Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obervation Letter
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
2017:83:1;113-116
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.193613
PMID: 27852990

The utility of etanercept in chronic stable plaque psoriasis: Results from an open-label, prospective, single arm study

Anandan Venkatesan, KP Saradha, V Senthil Kumar, Mani Surya Kumar, C Zohra Begum, Rashmi Singh
 Department of Dermatology, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Rashmi Singh
Department of Dermatology, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Royapuram, Chennai - 600 001, Tamil Nadu
India
How to cite this article:
Venkatesan A, Saradha K P, Kumar V S, Kumar MS, Begum C Z, Singh R. The utility of etanercept in chronic stable plaque psoriasis: Results from an open-label, prospective, single arm study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2017;83:113-116
Copyright: (C)2017 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Sir,

The introduction of biologicals has greatly revolutionized the treatment options for psoriasis, with the advantages of good efficacy and a reasonable safety profile.

The recombinant tumor necrosis factor antagonist, etanercept is approved for use in India as monotherapy in adults and children (>6 years) with moderate to severe psoriasis. Extensive studies from around the world, in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, demonstrate its long-term benefits. However, Indian data is limited.

We conducted an open-label, non-randomized, single-arm, prospective, observational study in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis in order to observe the safety, efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneously injected etanercept (50 mg/week), at the Department of Dermatology, Government Stanley Medical College, Chennai. Data was collected between June 2012 and June 2013. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

A detailed medical history and physical examination findings were recorded at the initial visit. Twenty patients with chronic stable plaque type psoriasis satisfying the inclusion criteria [Table - 1] were enrolled in this study. Baseline investigations were undertaken [Table - 2].

Table 1: Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the enrolment of subjects in study
Table 2: Baseline investigations

Patients were hospitalized and administered weekly subcutaneous injections of etanercept 50 mg for 12 weeks and an additional 12-week safety follow-up was conducted. Assessment of the safety profile of etanercept was done using the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0, 1999.

Efficacy was assessed by monitoring the psoriasis area severity index score on a weekly basis throughout the duration of the study. Clinical improvement was graded as 'good' on achieving PASI 50 (50% or more reduction in psoriasis area severity index) and 'excellent' on achieving PASI 75 (75% or more reduction in psoriasis area severity index).

There were 10 men and 10 women with a mean age of 39.5 years and a mean duration of psoriasis of 9 years. The mean psoriasis area severity index score at baseline was 22.8. Eighteen patients had received prior systemic therapy or phototherapy.

At week 4, only 1 (5%) patient achieved PASI 25 (25% reduction in psoriasis area severity index) while the rest had less than 25% reduction in psoriasis area severity index. At week 8, 8 (40%) patients achieved PASI 50 (50% reduction in psoriasis area severity index), 9 (45%) patients achieved PASI 25 and 3 (15%) had patients less than 25% reduction.

At week 12, 13 (65%) patients had achieved PASI 75 (primary endpoint), 5 (25%) patient had achieved PASI 50, 1 (5%) patient had achieved PASI 25 and 1 patient had less than 25% reduction in psoriasis area severity index. Similarly, the mean psoriasis area severity index score was observed to decrease from 22.8 at baseline to 20.8 at the end of week 4, 12.8 at week 8 and 7.2 (68.4%) at the end of week 12 [Figure - 1] and [Figure - 2]a,[Figure - 2]b,[Figure - 2]c.

Figure 1: Decline in mean psoriasis area severity index score over 12 weeks
Figure 2a: Patient Response A: Week 0 and 12
Figure 2b: Patient Response B: Week 0 and 12
Figure 2c: Patient Response C: Week 0 and 12

No hematological, cutaneous or systemic adverse events were observed in this study. No specific adverse events leading to withdrawal occurred during this study after 12 weeks. In general, etanercept was well tolerated.

The mean duration of remission was 3 months (standard deviation = 2.35).

Our results correlated with the study conducted by Sterry et al. who reported that 62% of patients treated with injection etanercept 50 mg/week achieved PASI 75 (75% reduction in psoriasis area severity index) at week 12.[1] On the other hand, studies conducted by Leonardi et al. and Papp et al. showed that only around one-third of the patients receiving injection etanercept 50 mg/week achieved PASI 75 at week 12.[2],[3] The mean time to relapse was 84 days which concurred with our results.[3] Another study by Papp et al. showed that etanercept was clinically beneficial to patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, with no apparent decrease in efficacy after dose reduction from 50 to 25 mg twice weekly.[4]

Even in the era of biologics, methotrexate remains the first-line drug in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Unfortunately, its dose-dependent risk of hepatotoxicity remains high.

Mazzotta et al. observed that patients who have not taken any biological therapy earlier have a better response to treatment with etanercept.[5] None of our patients had been exposed to biologicals previously. A study conducted in Italy, by calculating quality adjusted life years, inferred that in patients with psoriasis area severity index >20, etanercept is a cost-effective treatment.

Numerous published psoriasis trials have shown that etanercept is well tolerated. In placebo-controlled trials, adverse events have been typically reported to be mild to moderate in intensity, and occuring with similar frequency in both groups. Psoriasis clinical trials have revealed no evidence of increased risk of opportunistic infections, tuberculosis, or skin cancers during upto 60 weeks of etanercept treatment (Gottlieb et al., unpublished data, 2004).

The results from this study indicate that etanercept provided therapeutic improvement and was well tolerated in the treatment of stable chronic plaque psoriasis in our patients. Given the scarcity of available data, these findings from a small case series in an Indian tertiary level teaching hospital may be of value.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References
1.
Sterry W, Ortonne JP, Kirkham B, Brocq O, Robertson D, Pedersen RD, et al. Comparison of two etanercept regimens for treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: PRESTA randomised double blind multicentre trial. BMJ 2010;340:c147.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Leonardi CL, Powers JL, Matheson RT, Goffe BS, Zitnik R, Wang A, et al. Etanercept as monotherapy in patients with psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2014-22.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Papp KA, Poulin Y, Bissonnette R, Bourcier M, Toth D, Rosoph L, et al. Assessment of the long-term safety and effectiveness of etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis in an adult population. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;66:e33-45.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Papp KA, Tyring S, Lahfa M, Prinz J, Griffiths CE, Nakanishi AM, et al. Aglobal phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: Safety, efficacy, and effect of dose reduction. Br J Dermatol 2005;152:1304-12.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Mazzotta A, Esposito M, Costanzo A, Chimenti S. Efficacy and safety of etanercept in psoriasis after switching from other treatments: An observational study. Am J Clin Dermatol 2009;10:319-24.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
264

PDF downloads
185
Show Sections