Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Study Letter
90 (
6
); 811-813
doi:
10.25259/IJDVL_1109_2023
pmid:
39152805

Systemic tofacitinib in paediatric alopecia areata

Department of Dermatology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Medical College, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Corresponding author: Dr. Rachita S Dhurat, Department of Dermatology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Medical College, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. rachitadhurat@yahoo.co.in

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Dhurat RS, Sharma R, Zatakia S, Ranka A. Systemic tofacitinib in paediatric alopecia areata. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2024;90:811-3. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_1109_2023

Dear Editor,

There is paucity of data on the use and safety of tofacitinib in the paediatric population for alopecia areata, especially from the Indian subcontinent. We report our experience in 20 children with alopecia areata treated with tofacitinib at a tertiary care hospital in India. This was a retrospective study in which hospital records were reviewed to identify patients with alopecia areata less than 18 years of age treated with oral tofacitinib between January 2021 and March 2023. The severity of alopecia areata was assessed using Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) in which a SALT score of 100 corresponds to the complete absence of scalp hair and a SALT score of 0 indicates complete hair growth.1 Response to treatment was assessed after 6 months of therapy by calculating the percent change in SALT score from baseline to the most recent follow-up. Study participants were divided into two groups on the basis of treatment response: non-responders who achieved a percentage change in SALT score of <5% and responders who achieved a percentage change in SALT score of ≥5%.2,3 Responders were further divided into four groups according to their percentage improvement in SALT score: 5%–25% (modest response), 26%–50% (moderate response), 51%–75% (significant response) and 76%–100% (markedly significant response).

Twenty children with alopecia areata were treated with tofacitinib (9 boys and 11 girls) for a median duration of 7 months (mean 9.45 months; range 6–26 months). The age at the time of initiation of treatment ranged from 3 years to 17 years (mean 10.8 years). Among the morphological types of alopecia areata, seven (35%) had a reticular type, five (25%) had alopecia subtotalis, five (25%) had patchy alopecia and three (15%) had alopecia totalis. The baseline SALT score at the time of starting tofacitinib was > 50 in thirteen patients and <50 in seven patients. Of these seven patients with baseline SALT score < 50, two had SALT score < 20. These two patients were started on tofacitinib after there was no response to topical therapy, intralesional steroids, and immunotherapy for more than 6–8 months. The disease duration varied from 2 months to 7 years with a median duration of 18 months and a mean duration of 28 months. None of the patients had any associated co-morbidities but two patients had a family history of alopecia areata. Study participants characteristics have been summarised in Table 1. Pre-treatment investigations were performed in all patients. No active or latent infections or other significant metabolic disturbances were found.

Table 1: Patient characteristics
Patient who completed a minimum 6 months treatment, n = 20
All patients, n = 20 Responders, n = 20 Patient with baseline SALT score > 50, n = 13 Patient with baseline SALT score < 50, n = 7
Age, y, median (range) 11 (3–17) 11 (3–17) 9 (4–17) 14 (3–17)
Sex, n (%)
Male 9 (45) 9 (45) 7 (53.84) 2 (29)
Female 11 (55) 11 (55) 6 (46.16) 5 (71)
Age of alopecia areata onset, y, median (range) 8.25 (1–17) 8.25 (1–17) 6 (1–16) 10 (3–17)
Duration of disease, median (range) 18 (2–84) 18 (2–84) 12 (2–72) 24 (3–84)
Subtype, n (%)
Patchy alopecia areata 5 (25) 5 (25) 0 5 (71.4)
Reticular alopecia areata 7 (35) 7 (35) 5 (38.4) 2 (28.6)
Alopecia subtotalis 5 (25) 5 (25) 5 (38.4) 0
Alopecia totalis 3 (15) 3 (15) 3 (23.1) 0
Eyebrow/eyelash involvement 7/20 (35) 7/20 (35) 7/13(53.8) 0
Nail diseases, n (%) 0 0 0 0
Autoimmune comorbidities, n (%) 0 0 0 0
Atopic disease, n (%) 0 0 0 0
Family history of alopecia, n (%) 2 (10) 2 (10) 2 (15.3) 0

The dose of tofacitinib was decided according to the weight of the patient.4 The dose varied from 2.5 mg to 10 mg/day, with a mean dose of 5.75 mg/day. Eight patients received 2.5 mg/day, five patients received 5 mg/day and seven patients received 10 mg/day.

All twenty patients showed a percentage change in SALT score of ≥5 % and thus all were responders. The percentage change in SALT score varied from 5.17 to 100% with a median of 89.4 % and a mean of 75.8 %. Among all patients, 15 (75%) showed markedly significant improvement, two (10%) showed significant improvement, two (10%) responded moderately and one (5%) showed modest improvement. Overall, 85% (17/20) achieved over 50% improvement in SALT score from baseline and 35% (7/20) achieved complete regrowth (SALT score of 0). A visible reduction in SALT score was seen as early as 1.5 months in one patient. Most of the patients (18/20) showed visible regrowth in 2–5 months of therapy; a single patient showed a visible response at 8 months of therapy.

Response characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 2. Representative photographs of patients who responded to therapy are presented in Figures 1 and 2.

Table 2: Response characteristics
All patients, n = 20 Responders, n = 20 Patient with baseline SALT > 50, n = 13 Patient with baseline SALT < 50, n = 7
Initial SALT score – median; mean (range) 56.7; 57.53 (8.7–100) 56.7; 57.53 (8.7–100) 67.6; 73.57 (52.8–100) 29.6; 27.76 (8.7–46)
Most recent SALT score – median; mean (range)

4.8; 11.64

(0–70.16)

4.8; 11.64

(0–70.16)

8.97; 17.20

(0–70.16)

0; 2.88 (0–11)
% change in SALT score (%) – median, mean (range) 89.4; 75.84; (5.17–100) 89.4; 75.84; (5.17–100)

89.4; 77.79

(5.17–100)

100;86.05

(44.44–100)

% change in SALT score <5%, n (%) 0 0 0 0
% change in SALT score 5%–25%, n (%) 1 (5) 1 (5) 1 (7.7) 0
% change in SALT score 26%–50% n (%) 2 (10) 2 (10) 1 (7.7) 1 (14.3)
% change in SALT score 51%–75% 2 (10) 2 (10) 1 (7.7) 1 (14.3)
% change in SALT score 76%–100%, n (%) 15(75) 15(75) 10 (77) 5 (71.4)
Treatment duration, months – median, mean (range) 7; 9.45 (6–26) 7; 9.45 (6–26)

8;10.6

(6–26)

7; 8.2 (6–15)
Baseline image of a 4-year-old boy with alopecia totalis before starting tofactinib.
Figure 1a:
Baseline image of a 4-year-old boy with alopecia totalis before starting tofactinib.
Post 4 months of treatment with tofacitinib.
Figure 1b:
Post 4 months of treatment with tofacitinib.
Post 6 months of treatment with tofacitinib.
Figure 1c:
Post 6 months of treatment with tofacitinib.
Baseline image of a 12-year-old girl with alopecia areata.
Figure 2a:
Baseline image of a 12-year-old girl with alopecia areata.
Post 4 months of treatment with tofacitinib.
Figure 2b:
Post 4 months of treatment with tofacitinib.
Post 9 months of treatment with tofacitinib.
Figure 2c:
Post 9 months of treatment with tofacitinib.

Adverse events were mild and included headaches (two patients) and dizziness (one patient), which subsided with continuing therapy. One patient had a transient fall in haemoglobin from 13.3 g/dl to 10.0 g/dl, which improved with oral haematinics.

We also observed that out of total seven patients who achieved complete regrowth (SALT score 0), the baseline SALT score was <50 in four patients and > 50 in three patients. In these four patients (with baseline SALT<50), tofacitinib was tapered and even stopped without much flare of disease activity. The relapses seen if any after stopping tofacitinib were mild and localised and were managed with topical/intralesional steroids. None of these patients required restarting of tofacitinib. On the other hand, in the other three patients who achieved complete regrowth and had baseline SALT > 50, whenever tapering of tofacitinib was attempted, there was a flare of disease activity with multifocal hair pull test positivity.

To conclude, tofacitinib is a promising therapy for alopecia areata in children and adolescents. Since alopecia areata can show spontaneous regrowth, the efficacy of tofacitinib can only be definitively determined by performing randomised controlled trials.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required as this was a retrospective study.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Alopecia areata in-vestigational assessment guidelines. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40:242-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Safety and efficacy of the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib citrate in patients with alopecia areata. JCI Insight. 2016;1:e89776.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Tofacitinib for the treatment of alopecia areata and variants in adolescents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:29-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatment updates. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2021;47:545-63.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
3,179

PDF downloads
1,067
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections