Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Focus
2008:74:4;415-419
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.42898
PMID: 18797086

Techniques of immunofluorescence and their significance

KH Mohan, Sathish Pai, Raghavendra Rao, H Sripathi, Smitha Prabhu
 Department of Skin and STD, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India

Correspondence Address:
K H Mohan
Department of Skin and STD, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal- 576 104, Udupi Dist, Karnataka
India
How to cite this article:
Mohan K H, Pai S, Rao R, Sripathi H, Prabhu S. Techniques of immunofluorescence and their significance. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008;74:415-419
Copyright: (C)2008 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Immunofluorescence is a histochemical laboratory staining technique used for demonstrating the presence of antibodies bound to antigens in tissues or circulating body fluids. These techniques are essential to supplement clinical findings and histopathology in the diagnosis of immunobullous disorders. They permit early diagnosis, treatment, and subsequent monitoring of disease activity in patients with these potentially life-threatening disorders.

In 1941, Coons et al, developed the technique of immunofluorescence. Subsequently, granular deposits of IgG and C3 were first described along the dermo-epidermal junction in lesions of lupus erythematosus in 1963. In 1964, Beutner and Jordon used the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) technique to demonstrate antibodies in the sera of pemphigus patients.

Immunofluorescence Techniques

In clinical immunodermatology, there are three basic types of immunofluorescence techniques: direct immunofluorescence (DIF), indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) [Figure - 1], and complement binding indirect immunofluorescence. [1] All these methods entail the use of fluorescein-linked antibodies to immunoglobulins, complement components, or other proteins.

Fluorescent techniques involve the emission of light of one color/wavelength and a low energy level from a substance being irradiated with light of a different wavelength. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC) are two routinely used fluorochromes. The antibody is linked with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) via a thiocarbamide linkage without destroying its capacity to react with the corresponding antigen.

Direct Immunofluorescense

This is a one-step histological staining procedure for identifying in vivo antibodies that are bound to tissue antigens. [1],[2] [Figure - 1],[Figure - 2],[Figure - 3] The procedure entails the following steps:

  1. Skin or mucosal biopsy specimens are usually obtained by 3-5 mm punch or surgical biopsy.
  2. Biopsy specimens are snap frozen . If there is a delay between biopsy and snap freezing, the specimen should be kept in cold saline.
  3. Frozen 4-6μ sections are cut on a cryostat and placed on a glass slide before being air-dried for 15 minutes.
  4. After rinsing in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2, slides are overlaid in a moist chamber with FITC conjugates with the following specificities: antiIgG, antiIgM, antiIgA, antiC3, and antifibrin. Each reagent is tested on a separate slide.
  5. After rinsing in PBS, slides are mounted in buffered glycerin and examined under a fluorescence microscope.

Indirect Immunofluorescence

IIF is a two-step serological technique for detection of circulating antibodies in body fluids. [1],[2] The procedure involves the following steps:

  1. Substrate sections are allowed to react with serially diluted (1:10, 1:80 etc) patient′s serum in a moist chamber for 30 min. Control sera of known positive and negative antibody reactivity are tested simultaneously.
  2. Following a rinse in PBS to remove unbound serum proteins, sections are treated with a FITC-conjugated antiIgG or other antibody conjugates of defined specificity.
  3. Following a rinse for at least 10 min in PBS to remove the unbound conjugate, slides are mounted and examined under a fluorescence microscope.

Complement Indirect Immunofluorescence [1]

Antigens and antibodies bind to one another to generate many molecules of complement 3 (C3). This amplification principle is used in complement IIF, which is more sensitive than IIF. It is a three-step technique:

  1. A normal tissue substrate is overlaid with plasma, serum/other tissue fluid which has been heated to 56°C for 30 min to destroy the complement-fixing activity of antigen-antibody complexes. Specimens are then washed.
  2. Tissue sections are incubated with a source of complement such as fresh human serum. Complement-fixing IgG/IgM antibodies that have bound to the antigen in the first step can now activate complement, giving rise to numerous C3 molecules that are bound at the antigen-antibody binding site in the tissue. Specimens are then washed again.
  3. Sections are incubated with fluorescein-labeled antihuman C3 antibodies. These bind to C3 generated in the second step. After washing, the C3-antibody conjugates can be examined under a fluorescence microscope.

In some situations, so few IgG or IgM antibodies bind to tissue antigens that they cannot be detected by IIF. However, as these antibody-antigen complexes generate many C3 molecules, complement IIF is helpful to detect antigen(s) in these conditions.

Variants of Indirect Immunofluorescence

Salt split technique

This technique is used to distinguish between subepidermal blistering conditions with similar direct immunofluorescence findings. In this procedure, normal human skin is incubated in 1 M NaCl (sodium chloride) for 48-72 h to split it at the level of the lamina lucida. Bullous pemphigoid antibodies bind to the roof and floor of the blister while epidermolysis bullosa aquisita antibodies bind solely to the dermal (floor) side of the split skin.

Antigenic mapping method

This method is used as an adjunct to electron microscopy to differentiate between the major forms of epidermolysis bullosa . A blister is induced by rubbing the skin with a pencil eraser for one minute and a biopsy is taken from that area after ten minutes. The biopsy material is snap frozen and slides are prepared.

Indirect immunofluorescence is performed with polyclonal/monoclonal primary antibodies directed against different antigenic components of the dermal-epidermal junction, including the bullous pemphigoid antigen, laminin, and type 4 collagen. The cleavage plane is determined by noting which antigens are detected on the roof and the floor of the mechanically induced blisters. All three antigens are seen on the floor (intraepidermal split) in superficial blisters, bullous pemphigoid and laminin antigens are seen on the roof and type 4 collagen on the floor (intralamina lucida split) in junctional blisters, and all three antigens are detected on the roof (sublamina densa split) in dystrophic blisters.

Double staining method

In this method, FITC is used in conjunction with TRITC to demonstrate the co-distribution of two antigenic substances in tissues. Double staining can be used as a direct/indirect method. The indirect method has very high sensitivity.

Significance of indirect immunofluorescence

During active disease, 80-90% of pemphigus vulgaris patients show IgG antibody against the intercellular cement substance of stratified cornified epithelium. Circulating antibodies may not be detectable in early cases when there are only a few lesions, and during remission.

In pemphigus, titers of circulating intercellular antibodies can be correlated with disease activity-a two-fold rise in titer may indicate an impending relapse. [3],[4] Of the four classes of IgG, IgG1 is the best indicator of disease. False positive pemphigus-like antibodies have been reported in thermal burns, toxic epidermal necrlysis, SLE, lichen planus , healthy people, relatives of patients with pemphigus, D-penicillamine therapy, myasthenia gravis, trichophyton rubrum fungal infection, and lepromatous leprosy.

IIF can be used to demonstrate lichen planus specific antigen (LPSA), which is expressed in the stratum granulosum and stratum spinosum. LPSA is specific for lichen planus and found in 80% of patients with and without oral lesions.

On the other hand, direct immunofluorescence is believed to be virtually free of false positive results.

False negative results are seen with organ-specific antibody, prozone interference by the other antibodies, or due to error in technique.

Collection and handling of specimens for immunofluorescent studies in skin disease

Two types of specimens can be examined by IF techniques, notably biopsy specimens of skin or mucus membranes and serum samples. [5]

Biopsy specimens

Perilesional skin is used for immunofluorescence for DIF patients. Monkey or guinea pig esophagus, rat bladder epithelium for paraneoplastic pemphigus, or blister fluid can be used for IIF. Quick freezing is the most widely used method for handling biopsy specimens for IF studies. This can be performed by immersing the biopsy specimen either in liquid nitrogen or cold solid carbon dioxide or in a hexane bath. The quick frozen biopsy is then mounted in tissue-embedding compound and sectioned in a cryostat. Tissue substrates for IIF techniques are processed similarly. At present, immunofluorescence can be performed with biopsy specimens handled for several days at ambient temperature in a preservative liquid medium, as described by Michel et al . Michel′s medium is now commercially available.

Serum samples

Blood (8-10 mL) should be collected without anticoagulant. Serum is separated from the clotted blood and if not immediately tested, it should be aliquoted and stored at -20°C.

Other specimens for DIF

Outer root sheath of anagen hair from pemphigus vulgaris patients can be used for DIF. The outer root sheath is structurally analogous to epidermal keratinocytes in which antibodies can be detected.

Immunofluorescence findings in skin diseasesImmnufluorescence findings in the pemphigus group of diseases are tabulated in [Table - 1].

Immunoluorescence-negative bullous disordersImmunofluorescence is negative in subcorneal pustular dermatosis, transient acantholytic dermatosis, familial benign chronic pemphigus, and epidermolysis bullosa. [6],[7]

Immunfluorescence findings in subepidermal [Table - 2] and other skin diseases are enumerated [Table - 3]. [8],[9]

In conclusion, immunofluorescence methods provide a useful adjunct to light microscopy for reaching diagnosis of immunological skin diseases. However, they require technical skill to perform as well as experience and caution to interpret.[Figure - 4]

References
1.
Huligol SC, Bhogal BS, Black MM. Immunofluorescence of the immunobullous disorders: Part one: Methodology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1995;61:187-95.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Vassileva S. Immunofluorescence in Dermatology. Int J Dermatol 1993;32:153-61.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Jablonska S, Chlorzelski T, Blaszyk M, Maciejewski W. Pathogenesis of pemphigus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol Res 1977;258:135-40.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Chlorzelski TP, Butneur EH. Factors contributing to occasional failure in demonstration of pemphigus antibodies by immunofluorescence test. J Invest Dermatol 1969:53:188-91.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Rao R, Shenoi SD. Indirect immunofluorescence to demonstrate lichen planus specific antigen (LPSA) in Lichen planus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006;72:350-2.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Feliciana C, Pour SM ,Toto P, Coscione G, Amerio P. Direct immunofluorescence diagnosis of pemphigus without biopsy. J Cutan Med Surg 1998;2:209-11.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Brystryn JC, Sabolinski M. Effect of substrate on indirect immunofluorescence tests for intercellular and basement membrane zone antibodies. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986;15:973-7.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Ratnam KV, Pang BK. Pemphigus in Remission: Value of negative Direct Immunofluorescence in management. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;30:547-50.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Bhogal B, Wojnarowska F, Black MM, Xu W, Levene GM. The distribution of immunoglobulins and the C3 component of complement in multiple biopsies from the uninvolved and perilesional skin in pemphigus. Clin Exp Dermatol 1986;11:49-53.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
538

PDF downloads
598
Show Sections