Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Observation Letter
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJDVL_296_2021

Primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic T-cell lymphoma mimicking pyoderma gangrenosum

Department of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, Australia
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
Corresponding author: Dr. Akshay Flora, Department of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. flora.akshay@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: How to cite this article: Flora A, Gibson M, Toon C, Rawson R, Lowe P. Primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic T-cell lymphoma mimicking pyoderma gangrenosum. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_296_2021

Sir,

A 62-year-old male was admitted to a hospital in Australia with acute worsening and secondary infection of a non-healing cutaneous ulcer on the right hip [Figure 1a]. The ulcer had been present for nearly one year with no history of constitutional symptoms such as fever, weight loss or night sweats, diabetes, immunosuppression or recent travel.

Figure 1a:: Ulcerated erythematous plaque over right hip

Skin biopsy from the ulcer demonstrated a non-specific inflammatory exudate with necrosis extending to the subcutis. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was identified on tissue culture. He was treated with intravenous gentamicin and surgical wound debridement for the bacterial wound infection following which the hip ulcer rapidly expanded [Figure 1b]. A revised diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum was made on clinical grounds, suspecting ‘pathergy’. Over the next four months, the patient received multiple systemic immunosuppressive agents for presumed pyoderma gangrenosum including oral prednisone 50 mg daily for two weeks, hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice a day for six weeks and mycophenolate mofetil 1000 mg twice a day for six weeks [Table 1], with no response. In addition, he also developed new hyperkeratotic plaques on his torso, limbs and scalp some of which rapidly broke down and ulcerated [Figure 1c].

Figure 1b:: Rapid expansion of ulcerated plaque shortly after biopsy
Figure 1c:: Development of multiple plaques with hyperkeratosis and crusting on the back of the patient

Fresh deep incisional biopsies were taken from the new ulcers on the right axilla and thigh. Histopathology of the biopsies demonstrated ulceration of the epidermis with a prominent, predominantly lymphocytic, lichenoid inflammatory infiltrate in the surrounding superficial dermis. An interface reaction was present at the dermoepidermal junction [Figure 2a] with lymphocytic exocytosis. This infiltrate consisted primarily of CD3+ T-cells with a greater proportion CD8+ cells [Figure 2b] compared to CD4+ [Figure 2c]. There was also an aberrant loss of staining of the T-cell marker CD5 in a subset of T-cells [Figure 2d]. Furthermore, there was negative staining for CD56, ALK and EBER, some positive staining for CD30, CD20, granzyme B and perforin in scattered cells, and Ki-67 staining in approximately 80% of lymphoid cells. The overlying epidermis showed prominent spongiosis with occasional apoptotic keratinocytes. These features were consistent with a diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell phenotype), although further specification of a subtype required further clinical correlation.

Figure 2:: Histological and immunological changes identified on right thigh biopsy. (a) Prominent lichenoid lymphocytic infiltrate with widespread interface reaction (H&E x 200). (b) Positive CD8+ staining within the lower epidermis (CD8 immunohistochemistry x 100). (c) Positive CD4+ staining, concentrated at the dermoepidermal junction (CD4 immunohistochemistry x 100) (d) Positive but reduced CD5+ staining noted in the lower epidermis (CD5 immunohistochemistry x 100)

Given the combination of multiple new hyperkeratotic plaques that rapidly ulcerated, an absence of erythematous patches and the presence of the above-mentioned histological features, a diagnosis of primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma (PCAE) was established.

After urgent haematology review, and a positron emission tomography scan that demonstrated no extracutaneous activity, the patient was commenced on six cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy followed by weekly methotrexate. Though there was an initial rapid healing of all cutaneous ulcers including the right hip [Figure 3], relapse occurred three months after completion of chemotherapy. Following this, the patient was put on pralatrexate, although remission was not successfully achieved, and an alternative chemotherapy agent is now being sought.

Figure 3:: Healing of ulcerated plaque on right hip, three months after completing chemotherapy

In retrospect, the key difficulty in this case was determining whether the initial right hip ulcer represented primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma, or pyoderma gangrenosum secondary to malignancy, given the non-diagnostic histopathological features seen on initial biopsy. However, there are a few reasons why cutaneous lymphoma should be the favoured diagnosis of the initial ulcer. First, there was a high degree of necrosis and ulceration on the initial biopsy, making it difficult to appreciate histological changes of lymphoma. A previous case report has also described a primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma ulcer that was initially misdiagnosed as pyoderma gangrenosum due to ulceration secondary to massive epidermotropism and a scarcity of atypical cells.1 Second, the hip ulcer enlarged despite immunosuppressive therapy and rapidly responded to chemotherapy along with the other biopsy-proven cutaneous lymphoma ulcers. Finally, this lymphoma is known to follow an aggressive clinical course, where rapid tumour expansion may occur.2 It is likely that the initial hip ulcer expansion post-debridement was due to the natural history of this aggressive lymphoma rather than true pathergy.

Primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma is a rare malignancy and represents less than 1% of all cutaneous T-cell lymphomas.3 The differential diagnosis is wide and includes mycosis fungoides, pagetoid reticulosis of the Ketron-Goodman type, lymphomatoid papulosis and anaplastic large cell lymphoma.2 Clinically, this condition presents as widespread plaques or nodules, some of which may be hyperkeratotic and rapidly undergo central necrosis.2 Unfortunately, this type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma follows an aggressive course with early metastasis to extranodal sites, and a poor prognosis despite chemotherapy.2

With regard to differential diagnoses, mycosis fungoides usually has a CD4+ immunophenotype, but can also rarely be CD8+.2 However, it classically has an indolent course beginning with patches that may progress slowly overtime to plaques and ulcerative tumours.2 Pagetoid reticulosis of the Ketron-Goodman type is sometimes difficult to histologically differentiate from primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma, with pagetoid epidermotropism being present, and immunophenotyping showing either CD4-/CD8- or CD4+/CD8+ cells, with tumour cells localised to the epidermis.4 Similar to mycosis fungoides, lesions begin as hyperkeratotic patches which progress to plaques overtime, although the clinical course is more aggressive and carries a poorer prognosis.4 Lymphomatoid papulosis can also be virtually indistinguishable from primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma on histology alone and is CD30+ and either CD4+ or CD8+.5 Clinically, however, it presents quite differently with necrotic papules and nodules that spontaneously regress over a few months.5 Finally, cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma is CD30+, has positive staining for granzyme B and perforin and is ALK negative which is similar to primary cutaneous CD8+ aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma.5 Differentiating features are the presence of sheets of tumour cells infiltrating the dermis, and the presence of papules or nodules rather than plaques.5

The diagnosis of this condition can often be challenging, especially due to a variable histological appearance.6 It is, therefore, critical to obtain adequate tissue samples, perform appropriate immunohistochemical tests and ensure an accurate clinicopathological correlation.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Pitfalls in diagnosing primary cutaneous aggressive epidermotropic CD8(+) T-cell lymphoma. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180:411-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Primary cutaneous aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ T-cell lymphoma: Proposed diagnostic criteria and therapeutic evaluation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:748-59.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood. 2005;105:3768-85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Disseminated pagetoid reticulosis (Ketron-Goodman disease): Six-year follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:S183-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Non-mycosis fungoides cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: Report of the 2011 society for hematopathology/European association for haematopathology workshop. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;139:491-514.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: A review. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68:1003-10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
1,440

PDF downloads
30
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections