Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Original Article
2002:68:1;25-27
PMID: 17656863

Social risk factors for sexually transmitted diseases

Mohan C Shendre1 , Rajnaraayan R Tiwari2
1 Department Of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur, India
2 Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur, India

Correspondence Address:
Mohan C Shendre
C/o Dr. S.P Zodpey, 305, Hanuman Nagar, Nagpur-440 009
India
How to cite this article:
Shendre MC, Tiwari RR. Social risk factors for sexually transmitted diseases. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2002;68:25-27
Copyright: (C)2002 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

The present case control study included 322 cases of sexually transmitted diseases and equal number of age group matched and sex pair matched controls from the Skin and Venereal Disease out patient department of Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur. Of the six study factors viz. type of family, educational status, religion, socioeconomic status, marital status and social disharmony, except for religion and socioeconomic status other four factors were found to be significantly associated with sexually transmitted diseases'
Keywords: Social factors, STDs

Introduction

Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) are an important public health problem not only because of their severe complications and sequelae but also because they increase the risk for transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus.[1] Apart from physical morbidity, the victim also suffers from the social consequences of acquiring STDs. However there are some social factors which make an individual more vulnerable to indulge into risk-taking behaviours, thereby increasing the risk of acquiring STDs. These social factors include educational status, socio-economic status, marital status, type of family, religion, social disharmony, etc. However, very few studies[2],[3],[4] have reported the role of these social factors in acquring STDs and that too not comprehensively. Fortified with this fact the present case-control study was undertaken to study the role of social factors in acquiring sexually transmitted diseases.

Materials and Methods

The present case-control study was carried out at Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases of Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur. Case was defined as patient coming to Skin and Venereal Diseases out patient Department without signs and symptoms of STDs. After group matching for age and pair matching for sex, 322 study subjects in each group were included. The patients were taken into confidence and confidentiality of the information was assured. Information regarding demographic characteristics was collected on pretested questionnaire using interview technique/statistical analysis included calculation of proportion, odds ratio and their 95% confidence intervals.

Results

[Table - 1] shows the distribution of study subjects according to demographic characteristics. Majority (53.72%) of the study subjects belonged to 20-30 years age group. 295 (91.6%) of the subjects were males. Bulk of the cases and controls belonged to upper lower and lower socio-economic classes according to modified Kuppuswamy′s Socio-economic scale. [Table - 2] depicts the distribution according to the social factors which were dichotomised to classify individuals into exposed and unexposed groups. Risk associated with the social factors is also described in [Table - 2]. Except for lower socioeconomic strata and religion other factors viz. nuclear family, lower educational level, marital status and presence of social disharmony were found to be significantly associated with STDs.

Discussion

The present case control study shows that majority of the subjects belonged to 20-30 years group. This period has maximum sexual activity, the chances of exposure are also likely to be increased and hence more prevalence is found in that age group.[2],[3] Males enjoy more freedom in all respects in society including sex because of which there is high proportion of males as compared to females.

The study included as many as six risk factors viz. type of family, educational status, religion, socio-economic status, marital status and social disharmony. Those who were single or living in nuclear family were at increased risk as compared to those living in joint family (OR=1.52;95% Cl=1.06-2.19). This high risk may be due to loneliness or frustration because of which they are likely to fall prey to the STDs or there might be nobody to supervise, guide or advise individuals living in nuclear family.[6],[7]

Significant low educational status could be reason for unawareness of mode of transmission and preventive measures for STDs.[2],[3] Religion and lower socio-economic status were found to be non-significant risk factors. This could be due to the similar distribution of cases and controls in exposed and unexposed group as the hospital being a governmental institute where patient turnover is from lower socioeconomic classes. Earlier studies have also shown the non-significance of religion[4] and lower socio-economic class.[8] The unmarried, separated, widow and divorcees are exposed to high risk sexual behaviour to satisfy rheir sexual desire which increases the chance of acquiring STDs. This could explain the excess risk among unmarried and singles as compared to married subjects (OR=1.37; 95% CI:1.1.01-1.87).

Basserr et al[9] found that marital status was independent risk factors for HIV infection whereas Moses et al[10] in their study found that in multivariate analysis, the important predictor of STD acquisition was marital status (unmarried or married but living apart from their wives). Social disharmony in form of broken homes, quarrels in family and child abuse were found to be a significant social risk factor (OR=4.30;95% Cl: 2.99-6.15) as reported by Bartholow et al.[11] Thus to conclude, the present study recognised nuclear family and those living alone, lower educational status, unmarried and those married but living apart from their partners and social disharmony as significant risk factors for acquiring STDs.

References
1.
Dyck EV, Meheus AZ, Not P Laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1999:ixx.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Seth TR. Socio-physical factors and incidence of venereal diseases. Indian J Dermatol Venereal 1970;36:93-99.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Nair BKH, Vishwan MP, Venugopol BS, et al. An epidemiological study of venereal diseases, IJMR 1973;61:11-16.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Sanchez J, Gotuzzo E, Courillo-C, et al. Gender differences in sexual practices and sexually transmitted infections among adults in Lima, Peru. Am Publ Health 1996;86:1098-1107.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Mahajan BK, Gupta MC. Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 2,d edition, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. New Delhi. 1995;134-135.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Mbizvo HT, Machekno R, Mcfarland W, et al. HIV Seroincidence and correlates of seroconversion in a cohort of male factory workers in Harare, Zimbabwe. AIDS 1996;10:1985-1901.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Mehendale SM, Shephered ME, Divekar AD, et al. Evidence for high prevalence and rapid transmission of HIV among individuals attending STD clinics in Pune, India. IJMR 1996;304-335.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Chaubey D, Sharma AK, Singh RK. Identification of risk factors in sexually transmitted diseases: Role of health education. Indian Community Medicine 1993;XVII:62-67.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Basset MT, Mcfarland WC, Ray S, et al. Risk factor for HIV infection at enrolment in an urban male factory cohort in Harare, Zimbabwe. J Acquir Immuno Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1996;13:287-293.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Moses S, Muia E, Bradelly KJ, et al. Sexual behavioural desease transmission and control. Social Science Medicine 1994;18:747-761.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Bartholow BN, Doll LS, Jay D, et al. Emotional, behaviour and HIV risk associated with sexual abuse among adult homosexual and bisexual men. Child Abuse Negl 1994;18:747-761.
[Google Scholar]
Show Sections