Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obervation Letter
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Original Article
2003:69:4;281-283
PMID: 17642912

Profile of dermatophyte infections in Baroda

S Singh1 , PM Beena2
1 Department of Microbiology, Pramukh Swami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Baroda, India

Correspondence Address:
S Singh
29 Jalaram Park, Near New Postal Colony, Behind Parikh Bhuvan, Anand - 388001
India
How to cite this article:
Singh S, Beena P M. Profile of dermatophyte infections in Baroda . Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:281-283
Copyright: (C)2003 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Introduction: This is an attempt to find the species prevalence of various dermatophytes in patients with dermatophytosis in our hospital in Baroda. Material and Methods: Two hundred and sixty clinically suspected cases of dermatophytosis were subjected to mycological studies. Results: One hundred and fifty seven cases (60.38%) were positive for fungus in direct microscopy while 116 (44.62%) were culture positive. Tinea corporis was the most common clinical presentation followed by tinea cruris. Young adults in the age group of 16-30 yrs were mainly affected. The male to female ratio was 1.57:1. Trichophyton rubrum (73.27%) was the most common isolate, followed by Trichophyton mentagrophytes (17.24%), Epidermophyton floccosum (7.75%) and Trichophyton violaceum (1.72%). Conclusion: Trichophyton rubrum was the predominant fungus found in this area of Gujarat, followed by Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Epidermophyton floccosum and Trichophyton violaceum.
Keywords: Dermatophytes, Species, Prevalence

India is a large subcontinent with remarkably varied topography, situated within the tropical and subtropical belts of the world. Its climate is conducive to the acquisition and maintenance of mycotic infections. Since dermatophytosis occurs most frequently during the monsoon, the present study was planned during this period.[1]

Material and methods

Two hundred and sixty clinically suspected cases of dermatophytosis attending the dermatology outpatient department of Shri Sayaji Rao General Hospital, Baroda, during the period 1999-2000 were included in this study. A detailed clinical history, including age, sex, duration and type of lesion or history of family contact, was taken. Patients were examined and grouped in different clinical types depending upon the site of involvement.

Clinical material was collected for microscopy and culture using standard mycological techniques. SDA (Sabourauds Dextrose Agar) and DTM (Dermatophyte Test Media) with cycloheximide and chloramphenicol were used for culture. The media were incubated at 250C and 370C for a minimum period of three weeks. Positive cultures were examined both macroscopically and microscopically for species identification. Special tests like hair perforation, urease production or slide culture were performed when required.[2]

RESULTS

The maximum number of patients was found in the age group of 16-30 years (118/260; 45.38%), followed by 31-45 years (67/260; 25.76%). There were 159 men (61.15%) and 101 women (38.84%), the male to female ratio being 1.57:1.

Out of 260 patients, 157 (60.38%) tested positive by direct microscopy and 116 (44.62%) by culture [Table - 1]. Ten patients were negative for dermatophytes by direct microscopy but yielded growth on culture; 51 were positive on direct microscopy but negative on culture. Ninety three cases were negative by both techniques. Culture positivity was highest with tinea manuum (56.25%) and lowest with tinea barbae (0%). Being the most common clinical type, tinea corporis contributed the highest number of culture positive cases (71/153).

The isolation rate of dermatophytes was 44.6% (116/260), with four species of dermatophytes being isolated: T. rubrum (isolation rate 73.27%),

T. mentagrophytes (17.24%), T. violaceum (1.72%) and E. floccosum (7.75%). The clinical and mycological correlation is shown in [Table - 2].

DISCUSSION

The commonest clinical types of dermatophytosis that presented to us were tinea corporis (58.84%), followed by tinea cruris (12.3%), which concurs with reports from other parts of India.[3] The incidence of tinea capitis was 6.92% in our study which is comparable with reports from other workers (0.57%[4] to 10%[5]). Tinea capitis is less common in India than in other countries,[4],[6],[7] This may be attributable to the use of hair oils (particularly mustard oil) which are customarily used by Indians and have been shown to have an inhibitory effect on dermatophytes in vitro.[8],[9] The reported incidence of tinea pedis varies from 26.4% from Pune[10] to 0.4% from Ahmedabad.[11] We found it to be 11.53% in our study. The predominance of tinea pedis in western countries could be because of the regular use of shoes and socks, predisposing to perspiration and maceration.

Dermatophyte infection is more common in adults aged 16-45 years.[3] As universally reported, tinea capitis is an infection of children. The post-pubertal changes in hormones, resulting in acidic sebaceous gland secretions, are responsible for the decrease in incidence with age.[12]

A higher incidence of dermatophytosis in males than in females has been reported both in India and abroad.[3] Philpot suggested that males may be more vulnerable to infection due to higher exposures in the army, schools and sporting activities, and due to the type of shoes and socks they use.[12] This is especially true for tinea cruris. Differences in the incidence of other clinical types were also observed in the present study, e.g. tinea corporis, tinea capitis and tinea manuum were more common in males while tinea pedis and tinea unguium were more common in females.

We found an isolation rate of 44.62% with culture, compared to rates varying from 7% to 49% in other studies.[13],[14] Trichophyton species were more commonly isolated than Epidermophyton and Microsporum. T. rubrum is the main dermatophyte reported from India and other countries.[3] Many other species of dermatophytes like T. schoenleinii, T. tonsurans, T. verrucosum, T. ferrugineum, T. concentricum and M. audouinii have been isolated by other workers, but we could isolate only T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes, T. violaceum and E. floccosum.[5], [15],[16],[17] T. rubrum has been found to be the main causative agent of tinea corporis, whereas tinea cruris is mainly caused by E. floccosum and tinea capitis by T. violaceum.[3]

References
1.
1959:13-22.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberber P, Win WC Jr. Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1997.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Kanwar AJ, Mamta, Chander J. Superficial fungal infections. In: Valia RG, Valia AR, editors. IADVL textbook and atlas of dermatology. 2nd ed. Mumbai: Bhalani Publishing House; 2001. p. 215-58.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Kaur S. Incidence of dermatophytosis in Chandigarh and surrounding areas. Ind J Dermatol Venereol 1970;36:143-5.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Varenkar MP, Pinto MJ, Rodrigues S, et al. Clinico-microbiological study of dermatophytosis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1991;34:1986-92.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Vasu DRBH. Incidence of dermatophytosis in Warangal, Andhra Pradesh. India. Indian J Med Res 1966;54:468-74.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Malik AK, Chugh TD, Prakash K. Dermatophytosis in North India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1978;21:53-9.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Hajini GH, Kandhari KC, Mohapatra LN. Effect of hair oils and fatty acids on the growth of dermatophytes and their in vitro penetration of human scalp hair. Sabouradia 1970;8:174.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Garg AP, Muller J. Inhibition of growth of dermatophytes by Indian hair oils. Mycoses 1992; 35:363-9.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Anand LC, Singh UK, Rathore BS. Fungal flora in the armed forces; clinical and mycological studies Indian J Med Res 1980;71:365-71.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Shah HS, Amin AG, Kavinde MS, et al. Analysis of 2000 cases of dermatomycoses. Indian J Pathol Bacteriol 1975;18:32-7.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Philpot CM. Some aspects on the epidemiology of tinea. Mycopathologia 1997;3:62.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Gupta RN, Shome SK. Dermatomycoses in Uttar Pradesh - an analysis of 620 cases. Indian J Med Assoc 1959;33:39-43.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Bhaskaran CS, Rao PS, Krishnamoorthy T, et al. Dermatophytoses in Tirupati (Andhra Pradesh). Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1977;20:251-5.
[Google Scholar]
15.
Rani V, Saigal RK, Kanta S, et al. Study of dermatophytes in Punjabi population. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1983;26:243-7.
[Google Scholar]
16.
Nagbhusanam P, Rao TD. Patnaik R. Dermatomycoses in Hyderabad area. Indian J Dermatol Venerol 1969;35:120-3.
[Google Scholar]
17.
Agrawalla A, Jacob M, Sethi M, et al. A clinico-mycological study of dermatophytosis in Nepal J Dermatol 2001;28:16-21.
[Google Scholar]
Show Sections