Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Original Article
2001:67:1;25-27
PMID: 17664694

Diagnostic clinical features of atopic dermatitis

Lata Sharma
 Department of Dermatology and Venereolody, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221 005, India

Correspondence Address:
Lata Sharma
Department of Dermatology and Venereolody, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221 005
India
How to cite this article:
Sharma L. Diagnostic clinical features of atopic dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2001;67:25-27
Copyright: (C)2001 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis is a common disease which varies widely in clinical presentation at different ages and places. Although authors working in western countries on white races have suggested many criteria, there is no uniform set which can be used in large population studies in this part of the world. Hence keeping in mind differences in environment and ethnicity of population, the present study was carried out.
Seventy- three patients of atopic dermatitis and 71 age matched controls were studied. All the subjects were examined using a set of 34 potentially useful clinical features selected from different studies, including features for evaluation of photosensitivity. Multiple regression technique was used for analysing the data. It was found that 6 clinical features were diagnostic, 1. presence of itch, 2. history of flexural involvement, 3. history of dry skin, 4. family history of atopy, 5. personal history of diagnosed asthma and 6, visible flexural dermatitis. Photosensitivity was not a significant feature.
Keywords: A topic dermatitis, Diagnostic clinical features, Multiple regression technique

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic disease which starts early in life and varies widely in clinical presentation at different ages and places. There is a uniform set of diagnostic clinical features which can be used in large population studies. Au-thors working in western countries on white races, have suggested many sets of diagnostic features.[1] Therefore keeping in mind the differences in envi-ronment and ethnicity of population in this part of the world, this study was planned to find out a mini-mum set of clinical features which will be diagnostic of AD.

Subjects and Methods

Seventy-three patients of AD with mild to moderate severity, not taking any drugs systemically and 71 age-matched controls suffering from other inflammatory dermatoses were selected. One case each of diaper rash, seborrheic dermatitis, perioral dermatitis, Henoch- Schonlein purpura, intertrigo, erythema multiforme, 2 cases each of impetigo, molluscum contagiosum, pompholyx, urticaria, con-tact dermatitis, 3 cases each of pityriasis rosea, tinea, stasis dermatitis, 3 cases each of scabies, viral warts, acne vulgaris, lichen simplex chronicus, 8 cases of lichen planus and 14 cases of psoriasis were stud-ied. The clinical details of all the cases were recorded on a proforma. All the cases were examined for 34 potentially useful clinical features, selected from dif-ferent studies,[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] including features for evaluation of photosensitivity which was noticed by Keong et al.[8]

At the end of the study, sensitivity and speci-ficity for each clinical feature was determined. Chi-square and relative values were calculated. Clinical features with X2 values less than 10 were omitted and the remaining were entered in correlation re-gression analysis. Using multiple regression technique a[4] minimum set of diagnostic clinical features for AD was determined.[4]

Results

One hundred and forty- four subjects including 73 cases and 71 controls were studied. Demographic variables of cases and controls were statistically similar, p> 0.01, [Table - 1].

The sensitivity and specificity of the clinical features were deter-mined, and Chisquare and relative values were calculated [Table - 2]. Clinical features with X2 value less than 10 were calculated from further analysis. The remaining 17 clinical features were found to be signifi-cantly associated with AD on corre-lation analysis, p< 0.0001 in all [Table - 3]. They were entered in multiple logistic regression analysis [Table - 4]. Six most useful clinical features which emerged from the regression analy-sis were: 1. presence of itch, 2. his-tory of flexural dermatitis, 3. history of dry skin, 4. family history of atopy, 5. personal history of diagnosed asthma and 6. visible flexural dermatitis. Photosen-sitivity was not found to be a significant feature. If three more clinical features such as 1. wool aggra-vating itch, 2. extensor dermatitis and 3. periorbital dermatitis are also added, they can favourably help in the diagnosis of difficult cases.

Discussion

This study reveals that diagnosis of AD and its differentiation from other inflammatory diseases can be done just by a set of six clinical features in which there is only one physical sign and the re-maining are historical features. Important clinical discriminators suggested as major signs by Hanifin and Rajka are included in them.[1],[2] Onset below two years was found to be important by Williams et al because a large number of their subjects were chlidren,[4] but this history can only be obtained from patients parents so it is difficult to be obtained in adults, Plenty of exposure to sunlight in this part of the world has not affected our study results because photosensitivity was not found to be a significant feature as stated by others also [9]. In this study it was found that addition of three more clinical fea-tures such as wool aggravating itch, extensor and periorbital dermatitis, to the six diagnostic fea-tures can favourably help in discriminating diffi-cult cases of AD from other inflammatory dis-eases. Thus the diagnostic clinical features de-rived from this study will be very useful for clini-cal studies on large population even in chang-ing environment.

References
1.
Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980; (Suppl.92): 44- 47.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Lobitz WC Jr, Campbell CJ. Physiologic studies in atopic dermatitis, Arch Derm Syph 1953;67:575.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Rajka G. Atopic dermatitis. in: Recent Advances in Dermatology. Editors Rook A and Haibach HJ. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburg 1983;1: 105.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Williams HC, Burney PG, Hay RJ, et al. The U.K. Working party's diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis 1. Derivations of a minimum set of discriminators for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1994;131:383-396.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Kang K, Tian R. Atopic dermatitis. An evaluation of clinical and laboratory findings. Int J Dermatol 1987;26:27-32.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Visscher MD, Hanifin JM. Atopic dermatitis and atopy in non clinical population. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1989: Suppl (114) 33-40.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Diepgen TL, Fartasch M, Hornstein OP. Evaluation and relevance of atopic basic and minor features in patients with atopic dermatitis and in general population. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1989; 144 (suppl): 50-54.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Keong CH, Kurmimaji Y, Miyamato C. Photosensitivity in atopic dermatitis: Demonstration of abnormal response to UVB. Dermatol 1992; 19: 342-347.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Donald Y ML, Arthur RR, Raif S, et al. Atopic dermatitis, In Dermatology in General Medicine. Editor Fitzpatrick TB, Eisen AZ, Kiauss W, et al. Mc Graw Hill Book Co. NY (4th ed) 1993;1543-1560.
[Google Scholar]
Show Sections