Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obervation Letter
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Brief Report
2008:74:3;234-237
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.41368
PMID: 18583790

Adverse effects of antiretroviral treatment

Ajay Sharma, Roshni Vora, Megha Modi, Archana Sharma, Yogesh Marfatia
 Department of Skin and VD, Medical College and SSG Hospital, Vadodara, India

Correspondence Address:
Yogesh Marfatia
Department of Skin and V.D Medical College and SSG Hospital, Vadodara
India
How to cite this article:
Sharma A, Vora R, Modi M, Sharma A, Marfatia Y. Adverse effects of antiretroviral treatment. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008;74:234-237
Copyright: (C)2008 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Background: The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has led to significant reduction in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related morbidity and mortality. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to antiretroviral treatment (ART) are however, major obstacles in its success. Aims: We sought to study the adverse effects of ART in a resource-restricted setting in India. Methods: Hundred patients on ART were studied prospectively over a period of two years. All patients were asked to visit the clinic if they developed any symptoms or on a monthly basis. They were screened clinically and investigated suitably for any ADRs. Result: Out of the 100 patients, ten patients did not come for follow-up; only 90 cases were available for evaluation. ADRs were observed in 64 cases (71.1%) - the maximal frequency of ADRs was seen with zidovudine (AZT) (50%) followed by stavudine (d4T) (47.9%), efavirenz (EFV) (45.4%) and finally, Nevirapine (NVP) (18.4%). Most common ADRs were cutaneous (44.4%) followed by hematological (32.2%), neurological (31.1%), metabolic (22.2%) and gastrointestinal (20%). Most common cutaneous ADRs observed were nail hyperpigmentation (14.4%) and rash (13.3%). Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) was observed as a paradoxical reaction to ART in 20 (22.2%) cases. Conclusion: To optimize adherence and thus, efficacy of ART, clinicians must focus on preventing adverse effects whenever possible, and distinguish those that are self-limited from those that are potentially serious.
Keywords: Adverse drug reaction, Antiretroviral therapy, Acquired immune deficiency syndrome, Human immune deficiency virus

Introduction

The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has led to a significant reduction in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, up to 25% of all patients discontinue their initial HAART regimen because of treatment failure, toxic effects or noncompliance within the first eight months of therapy. [1],[2] Several strategies have been implemented to improve treatment duration. Due to the ongoing development of new antiretroviral agents, prompt understanding and management of adverse effects becomes very important.

The sustained benefits of HAART have led to far greater numbers of HIV-1 infected cases receiving at least three drugs for greater periods of time. Moreover, drug-related toxicity is being increasingly recognized because of the declining incidence of HIV1-associated opportunistic infection. The risk of specific side effects varies from drug to drug, from drug class to drug class, and from patient to patient.

This paper presents results from our study of adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in a cohort of 100 patients from Vadodara, India in a resource-restricted setting.

Methods

This study was carried out in the HIV referral clinic of the Department of Skin and V.D. from September 2004 to October 2006. In this two-year period, all HIV-positive cases who were already on ART and who were newly started on ART were included and were followed prospectively for the development of any ADRs. One hundred HIV-positive cases who were on ART, were included in this study. A detailed history of every patient was taken including past history of ART. History of fever, cough, breathlessness, past or present history of pulmonary/extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB), skin lesions, mucosal lesions and sexually transmitted diseases (STD) was taken for every patient.

Baseline laboratory investigations such as hemoglobin (Hb), total counts, differential counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, urine analysis, serum venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) test, serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Mantoux test (MT) and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of lymph nodes were carried out in each patient to rule out any opportunistic infection or specific contraindication to any drug. X-ray of the chest and ultrasonography of the abdomen were done in all cases to determine the focus of TB. Lymphocyte enumeration was carried out before starting antituberculous treatment (ART). Viral load was not advised routinely and patients were also subjected to liver function tests (LFTs), renal function tests (RFTs), lipid profile and blood sugar tests.

The three-drug regimen was given to patients who could afford to undergo this treatment. Efavirenz-based regimen was given to patients having TB. All cases on ART were periodically subjected to clinical and laboratory monitoring. They were also screened for opportunistic infections (OIs) and drug toxicity in each follow-up visit during this two-year period. Response to ART was indicated by decreased frequency of infections (bacterial infections, oral thrush and other OIs). CD4 count was done every six months or more frequently if clinically indicated. In patients who were on zidovudine (AZT)-containing regimens, hemoglobin was measured before initiation and at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of therapy or in response to their symptoms. LFTs were done at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks in patients on nevirapine (NVP)-based regimens. Lipid profile and serum lactate, serum amylase were done whenever indicated. Plasma viral load was not done routinely but was carried out in case of treatment failure.

Assessment of adherence to study medication was based on the patient′s self-report and pharmacy records. Patients were asked to bring empty bottles and strips.

Results

One hundred cases were enrolled in the study - ten cases were lost to follow-up after the first visit and they were omitted from the study so that 90 cases were available for evaluation.

In the present study, ADRs were observed in 64 cases (71.1%) and many cases had ³ 1 ADR. The most common ADRs were cutaneous (44.4%) [Table - 1]: nail hyperpigmentation (14.4%) and rash (13.3%) [Table - 1]. Rash was mainly observed with Nevirapine-based regimen and in one case with efavirenz (EFV)-based regimen [Table - 1]. The rash was graded according to the AIDS Clinical Trial Group′s grading severity of cutaneous eruptions. [3] Nail and oral hyperpigmentation was attributed to AZT [Table - 1], [Figure - 1]. Anemia was observed after ART containing AZT in 18 cases (20%) [Table - 1] and severe anemia (grade IV, Hb < 6.5 g/dL) was observed in 7.2% of the cases. The most common neurological ADR peripheral neuropathy (PN) (22.2%) was induced by stavudine (d4T) in 19 cases [Table - 1] and by boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) in one case. Lipodystrophy observed in 14.5% of all cases [Table - 1] was due to d4T or AZT. Pancreatitis was observed in a 12 year-old male on AZT + 3TC (lamivudine) + NVP, which could be attributed to 3TC. Gastrointestinal ADRs were seen in 18 cases (20%). Abnormal liver function tests (LFT) were observed in five cases (5.5%) and fatty changes were detected in the liver on ultrasonography in three cases (3.3%) on follow-up. In the present study, fatty changes were observed in AZT-based regimens. Liver mitochondrial toxicity is associated with increased lipid deposits, resulting in micro- or macrovesicular steatosis.

The number of cases having ADR with a specific drug was highest with AZT (50%), followed by d4T (47.9%) [Table - 2]. However, the more serious long-term metabolic ADRs were more commonly observed with d4T [Table - 1].

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) was observed as a paradoxical reaction to ART in 20 (22.2%) cases [Table - 3]; TB IRIS was observed in four cases. Two had abdominal tuberculosis detectable on ultrasonography and two had tuberculous lymphadenitis.

Seventeen (19%) out of 90 cases were nonadherent to medications and ADRs were the most common reason for irregular treatment in five (29.4%) cases.

Discussion

Ninety cases were observed over a period of two years; ADRs were observed in 64 of them (71.1%). A Swiss cohort reported ADRs in 74% of their cases. [4] The most common ADRs were cutaneous (44.4%), rash was mainly due to NVP. In all cases with rash, NVP was omitted and the rash was managed conservatively. Later on, EFV replaced nevirapine in the regimen. Other common ADRs in this study were PN (22.2%) and anemia (20%). In a study by Kumarasamy et al. , the most common ADRs were PN, anemia and nail hyperpigmentation. [5]

Anemia was seen in 20% of the cases; grade IV anemia was seen in 7.4% cases as compared to 34% in an old study by Van Leeuwen et al. [6] In cases with grade IV anemia (Hb < 6.5 g/dl), AZT was replaced by d4T and the remaining cases were managed conservatively with iron and folic acid supplementation. Peripheral neuropathy was mainly seen with d4T and d4T was replaced by AZT in all cases. Lipodystrophy was observed in 14.5% of the cases while Thierry Saint Marc et al. reported it in 46.5% of their cases. [7] Lactic acidemia, a subtle manifestation of lactic acidosis, was observed in one female. It was diagnosed promptly due to clinical suspicion and proper investigation of serum lactate levels, because of which she was managed effectively.

The most common gastrointestinal ADR was gastritis (10%) in the present study. In a study by O′Brien et al. , GI events were mentioned as the most common reason (4.4%) for a patient to discontinue ART due to ADRs. [8] Maniar et al. reported abdominal pain and diarrhea in 0.7 and 0.2% of their cases, respectively, while they were observed in 2.2 and 1.1% of our cases, respectively. [9] Fatty changes observed in the liver on routine ultrasonography were mainly due to AZT-induced mitochondrial toxicity.

IRIS was observed in 22.2 and 21% of the cases in our and the King′s College study, respectively. [7] The most common among these was herpes zoster due to IRIS. All cases were managed conservatively and ART was continued.

ART is becoming increasingly effective, but also increasingly complex. Adverse effects of therapy may cause symptoms that affect a variety of organ systems. Although current antiretroviral regimens are potent from an antiviral perspective, they often fail because of patient nonadherence. To optimize adherence and hence efficacy, clinicians must focus on preventing adverse effects whenever possible, and distinguishing those that are self-limited from those that are potentially serious.

References
1.
d'Arminio Monforte A, Lepri AC, Rezza G, Pezzoti P, Antinori A, Phillips AN, et al. Insights into the reasons for discontinuation of the first highly active antretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in a cohort of antiretroviral naοve patients: Italian cohort of antiretroviral Naοve patients. AIDS 2000;14:499-507.
et al. Insights into the reasons for discontinuation of the first highly active antretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in a cohort of antiretroviral naοve patients: Italian cohort of antiretroviral Naοve patients. AIDS 2000;14:499-507.'>[Google Scholar]
2.
Lucas GM, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Highly active antiretroviral therapy in a large urban clinic: Risk factors for virologic failure and adverse drug reactions. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:81-7.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Divisions of AIDS Table for Grading Severity of Adult Adverse experiences. AIDS Clinical Trial Group Protocol Management Handbook. Divisions of AIDS (DAIDS) Regulatory Operations Center (ROC) Titled Serious Adverse Experience (SAE) Reporting Manual for: AIDS Clinical Trail Groups (AACTG and PACTG), Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA), Intramural Research Programs (IRP). Rockville, MD: Frontier Science, 1 August 1998.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Fellay J, Bousaker K, Ledergerber B, Bernasconi E, Furrer H, Battegay M, et al. Prevalence of adverse drug events associated with potent antiretroviral treatment: Swiss HIV cohort study. Lancet 2001;358:1322-7.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Kumarasamy MP, Balakrishnan. Safety, tolerability and effectiveness of locally produced generic antiretroviral drugs in persons with HIV disease in Southern India. Int Cong Drug Ther HIV 2002;6:298.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Van Leeuwen R, Van den Hurk PJ, Jobsis GJ. Failure to maintain high dose treatment regimens during long term use Zidovudine in patients with symptomatic HIV-1 infections. Genitourin Med 1990;66:418-22.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Saint-Marc T, Partisani M, Poizot-Martin I, Bruno F, Rouviere O, Lang JM, et al. A syndrome of peripheral fat wasting (Lipodystrophy) in patients receiving long term nucleoside analogue therapy. AIDS 1999;13:1659-67.
[Google Scholar]
8.
O'Brien ME, Clark RA, Besch CL, Myers L, Kissinger P. Patterns and correlates of discontinuation of the initial HAART regimen in urban outpatient cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003;34:407-14.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Maniar J, Desai S. Antiretroviral therapy: Real challenges for developing World. Int Cong Drug Ther HIV 2000;5:249.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
211

PDF downloads
57
Show Sections