Polymerase chain reaction is no better than Gram stain for diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis
2 Department of Microbiology, Adan Hospital, Kuwait
Abdel-Hamid F El-Gamal
P.O.Box:2193 Al-qurain 47372
|How to cite this article:
El-Gamal AHF, Al-Otaibi SR, Alshamali A, Abdulrazzaq A, Najem N, Al. Fouzan A. Polymerase chain reaction is no better than Gram stain for diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:101
Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea are the leading reportable causes for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the United States. , In UK, gonorrheal disease is considered the second most common sexually transmitted infection of bacterial origin.  In France, the average number of Neisseria gonorrhea isolated per laboratory per year decreased from 10.6 in 1986 to 0.6 in 1997, but then increased yearly to reach 1.9 in 2000.  Also, gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis are the most commonly reported STDs in China since the re-emergence of STDs in the late 1970′s and early 1980′s. 
Among individuals with gonorrheal infection, 3.3-37% of men had a chlamydial coinfection, and 12-28% of men with chlamydial infection had a gonorrheal coinfection. , Although gonorrheal and chlamydial infections can be easily diagnosed, treated, and cured, the undetected and untreated infections lead to severe and costly health problems such as pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility in females; and testicular and prostate infections and infertility in males. 
At the national level of Kuwait, the information on reported cases of gonorrheal and chlamydial infections are limited and often missing. Hence, our goal is to determine the co-occurrence of both these diseases among men with urethral discharge as well as to establish the efficacy of PCR in the diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis.
This study was conducted in the STD clinic of Adan hospital, which is the referral to the whole south region of the state of Kuwait. Men attending STD clinics and currently having any of the STD symptoms (e.g., genital discharge, itching, burning or pain during urination) were examined and only those patients with urethral discharge and past history of heterosexual intercourse confirmed by clinical examination (visible or milking when necessary) were included in this study. Two urethral swab samples were taken. The swab was inserted 1-2 cm into the urethra and rotated for 30 seconds before withdrawing. One sample was smeared on a slide and examined after Gram staining and the other was stored at -20°C to test for the presence of Neisseria gonorrhea and Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR assay.
The study conducted between October 2005 and 2006 had a total of 475 newly registered cases of men complaining of urethral discharge with past history of heterosexual intercourse. The mean age of the patients was 32.5 years with standard deviation of 7.62 years (range: 17-61 years). Of the 475 patients, 125 (26.3%) were diagnosed with gonococcal urethritis, 47 (9.8%) were diagnosed with chlamydial urethritis, and 11 (2.31%) were diagnosed with coinfection of both Neisseria gonorrhea and Chlamydia trachomatis . The chlamydial coinfection among patients with gonorrheal urethritis was 8.1% (11/136), while gonorrheal coinfection among patients with chlamydial urethritis was 18.9% (11/58) [Table - 1].
The correlation of the results of both Gram stain and PCR for diagnosis of gonorrhea, they agree in 134 cases (98-52%) of totally 136 diagnosed cases of gonorrhea, and disagree only in two of the cases (1.48%). The overall correlation between the two methods was 99.4%.
Consistent with our results, Juchau et al .  concluded that the correlation between PCR and Gram stain examination for diagnosis of gonorrhea was 99.6%. Thus, we conclude that there is no practical reason to use PCR examination for diagnosis of gonorrhea in symptomatic males owing to its high cost.
Centers for disease control and prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2001. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002.[Google Scholar]
The Hidden Epidemic. Confronting sexually transmitted disease. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1997.[Google Scholar]
GRASP steering group, the gonococcal resistance to antimicrobial surveillance program (GRASP) year 2001 report. London: Public Health Laboratory Service; 2002.[Google Scholar]
Herida M, Sednaoui P, Goulet V. Gonorrhea surveillance system in France: 1986-2000. Sex Trans Dis 2004;31:209-14.[Google Scholar]
Parish WL, Laumann EO, Cohen MS, Pan S, Zheng H, Hoffman I, et al . Population based study of Chlamydial infection in China: A hidden epidemic JAMA 2003;289:1265-73.[Google Scholar]
Dragovic B, Greaves K, Vashisht A, Straughair G, Sabin C, Smith NA. Chlamydia co-infection among patients with gonorrhea. Int J STD AIDS 2002;13:261-3.[Google Scholar]
Creightons S, Tenant-flowers M, Taylor CB, Miller R, Low N. Co-infection with gonorrhea and Chlamydia: how much is there and what does it mean? Int J STD AIDS 2003;14:109-13.[Google Scholar]
Holmes KK, sparling PF, Per Anders M, et al , editors. Sexually transmitted diseases, 3rd ed. New York: McGerow - Hill, Professional; 1998.[Google Scholar]
Lyss SB, Kamb ML, Pelerman TA, Moran JS, Newman DR, Bolan G, et al . Chlamydia trachomatis among patients infected and treated for neisseria gonorrhea in sexually transmitted disease clinic in United States. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:178-85.[Google Scholar]
Juchau SV, Nakman R, Ruppard. Comparison of gram stain with DNA probe for detection of Neisseria gonorrhea in urethras of symptomatic males. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:3068-9.[Google Scholar]