Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
Images in Dermatology
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Media and news
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
2009:75:5;452-462
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.55387
PMID: 19736423

Management of hyperlipidemias: An update

Nitin Ranjan
 Department of Dermatology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Nitin Ranjan
Department of Dermatology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh - 202 001, Uttar Pradesh
India
How to cite this article:
Ranjan N. Management of hyperlipidemias: An update. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:452-462
Copyright: (C)2009 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

The discovery of the key enzymes, receptors, and transporters in cholesterol biosynthesis has enabled us to assemble fragments of knowledge concerning lipids and lipoproteins into dynamic pathways, leading to the development of a multitude of lipid-lowering drugs. After a brief recapitulation of the pathways of cholesterol metabolism and the dermatologic manifestations of lipid derangement, we shall review drugs which modify intestinal cholesterol and bile-acid reabsorption, and hepatic lipoprotein biosynthesis and catabolism. The current literature is examined to determine future therapeutic targets in lipid metabolism, as well as the role of traditional foods as lipid-lowering agents. The latest National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for managing hypercholesterolemia are also discussed.
Keywords: Guidelines, Lipid metabolism, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Statins

Introduction

Cholesterol serves not only as an essential component of the cell membrane but also as the precursor molecule from which steroid hormones, bile salts, and vitamin D are synthesized. It is both derived from the diet and synthesized within the body, mainly in the liver. Cholesterol circulates as a component of lipoproteins. The principal plasma lipoproteins are the chylomicrons (CMs), very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and high-density lipoproteins (HDL). The principal fat in the diet is the triglycerides (TG), which are absorbed in the intestine. The lipoproteins are transported in combination with apoproteins (apo), like apo-A, apo-B, and apo-C.

The Pathways

Transport of lipoproteins can be divided into:

Exogenous transport

From ingested food to intestine to peripheral cells and liver [Figure - 1]

Products of fat digestion from the gut (cholesterol, TG) are packaged with intestinal apo-B48 to form nascent CMs. This process is mediated by microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP). [1] In the circulation, nascent CMs acquire cholesteryl esters (ChE), apo-C, and apo-E from HDL to form CMs. These CMs come in contact with lipoprotein lipase (LPL) located on the luminal surface of vascular endothelium of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. LPL breaks down the triglyceride component of CMs into free fatty acids (FFA) and monoglycerides, in the process converting the CMs to smaller particles called CM remnants. The cholesterol-rich CM remnants are taken up by the liver via LDL-receptor-like-protein (LRP) receptors or Apo-E receptors. [2] In this way, dietary cholesterol finally reaches the liver.

Endogenous transport

From liver to peripheral tissues: the apo-B100 lipoprotein system [Figure - 2]

Analogous to the secretion of nascent CMs by the gut, liver synthesizes and secretes nascent VLDL, by complexing TG and apo-B100 under the mediation of MTP. [1] Triglyceride-rich nascent VLDL serves as an efficient acceptor of ChE from HDL. This transfer takes place under the agency of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) in the plasma and leads to the formation of mature VLDL. [3] During circulation, LPL hydrolyses the TG of VLDL to FFA and monoglycerides, in the process converting VLDL to smaller lipoproteins called intermediate density lipoproteins (IDL), and further to still smaller ChE-rich LDL. LDL supplies tissues with cholesterol. Thus the liver serves as the major site for both cholesterol synthesis and LDL catabolism.

From peripheral tissues to liver: the apo-A 1 lipoprotein system [Figure - 3]

Nascent HDL particles are synthesized by apolipoprotein-phospholipid complexes in plasma, and also by intestine and the liver. Peripheral tissues (including liver) transfer unesterified cholesterol to nascent HDL by the membrane protein ATP-binding cassette protein A1 (ABCA1). [4] Lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), an enzyme present on HDL, esterifies this cholesterol, leading to the formation of ChE. VLDL and CMs transfer TG to nascent HDL, which leads to formation of mature HDL. HDL is taken up directly by hepatocytes via the scavenger receptor class BI (SR-BI). [5] The transfer of excess cholesterol from the tissues back to the liver via HDL is called ′reverse cholesterol transport.′

Hyperlipidemias

Hyperlipidemias are classified as primary or secondary. Patients with primary hyperlipidemia have been classified into 5 major groups according to plasma lipoprotein patterns [Table - 1],[Figure - 4]. [6],[7] Conditions causing secondary hyperlipidemia include obstructive liver disease, various hematopoietic diseases (myeloma, Waldenstrom′s macroglobulinemia, cryoglobulinemia, hemochromatosis), chronic renal failure, myxedema, pancreatitis, and drugs like estrogens, corticosteroids, and retinoids. [8]

Dermatologic Markers of Lipid Derangement

Abnormalities of lipid metabolism may favor lipid deposition in the skin and present as xanthomas. [9] Xanthelasma palpebrarum is the commonest type of cutaneous xanthoma and typically involves the upper eyelids as symmetrical, soft, yellowish papules and plaques near the medial canthi. [10],[11] The major lipid stored in xanthomas is esterified cholesterol. [12],[13] Xanthelasma is a marker of dyslipidemia, requiring a complete lipid profile to detect patients potentially at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. [14] However, only about half of the patients with xanthelasma are hyperlipidemic. [15] The most frequent hyperlipidemia associated with xanthelasma is type IIa. [16] Less frequently, types IIb, III, and IV are found. [16] Isolated xanthelasmata are often treated with destructive modalities, like trichloroacetic acid, electrocautery, surgical excision, [17] carbon dioxide laser, [18] pulsed dye laser, [19] and erbium:YAG laser. [20] A brief review of various other types of xanthomas is presented in [Table - 2].

Management

Traditional foods and herbal therapies

Dietary advice has a small but significant role to play in normalizing abnormal serum lipids in those at high risk of cardiovascular disease, and reductions in serum total cholesterol levels of the order of 3% to 6% are to be expected. [21],[22] Replacement of saturated fats by unsaturated fats leads to improved lipid levels.[23] However, it is not clear whether polyunsaturated or monounsaturated fats are most cardioprotective. [24] Rapeseed oil, which is rich in omega-3 fats, is especially useful. [25] Soluble fiber (in oats, pectin, psyllium, guar gum) results in a significant but very modest lipid-lowering effect.[26],[27],[28] Unrealistic (47g per day) intake of purified soy protein will lower total cholesterol levels by about 0.6 mmol L. [29] A recent review of the efficacy of garlic as an antihyperlipidemic agent found it difficult to recommend garlic as an antihyperlipidemic agent owing to the low methodological quality of the studies. [30] Stanol esters and plant sterols reduce cholesterol in those on an average diet, but may lack efficacy in those already on a low fat diet. [25]

Drug treatment

Statins

One of the major advances in the management of hyperlipidemias has been the development of the statins, derived initially from fungi and later as purely synthetic molecules. [31],[32],[33] The statins are competitive inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase leads to a decrease in intrahepatic cholesterol concentration, to which the liver responds by inducing its LDL receptors, leading to an increase in receptor-mediated LDL catabolism. [32]

Vis-à-vis the induction of LDL receptors, the SR-B1 receptors also increase their uptake of cholesterol from HDL. [34] However, the statins also decrease the activity of CETP. [35],[36] Thus the overall effect is a small increment in HDL. [34]

Statins decrease serum triglycerides. [37] Statin-induced increased LDL-receptor activity also leads to the enhanced removal of the TG-rich lipoproteins VLDL and IDL. Similarly, increased activity of LDL receptor leads to enhanced uptake of CM remnants, thereby increasing postprandial TG clearance.

Five statins are currently available [Table - 3]. [38] Out of these, rosuvastatin and atorvastatin are the most potent. [39]

However, another response to statin-induced decrease in intrahepatic cholesterol is the increased expression of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBP). [40] This leads to increased synthesis of HMG-CoA reductase, essentially an attempt by the body at maintaining metabolic homeostasis. But this imposes a pharmacologic limitation on the amount of LDL lowering, which can be achieved by treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Development of noncompetitive inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase, like apomine, is the solution. [41]

Bile-acid sequestrating agents (BASA)

BASA are anion exchange resins, which bind bile acids in the intestinal lumen. The physiological process of enterohepatic circulation involves reabsorption of bile acids in the terminal ileum and their circulation back to the liver. [42] BASA bind the bile acids, thus impeding their reabsorption and significantly increasing their fecal excretion. In response, the liver steps up the synthesis of bile acids from cholesterol. This leads to the depletion of intrahepatic cholesterol, which causes increased expression of LDL receptors. [43] Hepatic LDL uptake is thereby raised, and the net result is a decrease in LDL. BASA promote apo-A1 synthesis by an unknown mechanism and tend to raise HDL levels.[44]

Three BASA are currently available [Table - 3]. Their use has been hindered by inconvenient dosing and by unpleasant side effects (e.g., constipation). [45] However, colesevelam appears to be better tolerated than the older resins. [46],[47] BASA nonspecifically bind anions and interfere with absorption of a number of drugs which are anionic at intestinal pH (statins, fenofibrate, corticosteroids, diuretics, tricyclic antidepressants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, thyroxine, and digoxin). These drugs should be administered at least 4 hours after or 1 hour before the last dose of BASA. [48] As BASA tend to raise triglycerides, they are contraindicated in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (>400 mg/dL). [49]

Nicotinic acid (NA)

Plasma FFA are immediate precursors of hepatic and subsequently plasma triglycerides transported in VLDL. NA is immediately taken up by adipose tissue via a specific high-affinity G-protein-coupled receptor. [50] It then inhibits lipolysis in adipose tissue, resulting in a decrease in plasma FFA. NA, in a dose-dependent way, lowers triglyceride-rich VLDL and cholesterol-rich LDL. [51] Furthermore, NA is the most potent HDL-raising drug. [52] But the unpleasant side effect of flushing precludes many patients from taking this drug. [53]

Three formulations of NA are currently available [Table - 3]. Of these, the prolonged-release (PR) preparation, [54] also called extended-release (ER) preparation, has absorption rates between those of IR (immediate-release) and SR (sustained-release) preparations, and a lesser frequency and intensity of causing flush. [55]

Fibric acid derivatives (fibrates)

The lipid-modifying effects of fibrates are largely mediated by their ability to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). [56] PPARs are ligand-activated transcription factors that control gene expression by interacting with response elements located upstream. PPARa is expressed primarily in the liver and brown adipose tissue. PPARa controls a number of genes involved in lipid metabolism, including those encoding for apo-CIII, apo-AI, and apo-AII. [57] Fibrates reduce triglycerides through PPARa-mediated reduced expression of apo-CIII, which serves as an inhibitor of lipolytic processing and receptor-mediated clearance. This leads to increased LPL synthesis and enhanced clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Fibrate-mediated increases in HDL are due to PPARa stimulation of apo-AI and apo-AII expression. [58]

Three fibric acid derivatives are currently available [Table - 3]. Fibrates are primarily used for lowering elevated triglycerides because the LDL cholesterol-lowering effects of fibrates are generally only 10% or less in persons with hypercholesterolemia. [38] Fenofibrate, however, reduces LDL cholesterol by a relatively greater extent than gemfibrozil. [59]

Other therapeutic targets in lipid metabolism

Guggulsterone (gugulipid) is a widely used yet controversial hypolipidemic drug. The plant sterols E- and Z-guggulsterone are the active compounds [60] derived from the gum resin of the mukul myrrh tree (Commiphora mukul). They act as antihyperlipidemic agents via the antagonism of the Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) [61],[62] and up-regulation of the bile salt export pump (BSEP). [63] E- and Z-guggulsterone are currently marketed under the brand name Gugulipid. Most of the clinical trials conducted in Asia demonstrated hypolipidemic activity of gugulipid with an average decrease of 10%-30% and 10%-20% in total cholesterol and triglyceride respectively. [63] However, the first and only clinical trial conducted in the U.S. population found that gugulipid did not improve the levels of serum cholesterol and might in fact raise LDL levels. [64] A recent review concluded that at present, there is not enough scientific evidence to support the use of guggul for any medical condition. [65] Larger clinical trials are required to obtain extensive clinical knowledge of this drug.

A number of lipid-lowering pharmacological agents are currently under evaluation [Table - 4]. [66],[67] The most promising among these are ezetimibe [68] and squalene synthase inhibitors. [69]

Ezetimibe blocks uptake of cholesterol into jejunal enterocytes, hence selectively blocking dietary and biliary cholesterol absorption from the gut. It acts by decreasing the intestinal cholesterol supply to the liver, lowering hepatic cholesterol levels and thus inducing LDL receptor expression. [70] Unlike the bile-acid sequestrants, it does not interfere with absorption of fat-soluble drugs. Moreover, ezetimibe does not increase serum TG. [71]

Squalene synthase (SS) is the first enzyme in the hepatic cholesterol biosynthetic pathway which produces a metabolite (lanosterol) committed to cholesterol synthesis. [72] The result of inhibition of SS is analogous to that of HMG-CoA reductase. Induction of LDL receptors occurs, leading to a decrease in circulating LDL. Thus SS inhibitors act similar to statins, albeit at a different and a more specificlevel. [72]

NCEP Guidelines

The NCEP Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) first published guidelines for managing hypercholesterolemia in 1988 (ATP I) [73] and revised them in 1993 (ATP 2). The latest NCEP report (ATP III) has been published in 2001. [38]

The first step is to determine lipoprotein levels after a 9- to 12-hour fast. [38] Next, coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalents and major risk factors should be established. CHD risk equivalents include clinical CHD, symptomatic carotid artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and diabetes. Major risk factors (exclusive of LDL cholesterol) include cigarette smoking, hypertension, low HDL cholesterol (< 40 mg/dL), family history of premature CHD, and age (men> 45 years; women> 55 years). CHD risk equivalents and risk factors are then used to determine the risk category of the patient [Table - 5].

Therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC) [38] are considered first-line therapy in the management of high cholesterol. A 3-month trial of TLC should precede the use of drug therapy. The essential features of TLC are (a) reduced intake of saturated fats [less than 7% of total calories] and cholesterol [less than 200 mg/d]; (b) therapeutic options for enhancing LDL lowering - such as plant stanols/sterols [2 g/d] and increased soluble fiber [10-25 g/d; (c) weight reduction; and (d) increased physical activity.

According to ATP III, the most cost-effective approach to prevention of CHD is: diet modification, exercise, and weight control, combined with avoidance or cessation of smoking. Cigarette smoking is a strong, independent risk factor for CHD and leads to elevated triglycerides and low HDL levels. Smoking cessation should receive prime emphasis in the clinical strategy to reduce CHD risk. While moderate intakes of alcohol in middle-aged and older adults may reduce risk for CHD, high intakes of alcohol produce multiple adverse effects. No more than 2 drinks per day for men and no more than 1 drink per day for women should be consumed. Persons who do not drink should not be encouraged to initiate regular alcohol consumption. Physical activity as a component of TLC includes enough moderate exercise to expend at least 200 kcal per day. Thus life-habit changes - weight control, exercise, and smoking cessation - will favorably modify multiple risk factors, including elevated triglycerides and low HDL levels.

However, for patients with CHD or CHD risk equivalents and an LDL cholesterol level of 130 mg/dL or higher, an LDL-lowering drug may be started simultaneously with TLC to achieve the LDL goal of less than 100 mg/dL.

The NCEP recommends the use of statins as first-line therapy when LDL cholesterol-lowering drugs are indicated. BASA′s LDL-lowering effects may be enhanced in combination with other cholesterol-lowering medications, particularly statins. Nicotinic acid is recommended for high-risk patients with low levels of LDL cholesterol, high triglycerides, and low HDL cholesterol - a triad known as atherogenic dyslipidemia. [38] Fibrates are primarily used for persons with very high triglycerides to reduce risk for acute pancreatitis and for those with dysbetalipoproteinemia.

References
1.
Olofsson S-O, Stillemark-Billton P, Asp L. Intracellular assembly of VLDL. Two major steps in separate cell compartments. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2000;10:338-45.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Cooper AD. Hepatic uptake of chylomicron remnants. J Lipid Res 1997;38:2173-92.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Barter PJ, Brewer HB, Chapman MJ, Hennekans CH, Rader DJ, Tall AR. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: A novel target for raising HDL and inhibiting atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:160-7.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Attie AD, Kastelein JP and Hayden MR. Pivotal role of ABCA1 in reverse cholesterol transport influencing HDL levels and susceptibility to atherosclerosis. J Lipid Res 2001;42,1717-26.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Krieger M. Scavenger receptor class B type 1 is a multiligand HDL receptor that influences diverse physiologic systems. J Clin Invest 2001;108:793-7.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Fredrickson DS, Levy RI, Lees RS. Fat transport in lipoproteins - an integrated approach to mechanisms and disorders. N Engl J Med 1967;276:34-44.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Havel RJ. Classification of the hyperlipidemias. Annu Rev Med 1977;28:195-209.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Havel RJ, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Lipoproteins and lipid transport. In: Bondy PK, Rosenberg LE, eds. Metabolic control and disease. Philadelphia: Saunders,1980:446.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Seymour CA. Xanthomas and abnormalities of lipid metabolism and storage. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C, editors, Rook's textbook of dermatology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p. 57.60 - 57.77.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Odom RB, James WD, Berger TG. Errors in in metabolism. In: Andrew's disease of the skin, 9 th ed. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders, 2000:648-71.
th ed. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders, 2000:648-71.'>[Google Scholar]
11.
Bergman R. The pathogenesis and clinical significance of xanthelasma palpebrarum. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;30:236-42.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Bergman R, Kasif Y, Aviram M, et al . Normolipidemic xanthelasma plapebrarum: lipid composition, cholesterol metabolism in monocyte-derived macrophages, and plasma lipid peroxidation. Acta Dermato-Venereol (Stockh) 1996;76:107-10.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Vermeer BJ, Mateysen AAE, van Gent CM, et al . The lipid composition and localization of free and esterified cholesterol in different types of xanthomas. J Invest Dermatol 1982; 78:305-8.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Ribera M, Pinto X, Argimon M, et al . Lipid metabolism and apolipoprotein E phenotypes in patients with xanthelasma. Am J Med 1995;99:485-490.
[Google Scholar]
15.
Bergman R. Xanthelasma palpebrarum and risk of atherosclerosis. Int J Dermatol 1998;37:343-5.
[Google Scholar]
16.
George WM. Cutaneous findings related to cardiovascular disorders. Int J Dermatol. 1998;37:161-72.
[Google Scholar]
17.
Eedy DJ. Treatment of xanthelasma by excision with secondary intention healing. Clin Exp Dermatol 1996;21:273-5.
[Google Scholar]
18.
Ullmann Y, Har-Shai Y, Peled IJ. The use of CO2 laser for the treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum. Ann Plast Surg 1993;31:504-7.
[Google Scholar]
19.
Schönermark MP, Raulin C. Treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum with the pulsed dye laser. Lasers Surg Med 1996;19:336-9.
[Google Scholar]
20.
Borelli C, Kaudewitz P. Xanthelasma palpebrarum: treatment with the erbium: YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med 2001;29:260-4.
[Google Scholar]
21.
Clarke R, Frost C, Collins R, Appleby P, Peto R. Dietary lipids and blood cholesterol: Quantitative meta-analysis of metabolic ward studies. Br Med J 1997;314,:112-7.
[Google Scholar]
22.
Tang JL, Armitage JM, Lancaster T, Silagy CA, Fowler GH, Neil HA. Systematic review of dietary intervention trials to lower blood total cholesterol in free-living subjects. Br Med J 1998;18;316:1213-20.
[Google Scholar]
23.
Mensink RP, Katan MB. Effect of dietary fatty acids on serum lipids and lipoproteins. A meta-analysis of 27 trials. Arterioscler Thromb 1992;12:911-9.
[Google Scholar]
24.
Gardner CD, Kraemer HC. Monounsaturated versus polyunsaturated dietary fat and serum lipids. A meta-analysis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995;15:1917-27.
[Google Scholar]
25.
Hooper L. UK Heart Health and Thoracic Dietitians Interest Group (Specialist interest group of the British Dietetic Association). Dietetic guidelines: Diet in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Hum Nutr Diet 2001;14:297-305.
[Google Scholar]
26.
Brown L, Rosner B, Willett WW, Sacks FM. Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: A meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:30-42.
[Google Scholar]
27.
Olson BH, Anderson SM, Becker MP, Anderson JW, Hunninghake DB, Jenkins DJ, et al . Psyllium-enriched cereals lower blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, but not HDL cholesterol, in hypercholesterolemic adults: results of a meta-analysis. J Nutr 1997;127:1973-80.
[Google Scholar]
28.
Ripsin CM, Keenan JM, Jacobs DR Jr, Elmer PJ, Welch RR, Van Horn L, et al . Oat products and lipid lowering. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1992;24;267:3317-25.
[Google Scholar]
29.
Anderson JW, Johnstone BM, Cook-Newell ME. Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids. N Engl J Med 1995;333:276-82.
[Google Scholar]
30.
Alder R, Lookinland S, Berry JA, Williams M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of garlic as an anti-hyperlipidemic agent. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2003;15:120-9.
[Google Scholar]
31.
Endo A, Kuroda M and Tanzawa K. Competitive inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase by ML-236A and ML-236B fungal metabolites, having hypocholesterolemic activity. FEBS Lett 1976;72:323-26.
[Google Scholar]
32.
Endo A. The discovery and development of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. J Lipid Res 1992;33:1569-82.
[Google Scholar]
33.
Steinberg D. Thematic review series: the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. An interpretative history of the cholesterol controversy, part V: The discovery of the statins and the end of the controversy. J Lipid Res 2006;47:1339-51.
[Google Scholar]
34.
Charlton-Menys V, Durrington PN. Human cholesterol metabolism and therapeutic molecules. Exp Physiol. 2008;93:27-42.
[Google Scholar]
35.
Bhatnagar D, Durrington PN, Kumar S,Mackness MI, Dean JD, Boulton AJM. Effect of treatment with a hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor on fasting and postprandial plasma lipoproteins and cholesteryl ester transfer activity in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes 1995;44:460-5.
[Google Scholar]
36.
Caslake MJ, Stewart G, Day SP, Daly E, McTaggart F, Chapman MJ, et al . Phenotype-dependent and -independent action of rosuvastatin on atherogenic lipoprotein subfractions in hyperlipidaemia. Atherosclerosis 2003;171:245-53. Stein EA, Lane M, Laskarzewski P. Comparison of statins in hypertriglyceridemia. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:66B-69B.
[Google Scholar]
37.
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486-97.
[Google Scholar]
38.
Law MR, Wald NJ, Rudnicka AR. Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;326:1423-7.
[Google Scholar]
39.
Brown MS, Goldstein JL. The SREBP pathway: Regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor. Cell 1997;89:331-40.
[Google Scholar]
40.
Roitelman J, Masson D, Avner R, Ammon-Zufferey C, Perez A, Guyon-Gellin Y, et al. Apomine, a novel hypocholesterolemic agent, accelerates degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and stimulates low density lipoprotein receptor activity. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:6465-73.
[Google Scholar]
41.
Fellstrom B. Impact and management of hyperlipidemia posttransplantation. Transplantation 2000;70:SS51-57.
[Google Scholar]
42.
Schwarz M, Lund EG, Russell DW. Two 7 a-hydroxylase enzymes in bile acid biosynthesis. Curr Opin Lipidol 1998;9:113-8.
[Google Scholar]
43.
Shepherd J. Mechanism of action of bile acid sequestrants and other lipid-lowering drugs. Cardiology 1989;76:65-71.
[Google Scholar]
44.
Steinmetz KL, Schonder KS. Colesevelam: Potential uses for the newest bile resin. Cardiovasc Drug Rev 2005;23:15-30.
[Google Scholar]
45.
Bays HE, Davidson M, Jones MR, Abby SL. Effects of colesevelam hydrochloride on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein when added to statins in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1198-1205.
[Google Scholar]
46.
LaRosa J. Review of clinical studies of bile acid sequestrants for lowering plasma lipid levels. Cardiology 1989;76:55-64.
[Google Scholar]
47.
Jacobson TA, Armani A, McKenney JM, Guyton JR. Safety considerations with gastrointestinally active lipid-lowering drugs. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:47C-55C.
[Google Scholar]
48.
Crouse JR 3 rd . Hypertriglyceridemia: a contraindication to the use of bile acid binding resins. Am J Med 1987;83:243-8.
[Google Scholar]
49.
Lorenzen A, Stannek C, Burmeister A, Kalvinsh I, Schwabe U. G protein-coupled receptor for nicotinic acid in mouse macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol 2002;64:645-8.
[Google Scholar]
50.
Carlson LA, Orö L. Effect of treatment with nicotinic acid for one month on serum lipids in patients with different types of hyperlipidaemia. Atherosclerosis 1973;18:1-9.
[Google Scholar]
51.
Carlson LA. Nicotinic acid: The broad-spectrum lipid drug. A 50th anniversary review. J Intern Med. 2005;258:94-114.
[Google Scholar]
52.
Drexel H. Nicotinic acid in the treatment of hyperlipidaemia. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007;21:5-6.
[Google Scholar]
53.
Carlson LA. Niaspan, the prolonged-release preparation of nicotinic acid (niacin), the broad-spectrum lipid drug. Int J Clin Pract 2004;58:706-13.
[Google Scholar]
54.
McCormack PL, Keating GM. Prolonged-release nicotinic acid: A review of its use in the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Drugs 2005;65:2719-40.
[Google Scholar]
55.
Kersten S, Desvergne B, Wahli W. Roles of PPARs in health and disease. Nature 2000;405:421-4.
[Google Scholar]
56.
Guay DR. Update on fenofibrate. Cardiovasc Drug Rev 2002;20:281-302.
[Google Scholar]
57.
Staels B, Auwerx J. Regulation of apo A-I gene expression by fibrates. Atherosclerosis, 1998;137:S19-S23.
[Google Scholar]
58.
Insua A, Massari F, Moncalvo JJR, Zanchetta JR, Insua AM. Fenofibrate or gemfibrozil for treatment of types IIa and IIb primary hyperlipoproteinemia. Endo Prac 2002;8:96-101.
[Google Scholar]
59.
Nityanand S, Kapoor NK. Cholesterol lowering activity of the various fractions of guggul. Indian J Exp Biol. 1973;11:395-398.
[Google Scholar]
60.
Chiang, J. Y. L.: Regulation of bile acid synthesis: pathways, nuclear receptors, and mechanisms. J. Hepatol. 2004, 40, 539-551.
[Google Scholar]
61.
Urizar NL, Liverman AB, Dodds DT, Silva FV, Ordentlich P, Yan Y, et al . A natural product that lowers cholesterol as an antagonist ligand for the FXR. Science. 2002;296:1703-1706.
[Google Scholar]
62.
Deng R. Therapeutic Effects of Guggul and Its Constituent Guggulsterone: Cardiovascular Benefits. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2007;25:375-90.
[Google Scholar]
63.
Szapary PO, Wolfe ML, Bloedon LT, Cucchiara AJ, DerMarderosian AH, Cirigliano MD, et al . Guggulipid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:765-72.
[Google Scholar]
64.
Ulbricht C, Basch E, Szapary P, Hammerness P, Axentsev S, Boon H, et al . Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Guggul for hyperlipidemia: A review by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Complement Ther Med. 2005;13:279-90.
[Google Scholar]
65.
Sullivan DR. Recent trends in lipid management: raising the bar and shifting the goalposts? Intern Med J 2003;33:95-102.
[Google Scholar]
66.
Lilly SM, Rader DJ. New targets and emerging therapies for reducing LDL cholesterol. Curr Opin Lipidol 2007;18:650-5.
[Google Scholar]
67.
Burnett D.A, Caplan M.A, Davis H.R Jr, Burrier RE, Clader JW. 2-Azetidinones as inhibitors of cholesterol absorption. J. Med. Chem 1994;37:1733-6.
[Google Scholar]
68.
Rau O, Zettl H, Popescu L, Steinhilber D, Schubert-Zsilavecz M. The Treatment of Dyslipidemia-What's Left in the Pipeline? ChemMedChem 2007;3206-21.
[Google Scholar]
69.
Gagné C, Bays HE, Weiss SR, Mata P, Quinto K, Melino M, et al. Ezetimibe Study Group. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe added to ongoing statin therapy for treatment of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:1084-91.
[Google Scholar]
70.
Efficacy and safety of a potent new selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Efficacy and safety of a potent new selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1092-7.
[Google Scholar]
71.
Charlton-Menys V, Durrington PN. Squalene synthase inhibitors: Clinical pharmacology and cholesterol-lowering potential. Drugs 2007;67:11-6.
[Google Scholar]
72.
The Expert Panel. Report of the National Cholesterol Educational Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:36-69.
[Google Scholar]
73.
Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Educational Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. JAMA. 1993;269:3015-3023.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
3,253

PDF downloads
2,581
Show Sections