Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obervation Letter
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Letter to Editor
2013:79:5;703-705
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.116743
PMID: 23974588

Major precipitating factors for stigma among stigmatized vitiligo and psoriasis patients with brown-black skin shades

Ramaswamy Premkumar1 , Bikash Kar2 , Pitchaimuthu Rajan3 , Joseph Richard4
1 Department of Research, CRHP, Jamkhed, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odhisha, India
3 Hand Unit, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
4 Department of Biostatistics, Schieffelin Institute of Health-Research and Leprosy Centre, Karigiri, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Ramaswamy Premkumar
4, Vallalar Street, Thiru Nagar, Gandhi Nagar Township (West), Vellore - 632 006
India
How to cite this article:
Premkumar R, Kar B, Rajan P, Richard J. Major precipitating factors for stigma among stigmatized vitiligo and psoriasis patients with brown-black skin shades. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2013;79:703-705
Copyright: (C)2013 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Sir,

Numerous earlier studies had presented the correlation between clinical and demographic parameters and stigmatization; however, their samples were (i) always either on total vitiligo or psoriasis population and were (ii) mostly from light skinned Western-Caucasian cultural backgrounds.

This letter is a part of a larger project that looked into the stigma among psoriasis and vitiligo. [1] Our earlier study [2] was a cross sectional comparative study conducted at Karigiri, South India with a sample of 150 cases each of psoriasis and the same number of vitiligo, a total of 300 subjects. [2] Nearly all of their unexposed skin shades were brown-black and fitted into Fitzpatrick skin type VI [3] and from South Indian cultural background. A detailed clinical, socioeconomic and stigma assessment of these two conditions was done. It measured the level of stigma among these patients and quantified the percent of vitiligo and psoriasis patients minimally participated in domestic and social life, which we defined as stigma by using a recently developed tool called Participation Scale (P-Scale). [4] The reason for using P-Scale was because it uses the framework of the International classification of functioning (ICF), Disability and Health to measure domestic and social participation in such stigmatizing diseases whereas Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) which numerous other studies in psoriasis and vitiligo had administered in the past hardly elaborated ICF model theoretically. [2]

Stigma measurement was among vitiligo and psoriasis patients in comparison to a third group enrolled in the study, serving as controls, comprised 150 adults from both sexes who accompanied the cases to the clinic and who had no dermatological and psychiatric morbidities. During the time of data collection no matching among cases or controls was attempted. The conclusion of stigma was based on this comparison with a control group population. Thus, 26 vitligo and 42 psoriasis patients were identified as suffering from stigma.

In the second part of the study, only these stigmatized patients were taken for further analysis of each condition individually after adjusting for other covariants using logistic regression.

Careful literature search showed that stigma studies based on brown-black skin shade are unavailable. Such studies will also have an added advantage of extrapolating its findings to other South Indian, African and Aborigine population who share similar skin type. We specifically investigated the clinical and demographic profile of the above patients in order to find out the factors that influenced it.

The results depicted that with age increase (41-year and above), stigma also increases among vitiligo and psoriasis; vitiligo have 2.74 times and psoriasis have 2.32 times higher chances of stigma to those who aged 40 years and below with brown-black skin type. Stigma impact increases by 3.37 times with less education among vitiligo population, whereas in psoriasis, increase in the percentage of body parts affected contributes to add stigma by 2.52 times higher chances. The overall predictive power of its equation for vitiligo and psoriasis was 82.7% and 72%, respectively.

The uniqueness of this study is it focused only on the stigmatized sections of these diseases population to specify the factors which influenced it; as well, it fulfilled the need to investigate this problem from a population with brown-black skin shade. As per Fitzpatrick skin shade classification [3] South Indians, Africans and Aborigines share this color blend. This study also considered the original skin color of vitiligo and psoriasis patients as one among the essential parameters to measure stigma.

In order to systematically analyze different factors that precipitates stigma, firstly univariate analysis was done. It did not show any significance except the body parts affected and that in psoriasis patients alone. Regarding the site of disease in psoriasis, if lesion is present in both exposed and unexposed parts of the body, they had significant stigma compared to the lesions only in the exposed parts of the body [P = 0.008, [Table - 1]. Therefore, logistic regression analysis was undertaken as the next phase. Results of this analysis with this study population showed that both in vitiligo and psoriasis, as their age increases, stigma also increased, whereas a Polish study with predominantly Caucasian population showed that there were no significant relationship between increase in age and stigmatization in psoriasis. [5]

Table 1: Results of the logistic regression for vitiligo and psoriasis: Listing of only the risk factors that have significant independent influence on stigma

Two explanations we offer for the association between age increase and increase in the intensity of stigma. One is the culture of arranged marriages. It is largely practiced in South Asia and in Africa, to some extent. In an arranged marriage, one of the factors considered in match making is the parents′ health, generally to be without any visible stigmatizing diseases. Individuals with psoriasis and vitiligo may have hard time finding a mate for their children and get married. Second, in India, elders have a major role in community, social and civic life.

Similarly, we found in psoriasis, increase in the percentage of body parts affected contributed to the stigma in their domestic and social lives. A study from North America showed that stigma is not always proportional to or predicted by measure of body surface area involvement. [6] Another three earlier studies from Europe and North America corroborated this finding. [7],[8],[9] Such results clearly bring out that the clinical and demographic parameters that are responsible for stigma differ widely not only between different cultures, but also the skin shades play a major role for this dichotomy. The common perception is that more educated vitiligo individuals are likely to suffer from the stigma, whereas the results showed when education decreased the participation restriction increased. Hence, awareness among Dermatologists treating black skin type population with these health problems about their educational level, age, and body parts involved suffer more from stigma is a message from this study.

At this juncture, we recommend readers to also refer to another important publication on related issue by Porter et al. [10] One important conclusion drawn from this study is that the clinical and demographic factors that influenced stigma among vitiligo and psoriasis population in brown-black skin shade of South Indian culture is by and large different to that of light-skinned Caucasian societal backgrounds.

References
1.
Premkumar R, Augustine V, Joseph PA, Richard J. Effects of the impact of counseling intervention on life situations in stigmatized vitiligo and psoriasis patients. Study Protocol and Activities Report - unpublished. Karigiri: Funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research; 2011. p. 1-22.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Pichaimuthu R, Ramaswamy P, Bikash K, Joseph R. A measurement of the stigma among vitiligo and psoriasis patients in India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011;77:300-6.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Rebate M, Halder RM, Taliaferro SJ. Classification of vitiligo. In: Goldsmith L, editor. Fitzpatrtick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 7 th ed. London: McGraw Hill Medical; 2006. p. 178-80.
th ed. London: McGraw Hill Medical; 2006. p. 178-80.'>[Google Scholar]
4.
Participation Scale: Users Manual - Version 6.0. Available from: http://www.ilep.org.uk/documents/participation_scale.[Last cited 2010 Apr 16].
[Google Scholar]
5.
Hrehorów E, Salomon J, Matusiak L, Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Patients with psoriasis feel stigmatized. Acta Derm Venereol 2011;92:67-72.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Kimball AB, Jacobson C, Weiss S, Vreeland MG, Wu Y. The psychosocial burden of psoriasis. Am J Clin Dermatol 2005;6:383-92.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Richards HL, Fortune DG, Griffiths CE, Main CJ. The contribution of perceptions of stigmatisation to disability in patients with psoriasis. J Psychosom Res 2001;50:11-5.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Finlay AY, Kelly SE. Psoriasis - An index of disability. Clin Exp Dermatol 1987;12:8-11.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Fortune DG, Main CJ, O'Sullivan TM, Griffiths CE. Quality of life in patients with psoriasis: The contribution of clinical variables and psoriasis-specific stress. Br J Dermatol 1997;137:755-84.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Porter JR, Beuf AH. Racial variation in reaction to physical stigma: A study of degree of disturbance by vitiligo among black and white patients. J Health Soc Behav 1991;32:192-204.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
219

PDF downloads
57
Show Sections