Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Original Article
2003:69:2;144-147
PMID: 17642862

Utility of Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and its detection in male patients with non gonococcal urethritis in New Delhi

SK Agrawal, BS Reddy, P Bhalla, H Kaur
 Dept. of Dermatology, STD & Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
B S Reddy
Type VI Quarter No. 2, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi - 110 002
India
How to cite this article:
Agrawal S K, Reddy B S, Bhalla P, Kaur H. Utility of Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and its detection in male patients with non gonococcal urethritis in New Delhi. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:144-147
Copyright: (C)2003 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was assessment of prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and utility of Direct Fluorescent Antibody (DFA) test for its detection in male patients with non gonococcal urethritis in New Delhi , India
Thirty male patients with symptoms of dysuria showing polymorphs in their gram stained urethral smears with no evidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and negative for Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans by wet mount were subjected to DFA test for detection of C. trachomatis in urethral samples.
Microscopic examination of gram stained urethral smears revealed 5-7 polymorphs / HPF in 90% of the patients. Evidence of C. trachomatis with DFA (MicroTrak) was detected in 11 cases (36.67%) when a cut off of 10 elementary bodies was considered essential.
It is concluded that C. trachomatis is an important cause of non gonococcal urethritis in male patients in New Delhi and DFA test is a useful diagnostic tool in its detection. Where facilities are not available for its detection antichlamydial therapy should be recommended emperically.
Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis, Non gonococcal urethritis, DFA test

Introduction

Sexually transmitted chlamydial infections are prevalent throughout the world.[1] A substantial number of them are undetected because asymptomatic cases account for 70-80% of women and upto 50% of men.[2] Sequelae such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy, tubal infertility, epididymitis, proctitis and arthritis have been costing heavily on health care resources demanding an urgent need for early and accurate diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Serological tests including enzyme immunoassay are not of much value in the diagnosis of C.trachomatis because of their low sensitivity and because a positive antibody test does not always distinguish past from current infection.[1],[3] Conventional diagnosis based on culture has always been technically demanding, relatively expensive and restricted to a few specialised centres.

Data pertaining to genital tract chlamydial infections in India is scanty. A prevalence of 41 was reported in patients presenting with vaginal discharge and in another study the chlamydial antigen was demonstrated in 37.4% women with PID.[4],[5] Prevalence of C. trachomatis in asymptomatic pregnant women was found to be 21.3% in an antenatal clinic in New Delhi.[6] As far as ascertained, no reports are available in male patients except for a single study,[7] despite the fact that urethritis is one of the most common and important clinical manifestations of C.trachomatis infection in males. Hence we studied the clinico-epidemiologic profile and utility of DFA in the diagnosis of urethritis due to C.trachomatis in symptomatic male patients with dysuria.

Materials and Methods

Male patients with complaints of urethral discharge, and dysuria, presenting to the STD clinic of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, were interrogated and examined.

After a minimum 4 hours of urine holding, the urethral smears were taken for Gram stain, wet mount for candida and trichomonas with the help of a sterile cotton swab stick. Cases positive for C. albicans, Tvaginalis, or N. gonorrhoeae were excluded and only those showing polymorphs in gram stained urethral smears were included in the study group of thirty patients. None of them had received antibiotics in the last 2 months. For DFA test urethral smears were obtained in all the patients with dacron swab and the slides were labelled, stored at -20°C and then stained, according to Syva MicroTrak DFA test booklet, within 7 days of collection of specimen. A cut off line off 10 elementary bodies was taken as a positive result.

Results

The youngest and oldest patient was 20 years and 55 years old respectively, with the peak incidence (70%) in the age group of 21-25 years.

50% of them were emplo-yed, 46.6% were unmarried and most of them were sexually promiscuous (76.6%) with heterosexual practices (96.6%). Female commercial sex workers were the commonest source of infection (46.6%) al-though 33.3% acquired the infection through marital contact. History of past gonococcal ure-thritis was present in 20% of the patients.

Burning micturition and urethral dis-charge were the commonest complaints [Table - 1]. Majority of them presented with mild (66.6%), clear (76.6%) and thin (96.6%) discharge. Gram stained urethral smears revealed 5-7 polymor-phs/HPF in most (90%) of the patients. DFA test was found positive in 11 cases (36.6%) with a cut off line off 10 elementary bodies.

Discussion

C. trachomatis is believed to be an important etiological agent responsible for sexually transmitted genital tract infections and represents one of the major areas of investigative interest in recent years.

The epidemiological profile of chlamydial urethritis studied in male patients in our series revealed that the peak age group of the patients is 21-25 years. This is in conformity with earlier studies.[8],[9] Holmes noted that those with NGU belong to higher socio-economic strata and are less likely to be unemployed.[10] This is further substantiated in the present study as the majority of our patients were employed. Lack of financial resources may account for lower incidence of NGU in unemployed persons and students.

The fact that most of our patients were unmarried (46.6%) and sexually promiscuous (76.6%) points out to the fact that NGU occurs more commonly in unmarried individuals having high risk sexual behaviour. A similar view was expressed by Tchoudomirova et al.[9] Female commercial sex workers constituted an important source of infection (46.67%) in our series. Poor sex education, low income and social structure contribute to prostitution, which in turn promotes sexually transmitted diseases including NGU. Coinfection of gonorrhoea and NGU was noted in 15-35% of heterosexual males by Stamm and 20% of our patients had past history of gonococcal urethritis which further emphasises the fact that mixed infections occur commonly in patients with STDs.[11] Several studies including the present series, noted that burning micturition (93.3%) and urethral discharge (86.6%) are the most common complaints in chlamydial urethritis.[9],[12] Martin and Bowie have observed scanty and mucoid discharge in most cases of NGU and similarly in many of our patients the nature of urethral discharge was mild (66.6%), clear (76.6%) and thin (96.6%).[12]

Apart from conventional culture techniques, several studies as listed in table-I have proved that DFA is an important test aiding the diagnosis of chlamydial urethritis infectian.[13],[14],[15] However, it involves staining of the elementary bodies in epithelial cell scrapings from infected sites and requires a trained microscopist. It is the only diagnostic test that permits simultaneous assessment of specimen adequacy by visualisation of cuboidal columnar epithelial cells.[2] It does not require the maintenance of a cold chain for specimen shipment and provides results faster than culture. Thirty-six percent of our cases were proved chlamydia-positive with DFA test which corroborates with the incidence of C. trachomatis infection in NGU patients.[12] Nair et al also observed that DFA test is positive in 43.8% of NGU male patients.[2] When 10 or more elementary bodies are seen in a background of reddish-brown counterstained cells, the test becomes quite specific, although some bacteria can bind immunoglobulins to their surfaces and appear fluorescent specially in rectal specimens.[16],[17] Judson et al suggested that the monoclonal antibodies used in the MicroTrak kit react less intensely with A, I and J serotypes of C.trachomatis.[18]

More specific tests like PCR and LCR have been evaluated to detect C.trachomatis infection. However, these tests are quite expensive, time consuming and not easily available Based on the data observed in several earlier studies including the present series, it is clear that DFA test is one of the most appropriate and cost effective screening test for chlamydia detection. The easy applicability and immediate results are the additional advantages.

It is evident that C. trachomatis is an important cause of non gonococcal urethritis in male patients. Although the participating centre is not necessarily representative of the entire nation, it does help us to focus that antichlamydial therapy should be recommended empirically in this group if facilities for its detection are unavailable.

References
1.
Paavonen J. Is screening for C.trochomatis infection cost effective? Genitourin Med 1997; 73: 103-104.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Black CM. Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin Microbial Reviews 1997; 10: 160-184.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Palayekar VV, Joshi JV, Hazari KT Comparison of four non culture diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. JAPI 2000; 48: 481-483.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Mittal A, Kapur 5, Gupta S. Screening for genital chlamydial infection in symptomatic women. Ind J Med Res 1993 June; 98: 119-123.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Jalgaonkar SV, PathakAA, Thakur YS, et al. Enzyme immunoassay for rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital infections. Indian J Sex Transm Dis 1990; 1 1 : 23-26.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Rastogi S, Kapur 5, Salhan S, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy: Risk factor for an adverse outcome. Br J Biomed Science 1999; 56: 94-98.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Nair D, Bhalla P, Mathur MD. Comparison of enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescent antibody test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in non gonococcal urethritis. Ind J Med Microbial 1999;17(4) : 184-186.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Information and Statistics Division Scottish Health Service. GenitourinoryMedicine Statistics Scotland 1996/97. Edinburgh 1998; 1-35.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Tchoudomirova K, Nuhor PL, Tchapanova A. Prevalence, epidemiological and clinical correlates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. J EuroAcad Dermatol Venereal 1998; 11 : 214-220.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Holmes KK. Etiology of non-gonococcal urethritis. N Engl J Med 1975; 292 :1199.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Stamm WE. Chlamydio trachomatis infections of the adult, In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, edited by Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh PA et al. McGraw Hill 1999; p407-422.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Martin DH, Bowie WR. Urethritis in males, In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, edited by Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh PA, et al. McGraw Hill 1999; p 833-834.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Phillips RS , Hanff PA , Kauffman RS et al. Use of DFA test for detecting C. trachomatis cervical infection in women seeking routine gynaecologic care. J Inf Dis 1987 ; 56 : 575-581.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Lefebvre J, Laperriere H, Rousseau H, et al. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women. J Clin Microbial 1988; 26 : 726-731.
[Google Scholar]
15.
Bornman MS, Ramuthaga TN, Mohamed MF, et al. Chlamydial infection in osymptomatic infertile men attending an andrology clinic. Arch Androl 1998; 41 :203-208.
[Google Scholar]
16.
Langone JJ. Protein A from Staphylococcus aureus and related immunoglobulin receptors produced by streptococci and pneumococci. Adv Immunol 1982; 32: 157.
[Google Scholar]
17.
Kretch T. Interference of Staphylococcus aureus in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by monoclonal antibodies. Lancet 1985; 1161 1162.
[Google Scholar]
18.
Judson FN, Ehret JM, Moore F Abstr Annu Meet Am Soc Microbio 1986; C-17 : p 330.
[Google Scholar]
Show Sections