Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Quiz
2012:78:3;403-405
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.95475

Widespread hyperpigmented and hyperkeratotic plaques following lines of Blaschko

Serap Gunes Bilgili1 , Ayse Serap Karadag1 , Omer Calka1 , Gulay Bulut2 , Ilhan Cecen1
1 Department of Dermatology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey
2 Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular Training Education, Van, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Serap Gunes Bilgili
Department of Dermatology, Yuzuncu Yil University, 65100 Van
Turkey
How to cite this article:
Bilgili SG, Karadag AS, Calka O, Bulut G, Cecen I. Widespread hyperpigmented and hyperkeratotic plaques following lines of Blaschko. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2012;78:403-405
Copyright: (C)2012 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

A 3-year-old girl was admitted to our outpatient clinic with complaints of brown cutaneous verrucous lesions. Three months after her birth, lesions had first appeared around her navel and then gradually spread over to the trunk. Her parents described occasional blister formation that were located on the trunk and limbs. Her parents were nonconsanguineous and had no family history of similar disorders.

Dermatological examination revealed linearly distributed papules and hyperkeratotic plaques along Blaschko′s lines with areas of scaling and crusting over lower extremities, inguinal region, buttocks, abdomen and scapular region [Figure - 1] and [Figure - 2]. There were not any lesions in the skin creases. Hair, nail and teeth problems, abnormality in gait, digital contractures were not seen in the case. Neurological examination was normal.

Figure 1: Hyperkeratotic papules and plaques with areas of scaling and crusts over lower limb, inguinal region and abdomen
Figure 2: Hyperkeratotic papules and plaques on the abdomen

Histopathological examination of a biopsy taken from the lesion showed compact hyperkeratosis, papillomatosis, degeneration and prominent keratohyalin granules in the granular layer. There were perinuclear clear spaces in variable sizes in stratum granulosum and stratum spinosum with faint keratohyalin granules at their peripheries. Focal vacuolar degeneration in the basal layer, perivascular lymphocytic infiltration and sparse melanophages were detected in the upper dermis [Figure - 3].

Figure 3: Histopathology showing vacuolization of the upper and mid spinous layer, hyperkeratosis with large keratohyaline granules in the vacuoled expanded granular cell layer (H and E, ×200)

What is Your Diagnosis?

Answer: Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EHK)

Discussion

Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder of keratinization with an estimated prevalence of 1:200,000. [1],[2] Mutations in the genes that encode keratin-1 and keratin-10 have been associated with this disorder(OMIM #113800). [1] Mutations are mapped on the keratin gene clusters within chromosomes 12q and 17q. The frequency of sporadic cases due to spontaneous mutations is as high as 50%. [3] Patients characteristically develop generalised erythema, scaling and blistering that occur especially at birth or in the early childhood. Gradually hyperkeratotic plaques develop and become more prominent around large joints. They exhibit intraepidermal blisters and erosions at sites of even mild trauma. EHK shows a variable clinical course in terms of cutaneous manifestations such as hyperkeratosis, blistering, the presence of erythroderma, and the involvement of palms and soles. [4] Disease generally has a more severe course in early childhood.

Mosaic EHK is due to a postzygotic, spontaneous mutation. Hyperkeratosis is distributed in streaks along Blaschko′s lines. It is not inherited unless postzygotic mutation occurs in the germ line. It may be difficult to distinguish mosaic EHK from epidermal nevus clinically without characteristic histopathological features which are the same as those of the generalized EHK. [5] EHK is divided into two groups, based on presence or absence of severe palm/sole involvement (PS type or NPS type). Each group consists of three sub-groups totalling six distinct clinical phenotypes. [6] Our patient had no palmar/plantar hyperkeratosis. Her past medical history was negative for erythroderma. Diagnosis of NPS-type EHK was made according to the clinical and histopathological findings.

Histopathology of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis is characterized by hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, and epidermolysis. Histopathology demonstrates perinuclear vacuolization with indistinct peripheral boundaries. Keratohyalin granules are basophilic and clumped. On histopathological assessment keratinocytes with indistinct cell boundaries exhibiting variously sized clear spaces around their nuclei are noted within the upper spinous and granular layers. [5] Mosaic EHK is focal epidermolytic hyperkeratosis with epidermolytic hyperkeratosis horizontally alternating with areas without epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. [5] In our patient, histopathological findings were consistent with mosaic EHK.

Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens and ichthyosis hystrix of Curth and Macklin should be considered in the differential diagnosis for EHK. Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens is different than EHK, as the epidermal fragility is very superficial and hyperkeratosis and vacuolization are confined to the granular layer in the latter. Ichthyosis hystrix of Curth and Macklin presents with extensive and very severe, spiky or verrucous hyperkeratosis without blisters. Frequently hyperkeratosis is more prominent over the extensor surfaces of the arms and legs. [6] ILVEN (Inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevus), Darier disease, hypertrophic lichen planus, incontinentia pigmenti should also be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of EHK as in our case.

Various treatment options exist for managing EHK including of keratolytics, antiseptic washes, topical calcipotriol, alpha hydroxy acids and oral retinoids. [6] Unfortunately current treatment modalities are not sufficiently effective. In our patient topical treatment with 10% salicylic acid along with a moisturizer cream was commenced but discontinued after a week because of the lack of improvement with treatment. We initiated 0.1% tretinoin cream mixed with the same amount of petrolatum by weight. Mixture was applied every night. Due to an inadequate response to treatment we planned and recommended to start on oral acitretin treatment but parents of the patient did not consent to treatment.

EHK is a rare disease. It is recognized by its distinctive histopathological features. It is very important to inform patients and their relatives about the course and prognosis of the disease in detail.

References
1.
Chassaing N, Kanitakis J, Sportich S, Cordier-Alex MP, Titeux M, Calvas P, et al. Generalized epidermolytic hyperkeratosis in two unrelated children from parents with localized linear form, and prenatal diagnosis. J Invest Dermatol 2006;126:2715-7.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Pulkkinen L, Christiano AM, Knowlton RG, Uitto J. Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma). Genetic linkage to chromosome 12q in the region of the type II keratin gene cluster. J Clin Invest 1993;91:357-61.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Betlloch I, Lucas Costa A, Mataix J, Pérez-Crespo M, Ballester I. Bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma: A sporadic case produced by a new KRT10 gene mutation. Pediatr Dermatol 2009;26:489-91.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Math A, Frank J, Handisurya A, Poblete-Gutiérrez P, Slupetzky K, Födinger D, et al. Identification of a de novo keratin 1 mutation in epidermolytic hyperkeratosis with palmoplantar involvement. Eur J Dermatol 2006;16:507-10.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Ross R, DiGiovanna JJ, Capaldi L, Argenyi Z, Fleckman P, Robinson-Bostom L. Histopathologic characterization of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: A systematic review of histology from the National Registry for Ichthyosis and Related Skin Disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;59:86-90.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Nayak S, Behera SK, Acharjya B, Sahu A, Mishra D. Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis with rickets. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006;72:139-42.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
761

PDF downloads
162
Show Sections