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 2d:

After discontinuation of ixekizumab and treatment with adalimumab for 5 weeks in case 2.

Export to PPT

Case 3: A 19-year-old overweight man, diagnosed with plaque psoriasis for 8 years and recently found to have metabolic syndrome, was referred to our clinic due to the significant impact of the disease on his quality of life [Figure 3a]. Previous medical records indicated a refusal of traditional systemic agents due to potential adverse effects. A physical examination revealed widespread redness and thickened scaly plaques covering the skin (BSA = 70%, PASI = 40.8). Consequently, ixekizumab was administered at the recommended dosages. By the 2^nd week, PASI decreased to 19.6 [Figure 3b]. However, by the 5^th week, guttate psoriasiform eruptions appeared on the ventral and dorsal trunk, and the bilateral lower limbs were covered with coarse plaques without any identifiable triggers (PASI = 29.7) [Figure 3c]. To address this, topical corticosteroids were added for rescue, but the outcomes were unsatisfactory. Subsequently, ixekizumab was stopped, and adalimumab was initiated. Unfortunately, at the 3-month follow-up, the eruption had only partially improved (PASI = 20.7) [Figure 3d].

Close

Figure 3a:

Plaque psoriasis was diagnosed at the initial visit in case 3.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 3b:

After 14 days of treatment with ixekizumab in case 3.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 3c:

Paradoxical psoriasis was diagnosed after 5 weeks of treatment with ixekizumab in case 3.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 3d:

After discontinuation of ixekizumab and treatment with adalimumab for 3 months in case 3.

Export to PPT

Case 4: A 24-year-old woman, diagnosed with plaque psoriasis for 8 years, was referred to our clinic [Figure 4a]. No prior medical history was available. A physical examination showed generalised thick scaly plaques (BSA = 30%, PASI = 24.3). Ixekizumab was then prescribed. Within 2 weeks, the PASI decreased to 11.1 [Figure 4b]. Unfortunately, by the 3^rd week, annular lesions developed and spread on the trunk and gradually onto the limbs despite the application of potent topical corticosteroids (PASI = 29.7) [Figure 4c]. No specific triggers were identified during this time. Consequently, we switched from ixekizumab to adalimumab in the 5^th week. At the 3-month follow-up, the lesions were almost resolved (PASI = 0.6) [Figure 4d].

Close

Figure 4a:

After 14 days of treatment with ixekizumab in case 4.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 4b:

Plaque psoriasis was diagnosed at the initial visit in case 4.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 4c:

Paradoxical psoriasis was diagnosed after 5 weeks of treatment with ixekizumab in case 4.

Export to PPT

Close

Figure 4d:

After discontinuation of ixekizumab and treatment with adalimumab for 3 weeks in case 4.

Export to PPT

Results

A total of 22 articles, including 30 patients, were included in the final analysis. Gender, age, comorbidities, diagnosis, drug administration, the progression of skin eruption, and management details are presented in Tables 1 and 2. As indicated in Table 1, the onset time of paradoxical psoriasis varied, ranging from 1 week to 2 years. Preexisting psoriasis deteriorated in most cases (except for three patients with different major diagnoses). Conversion of lesion morphology during anti-IL-17 therapy was observed in 59.3% (16/27) of patients, with 3 cases developing de novo psoriasis. Among these, the conversion of plaque to pustular was the most common, accounting for approximately 68.8% (11/16).

The management of paradoxical psoriasis varied widely due to patient heterogeneity. Among the 30 patients, 53.3% switched to another systemic agent, 20% suspended the culprit drug and added topical agents, 20% added topical agents without discontinuing the drug, and 6.6% continued the drug with another systemic agent as a complement. In the follow-up, 93.3% of cases showed partial or complete resolution, regardless of drug continuation, while 6.6% exhibited no resolution, primarily in patients maintaining the culprit drug. Interestingly, two cases reintroduced a different class of IL-17 inhibitors for treating paradoxical psoriasiform eruptions, with no observed deterioration and partial improvement of the disease. Additionally, 71.4% (5/7) of patients with comorbidities discontinued the original drug and switched to another systemic agent. For patients without comorbidities, 47.8% (11/23) made the same decision for management. Subgroup analysis generally mirrored the overall group analysis.

Discussion

IL-17A/IL-17R inhibitors are effective and safe in large-scale randomised controlled trials for treating psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, occasional reports of less common side effects, such as paradoxical psoriasis, have emerged. This paper presents representative cases of paradoxical psoriasis induced by IL-17A inhibitors in our institution. Our findings suggest that our patients may be more susceptible to severe attacks with a shorter latency compared to previous studies. Although three out of four patients had comorbidities [Table 3], and one had experienced multiple agents, we attribute the sudden deterioration to paradoxical psoriasis rather than the above mentioned factors. A multicenter retrospective study revealed that ixekizumab response was unaffected by clinical variables like body mass index, disease duration, or psoriatic arthritis, further supporting our opinion.²

Reviewing the literature on IL-17 inhibitor-induced paradoxical psoriasis; we observed that compared with TNF-α inhibitors, the latency was shorter, and the lesion morphology tended to transform plaque into pustular rather than plaque to guttate. Mechanistically, IL-17 inhibitors lead to a decrease in TNF-α concentrations, directly or indirectly causing an increase in IFN-α. This, in turn, leads to the expression of chemokines such as CXCR3 on T cells, promoting T-cell homing to the skin and sustaining the inflammatory mechanisms of psoriasis lesions.³ Inhibition of Th17 may cause repolarization toward Th1, possibly explaining why TNF-α inhibitors can manage paradoxical psoriasis caused by IL-17 inhibitors.

There is no consensus on managing paradoxical psoriasis induced by IL-17 inhibitors due to limited reported data.^4–25 In our study, we found that more patients preferred discontinuing the implicated drug and sought additional adjuvant therapy to control paradoxical psoriasis, in contrast to that induced by TNF-α inhibitors (73.3% vs. 33.2%). Patients attempting to continue IL-17 inhibitors without strong intervention faced more significant challenges instead of gradual improvement. This evidence suggests that more aggressive measures should be taken to treat paradoxical psoriasis induced by IL-17 inhibitors than those caused by TNF-α inhibitors. Reintroducing another IL-17 inhibitor is not recommended, as patients rarely improved according to this analysis.

Limitation

Data are limited to case reports and case series.

Conclusion

A substantial body of evidence suggests that patients in similar situations may benefit from more aggressive interventions. Additionally, the re-administration of another IL-17 inhibitor is not recommended.