Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Art & Psychiatry
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Cosmetic Dermatology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
Editor Speaks
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Miscellaneous Letter
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News & Views
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Original Article
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Study Letter
Study Letters
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

88 (
); 586-589

Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII and Trichophyton indotineae: A terminological maze, or is it?

Department of Mycology, Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Moelbiser Hauptstraße 8, Roetha OT Moelbis, Germany
Nirvan Skin Clinic, Makarpura Road, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
Belle Vue Clinic, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Corresponding author: Dr. Pietro Nenoff, Department of Mycology, Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Moelbiser Hauptstraße 8, Roetha OT Moelbis, Germany.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Nenoff P, Uhrlaß S, Verma SB, Panda S. Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII and Trichophyton indotineae: A terminological maze, or is it?. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2022;88:586-9.


There appears to be an ongoing epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis in India and neighbouring countries. The incriminated dermatophyte is anthropophilic considering the fact that it is primarily being transmitted from humans to humans. It has clearly dominated over Trichophyton rubrum, known to cause tinea pedis and onychomycosis worldwide, as well as tinea corporis and tinea cruris in India over many decades. This rather quick epidemiologic shift from Trichophyton rubrum to ‘Trichophyton mentagrophytes ’, documented as early as 2011, has been noticed for its propensity to frequently cause multidrug-resistant dermatophytosis in India and other countries. Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII, the current predominant pathogen, has been confirmed by ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) sequencing, considered the gold standard for determining a species besides the usual potassium hydroxide (KOH) positivity and culture characteristics. Unfortunately, the name of this dermatophyte has been wandering in a terminological maze with terms ranging from ‘Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton interdigitale, Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale complex and finally, Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII and Trichophyton indotineae. These terms have been used interchangeably by mycologists over the past few years and this lack of uniformity has confused practising dermatologists and has hampered evidence generation, collation and interpretation. This article aimsto provide practising dermatologists with a simple explanation for these variably used terms over the past few years. The concluding message is that the two most recent terms, Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII and Trichophyton indotineae, refer to the same pathogen responsible for the recent epidemic of dermatophytosis in India and which is increasingly seen in other parts of the world, especially in Asia and Europe.

Frequently used terms - then and now

Our aim here is to present a broad and simple overview of the myriad terms that have overwhelmed clinical dermatologists. It is interesting to delve into the recent few years of history of the terms used for the incriminated species under discussion. From 2008 to 2016, all strains within the species complex Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale were consistently classified as Trichophyton interdigitale, because the morphological differentiation between both species is very difficult and nucleotide polymorphisms within the internal transcribed spacer region of the ribosomal DNA are very rare compared to other fungal groups. Thus, sequences of dermatophytes stored in DNA databases across the world too were referred to as Trichophyton interdigitale, regardless of their anthropophilic or zoophilic nature. The taxonomy and nomenclature of dermatophytes were revised and the long-overdue clear distinction between zoophilic Trichophyton mentagrophytes and anthropophilic Trichophyton interdigitale was made in 2017.1 During that period, Nenoff and Uhrlaß, taking a cue from the initial work by Heidemann et al. were describing various genotypes of what, according to the new classification, was Trichophyton mentagrophytes, by sequencing the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of the rDNA and they described Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII.2,3 Such changes cannot be expected to be appreciated instantly because new concepts take time to be incorporated into mainstream literature. Even the most respected workers from India documenting squalene epoxidase gene (SQLE) mutations in their strains referred to them as Trichophyton interdigitale because the reference strains used for comparison from the database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information had also classified them as Trichophyton interdigitale.4 The confusion was genuine and the need to update sequence databases was also spelt out.5,6 The logical term, Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII, found its place in mycology literature.7-11 Amid this, a group from Japan described terbinafine resistance in two strains from an Indian and a Nepali patient, based on multigene phylogeny using high mobility group (HMG) and α box genes in addition to the Internal Transcribed Spacer genes used by Nenoff. They introduced these strains, molecularly identical to Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII, as a new species by the name Trichophyton indotineae.11 Much water has flown under the bridge since the confusion began but it has been a logical one, and nobody is right or wrong in this terminological confusion.

Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VIII

Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton interdigitale cannot be differentiated from each other microscopically.12 Macroscopically, however, some strains of the erstwhile Trichophyton mentagrophytes variatio interdigitale with white fluffy colonies may be distinguishable from Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton interdigitale strains that show more granular thallus surface of the colonies. Therefore, molecular identification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based sequencing of the rDNA is essential to distinguish one from the other. Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VIII is one of more than ten known and newly described genotypes or clusters within the Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale complex.2,3,13,14 There are currently two genotypes (genotype I and II) within the anthropophilic species Trichophyton interdigitale, and 11 genotypes of zoophilic species Trichophyton mentagrophytes, including the ITS genotype VIII. The notable paradox, however, is that though the latter is classified as zoophilic according to the current classification, it is transmitted predominantly from a human being to another human being, making it anthropophilic in nature. It is rarely transmitted by animal sources, with only six such sequenced isolates in Poland, Iran and India.9 Therefore, the rare possibility of an animal reservoir remains to be investigated. Though a mammoth task, the likelihood of millions of stray cattle, cats, dogs and rodents on the Indian subcontinent harbouring the infectious agent should be carefully looked into. The probability of this fungus having originated from the soil, primarily infecting animals who infect human beings, need to be looked into.3,15-17 Also, a hypothesis of the so-called obligatory anthropization of the dermatophyte, needs to be disproved before coming to an educated conclusion.18 The evolution of the dermatophytes in question may have been geophilic at some point, later becoming zoophilic, with some of them undergoing a clonal expansion that adapts to the human skin.7 The crux of the discussion, however, is that Trichophyton mentagrophytes VIII has adapted excellently to human skin and is easily transmitted to other humans. It also survives for presumably longer periods on inanimate surfaces and, hence, its transmission via fomites like clothes, bed linen and the surface of furniture and floor is a significant issue.

Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII is now Trichophyton indotineae

The current name of Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VIII has changed.11,19 It is now considered a new species with the name Trichophyton indotineae.7 This is the only genotype amongst the several existing ones, that has now been classified as a new species. The numerous genotypes present in a species complex are referred to as ‘cryptic species’ or ‘molecular siblings.’ While it is pointless to classify multiple genotypes as independent species, it is justifiable to do so with those which have a distinct disease-causing potential.20 Such genotypes are also molecularly and phenotypically different within a species complex, as seen in this example. It has been recently proposed to refer to them as ‘clonal offshoots’.20 Therefore, Trichophyton indotineae/Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII` are ‘clonal offshoots’ of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale complex. The naming of this clonal offshoot as a species, therefore, has more practical than a scientific value.

Morphological differentiation between Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale and Trichophyton indotineae is difficult owing to significant similarities between these two species. Trichophyton indotineae shows fast-growing central beige stained, flat, in the periphery white colonies, similar to that of Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale. Microscopic features like round microconidia, cigar-shaped macroconidia, chlamydospores and spiral hyphae—are also the same in these species. Even positive Urease reaction is seen in some Trichophyton indotineae strains, though it is seen much more commonly in Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale.

Practising dermatologists who are not expected to be conversant with mycological nuances would be benefited by knowing that Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII and the species Trichophyton indotineae are the same. They are molecularly identical, refer to the same pathogen with increased virulence, can cause widespread terbinafine resistance, and at times multidrug-resistant dermatophytosis, are linked with the abuse of topical steroid containing fixed-dose combination creams and erratic treatment with antifungal agents. The current confusion regarding the terms, therefore, may be attributed to the fact that the origin of the outbreaks (whether from an animal source or primarily human-to-human transmission) has not been clearly established7 and the current classification has not found uniform acceptance by the mycology community.

Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VIII/Trichophyton indotineae not limited to the Indian subcontinent

Taxonomy and terms change and evolve rapidly in the field of mycology.21-24 Trichophyton indotineae/Trichophyton mentagrophytes ITS genotype VIII, notwithstanding the terminological confusion, is no longer restricted to the Indian subcontinent. Its presence as early as between 2004 and 2013 has been documented in India, Australia, Iran and Oman. A significant rise in the number of cases has been reported after 2014. Its presence in other countries is becoming a matter of interest for dermatologists far and wide. The scenario in the United Arab Emirates and other Middle East Asian countries appears to be identical.13,25 It is thought that the disease has been introduced to Europe by migrants and travellers from India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Bahrain, Libya, Saudi Arabia or Thailand.9 The highest numbers are found in Germany with stray reports from France, Belgium and Switzerland.8,9,26-28 Its presence has been noted in China too.29 Indian dermatologists in certain parts of the country see many Indian patients coming from Africa and a majority of them give a history of steroid misuse as steroid-antifungal fixed dose combination creams are freely available over the counter there, as is seen in the Indian subcontinent and in the Middle East Asian countries.

We would like to reiterate that the epidemic of dermatophytosis in the Indian subcontinent needs more ‘rational antifungal’ stewardship and urgent, active intervention of the government in curbing the menace. We also propose to include dermatophytosis in the list of ‘emerging infectious diseases' as well as ‘neglected tropical diseases’. There is an unmet and urgent need for a drastic re-evaluation of policies related to manufacturing and sale of topical steroids and fixed dose combination creams containing antifungals and potent steroids in India. The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists has been an active crusader on this issue and has been prioritising curbing the menace of abuse and misuse of steroids among its multifarious activities. Active help of private practitioners, who constitute a vast majority of dermatologists, should be sought in fighting this menace. Finally, molecular diagnostics for detecting Trichophyton indotineae should be made more widely accessible to the community as this epidemic-like situation has wide ramifications due to its rampant spread and recalcitrance which, if detected early, can facilitate early, appropriate treatment.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


  1. , , , , , , et al. Toward a novel multilocus phylogenetic taxonomy for the dermatophytes. Mycopathologia. 2017;182:5-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Signature polymorphisms in the internal transcribed spacer region relevant for the differentiation of zoophilic and anthropophilic strains of Trichophyton interdigitale and other species of T. mentagrophytes sensu lato. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162:282-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. The current Indian epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis due to Trichophyton mentagrophytes - A molecular study. Mycoses. 2019;62:336-356.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. High terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton interdigitale isolates in Delhi, India harbouring mutations in the Squalene epoxidase (SQLE) gene. Mycoses. 2018;61:477-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . A clarion call for preventing taxonomical errors of dermatophytes using the example of the novel Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VIII uniformly isolated in the Indian epidemic of superficial dermatophytosis. Mycoses. 2019;62:6-10. Comment on: “High terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton interdigitale isolates in Delhi, India harbouring mutations in the squalene epoxidase gene.” by Ashutosh Singh et al., published in Mycoses 2018; 61 (7): 477-484.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Perspectives on misidentification of Trichophyton interdigitale/Trichophyton mentagrophytes using internal transcribed spacer region sequencing: Urgent need to update the sequence database. Mycoses. 2019;62:11-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Taxonomy of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale species complex harboring the highly virulent, multiresistant genotype T. indotineae. Mycopathologia. 2021;186:315-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Emergence of difficult-to-treat tinea corporis caused by Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex isolates, Paris, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:224-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Extensive dermatophytosis caused by Terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton indotineae, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:229-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Whole genome sequences of two Trichophyton indotineae clinical isolates from India emerging as threats during therapeutic treatment of dermatophytosis. 3 Biotech. 2021;11:402.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Trichophyton indotineae sp. nov.: A new highly terbinafine-resistant anthropophilic dermatophyte species. Mycopathologia. 2020;185:947-58.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Mycology - an update. part 2: dermatomycoses: clinical picture and diagnostics. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014;12:749-77.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Multidrug-resistant Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VIII in an Iranian family with generalized dermatophytosis: Report of four cases and review of literature. Int J Dermatol. 2021;60:686-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Trichophyton mentagrophytes and T interdigitale genotypes are associated with particular geographic areas and clinical manifestations. Mycoses. 2019;62:1084-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . [Treatment of a terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton mentagrophytes type VIII] Hautarzt. 2021;72:900-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Occurrence of pathogenic fungi in soil of burrows of rats and of other sites in bamboo plantations in India and Nepal. Mycoses. 2007;50:507-11.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Isolation of dermatophytes from rural and urban soil samples in premises of infected and non-infected animals. Int J Zoonoses. 1983;10:22-7.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. The unprecedented epidemic-like scenario of dermatophytosis in India: I. epidemiology, risk factors and clinical features. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2021;87:154-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. The unprecedented epidemic-like scenario of dermatophytosis in India: II. Diagnostic methods and taxonomical aspects. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2021;87:326-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. What is a species complex? Educational Atlas Clinical Fungi.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. . Atlas of clinical fungi. (4th Online Edition). In: Version 1.4.1., Utrecht, The Netherlands: Centraalbureau Voor Schimmelcultures, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Updating the taxonomy of dermatophytes of the BCCM/IHEM collection according to the new standard: A phylogenetic approach. Mycopathologia. 2020;185:161-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. The taxonomy of the Trichophyton rubrum complex: A phylogenomic approach. Microb Genom. 2021;7:000707.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , et al. Discovery of new Trichophyton members, T. persicum and T. spiraliforme spp. nov., as a cause of highly inflammatory tinea cases in Iran and Czechia. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9:e0028421.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , , et al. Extensive tinea corporis due to a terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton mentagrophytes isolate of the Indian genotype in a young infant from Bahrain in Germany. Hautarzt. 2019;70:888-96.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Spread of terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton mentagrophytes type VIII (India) in Germany-”The Tip of the Iceberg?”. J Fungi (Basel). 2020;6:207.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , . Antifungal resistance in dermatophytes: Genetic considerations, clinical presentations and alternative therapies. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7:983.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , . Epidemiological and clinical aspects of Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale infections in the Zurich area: A retrospective study using genotyping. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:1017-25.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Antifungal susceptibility and mutations in the squalene epoxidase gene in dermatophytes of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes species complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65:e0005621.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections