Translate this page into:
Lack of effectiveness of keratin dressings in epidermolysis bullosa
2 Department of Dermatology, Fish Lake Sanliurfa State Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
Correspondence Address:
Yavuz Yesilova
Department of Dermatology, 63300, Sanliurfa
Turkey
How to cite this article: Sürücü HA, Yesilova Y, Turan E, Aksoy M, Tanrikulu O, Eroglu N. Lack of effectiveness of keratin dressings in epidermolysis bullosa. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2015;81:91-92 |
Sir,
Keratin is the fundamental protein that creates cell structure in many tissues, particularly in the skin, hair, and nails. [1],[2],[3],[4] In recent years, emphasis has been placed on the role of keratin in healing wounds. The effects of keratin on cell multiplication and replacement, epithelialization and wound closure have been observed in many cases. Molecular analysis shows that keratin proteins have a positive effect on wound healing via increasing or accelerating epithelialization. This is caused by keratinocyte activation and migration, which is, in turn, caused by increasing keratin gene expression. The synthesis of fundamental proteins such as collagen 4, collagen 7, and collagen 17 increases in active and stimulated keratinocytes. [1] Keratin 17 production increases when the skin is damaged. It has been observed that wound healing does not occur properly in patients with low amounts of keratin 17. As a result of this keratin, wound healing is hastened, and the frequency of blistering is reduced. [2]
Taking the aforementioned into consideration, the effects of applying keratin to the skin as an exogen during wound healing have been studied, and keratin-based care products have been developed in which the activity of keratin protein has been retained. Bandages with keratin content help provide keratins to wounds. They are well tolerated by patients′ tissues during rehabilitation due to their non-immunogenic characteristics. [3] A gel containing keratin obtained from sheep′s wool, has been used in the treatment of EB patients. [4]
A total of five epidermolysis bullosa (EB) patients, including three dystrophic EB (DEB) and two EB simplex (EBS) patients (case 1 = 9-year-old male with DEB; case 2 = 17-year-old female with DEB; case 3 = 3-month-old female with DEB; case 4 = 6-year-old male with EBS; case 5 = 2-month-old female with EBS), were regularly subjected to application of a thick hydrogel rich in keratin (Keragel T™, Keraplast Technologies, Lincoln, New Zealand). The gel was applied every other day. The bodies of the patients were entirely washed with lukewarm sterile water, and the gel was rubbed on after the skin dried. The skin was then wrapped with a non-stick bandage (paraffin gauze bandage, Smith Medical Limited, Hull, England) after waiting for 15 minutes. The treatment was abandoned in case 3 at the fourth month of the treatment upon the request of the family because the number of blisters had increased significantly. Clinical photos of the fourth and fifth patients were taken before and after the treatment [[Figure - 1]a and b], [[Figure - 2]a and b]
![]() |
Figure 1: (a) Pre-treatment appearance: Eroded areas over left knee, mid-lateral tibial and ankles (Patient 2). (b) Post-treatment appearance: Worsening of erosions after three months of treatment |
![]() |
Figure 2: (a) Pre-treatment appearance; There were eroded area on the back, right thigh extensor (Patient 1). (b) Post-treatment appearance; Worsening of erosions after three months of treatment |
A significant decrease in the number of blisters was observed in all of our patients within the first two months of treatment. This result boosted the morale of the patients, their relatives, and the clinic employees. However, relapses in the form of additional blistering were observed in all of the patients beginning from the third month of the treatment, and no changes were noticed in the healing period of the existing eroded areas throughout the treatment. Case 3 gave up the treatment during the fourth month upon request of her family because the treatment was ineffective. The treatment was stopped in all of the remaining patients after six months of treatment at the request of the patients and their relatives.
In another study, a keratin-based care product was applied directly to the damaged areas of the left hand and left foot, as well as the right hand and foot, of a patient with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa as a standard-care treatment four times a week for a period of 6 weeks. [5] After treatment, it was observed that the number of blisters and the epithelialization period of the eroded areas significantly decreased in areas subjected to keratin application. Hand-based skills and quality of life of the patient were improved after keratin gel treatment. The hypothesis stating that keratin-based products affect the keratinocytes present at wounds and speed up healing is supported by these favorable results.It was also noted that the application of keratin-based products for long periods of time increases their quality of life and reduces their treatment costs. [5]
In contrast, our patients were disappointed with the results of keratin dressings.
1. |
Rogel MR, Jaitovich A, Ridge KM. The role of theubiquitinproteasomepathway in keratin intermediate filament protein degradation. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2010;7:71-6.
[Google Scholar]
|
2. |
Kim S, Wong P, Coulombe PA. A keratin cytoskeletal protein regulates protein synthesis and epithelial cell growth. Nature 2006;441:362-5
[Google Scholar]
|
3. |
De Guzman RC, Merrill MR, Richter JR, Hamzi RI, Greengauz-Roberts OK, Van Dyke ME. Mechanical and biological properties of keratosebiomaterials. Biomaterials 2011;32:8205-17.
[Google Scholar]
|
4. |
Pechter PM, Gil J, Valdes J, Tomic-Canic M, Pastar I, Stojadinovic O, et al. Keratin d ressings speed epithelialization of deep partial-thickness wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2012;20:236-42.
[Google Scholar]
|
5. |
Kirsner RS, Cassidy S, Marsh C, Vivas A, Kelly RJ. Use of a keratin-based wound dressing in the management of wounds in a patient with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Adv Skin Wound Care 2012;25:400-3.
[Google Scholar]
|
Fulltext Views
1,871
PDF downloads
1,322