Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
1997:63:3;170-172
PMID: 20944314

Comparative histopathology of scabies versus nodular scabies

RR Mittal, SP Singh, Reeta Dutt, Seema Gupta, PS Seth
 Departments of Dermato-Venereology and Pathology, Government Medical College/Rajindra Hospital, Patiala - 147 001, India

Correspondence Address:
R R Mittal
Departments of Dermato-Venereology and Pathology, Government Medical College/Rajindra Hospital, Patiala - 147 001
India
How to cite this article:
Mittal R R, Singh S P, Dutt R, Gupta S, Seth P S. Comparative histopathology of scabies versus nodular scabies. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1997;63:170-172
Copyright: (C)1997 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Comparative histopathology was studied in 25 cases of scabies versus 25 cases of nodular scabies which were selected from Dermato-Venereology out patients. Salient differences observed were that in scabies lifting of stratum corneum at places was seen in all 100% cases, spongiosis in 100%, spongiotic vesicles in 28%, burrows in 56%, mite in 40% and vasculitis in 28% whereas in nodular scabies acanthosis was seen in 100%, pseudo epitheliomatous hyperplasia in 8%, burrows in 48%, mite in 24% and vasculitis in 84%. In nodular scabies, dermal infiltrate in 32% cases was arranged as lymphoid follicles with admixture of plasma cells and eosinophils.
Keywords: Lymphoid follicle, Burrows, Vasculitis Nodular scabies

Scabies (S), a contagious parasitic disorder is caused by itch mite, Sarcoptes scabiei. Histopathologically, papular lesions of S reveal burrows with mite, empty burrows, eggs containing larvae, egg shells or excreta.[1] Faecal material or scybala within the horny layer is also indicative of scabies.[2] Spongiosis and spongiotic vesicles are seen in stratum malpighii near the burrows in S.[2] Vasculitis and dermal infiltrate in sections containing mite in S show variable number of eosinophils.[3] Mites are hardly ever, found in nodular scabies (NS). Histopathologically, nodules reveal dense chronic inflammatory infiltrate resembling lymphoma with atypical mononuclear cells.[4] Eosinophils may be present[1] or absent in lymphoma-like infiltrate.[3] Vasculitits with thickened walls, fibrinoid deposits, and vessel wall infiltration by cells was seen in NS.[1]

Subjects and Methods

Twenty-five cases of S and 25 cases of NS diagnosed clinically were selected from Dermato-Venereology outpatients for this study. Detailed history, thorough clinical and dermatological examination were done. Lesions were cleaned with spirit and infiltrated with 2% xylocaine. Elliptical biopsy was taken with the help of a scalpel. Samples were preserved in 10% formalin and sent for histopathology. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was done and slides were observed under 1OOx and 400x magnification with the help of light microscope.

Results

Hyperkeratosis was observed in 92% cases of S and in all cases of NS. Follicular keratosis was seen in all cases of S compared to 16% cases of NS. Delling was seen in all cases of S but in only 12% of NS. Lifting of stratum corneum was seen in 100% cases of S and it was absent in NS. Mild to moderate acanthosis was observed in 88% cases of S and more pronounced acanthosis in 100% of NS. In 8% cases of NS, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia was seen.

Burrows were seen in 56% cases of S, in 3 of them they traversed full strartum malpighii and 10 of them had mite or scybala. In NS, 48% showed burrows and 6 of them had mite or scybala. In S, spongiosis was seen in all cases, more prominent near burrows and with spongiotic vesicle formation in 7/25 (28%) cases, and bullae in one case. [Figure - 1] In NS, milder spongiosis was seen in 14, homogenisation of epidermal cells in 3 and intracellular oedema in 5 cases.

Papillomatosis was seen in 16 cases of NS versus 8 of S. Oedema of dermis was seen in 100% cases of S versus 80% of NS. Perivascular mononuclear infiltrate was seen in all 50 cases. Infiltrate was mild in S and moderate to intense in NS. In 10/25 cases of NS, prominent periadenexal infiltrate was also seen. In 8/25 cases of NS, infiltrate revealed lymphoid follicle formation with paler cells in the centres and darker cells towards periphery. Atypia and mitotic cells were seen in 48%; eosinophils in 72% and the plasma cells in 48% cases of NS, and these cells were observed even where infiltrate was not arranged as lymphoid follicles. Vasculitis seen as thickened vessels due to multilayering of endothelial cells, fibrinoid depostis and cellular infiltration of vessel walls was seen in 28% cases of S verus 84% of NS. Fibrinoid deposits in vessel walls was more in S and irregular thickening due to cellular poliferation was more in NS.

Discussion

Salient histopathological difference in S versus NS were (i) lifting of stratum corneum in 100% of S and its absence in NS (ii) more pronounced spongiosis and spongiotic vesicle formation in S versus more of intracellular oedema and homogenisation of epidermal cells in NS (iii) Fifty-six percent cases of S had burrows with mite in 40% versus 48% of NS had burrows with mite in 24% (iv) six out of 25 cases of NS had mite in the burrows and therefore persistent antigen could play important role in pathogenesis. Marked acanthosis in 100% with pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia in 8% moderate to intense inflammatory infiltrate in dermis which was arranged as lymphoid follicles in 32% with admixture of eosinophils and plasma cells were characteristic of NS and all above features differntiated lymphoid follicles of NS from lymphomas. Vasculitis was seen in 28% of cases of S versus 84% of NS.

References
1.
Fernandez N, Torres A, Ackerman A B. Pathological findings in human scabies, Arch Dermatol 1977;113:320-324.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Lever W F, Lever G S. Histopathology of scabies, in: Histopathology of the Skin, 7th edition J B Lippin cott Company, 1990;238.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Falk S, Dide T J, Histologic and clinical findings in human scabies, Int J Dermatol 1981;20:600-605.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Thomson J, Cochrane T, Cochran R et al. Histology simulating reticulosis in persistent nodular scabies, Br J Dermatol 1974;90:421-429
[Google Scholar]
Show Sections