Translate this page into:
Use of a 4-mm-wide double scalpel in dermatologic surgery
Corresponding author: Dr. Agustí Toll, Department of Dermatology, Clinic Hospital of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. atoll@clinic.cat
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Mansilla-Polo M, Morgado-Carrasco D, Toll A. Use of a 4-mm-wide double scalpel in dermatologic surgery. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2024;90:559-61. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_738_2023
Problem
Margin-controlled, micrographic surgery is commonly indicated for the removal of several tumours including large basal cell carcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas and fibrohistiocytic tumours such as dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. In these procedures, debulking is recommended to achieve flattening and an adequate evaluation of margins, commonly obtained with a 90° cutting angle. Thus, this practice requires several large incisions that may be technically challenging if homogeneous cuts are to be obtained for paraffin-embedded processing.
Solution
The use of a double scalpel with a 4-mm separation between the blades allows retrieval of 90° homogeneous surgical pieces, with an adequate thickness for processing and collection in pathology cassettes. This scalpel follows the same principle as the double scalpel with a 2-mm separation, already commercialised and routinely used in dentistry and in excision of lentigo maligna or extramammary Paget’s disease. The 4-mm double-blade scalpel can be customised by a surgical instrument manufacturer, based on this model. The risks associated with this scalpel do not differ from a conventional scalpel and its main limitation lies in the lack of experience with this instrument, its limited marketing, and the possible learning curve toward familiarisation with its use. This device is especially useful for the excision of lesions in which margins greater than 2 mm are the choice during paraffin-embedded margin-controlled micrographic surgery, such as large or high-risk basal cell carcinomas, and/or squamous cell carcinomas, Merkel cell carcinomas and/or dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans [Figures 1a–1g and 2a–2d, Video 1]1,2.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
References
- Double-bladed scalpel: A new option for harvesting margins in head and neck cancers. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2006;68:83-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Controlling the histological margin for non-melanoma skin cancer conveniently using a double-bladed scalpel. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:175-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]