Translate this page into:
A short, 8-week course of imiquimod 5% cream versus podophyllotoxin in the treatment of anogenital warts: A retrospective comparative cohort study
Corresponding author: Prof. Electra Nicolaidou, 1st Department of Dermatology, “A. Sygros” Hospital, 5, Dragoumi Street, 115 28 Athens, Greece. electra.nicol@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Nicolaidou E, Kanelleas A, Nikolakopoulos S, Bezrodnii G, Nearchou E, Gerodimou M, et al. A short, 8-week course of imiquimod 5% cream versus podophyllotoxin in the treatment of anogenital warts: A retrospective comparative cohort study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021;87:666-70.
Abstract
Background:
Studies comparing head-to-head treatment modalities for anogenital warts are lacking.
Aim:
We sought to compare a short, 8-week course of imiquimod 5% cream to versus the standard 4 week course of podophyllotoxin in the treatment of anogenital warts and to assess factors that may affect response to treatment.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study. We reviewed medical files of otherwise healthy patients with a first episode of anogenital warts who were treated with either a short, 8-week course of imiquimod or the standard 4-week course of podophyllotoxin. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW). Logistic regression was employed to evaluate factors that may affect response to therapy.
Results:
The study included 347 patients. In patients with lesions on dry, keratinized anatomical sites, the complete clearance rates were 7.6% for imiquimod and 27.9% for podophyllotoxin (P < 0.001). In patients with lesions on moist, partially keratinized sites, no difference between the treatments was revealed. Significant predictors of > 50% reduction in wart area were location of lesions [odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 3.6 (1.84–7.08), P = 0.0002] for “partially keratinized” versus “keratinized” sites and treatment used [OR (95% CI): 1.79 (1.08–2.97), P = 0.024] for podophyllotoxin versus imiquimod.
Limitations:
The retrospective design of the study was a limitation that we mitigated against with the use of IPTW logistic regression.
Conclusion:
A standard 4 week course of Podophyllotoxin was more effective than an 8-week course of imiquimod only for lesions on keratinized sites. Treatment with podophyllotoxin and location of lesions on partially keratinized sites were independent predictors of >50% reduction in wart area.
Keywords
Anogenital warts
comparison
human papillomavirus
imiquimod
podophyllotoxin
Introduction
Anogenital warts rank among the most frequent sexually transmitted infections.1 Treatment modalities for the management of anogenital warts are divided into provider-administered (such as cryotherapy) and patient-applied (imiquimod, podophyllotoxin, and sinecatechins).2,3
Imiquimod and podophyllotoxin are the most commonly used patient-applied treatments for anogenital warts. To our knowledge, there are only two studies comparing imiquimod and podophyllotoxin in the treatment of anogenital warts which concluded that both treatments were equally effective.4,5 Reports on the cost-effectiveness of anogenital wart treatments favor podophyllotoxin over imiquimod, because imiquimod is more expensive and the duration of treatment with imiquimod is longer.6,7 On the other hand, because imiquimod enhances the immune responses against human papillomavirus, recurrence rates following treatment with imiquimod are lower, compared with podophyllotoxin.7 Thus, the choice between the two agents is not clear cut.
Imiquimod can be used for up to 16 weeks.2,3 Shorter courses (4-week, 8-week, and 12-week) have been evaluated and produced results comparable to the 16-week course.8,9
In this study, we compared response rates between a short, 8-week course of imiquimod 5% cream and podophyllotoxin in patients with anogenital warts. Apart from general response rates, we also assessed factors that may affect response to treatment. We decided to evaluate an 8-week course of imiquimod instead of the licensed 16-week course, because we need more data on this more practical and less expensive imiquimod regime.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the database of all patients with anogenital warts who presented to the sexually transmitted infections unit of “Andreas Sygros” hospital for skin and venereal diseases, between January 2012 and December 2016. The study was approved by the institutional review board.
The inclusion criteria were the following: (a) otherwise healthy males and females age 18 years and older with a clinically diagnosed first episode of anogenital warts lasting no more than 3 months and (b) monotherapy with either an 8-week course of imiquimod 5% cream or a 4-week course of podophyllotoxin. Exclusion criteria included (a) receiving any treatment for anogenital warts before presentation to our department, (b) presence of either intra-anal/intravaginal warts or warts of the urethral meatus, (c) presence of giant condylomata (Buschke–Lowenstein tumors), (d) presence of only one wart or wart area larger than 6 cm2, and (e) pregnancy.
Anatomical sites of anogenital warts were divided into two groups. The first group included sites covered by dry, keratinized skin, such as pubic area, penile shaft, scrotum, groin, and the outer surface of labia majora of the vulva (“keratinized” sites). The second group included sites covered by moist, partially keratinized skin, such as perianal area, perineum, preputial cavity, inner surface of labia majora, and labia minora of the vulva (“partially keratinized” sites). Disease extent was defined as small, if the number of lesions was between 2 and 4 or affected area was <1 cm2; medium, if lesions were between 5 and 10 or area between 1 and 4 cm2, and large, if lesions were more than 10 or area affected was 4–6 cm2.
Imiquimod was applied three times weekly. Podophyllotoxin was applied each week twice daily for 3 consecutive days, followed by 4 days of rest. Podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution was prescribed for lesions on “keratinized” sites and podophyllotoxin 0.15% cream was prescribed for lesions on “partially keratinized” sites, in agreement with the recent European guidelines.2
For the comparison of the response rates between the different treatment groups, Chi-square test was used. We also performed a stratified analysis using Chi-square test for the comparison of response rates among the categories of location (“keratinized” sites vs. “partially keratinized” sites). For the comparison of medians between independent groups of patients, we used Mann–Whitney U-test.
Estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using a logistic regression model. To account for the observational nature of the study and possible confounding, inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression was also applied, with weights stabilized by the marginal probabilities of receiving each treatment. Analyses were conducted in R, version 3.5.1, and IPT weights were estimated using package “ipw.”
Results
In total, 347 patients were included in the study. Demographic and baseline characteristics of the treatment groups are shown in Table 1.
Treatment | Imiquimod (n=202), n (%) | Podophyllotoxin (n=145), n (%) | P |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | |||
Men | 148 (73.3) | 129 (89.0) | <0.001* |
Women | 54 (26.7) | 16 (11.0) | |
Age (median) | 34 | 33 | 0.509 |
Location of AGW | |||
“Keratinized” sites | 92 (45.5) | 104 (71.7) | <0.0001* |
“Partially keratinized” sites | 76 (37.6) | 23 (15.9) | |
Both | 34 (16.8) | 18 (12.4) | |
Extent of AGW | |||
Small | 62 (30.7) | 56 (38.6) | 0.282 |
Medium | 70 (34.7) | 47 (32.4) | |
Large | 70 (34.7) | 42 (29.0) |
Complete clearance rates and more than 50% reduction in wart area for the groups as a whole and separately for lesions on “keratinized” and “partially keratinized” sites are shown in Tables 2 and 3. For lesions on “keratinized” sites, the difference between imiquimod and podophyllotoxin both in clearance rates (7.6% and 27.9%, respectively) and in >50% reduction in wart area (54.3% and 76.0%, respectively) was statistically significant.
Complete clearance rates of AGW | |||
---|---|---|---|
Patients | Imiquimod, n/ntreated (%) | Podophyllotoxin, n/ntreated (%) | P |
All | 51/202 (25.2) | 46/145 (31.7) | 0.185 |
With lesions on “keratinized” sites | 7/92 (7.6) | 29/104 (27.9) | <0.001* |
With lesions on “partially keratinized” sites | 38/76 (50.0) | 12/23 (52.2) | 0.855 |
Both | 6/34 (17.6) | 5/18 (27.8) | 0.621 |
>50% reduction in wart area | |||
---|---|---|---|
Patients | Imiquimod, n/ntreated (%) | Podophyllotoxin, n/ntreated (%) | P |
All | 142/202 (70.3) | 111/145 (76.6) | 0.196 |
With lesions on “keratinized” sites | 50/92 (54.3) | 79/104 (76.0) | 0.001* |
With lesions on “partially keratinized” sites | 66/76 (86.8) | 20/23 (87.0) | 0.989 |
Both | 26/34 (76.5) | 12/18 (66.7) | 0.667 |
The results of the univariate logistic regression for patients with >50% reduction in wart area versus <50% reduction in wart area are presented in Table 4.
OR (95% CI) | P | |
---|---|---|
Treatment | ||
Podophyllotoxin vs. Imiquimod | 1.38 (0.85-2.25) | 0.197 |
Gender | ||
Women vs. men | 2.03 (1.04-3.98) | 0.0389* |
Location of AGW | ||
“Partially keratinized” vs. “keratinized” sites | 3.44 (1.79-6.61) | 0.0002* |
“Both” vs. “keratinized” sites | 1.41 (0.71-2.78) | 0.32 |
Extent of AGW | ||
Medium vs. small | 0.95 (0.53-1.69) | 0.851 |
Large vs. small | 0.82 (0.46-1.46) | 0.493 |
Age | 0.98 (0.95-1.006) | 0.12 |
Multivariate analysis revealed that only type of treatment and location of lesions were independent predictors of response to treatment [Table 5]. More specifically, treatment with podophyllotoxin [OR (95% CI): 1.9 (1.11–3.23), P = 0.018] and location on “partially keratinized” sites [OR (95% CI): 3.75 (1.88–7.49), P = 0.0001] were statistically significantly associated with > 50% reduction in wart area.
OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) IPTW | P (IPTW) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | ||||
Podophyllotoxin vs. imiquimod | 1.9 (1.11-3.23) | 0.018* | 1.79 (1.08-2.97) | 0.024* |
Gender | ||||
Women vs. men | 1.74 (0.83-3.66) | 0.14 | 1.87 (0.89-3.92) | 0.10 |
Location of AGW | ||||
“Partially keratinized” vs. “keratinized” sites | 3.75 (1.88-7.49) | 0.0001* | 3.6 (1.84-7.08 | 0.0002* |
“Both” vs. “keratinized” sites | 1.26 (0.6-2.63) | 0.54 | 1.15 (0.55-2.39) | 0.72 |
Extent of AGW | ||||
Medium vs. small | 1.03 (0.56-1.89) | 0.93 | 0.98 (0.54-1.78) | 0.95 |
Large vs. small | 0.95 (0.51-1.76) | 0.87 | 0.93 (0.51-1.69) | 0.80 |
Age | 0.98 (0.96-1.01) | 0.15 | 0.99 (0.97-1.01) | 0.39 |
Due to the observational nature of the study and nonrandom assignment of treatments, an inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression model was estimated. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights were calculated with marginal treatment probabilities as stabilizing factors and age, gender, extent of lesions, and location of lesions as probability of treatment factors. inverse probability of treatment weighted diagnostics demonstrated that weighting resulted in a balanced sample between treatment groups in important predictors for treatment and response [Table 6]. The inverse probability of treatment weighted model estimated a slightly smaller treatment effect of podophyllotoxin [OR (95% CI): 1.79 (1.08–2.97), P = 0.024], while the rest of the variables were found to have similar effects compared with the unweighted analysis [Table 5].
Variable | Chi-square statistic (df) unweighted sample | Chi-square statistic (df) IPT weighted sample | P(unweighted sample) | P(IPT weighted sample) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | 12.5 (2) | 0.08 (2) | 0.0001* | 0.78 |
Location of AGW | 25.3 (2) | 0.1 (2) | <0.0001* | 0.95 |
Discussion
In everyday clinical practice, imiquimod and podophyllotoxin are often considered first-line treatments for anogenital warts.
Imiquimod is shown to have a clearance rate ranging widely between 35% and 75% for treatment periods up to 16 weeks.5,8-14 In our study, the imiquimod clearance rate after 8 weeks of treatment was 25.2%. However, the clearance rate was 50%, for lesions on “partially keratinized” sites, and 7.6%, for lesions on “keratinized” sites. So, if imiquimod is prescribed for patients with warts on “partially keratinized” sites, our study showed that even an 8-week course can lead to a clearance rate comparable to the clearance rates mentioned in the literature for treatment up to 16 weeks.
Podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution has been shown to have a clearance rate between 54% and 85% after use for 4 weeks.5,15-18 For podophyllotoxin 0.15% cream, clearance rates of 63%19 and 75%18 have been reported. In this study, the clearance rate was 27.9% for podophyllotoxin solution (for lesions on “keratinized” sites) and 52.2% for podophyllotoxin cream (for lesions on “partially keratinized” sites). The low clearance rate that we observed for podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution can be attributed to the fact that we used it only for lesions on “keratinized” sites, which, according to the results of our study, are more resistant to treatment.
Previous studies comparing imiquimod and podophyllotoxin in the treatment of anogenital wartsinclude a meta-analysis4 (that evaluated three placebo-controlled trials of imiquimod and nine placebo-controlled trials of podophyllotoxin) and a head-to-head comparison in a randomized, open-label trial that included 45 patients.5 Both studies concluded that imiquimod and podophyllotoxin were equally effective. In this study, we compared podophyllotoxin with a shorter, 8-week imiquimod course. For lesions on “keratinized” skin, the difference between imiquimod and podophyllotoxin both in clearance rates and in >50% reduction in wart area was statistically significant. For lesions on “partially keratinized” skin, no difference was detected between the two treatments.
In univariate analysis, lesions on “partially keratinized” sites and female patients were statistically significantly associated with a >50% reduction in wart area. In the multivariate analysis, however, gender of patients was no longer associated with response to treatment and only location of lesions on “partially keratinized” sites and treatment with podophyllotoxin were independent predicting factors of >50% reduction in wart area. These findings reflect the fact that patients with lesions on “keratinized” sites, that is, with “difficult-to-treat” lesions, were mostly men and had been treated more frequently with podophyllotoxin, compared with imiquimod. Men more often have lesions on “keratinized” sites, such as the penile shaft and the pubic area, while women usually have lesions on “partially keratinized” sites, such as the perineum, inner surface of labia majora, and labia minora of the vulva. In the multivariate model that took into account the location of lesions, gender was no longer a predictor of response to treatment and, on the contrary, type of treatment was. So, our study showed that location of lesions and not patients’ gender predicts response to treatment.
The main limitation of our study is its retrospective design. We mitigated this shortcoming by basing the main results of our study on an inverse probability of treatment weighted analysis, creating a sample in which treatment assignment was independent of (measured) baseline covariates.
Conclusion
Our study showed that lesions’ location plays a central role on response to patient-applied treatments for anogenital warts. For lesions on “partially keratinized” sites, an 8-week course of imiquimod was equally effective to the standard 4-week course of podophyllotoxin. For lesions on “keratinized” sites, the 8-week course of imiquimod was less effective, compared with podophyllotoxin, so either podophyllotoxin or the standard “up to 16 weeks” imiquimod regime should be preferred. Lesions on “partially keratinized” sites responded more favorably to both treatments.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
EN has received honoraria from Meda Pharmaceuticals and Glaxosmithkline.
AK and GB have received honoraria from Meda Pharmaceuticals.
References
- Systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of genital warts. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:39.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- 2012 European guideline for the management of anogenital warts. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:e263-70.
- [Google Scholar]
- Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64:1-37.
- [Google Scholar]
- Meta-analysis of 5% imiquimod and 0.5% podophyllotoxin in the treatment of condylomata acuminata. Dermatology. 2006;213:218-23.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Efficacy and safety of imiquimod versus podophyllotoxin in the treatment of anogenital warts. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38:216-8.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The cost-effectiveness of patient-applied treatments for anogenital warts. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:228-34.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of anogenital warts: Systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1-486.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Treatment of genital warts with an immune-response modifier (imiquimod) J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38:230-9.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- An open-label phase II pilot study investigating the optimal duration of imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of external genital warts in women. Int J STD AIDS. 2006;17:448-52.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Imiquimod, a patient-applied immune-response modifier for treatment of external genital warts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:789-94.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Treatment of external genital warts in men using 5% imiquimod cream applied three times a week, once daily, twice daily, or three times a day. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:226-31.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Randomized, comparative trial on the sustained efficacy of topical imiquimod 5% cream versus conventional ablative methods in external anogenital warts. Eur J Dermatol. 2006;16:642-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Topical imiquimod 5% cream in external anogenital warts: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Dermatol. 2004;31:627-31.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Podophyllotoxin 0.5% v podophyllin 20% to treat penile warts. Genitourin Med. 1988;64:263-5.
- [Google Scholar]
- Patient-applied podofilox for treatment of genital warts. Lancet. 1989;1:831-4.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Double-blind randomized clinical trial of self-administered podofilox solution versus vehicle in the treatment of genital warts. Am J Med. 1990;88:465-9.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Topical treatment of genital warts in men, an open study of podophyllotoxin cream compared with solution. Genitourin Med. 1995;71:387-90.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of podophyllotoxin solution, podophyllotoxin cream, and podophyllin in the treatment of genital warts. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79:270-5.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]