Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJDVL_1027_2024

Blood donation and dermatology: What a dermatologist should know?

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Kiran C. Patel Medical College, Bharuch, India
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Baroda Medical College, Anandpura, Vadodara, India

Corresponding author: Dr. Abhishek R Parekh, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Kiran C. Patel Medical College, Bharuch, India. om10abhi@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Parekh AR, Shah HA. Blood donation and dermatology: What a dermatologist should know? Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_1027_2024

Abstract

Blood donation is an act of benevolence that significantly improves lives and fosters better health outcomes globally. Certain skin diseases and medications make an individual temporarily or permanently ineligible to donate blood. This article aims to elucidate the relationship between skin diseases, medication, and blood donation deferral periods, empowering individuals to make informed decisions and contribute to this life-saving endeavour.

Keywords

blood donation
dermatology
medication
deferral periods

Introduction

Blood donation is an act of benevolence that significantly improves lives and fosters better health outcomes globally.1 According to the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), blood is categorised as both a biologic and a drug.2 Consequently, blood donor centres, blood banks and transfusion services are required to adhere to all regulations on biologics and drugs.2 However, certain skin diseases and medications make an individual temporarily or permanently ineligible to donate blood. As dermatologists, it is crucial to guide patients on factors that necessitate deferral from blood donation. Recognising and understanding such deferral periods is important for upholding the safety and effectiveness of donated blood and as a holistic approach to patient care.1 This article aims to elucidate the relationship between skin diseases, medications and blood donation deferral periods, empowering individuals to make informed decisions and contribute to this life-saving endeavour.

There are three supranational agencies with treaty-defined powers: the World Health Organisation(WHO), the Pan-American Health Organisation (PAHO) and the Council of Europe.1 The WHO advocates for robust governmental leadership in establishing national transfusion networks.1 In developed countries, national systems are often observed, many of which are operated by the International Red Cross and receive government subsidies.1 The WHO’s involvement in blood transfusion is particularly influential in countries with medium and low development indices.1 Its strategy focuses on promoting national policies centred around a nationally co-ordinated blood transfusion service that is accountable to the government.1 The dual purpose of blood donor screening is to minimise risks for both the blood recipient and the donor.

The Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India (GOI), publishes the Transfusion Medicine Technical Manual through the National Blood Transfusion Council (NBTC) with technical support from the WHO periodically, the latest being published in 2022 to encourage uniform implementation of standards and consistency in the quality and safety of blood and blood products.2

WHO has categorised blood donor’s conditions based on selection criteria into four broad categories:

  • 1.

    Conditions that are acceptable

  • 2.

    Conditions that require temporary deferral for defined periods

  • 3.

    Conditions that require permanent deferral

  • 4.

    Conditions that require individual assessment1

In other words, donors who don’t fit the requirements for selection ought to be temporarily or permanently deferred.1 They should be informed whether the deferral is intended to protect their own health, the recipient’s health or both.

We compared the latest guidelines from the GOI and the WHO concerning donor deferral criteria related to skin diseases, dermatological procedures and medications used in dermatology. Additionally, we reviewed pertinent literature on blood donation in dermatology, including guidelines from the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, and Brazil, to analyse the impact of specific skin conditions and medications on eligibility for blood donation.

From a dermatologist’s perspective, the deferral period for blood donation can be understood in the following three contexts:

  • 1.

    Blood donation and skin diseases

  • 2.

    Blood donation and procedures

  • 3.

    Blood donation and medication

1) Blood donation and skin diseases

The suitability of prospective donors with skin diseases should be assessed if the skin condition reflects an underlying systemic disease, poses a risk of infection or if the donor is undergoing medication. According to WHO guidelines for blood transfusion, blood donation should be temporarily deferred if the venepuncture site is affected, the disease is severe or in the presence of secondary infection.3 While it’s impractical to enumerate all dermatologic diseases, we have summarised relevant conditions in Table 1.1,2,48

Table 1: Dermatologic diseases and deferral guidelines as per recommendations from GOI, WHO and other regulatory bodies
Dermatological diseases
Deferral period
GOI2 WHO1 Others
Infections Tuberculosis Active infection Two years following confirmation of cure Two years following confirmation of cure
Latent infection Seven days after completion of last dose of antibiotic therapy4
Household contacts Defer until screened and confirmed clear of infection
positive tuberculin skin test or blood test, but no active tuberculosis Acceptable5
Leprosy Active infection or cured cases Permanently
Household contacts Should be deferred*
Leishmaniasis Active infection Permanently Permanently
Individuals coming from endemic area Defer for 12 months since last return from endemic area
Filariasis Permanently7
Chagas disease Active infection Permanently
Individuals coming from endemic area Defer for six months since last return from endemic area
Dermatological diseases Deferral period
GOI2 WHO1 Others

Measles,

Chickenpox,

Rubella

Patients

Fourteen days following

full recovery

Fourteen days following full recovery
Close contacts Three weeks following the last day of close contact

Dengue,

Chikungunya

Six months following complete recovery Six months following complete recovery
Herpes labialis/cold sores Twenty-eight days following full recovery
Herpes zoster Six months due to potential association with malignancy and HIV infection7
Cutaneous warts Acceptable8
Scabies Defer till all lesions get cleared to avoid risk to blood collection staff
Superficial fungal infection Defer till all lesions get cleared to avoid risk to blood collection staff Defer for seven days after completing systemic anti-fungal therapy4
Paracoccidioidomycoses Systemic Permanently7
Pulmonary Five years7
Mucosal candidiasis Defer if it is associated with underlying immunosuppression and received systemic therapy within the last seven days4

Pre-malignant and

malignant skin conditions

Basal cell carcinoma, Bowen’s disease (Squamous cell carcinoma in-situ) Accept if successfully treated and in good health

Malignant melanoma,

Kaposi’s sarcoma,

Mycosis fungoides,

Invasive squamous cell carcinoma

Permanently Permanently
Autoimmune connective tissue disorders

Systemic lupus erythematosus,

Scleroderma,

Dermatomyositis

Permanently Permanently
Autoimmune vesiculobullous disorders

Pemphigus group of disorders,

Pemphigoid group of disorders

Permanently8
Other skin conditions Porphyrias Permanently8
Lichen planus Six months (concern about Hepatitis C)7
Hidradenitis suppurativa Permanent5
Alopecia areata Acceptable if the condition is not severe, there is no systemic involvement and the patient is not on immunosuppressive therapy7,8
Vitiligo
Psoriasis
Atopic dermatitis
Urticaria
Household contacts of leprosy patients from endemic areas should be deferred from donating blood if screening for anti-PGL-1 IgM antibodies and Mycobacterium leprae DNA is not available. GOI: Government of India.

Infections

According to European guidelines of blood donation:

  • For infections where the infectious agent has been completely cleared from the donor’s blood upon recovery, the donor should be deferred from donation until they are no longer infectious, typically two weeks after symptoms have ceased.9

  • If a donor has had known contact with an infectious agent, they should be deferred for a period approximately twice the length of the incubation period. When there is a geographical risk of exposure to multiple infectious agents, the longest deferral period applies.9

  • Many transfusion-transmissible infections have defined geographical limits, and the risk of transmission can be minimised by temporary deferral or testing donors traveling from affected areas.9

The existing literature does not provide clear guidelines for managing household contacts of individuals with leprosy. However, a study conducted by Goulart et al.6 in Brazil (an endemic region for leprosy) examined blood donors without prior contact with the disease. The study found that 3.8% of these donors tested positive for anti-phenolic glycolipid 1 (PGL-1) IgM antibodies and 0.3% were positive for Mycobacterium leprae DNA. Over a five-year follow-up, 14.6% of those who initially tested positive developed leprosy. Given the continuous exposure to lepra bacilli, household contacts are at a higher risk of developing leprosy compared to the general population. Therefore, we recommend that household contacts of leprosy patients from endemic areas should be deferred from donating blood if screening for anti-PGL-1 IgM antibodies and Mycobacterium leprae DNA is not available.

Certain diseases require permanent deferral. India is still an endemic country for leprosy, leishmaniasis and filariasis. Because of increased individual susceptibility and possible reinfection, patients who have been treated for these diseases are permanently deferred according to the current Indian guidelines.2

Premalignant and malignant skin conditions

As most of the malignant conditions spread to distant sites (metastasis) either through blood or lymphatics, and even a single neoplastic cell can seed a tumour, patients having a history of malignant conditions are permanently deferred.5 However, exceptions are made for basal cell carcinoma (rodent ulcer), which is locally invasive and does not spread through the blood, and Bowen’s disease (squamous cell carcinoma in situ), which remains confined to the epidermal basement membrane.5 Consequently, individuals who have been cured of these conditions can safely donate blood.4,7

Autoimmune conditions

Individuals with autoimmune conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, dermatomyositis and disorders within the pemphigus or pemphigoid groups are permanently deferred from donating blood.5,7 These patients typically require long-term immunosuppressive medications, which increase their susceptibility to infections. Additionally, they often have multisystem involvement, and donating blood can jeopardise their health condition.7

Porphyrias

Patients with acute porphyrias, such as variegate porphyria and hereditary coproporphyria, may be associated with skin lesions in addition to increased levels of blood porphyrin irrespective of acute attacks.7 Since the recipient of the blood may theoretically get skin lesions, they are disqualified if they already have active skin lesions.7

Porphyria cutanea tarda is an acquired condition associated with underlying liver disease, often viral hepatitis B and C (HBV, HCV) or of unknown origin. They are disqualified due to ethical guidelines prohibiting donors from receiving direct or indirect benefits.1 Therefore, therapeutic phlebotomy, which benefits the donor, could potentially compromise the reliability of the donor interview and the safety of the blood recipient due to the possibility of inaccurate risk behaviour disclosure.4,5 Moreover, there exists a risk of transmitting HBV and HCV.

In erythropoietic protoporphyria and congenital erythropoietic porphyria, patients are often anaemic.4 Additionally, the presence of porphyrins in red blood cells reduces their lifespan and renders the blood unsuitable for donation.4

In summary, any individuals suffering from porphyrias are permanently deferred from donating blood.

Sexually Transmitted Infections and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections

Certain sexually transmitted infections (STIs) can also be transmitted through blood. Therefore, screening and deferring individuals who may be affected is crucial.5 Additionally, sexual contact may necessitate deferral.1

Treponema pallidum, the causative organism of syphilis, is released into the bloodstream intermittently during infection and destroyed within 72 hours of storage at 40°C.1 Therefore, the risk of transmission of syphilis through the transfused blood is low. However, it can still be transmitted through fresh blood and platelets.1 While a recent Indian guideline mandates a deferral interval of one year following the date of cure, WHO still suggests permanent deferral of affected individuals.1,2

Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the causative organism of gonorrhoea, is not transmissible through blood transfusion.1 Despite this, many national and WHO guidelines mandate a temporary deferral of one year for affected individuals.1 However, the Indian guidelines (2017) prohibit such individuals permanently from donating blood.10

HIV is primarily transmitted through direct blood-to-blood contact (with an infectivity rate of approximately 95%) or via sexual intercourse.1 It is neither contagious nor spread by the faecal-oral route.1 Therefore, there is no need to defer household contacts.5

Deferral intervals of various STIs and HIV are mentioned in Table 2.

  • Pre-exposure prophylaxis or post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV

Table 2: Deferral intervals of various STIs and HIV as recommended by GOI, WHO and other guidelines
Sexually Transmitted Infections Deferral period for patient
Deferral period for sexual contact
GOI2 WHO1 Others GOI2 WHO1
Syphilis One year following the disappearance of the rash or completion of therapy Permanently Three months after treatment5 Twelve months since last sexual exposure
Gonorrhoea Permanently Twelve months following completion of treatment Three months after treatment5 Twelve months since last sexual exposure
Herpes genitalis

Accept, provided no active lesions

Symptoms are there

If symptomatic, defer 28 days following full recovery

Not a cause for deferral if feeling healthy and well5
Genital warts and Molluscum Deferral is necessary only if treatment leads to raw areas Acceptable5,8
Chlamydia Acceptable5
HIV/AIDS Permanently if a person is HIV positive, has high-risk sexual behaviour or having symptoms suggestive of AIDS Permanently Defer permanently (spouse/partner of PLHA) Twelve months since the last sexual contact

GOI: Government of India, HIV/AIDS: Human Immunodeficiency Virus/ Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, PLHA: people living with HIV/AIDS.

A person should be deferred if he has received pre-exposure prophylaxis or post-exposure prophylaxis in the last three months, as it interferes with testing for HIV by delaying seroconversion or producing ambiguous results in a positive donor.4

  • High-risk sexual behaviours

It is crucial to screen potential blood donors whose sexual behaviour places them at increased risk of acquiring infectious diseases transmitted through blood.1 High-risk behaviours include having multiple sex partners, engaging in transactional sex (exchange of money or drugs for sex), sex workers and their clients, men having sex with men (MSM) and females having sex with MSM.1,2 MSM represent the largest subgroup affected by HIV in many developed countries.1 MSM and blood donation accounts for a special mention.

  • MSM and blood donation

For a considerable period, many countries upheld a policy of indefinitely deferring blood donations from MSM, citing their higher HIV risk compared to the general population.1 However, this policy faced criticism in several countries, prompting adjustments that now permit donations from sexually active MSM under certain conditions, such as limitations on the number of sexual partners.5 On 7 August 2023, the American Red Cross implemented the FDA’s latest guidelines, mandating individual donor assessments for all prospective blood donors irrespective of their gender or sexual orientation.3,5 This change effectively ended restrictions that had previously prevented sexually active gay and bisexual men from donating blood.5 Those previously deferred under MSM guidelines can now seek reinstatement by contacting the Red Cross Donor and Client Support Center.5

2) Blood donation and procedures

Invasive cosmetic procedures like tattooing, piercing, botulinum toxin injections, fillers, thread-lifts, semi-permanent makeup and electrolysis carry a risk of blood-borne infections unless performed under sterile conditions.1 Blood donation centres should define deferral periods based on the safety and sterility of the procedure, and if it is not possible, individuals should be deferred for 12 months.1

Once the raw areas have healed after laser treatment, the donor may be accepted.4

Deferral intervals of dermatological procedures are mentioned in Table 3.

Table 3: Deferral intervals of dermatological procedures
Dermatological procedures Deferral interval
WHO1 Others
Invasive cosmetic procedures like tattooing, microblading, piercing (ears, body), semi-permanent makeup and electrolysis Deferred for 12 months, if safety and sterility of the procedure cannot be ascertained Acceptable if single-use disposable equipment is used, otherwise defer for three months (concerns about hepatitis)5
Botulinum toxin injections Deferred for 12 months, if safety and sterility of the procedure cannot be ascertained Defer for a month since last dose7
Fillers Acceptable7
Chemical peels Acceptable7
Lasers Acceptable,7 only if all wounds have healed and the condition for which laser has been used is not a contraindication for blood donation4
Major surgery (done under general/spinal anaesthesia) Defer for 12 months after recovery2

3) Blood donation and medication

What constitutes a medication deferral period? Drugs and their metabolites in transfused blood can exert unintentional pharmacological effects on the recipient.1 A medication deferral period signifies the duration during which individuals who have taken certain medications are temporarily ineligible to donate blood.5 This precautionary measure aims to avert any potential adverse effects on the recipients of donated blood.

Christian had proposed deferral periods based on factors such as the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the drug as well as the type of blood product used, its plasma content and dilution upon transfusion.11

1) Pharmacological properties of the drug

To determine the eligibility of drugs for blood donation purposes, they can be categorised based on their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles [Table 4].11

Table 4: Classification of drugs into four groups based on their pharmacological properties11
Class 1 drugs Class 2 drugs Class 3 drugs Class 4 drugs

Drugs having dose-dependent

pharmacokinetics, especially those with teratogenic, embryotoxic or fetotoxic potential

Drugs having genotoxicity

Drugs lacking systemic effects

Drugs having little pharmacodynamic potency

Drugs with a very high therapeutic index

Agents for the replacement of physiological metabolites

Drugs influencing the quality of blood products
Retinoids, Thalidomide, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate mofetil, Finasteride, Dutasteride, Antineoplastic drugs, that is, cyclophosphamide Thyroid hormones, nutrients, vitamins, herbal products Inhibitors of platelet function, that is, acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, ticlopidine

2) Concentration of drug in donor’s plasma and its dilution upon transfusion

The concentration of drugs in a donor’s plasma during blood donation depends on various factors, including drug intake, dose, mode of administration, drug preparation and pharmacokinetic properties.11 Both tmax (the time interval between drug intake and maximum plasma concentration) and t1/2 (the plasma elimination half-life) are crucial here. While tmax is determined by the release and absorption of the drug, t1/2 is affected by the distribution, metabolism and excretion of a drug. Drug concentrations at 3% and 0.000001% of therapeutic levels are considered safe for non-teratogenic and teratogenic drugs, respectively.12 Based on these safety margins, waiting periods can be calculated based on the drug’s pharmacokinetics and with/without blood components to be prepared.

3) Type of the blood product used

Blood products can be classified as:

  • i.

    Blood products containing up to 50 mL/U single-donor plasma(e.g. red blood cell concentrates, pooled plasma).11

  • ii.

    Blood products containing more than 50 mL/U single-donor plasma (average 250 mL/U)(e.g. whole blood, fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrates).11

Basis of deferral interval for a drug

1) Class 1 drugs

Following a period equivalent to tmax + 5t1/2, approximately 97% of the drug is eliminated, resulting in a residual plasma drug concentration of approximately 3% of the therapeutic level, and further dose-dependent clinical effects are not anticipated at this level.11 When blood products containing an average of 250 mL plasma from a single donor are transfused into adolescents >12 years of age and adults (5000mL blood volume, 2500mL plasma volume), the donor plasma is diluted about tenfold and the resultant drug level in the recipient’s plasma could reach around 10%.11 To comply with the intended safety margin of 3%, a deferral interval of five plasma elimination half-lives is warranted.1 In contrast, when blood products containing 50 mL single-donor plasma are transfused into adolescents >12 years of age and adults (5000mL blood volume, 2500mL plasma volume), the donor plasma is diluted about 50-fold and the resultant drug level in the recipient’s plasma is close to 2% of the therapeutic drug concentration, and that’s why no deferral is needed.11

In summary, the transfusion of blood products containing teratogenic, fetotoxic or embryotoxic substances to pregnant women poses minimal risk to the foetus if the final concentration in the mother’s plasma remains below 3% of the therapeutic level.11 This can be ensured either through the dilution of plasma in the recipient or by implementing donor deferral intervals equivalent to tmax + 5 t1/2.11

2) Class 2 drugs

In essence, defining threshold levels for genotoxicity presents a challenge due to the potential impact even a single molecule reaching the DNA may have.11 Thus, rather than focusing on dilution factors post-transfusion, the total dose of the genotoxic drug remains pertinent in this context. A maximum daily intake of up to 1.5 mcg of a genotoxic drug is generally considered to be safe, given the resulting low risk of genotoxicity.11 For this reason, a deferral period equivalent to tmax + 24 t1/2 is warranted as it results in a genotoxic drug concentration of 1 mcg in the donor plasma or 0.000001% of therapeutic levels, which is considered safe.11,12

3) Class 3 drugs

They do not require any deferral period.11

4) Class 4 drugs

Drugs like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause reversible inhibition of platelet aggregation. For such drugs, deferral periods of tmax + 5 t1/2 are sufficient.11

However, the impact of drugs such as aspirin, clopidogrel and ticlopidine extends beyond their elimination from the body as they inhibit platelet aggregation irreversibly.11 Consequently, the restoration of the normal hemostasis relies on the generation of fresh platelets. Human platelets have an average lifespan of ten days, with approximately 10% of circulating platelets being replenished daily. Hence, such medications necessitate a deferral period of tendays.11

Based on the aforementioned discussion, certain drugs and their deferral periods after the last dose are given in Table 5.

Table 5: Certain drugs and their deferral periods after the last dose
Drugs
Deferral period after the last dose
GOI2 WHO1 Others
Retinoids Isotretinoin* One month Twenty-eight days
Acitretin** One month Three years Three years5
Etretinate One month Not eligible to donate blood any time5
5-alpha reductase inhibitors Finasteride One month Twenty-eight days
Dutasteride Six months Six months
Immunosuppressive Methotrexate One month7
Mycophenolate mofetil Six weeks5
Prednisone Two days7
Immunoglobulins (IV, SC, IM) One year
Thalidomide One month5
Oral Minoxidil Two days7
Antibiotics*** Fourteen days after last dose if donor is well Fourteen days after completion of treatment
Systemic treatment for advanced BCC Vismodegib Two years5
Sonidegib Two years5
Vitamins and nutritional supplements Accept Acceptable5
Anti-platelet agents Aspirin Three days if blood is used for platelet preparation Five days

No waiting for donating whole blood

Two days if donating platelets by apheresis5

Clopidogrel Two weeks
Anticoagulants Rivaroxaban Two days5
Anti-retroviral drugs HIV treatment Not eligible to donate blood at any time5
HIV prevention (PrEP or PEP)

Oral

Emtricitabine

Tenofovir

Dolutgravir

Raltegravir

Three months5

Injectables

Cabotegravir

Two years5
NSAIDs Accept Forty-eight hours
Oral contraceptive Accept Accept5
Anti-fungal Ketoconazole Seven days
Beta-blockers Two days7
Calcium channel blockers Accept7
Diuretics Accept7
Anti-psychotics One week7
Anti-epileptics Permanently defer During use7
Insulin Permanently defer
Oral anti-diabetic drugs Accept if there is no alteration in dose within the last four weeks
Experimental medication Twelve months5
Medication of unknown nature Till details are available
Immunisation, Vaccination

Vaccines

Live attenuated (BCG, Zostavax, chickenpox)

Four weeks Four weeks Four weeks5
Killed/inactivated (HPV, Shingrix) Fourteen days Acceptable if symptom-free Acceptable if symptom-free5

(PrEP: Pre-exposure prophylaxis; PEP: Post-exposure prophylaxis; IV: Intravenous; SC: Subcutaneous; IM: Intramuscular; HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus; BCG: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin; HPV: Human Papilloma Virus).

Isotretinoin is highly bound to plasma proteins with a reported plasma half-life of up to 167 hours.13 Given the variability in reported half-life values; the manufacturer advises deferring blood donation for one month after the last dose.
Acitretin has a relatively short half-life of approximately 49–50 hours. However, ethanol consumption can lead to its re-esterification into etretinate, which has a significantly longer half-life of around 160 days due to its accumulation in adipose tissue.13 Some non-alcoholic products, including mouthwashes and cough syrups, also contain ethanol to some extent.13 The precise amount of alcohol intake necessary for acitretin to convert to etretinate remains unclear, as does the influence of timing regarding ethanol ingestion.13 As a precautionary measure, the FDA recommends a deferral period of three years to mitigate even minimal risks of retinoid embryopathy.3
Antibiotics are acceptable, if taken for acne and rosacea.5

Corticosteroid therapy needs special mention. Donors should be deferred temporarily if:

  • 1.

    Topical corticosteroids or tacrolimus/pimecrolimus are applied over large areas (>9%) or received tablets or injections for more than three weeks in the last six months

  • 2.

    Donor needed systemic steroids for more than six months within the last 12 months.2

High-dose steroid therapy leads to immunosuppression, potentially masking infectious and inflammatory conditions that would otherwise disqualify donation.1 Additionally, prolonged steroid use can lead to temporary adrenal dysfunction.1 A 12-month waiting period after the final dose is recommended to ensure adrenal gland recovery.1

Impact of deferral on blood donors

Studies indicate that deferral negatively affects future donor return rates, particularly among first-time donors and those who have deferred for more than a year.5 It is crucial to advise temporarily deferred donors on when they can donate and encourage their return.1 Blood donors are less likely to return if the reasons for their deferral are communicated unclearly or unsatisfactorily. Providing counselling to deferred blood donors can enhance their compliance with follow-up medical care.

Conclusion

Dermatologists should educate their patients about disclosing their medical history to blood donation centres to minimise the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections and to mitigate potential risks associated with the transfusion of teratogenic or genotoxic drugs in recipients. Through proactive communication and collaboration with blood banks and donation centers, dermatologists can enhance awareness among patients and healthcare providers, fostering a culture of safety and responsibility in blood donation practices.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. Blood donor selection: Guidelines on assessing donor suitability for blood donation. World Health Organization; .
  2. Transfusion medicine technical manual (3rd ed). Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India; .
  3. Food and drug. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. (2024, July 5). Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21. Accessed July 06, 2024.
  4. Whole Blood and Components. Transfusion guidelines. (n.d.). Available from: https://www.transfusionguidelines.org/dsg/wb. Accessed July 06, 2024
  5. Eligibility criteria alphabetical listing. American Red Cross Blood Services. (n.d.). Available from: https://www.redcrossblood.org/donate-blood/how-to-donate/eligibility-requirements/eligibility-criteria-alphabetical.html. Accessed July 06, 2024
  6. , , , , . Asymptomatic leprosy infection among blood donors may predict disease development and suggests a potential mode of transmission. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:3345-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Brazilian blood donation eligibility criteria for dermatologic patients. A Bras Dermatol. 2012;87:590-95.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Restrictions on blood donations relevant to dermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2018;24:13030/qt1s98s3v4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guide to the preparation, use and quality assurance of blood components (21st edition). Council of Europe; .
  10. Guidelines for blood donor selection and blood donation referral. National Blood Transfusion Council, National AIDS Control Organization, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; Govt. of India; .
  11. , , , , . Blood donors on medication – an approach to minimize drug burden for recipients of blood products and to limit deferral of donors. Transfus Med Hemother. 2009;36:107-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Blood donors on medication. Are deferral periods necessary? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;57:433-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Systemic Retinoids. In: , , eds. Comprehensive dermatologic drug therapy (4th ed). Philadelphia: Elsevier; . p. :245-61.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections