Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obervation Letter
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Editorial
2003:69:5;319-322
PMID: 17642928

Dexamethasone pulse therapy in dermatology

M Ramam
 Department of Dermatology and Venereology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029, India

Correspondence Address:
M Ramam
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
India
How to cite this article:
Ramam M. Dexamethasone pulse therapy in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:319-322
Copyright: (C)2003 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

The first report of the use of dexamethasone pulse therapy for a dermatological disease appeared in the pages of this journal two decades ago.[1] At that time, it represented a radical change in the approach to skin diseases as pulse therapy had previously been used mainly to prevent transplant rejection and in the treatment of lupus nephritis.[2],[3] The therapy has since been used to treat a very large number of patients at several centers in India[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] and elsewhere.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17] This issue of the journal carries three articles describing the use of pulse therapy and its variants.

Details of the treatment regimens have been published previously.[4],[18] Briefly, dexamethasone pulse therapy consists of the intravenous administration of 100 mg dexamethasone dissolved in 500 ml of 5% dextrose on 3 consecutive days. The pulses are repeated every 4 weeks. Cyclophosphamide 500 mg is given as an intravenous bolus on one day as part of dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulses (DCP) in pemphigus and other diseases; these patients also receive 50 mg cyclophosphamide daily orally between the pulses. In some patients, to achieve a quicker remission, daily oral corticosteroids and/or 2-weekly boluses of dexamethasone are used in addition. In pemphigus, phase II of the regimen begins when complete clinical remission has been achieved. During this phase, the patient receives 9 more DCPs along with 50 mg cyclophosphamide orally per day. In phase III, the pulses are discontinued and the patient receives only oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg a day for another 9 months.

Several factors have contributed to the success and widespread acceptance of dexamethasone pulse therapy. One important factor was the choice of corticosteroid. Conventionally, methylprednisolone was the agent most commonly used in corticosteroid pulse therapy. The choice of dexamethasone made the treatment considerably more affordable and accessible to patients. There was concern among some workers about the equivalence of 1000 mg of methylprednisolone and 100 mg of dexamethasone and some groups have administered pulses of 136 mg of dexamethasone.[5] However, a dose of 1000 mg of methylprednisolone is as arbitrary as a dose of 100 mg of dexamethasone, and in the absence of evidence that 136 mg pulses of dexamethasone are more effective, nearly all centers continue to use 100 mg boluses. There was initial alarm and anxiety about the large doses of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide involved, and in the early days some centers would administer the therapy in the ICU under continuous cardiac monitoring. It is now given as a routine infusion, often in a day care or OPD setting, with the patient going home a few hours after completion of the infusion.

Another factor responsible for the effectiveness of pulse therapy is that the treatment has evolved in response to observations of the results of treatment in patients who were receiving this form of therapy.[19] Initially, only dexamethasone pulses were used. Cyclophosphamide boluses were added because relapses were frequent with dexamethasone alone. Earlier, patients received only monthly pulses of corticosteroids but with the observation that many patients developed some degree of recurrence of lesions between pulses in the early stages of therapy, daily oral corticosteroids were added in the first few months. Patients with extensive, active disease are also given interval pulses of dexamethasone during this phase. The current recommendation of administering 9 pulses after achieving clinical remission (phase II) and 9 months of oral cyclophosphamide therapy after stopping the pulses (phase III) was also arrived at by observing the relapse rate in patients who were treated with varying lengths of therapy. Similarly, the insistence on a strict 28-day cycle for pulses is based on the observation that relapses were commoner in those who took pulses irregularly.

Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy is primarily used for pemphigus (and most of the preceding comments refer to this indication). It was initially described as a treatment that produced quick control of the disease and reduced hospital stay in pemphigus.[20] Later, it was noted to lead to long lasting remissions even after stopping therapy, virtually amounting to "cure".[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26] Pulse therapy has also been used for other conditions, chiefly autoimmune diseases, and found to be an effective therapy. Several papers have reported its effectiveness in systemic sclerosis.[8],[9],[10],[28] By extension, other conditions associated with increased dermal sclerosis and fibroblastic activity such as generalized morphea, keloids, post-burn contractures and scleredema have also been treated. The treatment is also effective in other autoimmune conditions like bullous lupus erythematosus,[30] dermatomyositis and pyoderma gangrenosum.[11],[31],[32] The enthusiasm for a new and effective treatment has led to its use in a small number of patients with a wide variety of difficult-to-treat conditions including multicentric reticulohistiocytosis,[32] prurigo nodularis,[33] disseminated porokeratosis,[34] urticarial vasculitis,[13] toxic epidermal necrolysis,[17] Stevens-Johnson syndrome,[15] generalized lichen planus, extensive alopecia areata, extensive, rapidly spreading vitiligo, sarcoidosis, Peyronie′s disease, Darier′s disease and Hailey-Hailey disease.[27] Larger studies are required to establish the role of dexamethasone pulse therapy in these disorders.

The adverse effects of pulse therapy are those of its constituent drugs, corticosteroids (infections, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperacidity, and osteonecrosis) and cyclophosphamide (leukopenia, hematuria, gonadal failure, pigmentation, and hair loss).[19] These side effects are infrequent compared to daily corticosteroid therapy. Side effects peculiar to pulse therapy include hiccups,[35] facial flushing,[36] diarrhea, weakness, generalized swelling and weight gain, joint and muscle pains.[12] These side effects are usually observed with each pulse and last for a few days afterwards.[19] Most patients are able to tolerate these symptoms and continue treatment. On testing, pituitary-adrenal function was found to be suppressed in about half the patients 1 month after the last pulse of phase II. However, all these patients were asymptomatic and remained well during subsequent follow up and thus the clinical significance of the abnormal test results is unclear.[37]

Where do we go from here? We need to have reports from other centers that use pulse therapy to confirm that the guidelines formulated for DCP therapy are effective in producing remissions and preventing relapses. We need to identify problem situations that require modifications of pulse therapy and to rigorously examine that the modifications actually work. One such problem pointed out by the Hyderabad group is the patient in whom the disease smolders for many months. They comprise a small minority of patients who are seen in nearly all the large centers where pemphigus is treated. In spite of regular treatment, including daily corticosteroids and interval pulses, these patients do not have a remission of their clinical lesions for many months. These patients may benefit by a change in the adjuvant as was seen in two patients reported by the Hyderabad group who responded after they were switched to dexamethasone-methotrexate pulse. Another option may be the addition of another immunosuppressive agent to DCP therapy. This will require close and careful monitoring of the patient but may lead to a shorter duration of treatment and fewer side effects.

At the other extreme, we also need a way to identify those patients who respond to treatment and have long lasting remissions even though they have taken DCP therapy for a very short time. Attempts should be made to identify such patients early in the course of treatment so that they may be given a briefer or abbreviated course of therapy. This will reduce the burden of repeated visits to the hospital and prolonged therapy.

Another change in the DCP therapy that may be considered is the omission of daily doses of cyclophosphamide when pulse doses are being administered. Daily cyclophosphamide is not usually required when monthly boluses are administered, as in the treatment of lupus nephritis. It would be worthwhile to evaluate if the results of DCP therapy can be achieved without daily cyclophosphamide therapy while pulses are being given (i.e. during phase I and II). It may be given only in phase III. Other variations that have been practiced include oral pulses with dexamethasone or betamethasone, administration of boluses of cyclophosphamide without boluses of dexamethasone, and the use of azathioprine or methotrexate with monthly pulses of dexamethasone.

All these variations need to be compared with the original DCP schedule both for the rapidity of control of disease and for the length of remission achieved after stopping the treatment. Every evaluation of pulse therapy, its variants or indeed any treatment for pemphigus should report three clinical outcomes: the time to clinical remission, the duration of remission while on treatment and the duration of remission after withdrawing treatment. This will enable valid comparisons to be made between different treatments.

Finally, though we know that DCP therapy works very well in practice, there is little information about the basic science aspects of this treatment regimen. Pharmacokinetic studies and studies of the effects of the therapy on the immune system may help us to understand the mechanism of action and refine this path breaking therapy further.

Acknowledgments

Dr. V. K. Sharma and Dr Binod Khaitan read the manuscript and provided useful suggestions.

References
1.
Pasricha JS, Gupta R. Pulse therapy with dexamethasone in Reiter's disease. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1982;48:358-61.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Feduska NJ, Turcotte JG, Gikas PW, Bacon GE, Penner JA. Reversal of renal allograft rejection with intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy. J Surg Res 1972;12:208-15
[Google Scholar]
3.
Cathcart ES, Scheinberg MA, Idelson BA, Couser WG. Beneficial effects of methylprednisolone 'pulse' therapy in diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Lancet 1976;1:163-6.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Pasricha JS, Khaitan BK, Raman RS, Chandra M. Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for pemphigus. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:875-82.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Kaur S, Kanwar AJ. Dexamethasone cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in pemphigus. Int J Dermatol 1990;29:371-4.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Roy R, Kalla G. Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse (DCP) therapy in pemphigus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1997;63:354-6.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Singh IP, Mehta SD. Pulse therapy in pemphigus vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol 1996;41:31-2.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Pai BS, Srinivas CR, Sabitha L, Shenoi SD, Balachandran CN, Acharya S. Efficacy of dexamethasone pulse therapy in progressive systemic sclerosis. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:726-8.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Vatwani V, Palta SC, Verma N, Pathak PR, Singh RP. Pulse therapy in scleroderma. Indian Pediat 1994;31:993-5.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Sharda B, Kumar A, Kakker R, Adya CM, Pande I, Uppal SS, et al. Intravenous dexamethasone pulse therapy in diffuse systemic sclerosus. A randomized placebo-controlled study. Rheumatol Internal 1994;14:91-4.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Sood J, Singh M, Chaturvedi P. Infantile pyoderma gangrenosum. Australas J Dermatol 1992;33:43-4.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Appelhans M, Monsmann G, Orge C, BrockerEB. Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in bullous autoimmune dermatoses. Hautarzt 1993;44:143-7.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Worm M, Muche M, Schulze P, Sterry W, Kolde G Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis Successful treatment with cyclophosphamide dexamethasone pulse therapy. Br J Dermatol 1998;39:704-7.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Becker LR, Bastian BC, Wesselmann U, Karl S, Hamm H, Brocker EB. Paraneoplastic pemphigus treated with dexamethasone/cyclophosphamide pulse therapy. Eur J Dermatol 1998;8:551-3
[Google Scholar]
15.
Barman KD, Verma KK, Agrawal S, Agarwalla A, Rijal A. Stevens-Johnson syndrome with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura treated with dexamethasone pulse therapy. J Dermatol 2003;30:54-8.
[Google Scholar]
16.
Toth GG, van de Meer JB, Jonkman MF. Dexamethasone pulse therapy in pemphigus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2002;16:607-11.
[Google Scholar]
17.
van der Meer JB, Schuttelaar ML, Toth GG, Kardaun SH, Beerthuizen G, de Jong MC, et al. Successful dexamethasone pulse therapy in a toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) patient featuring recurrent TEN to oxazepam. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001;26:654-6.
[Google Scholar]
18.
Verma KK. Pulse therapy regimens. In: Pasricha JS, editor. Pulse therapy in pemphigus and other diseases, New Delhi, 1998. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Pulse Therapy and Pemphigus Foundation; 2000. p. 7-8
[Google Scholar]
19.
Pasricha JS. AIIMS experience. In: Pasricha JS, editor. Pulse therapy in pemphigus and other diseases, New Delhi, 1998. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Pulse Therapy and Pemphigus Foundation; 2000. p. 21-40.
[Google Scholar]
20.
Pasricha JS, Gupta R. Pulse therapy with dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide in pemphigus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1984;50:199-203.
[Google Scholar]
21.
Pasricha JS, Srivastava G. Cure in pemphigus a possibility. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1986;52:185-6.
[Google Scholar]
22.
Pasricha JS, Thanzama J, Khan UK. Intermittent high dose dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for pemphigus. Br J Dermatol 1988;119:73-7.
[Google Scholar]
23.
Pasricha JS, Seetharam KA, Das U. Further studies on pemphigus patients treated with dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1989;55:98-104.
[Google Scholar]
24.
Pasricha JS, Das SS. Curative effect of dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Int J Dermatol 1992;31:875-7.
[Google Scholar]
25.
Pasricha JS, Khaitan BK, Raman RS, Chandra M. Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for pemphigus. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:875-82.
[Google Scholar]
26.
Pasricha JS, Khaitan BK. Curative treatment for pemphigus. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:1518-9.
[Google Scholar]
27.
Ramam M. Pulse therapy in other diseases. In: Pasricha JS, editor. Pulse therapy in pemphigus and other diseases, New Delhi, 1998. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Pulse Therapy and Pemphigus Foundation, 2000 p. 41-2.
[Google Scholar]
28.
Pasricha JS, Ramam M, Shah S. Reversal of systemic sclerosis with dexamethasone pulses. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1990;56:40-2.
[Google Scholar]
29.
Singh OP, Verma KK. Discoid lupus erythematosus treated with dexamethasone pulse therapy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1991;57:311.
[Google Scholar]
30.
Pasricha JS, Reddy R, Nandakishore Th, Khera V. Pyoderma gangrenosum treated with dexamethasone pulse therapy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1991;57:225-8.
[Google Scholar]
31.
Sood J, Singh M, Chaturvedi P. Infantile pyoderma gangrenosum. Australas J Dermatol 1992;33:43-4.
[Google Scholar]
32.
Pandhi RK, Vaswani N, Ramam M, et al. Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis. Response to dexamethasone pulse therapy. Arch Dermatol 1990;126:251-2.
[Google Scholar]
33.
Verma KK, Pandhi RK. Prurigo nodularis treated with dexamethasone pulse therapy. African J Dermatol 1994;1:27-8.
[Google Scholar]
34.
Verma KK, Singh OP. Dexamethasone pulse treatment in disseminated porokeratosis of Mibelli. J Dermatol Sci 1994;7:71-2.
[Google Scholar]
35.
Kanwar AJ, Kaur S, Dhar S, Ghosh S. Hiccup-a side effect of pulse therapy. Dermatology 1993;187:279.
[Google Scholar]
36.
Dhar S, Kanwar AJ. Facial flushing-a side effect of pulse therapy. Dermatology 1994;188:332.
[Google Scholar]
37.
Kumrah L, Ramam M, Shah P, Pandey RM, Pasricha JS. Pituitary-adrenal function following dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for pemphigus. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:944-8.
[Google Scholar]
Show Sections