Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obervation Letter
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF
Letter to Editor
2013:79:5;701-702
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.116741
PMID: 23974587

Skin lightening agents - Use or abuse? - A retrospective analysis of the topical preparations used by melasma patients of darker skin types

Rajat Kandhari, Niti Khunger
 Department of Dermatology and STD, V. M. Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Rajat Kandhari
11, Munirka Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi - 110 057
India
How to cite this article:
Kandhari R, Khunger N. Skin lightening agents - Use or abuse? - A retrospective analysis of the topical preparations used by melasma patients of darker skin types. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2013;79:701-702
Copyright: (C)2013 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Sir,

Treatment with a triple combination (TC) agent appears to be the most clinically effective initial therapy for patients with melasma. [1] We carried out a retrograde analysis in 69 patients of melasma of the topical preparations used for more than 3 months. The objective of our study was to analyze the topical preparations used by patients of melasma, their mode of usage and their side effect profiles. The type of melasma and the skin type (Fitzpatrick classification) were noted in each patient. The preparations used were divided into 2 groups, use of a single agent or a combination of agents (combination creams or more than one agent). The usage of the agents, whether single or combination was further classified into 3 groups, as advised by a clinician, self-application or both. Each agent used was assessed on the basis of concentration used, mode of usage and type of usage, i.e., regular or intermittent. The 3 main agents assessed were hydroquinone (HQ), corticosteroids (CS) and tretinoin (Tr.). Patients, who had used combinations, were further classified into those who had used TCs containing HQ, CS, and Tr. (HQ + CS + Tr.) and those who had used a combination of hydroquinone and Tr. (HQ + Tr.), HQ and CS (HQ + CS) and CS and Tr. (CS + Tr.). The side-effect profile of each patient was assessed and a comparison was made between the side effects in the group of patients who used TC formulations versus those who had not used these formulations.

Majority of the study group (48 patients) belonged to Fitzpatrick skin type IV, and malar melasma was the most common morphological pattern noted in 38 patients. The combination most commonly used was a TC formulation which was used by 36 patients (52.17%). The other combinations included (HQ + CS) used by 10 patients (14.49%) and (HQ + Tr.) by four patients (5.79%). Usage of HQ as monotherapy was noted in 12 patients, whereas seven patients (10.1%) reported usage of topical CS as monotherapy. Tr. usage as monotherapy or (CS + Tr.) usage was not noted even in a single patient. As per the mode of usage, both self-application along with advised application was noted in a staggering 57.97% of patients, whereas self-application alone was seen in 28.98% of patients and application advised by a physician was noted in 13.04% of patients. TC formulations were used most commonly in an unsupervised manner. Further the concentrations used and the type of usage (regular or intermittent) was assessed. 2% HQ was used most commonly by 48 patients whereas 4% HQ was used by 14 out of the 69 patients. Thirty-Five patients reported usage of HQ in an intermittent fashion. Moderate to potent CS usage was more common than usage of mild CS. Usage of Tr. 0.025% was reported by 40 patients. Unsupervised, intermittent usage was far more common than regular usage [Table - 1]. The side effects experienced included erythema in 43 patients, epidermal atrophy in two patients, irritant contact dermatitis in one patient, acneiform eruptions in 18 patients, telangiectasias in 25 patients, hypertrichosis in 30 patients, rosacea-like eruption in 13 patients, confetti like depigmentation in eight patients [Figure - 1]a-f. None of the patients experienced an allergic reaction to the preparations used. We further compared the side effects experienced in patients who used TC agents versus those who had used other preparations. The Pearson′s Chi-square test was carried out to compare the two groups. Erythema and hypertrichosis in the group who used TC was significantly more as compared to the group who had not used the TC ( P < 0.05). The other side effects experienced by the group who used TC and those who had used other preparations did not show any statistically significant increase in either of the groups [Table - 2]. The lacunae of our analysis were a small sample size, lack of histological assessment and lack of control groups. To conclude we highlight the fact, that TC usage was highly rampant, whether advised by a clinician or as self-application. Most patients using these formulations used them for a longer duration than advised. Despite prolonged usage of TC formulations epidermal atrophy was not found to be a significant side effect, which may be due to the Tr. which is said to prevent the atrophy from occurring and renders these formulations "safe." [2] The TC users experienced significant erythema and hypertrichosis. Whether the erythema was due to the prolonged corticosteroid usage or the HQ in the formulations is unclear. The hypertrichosis due to the CS was not prevented by the Tr. present in the formulations. Even though various studies [3],[4] demonstrate the favorable side-effect profile of TC (HQ 4%, Tr. 0.05%, flucinolone acetonide 0.01%) used intermittently over long periods, we urge dermatologists to be cautious while prescribing these formulations and lay stress on the importance of a regular follow-up while doing so. The probable reason for unsupervised, self-usage of the TC is their ability to provide a rapid clearance of the melasma, which invariably results in the patient abruptly stopping the use of the formulation, thereby leading to a relapse and further application of the same formulation. [5] The Pigmentary Disorders Academy in 2006 suggested fixed TC agents as first line treatment for melasma patients [2] In our opinion, there is an urgent need for proper treatment guidelines for melasma management and agents such as HQ 2-4%, topical retinoids, alpha hydroxyl acids, azelaic acid, topical vitamin C and kojic acid in conjunction with regular photoprotection used under supervision may be safer alternatives to TC agents, even though they may be less efficacious and require a longer time to produce clinically visible improvement.

Table 1: Concentration of the topical agents used, and whether they were used regularly or intermittently
Table 2: Comparison of the side effects in the triple combination versus the non-TC group. Erythema and hypertrichosis in the TC group is significantly higher (Chi-square test, P value <0.05)
Figure 1: Side effects due to the use of skin lightening agents; (a) Telangiectasias, (b) Acneiform eruptions, (c) Hypertrichosis, (d) Confetti-like depigmentation, (e) Rosacea-like eruption. (f) Erythema
References
1.
Sheth VM, Pandya AG. Melasma: A comprehensive update: Part II. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;65:699-714.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Rendon M, Berneburg M, Arellano I, Picardo M. Treatment of melasma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;54:S272-81.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Torok HM, Jones T, Rich P, Smith S, Tschen E. Hydroquinone 4%, tretinoin 0.05%, fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%: A safe and efficacious 12-month treatment for melasma. Cutis 2005;75:57-62.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Torok H, Taylor S, Baumann L, Jones T, Wieder J, Lowe N, et al. A large 12-month extension study of an 8-week trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple combination (TC) cream in melasma patients previously treated with TC cream or one of its dyads. J Drugs Dermatol 2005;4:592-7.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Majid I. Mometasone-based triple combination therapy in melasma: Is it really safe? Indian J Dermatol 2010;55:359-62.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
574

PDF downloads
146
Show Sections